The Chinese people have waited years for the Olympics. So did the
lavish Beijing 2008 Opening Ceremony deliver? Five cultural
commentators gave me their views: most gave a thumbs up to director
Zhang Yimou’s portrayal of China’s ancient culture. However, they were
less keen on the scenes of China’s modernized present and promising
future which they found tacky or sentimental.
Basically, the opening ceremony was in three parts: a gorgeous
series of tableaux covering China’s history and culture; an endless
parade of athletes; and the stodgy ceremonials surrounding the Olympic
flag and flame.
Part One was a magnificent light show that used hundreds of twirling
dancers, switching from red and gold scenes to quieter blue and white
ones, from wild drumming to delicate taichi. It acted as condensed
guide to China’s history, Confucian culture and famous inventions –
paper, printing, fireworks, and the first compasses for navigation.
Luckily, I got walked through all of this by an expert, Prof Chen Xia
from the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.
“It’s very beautiful, oh yes, very beautiful,” she murmured. Early
scenes showed performers painting on paper by twisting their bodies
like dancers. A scroll of lights unrolled itself across in the middle
of the stadium, scripting the story like an old Chinese book as the
picture on it changed from desert Silk Road to maritime exploits
exporting tea and porcelain.
This bit was easy enough for a foreigner to grasp, but the invention
of wood block printing, coupled with readings from the philosopher
Confucius were tougher going. Prof Chen was so inspired, particularly
by the fireworks, that at one point she set out from her home towards
the Bird’s Nest for a closer view. Disappointment followed, as the taxi
driver told her the roads were blocked off.
I was grateful though that she explained some of the more opaque
sequences, such as the link between the scenes of musicians and
Confucian beliefs that joyful self-restraint is internalized by playing
music. Perfect for encouraging the harmonious society China’s leaders
want to see.
Prof Chen’s verdict was mixed though. The history was beautifully
done she thought, but “a little hard for foreigners to understand, and
even some Beijing people”. More modern-day sequences showing the Bird's
Nest, trains, tower blocks and school kids were cloying, with “too many
things from the children”, she said.
Victor Yuan, founder of opinion polling company Horizon gave the
show 65%, praised the fireworks and loved the writhing dancers who
painted with their feet. Overall, though he was “really disappointed”
that the show’s magic was limited to the past with “not so much
imagination about the future” and critical of Zhang for failing to
consult more radical artists. Journalist Yu Ping, who writes about
culture and fashion, also dismissed tableaux of modern China showing
children and space ships as “too simple”.
So far, three of my commentators had approved the show’s portrayal
of China’s ancient culture, but I expected TV anchor Rui Chenggang to
be a hard guy to please. He shot to fame after objecting to the
presence of Starbucks in the Forbidden City as trampling on Chinese
tradition. Did Zhang Yimou’s popularization win his approval? Overall,
yes. “It’s appropriate, it’s imaginative”, he said.
While my commentators were mostly watching on TV, philanthropist Hiu
Ng was in the Bird’s Nest, and bombarding me with excited text
messages. “The atmosphere is unbelievably vibrant”, she yelled when I
called her. Ng, co-founder of civic action groups 51SIM.org and 51give,
saw the lavish portrayal of the past as packaging a message about the
present. China “went through a phase when we were unhappy with our
culture” and is now “at peace” with history. As a result, it’s poised
to promote its traditional approach of harmony to the wider world, she
says. As for the performance, “this is a show that everyone from all
over the world can love”.
Ping was waiting to see the Chinese team stride out to test that
theory. Chinese Netizens had failed to love their team’s yellow and red
outfits, savaging them as a “tomato [and] scrambled egg” look. She’d
interviewed the design company Hengyuan Xiang who’d protested that the
clothes' vivid colors were meant to enhance the group in a big arena
not flatter individuals. To her relief, she found that “if they are
walking together they look very wonderful”. Here at least, harmony
ruled. But based on my unscientific straw poll few Chinese will have
found an enduring image of the future in tonight's events.