Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com

Checkpoint Baghdad

SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Sunday, July 27, 2008 6:06 PM

After Calling Them Attackers, Army Admits Slain Iraqis' Innocence

Larry Kaplow

The military admitted late Sunday that three bank employees – a 57-year-old man and two women coworkers – killed by U.S. soldiers in the Baghdad airport complex were just as their loved ones and Iraqi police had maintained: "Law abiding citizens of Iraq." But the soldiers who fired at them were, a military statement said, "not at fault."

The announcement about the conclusion of an Army investigation corrected what had seemed implausible all along. For weeks after the June 25 shooting, the Army claimed a weapon was found with the Iraqis' car despite the fact that they had just passed through the rigorous weapons searches leading to the airport terminal. Even as NEWSWEEK reported on the high-profile case July 7, the military was standing by its story, which would have meant that a long-time employee of an airport bank branch suddenly decided to divert from his daily commute to fire small arms at soldiers in multiple armored vehicles. The original Army statement portrayed the incident as a minor combat victory, claiming soldiers had killed three "criminals" attempting to attack them.

 The new military account calls the incident itself "tragic" and attempts to account for the dramatic reversal by saying there was a mix up in the investigation. A press release stated that the soldiers initially thought they were being fired upon and then there was "a misunderstanding that the Iraqi police arriving at the scene collected a weapon."

Advertisement

But a member of the Iraqi police team at the airport told NEWSWEEK Sunday night that he told American investigators the day of the incident that he and his colleagues had found no weapon. The man, who asked not to be named because he is not authorized to speak about the investigation, said he angrily asked U.S. troops examining the scene why soldiers had fired on unarmed Iraqis. He kept asserting the same in two subsequent interviews by U.S. officers, he said. The original Army statement also said the car "exploded" after it hit a wall, which Iraqi witnesses contradicted.

Iraqi officials have stated consistently since the incident that the Iraqis were unarmed and the western-owned contractor responsible for airport security has attested that it would be nearly impossible for a driver to successfully pass its search points with a weapon. Army spokesman Lt. Col. Steve Stover told NEWSWEEK that investigators knew about July 7 that no weapon was involved.

The victims were Hafd Abood, known to be a doting father who preached education to his children, and two female coworkers, Maha Adnan Younis and Surur Shahid Ahmed. Abood's son Mohammed said earlier Sunday that the military offered each family $10,000 in compensation in a meeting on Friday. He said the families refused the money unless it comes with a written apology.

The case received widespread attention among Iraqis and prompted condemnations by Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki. Iraqi police said early on that it appeared that Abood was driving toward where U.S. soldiers were parked by the road and may have innocently swerved in their direction to avoid a pothole. The military's new account says the soldiers opened fire after using "escalation of force" measures to get the car to slow – including warning shots. They fired warning shots to stop at least one other car after the incident. The soldiers were from a unit that does not usually travel in the airport area, meaning they might not have known that it's considered one of the most secure places in Iraq. Civilian cars there regularly move at close distances with military convoys amid the daily traffic.

Human rights advocates have repeatedly called for better precautions against similar incidents and more thorough military investigations into civilian deaths.

Late Sunday, Mohammed, himself a taxi driver in the airport, was stunned by the news. "I'm confused. I don't know what to do. We need our rights," he said, noting that his father was the breadwinner for a large family. "We need to make a case in American courts." Such cases are nearly impossible to win. 

Stover said the military planned to continue meetings with the families.

With reporting from Salih Mehdi and Yassar Ghani in Baghdad.

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: tc125231 (July 30, 2008 at 1:17 PM)

If "thehappyamerican" represents the thinking capacities of those who support the war, it's small wonder we are in trouble in Iraq.

Happy, old boy, did you know over 81,000 soldiers , about 1/8 of those who have served, have experienced "Stop Loss" orders so the President could wage a war with an Army that was too small for the job.  This was done so he could cut taxes on the wealthy while sending our children to a really difficult place.

In addition, when the war expenditures take our defecit this year to $600 billion, there are some real issues regarding what this is doing to the future of all our children.

Both teh Administration and McCain opposed the New GI Bill because they thought troops would be less desperate, and thus less likely to re-enlist.

McCain didn't even bother to vote.

So, why is an end to stop loss orders, or decent medical treatment for injured vets, or good education benefits for vets  --why are these attacks "all the Americans who make the country work."

I really don't think they are.  

Patrick Moynihan., who was not a liberal, once said everyone was entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts.

Get your facts straight.


Posted By: Karenn1 (July 29, 2008 at 9:00 AM)

Now we shoot the ones bringing  the flowers. Just get the hell out of Iraq,and bring the troops home.Nobody against the troops,all spin to keep them their.Hide behind religion,wrap yourself with the  flag all,owe a gun, than rape the contitution.This is  not the Liberals doing.This is done by the pervert right wing,the leg spreaders in the public rest rooms,the family value Party.The drones of the  Corp.


Posted By: Karenn1 (July 29, 2008 at 8:58 AM)

Now we shoot the ones bringing  the flowers. Just get the hell out of Iraq,and bring the troops home.Nobody against the troops,all spin to keep them their.Hide behind religion,wrap yourself with the  flag all,owe a gun, than rape the contitution.This is  not the Liberals doing.This is done by the pervert right wing,the leg spreaders in the public rest rooms,the family value Party.The drones of the  Corp.