I've gotten in trouble with my publicist for having used this space
to point out inaccuracies in reportage about my book and my personal
life. (Any press, even snarky press, must be viewed as beneficial. To
complain is to be viewed as a whiner, a malcontent, an agitator. Now
get back in line!)
So, please understand that I think this is funny, and that I AM NOT COMPLAINING! I really just got a kick out of it....
A group of people called The Underground Literary Alliance
began, a few years ago, to accost writers at readings. The group
believed that all published writers were part of some corrupt,
insider's game—and that, if you were not part of the New York literary
scene, then you were forever an outsider, someone without hope of being
published. (The ULA came to a reading I did a few years ago at the The Whitney Museum for the literary journal McSweeneys, but they didn't throw tomatoes or anything.) More recently, when my latest book came out, the folks who post on Literary Rejections on Display
started to insult it—without having read a word of my writing—because
they thought I was getting too much attention for it; if I was getting
attention, they assumed, I must be part of some literary clique, some
shadowy insider. (The people who run LROD are quite nice,
actually—and, after the kerfuffle there about my book, they decided to
have my novel be the subject of their first online book club—much
to my happy surprise and the chagrin of some of the people who post
there.) And there's another blog I won't link to—or even mention by
name—which has also come after me, for much the same reason, but with
more vitriol and less coherence.
So I wanted to address the question: Is there a New
York literary scene, and if so, does being a part of it help you get
published, no matter your talent (or lack thereof)?
I don't know. I certainly didn't have any writer
friends—or any publishing connections—before I published my first book.
Still, I did live in New York, and so thereby was able to walk my
manuscripts over to publishers and agents, and I admit—I did go to
readings, not only for the entertainment, but also hoping to meet
people. And now that I am published, I further admit: I do have a lot
of writer friends, and even play in a poker game with a number of
high-profile authors. (And, yes, the truth is, there is some logrolling
in this business. You can trace the genealogy of a number of literary
cliques by paying attention to who’s blurbing one another’s books. This
is truly a bad thing. To paraphrase the writer Fiona Maazel, whom I'm
also friendly with: books that don't win some big-name blurb have a
harder time getting noticed.)
But I think that what's going on is less
professional than personal: It's rewarding to be a part of a writers’
community. Cheesy as that sounds, it’s true. There's no water cooler we
in this solitary job can go to; shop talk is hard to come by. And I
think very few people succeed in this business based on connections.
Your work eventually has to find readers, and that has nothing to do
with whose friend you are. Publishers aren't going to waste their
money, in this economy, publishing someone as a favor to someone else.
And again, most writers I know became friends with other writers only after they were published.
But because there is so much subjectivity—and downright
unfairness—in this business (good work that gets rejected, bad work
that gets published), it's easy to point fingers, to look for
conspiracies. Let me quote Maazel again: "Too much media coverage and
people start to hate you. Too little and no one knows you are alive
enough to hate you for it."