Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com

Checkpoint Baghdad

SPONSORED BY
  • Soccer As An Extension of Politics By Other Means (Apologies to Clausewitz)

    Larry Kaplow | May 22, 2009 01:21 PM
    PHOTO: Christopher Anderson/ Magnum for Newsweek

    U.S. soldiers leaned back on metal chairs in the open parking lot where the crowds walked through metal detectors. Inside their cordon they mingled through the stands at Baghdad's national soccer stadium. The games today comprised mixed teams of U.S. soldiers and Iraqi national police, organized by the areas they patrol together, in what's thought to be the largest-scale attempt at soccer counterinsurgency since the U.S.-led invasion six years ago.

    These are days, yet again, of great uncertainty in Baghdad. There's been a spate of high-profile attacks after a couple weeks of relative calm. Doubt hangs in the air about what will happen when American forces reduce their numbers in Iraqi cities next month and whether Iraqis can handle what will be thrown at them. But on this hot, hazy afternoon troopers from the 82nd Airborne Division, the Iraqi national police and a London group that promotes reconciliation through soccer provided a microcosm of how things could be if the country stays on track.

    U.S. and Iraqi troops mingled in the stands, not only unarmed but in their soccer jerseys and shorts. The stadium, a sleek, tapered oval that holds several thousand, was mostly empty but for the hundreds of Iraqi kids who came to attend soccer clinics or just stop by for a look after prayers or a swim in a nearby community pool. Integrated teams of Iraqis and Americans, including one American woman, played hard on the field. And, in a display of the Iraqi top-down management American military trainers often complain of, an Iraqi commander in the press booth atop the stands could be seen radioing tips to a coach on the sidelines. At one point, he was heard ordering an Iraqi player to apologize to an American opponent, perhaps for some minor contact.

    In the VIP section, American and Iraqi commanders sat in overstuffed chairs, sipping Gatorade and mingling with invited sheiks. They were afforded a security detail of U.S. and Iraqi sentries though visitors streamed in and out. Yamam Nabeel, chief executive of London-based FC Unity, looked on. His group uses State Department and private funding to start soccer programs in Iraq and provided the equipment for the ongoing tournament around the days event. A native Iraqi whose family left the country when he was three years old in 1980, Nabeel acknowledged the obvious point that one soccer tournament does not make peace. But for those playing and watching, he said, it might undermine some of the recruiting lines used by insurgents. Potential recruits, he said, "might think, I was on a team [with Americans] and they did not act like you say they do."


  • Making a Lasting Peace with the Sunni Awakening Movement

    Larry Kaplow | May 19, 2009 01:36 PM
    Iraqi government representatives faced leaders of the Awakening tribal militia movement in Baghdad today to hear their complaints and answer with promises that they are not being abandoned. In the second such large public meeting meant to clear the air, sheiks and former officers from the old Iraqi army lined up at a microphone in the Rasheed Hotel to sound off. Their fighters aren’t getting paid what they’re owed, they claimed. They will be left unprotected and vulnerable to Al Qaeda when their forces are moved into the Iraqi security forces. And, some protested, many in their ranks have been arrested by government forces or are in hiding.

    With American commanders as matchmakers, the arranged marriage between the Shiite-led Iraqi government and the largely Sunni Awakening movement is one of the country’s most tenuous and important pairings. It will take constant tending. American officers, who had encouraged a similar meeting last fall, lined the back of the hotel ballroom today. The 90,000-strong Awakening militias include many former insurgents who decided to turn and fight against Al Qaeda and with U.S. forces--who paid them salaries. The trick is to find enough of them jobs and a future--without dependence on the departing U.S. forces--to keep them from returning to insurgency. Last year they were put under the command and pay of an Iraqi government they trust little and has given mixed messages.

    For starters, the Iraqi government continues to hold in jail about 17 Awakening (also called Sahwa or Sons of Iraq) leaders and arrested another just last night. U.S. Maj. Gen. J.D. Johnson, overseeing the program, says that’s out of a total of about 800 leaders. But each arrest casts a chill over the other leadership. The fear is that government forces are settling scores or view the militia commanders as rivals. The government says some of them have committed crimes, abusing their positions. Some have. But some have also been released after U.S. officers investigated and found the charges to be bogus. “Once we know about [an arrest], we start tracking it very closely,” Johnson said. His answer appeared to acknowledge another complication: Sometimes the Iraqis are making the arrests without U.S. knowledge.

    There’s also a multitude of problems with the cumbersome management of the diverse local groups. It’s rarely clear if salaries are delayed by government opposition or simply problems in reconciling the many lists of fighters with payrolls. It almost doesn’t matter in the end. “The slightest bureaucratic error becomes interpreted as something greater than that,” Johnson said.

    While Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki has repeatedly promised to integrate the fighters into the government, their presence angers members of his own Shiite constituency who worry about coddling former Baathists or insurgents. About 13,000 have been brought into the Iraqi security forces so far, a slow pace endangered anew by a government budget crunch.

    Some Awakening leaders see the end of their influence coming as their men fold into the government. Whether they were in it for the money, the power or out of patriotic duty, these tribal leaders and neighborhood elders are the ones who encouraged their followers to switch sides. The decision came with risks. “They should support us. We are targeted by Al Qaeda , by IED’s, by snipers,” pleaded Gen. Abdel Razaq, an avuncular, retired commander who leads a group of fighters in western Baghdad. “We support the government.”


  • Advertisement
  • Combat Stress System to Come Under New Focus

    Larry Kaplow | May 12, 2009 03:34 PM
    Amid the patrols, searches, training of Iraqi counterparts and the usual tedium of soldiering, many U.S. troops in Iraq are also trying to manage their mental health. Modern warfare today means an Army in which sleeping pills and anti-depressants are dispensed by medical units to help keep troops functioning in a war in which the forces are stretched thin. It’s not uncommon, Army psychologists have said, for soldiers to threaten others or themselves. There are procedures, like confiscating weapons and imposing around-the-clock suicide watches, to prevent danger. Now the shocking shooting spree by a U.S. soldier who killed five of his comrades at a combat stress center is placing new emphasis on the military mental health system, and the challenges of convincing some soldiers to use it.

    The Pentagon today announced that the soldier, Sgt. John M. Russell is in custody facing a charge of aggravated assault and five counts of murder. After being flagged by commanders for stress problems about a week ago, the military said, Russell was ordered to a combat stress clinic at Camp Liberty (abutting his home base, Camp Victory). His weapon had already been taken from him. According to published reports, he apparently had an altercation with someone there and used another person's gun to kill two officers who were staff members in the clinic and three soldiers who happened to be there at the time. It’s the worst reported case of a soldier attacking his own troops since the war started. In addition to the criminal investigation, the Army has ordered a complete review of its mental health system.

    The mental health infrastructure in Iraq has been growing throughout the war. The shooting yesterday took place at one of four “restoration centers” in Iraq, where soldiers can bunk temporarily or get outpatient care along with therapy. There are about 40 other combat stress teams on location with troops around the country. Their phone numbers are posted on bulletin boards, handed out by chaplains and commanders. But commanders acknowledge the system has problems, different doctrines and techniques have been tried.

    As an Army psychologist explained to me a few years ago, there are competing interests between mental health and war fighting. One of the biggest is that soldiers and officers still look at therapy as a sign of weakness. Secondly, the goal is “unit cohesion,” that is, keeping the soldier at work rather than sending him or her home. Medicines can be prescribed but, as soldiers are sent back to the field, they don’t have the follow-up they need to monitor their condition--or make sure they don’t hand out the pills to others.

    The hope for the troop was that as the violence in Iraq subsided and tours of duty were shortened, stress would decrease. But in some cases, simply being connected through the Internet to family back home has been enough to cause problems--the psychiatrist told me of one case in which a wife back home had posted photos of her and her new boyfriend on the Web to torment her soldier husband. And a recent USA Today story posited that boredom may increase stress.

    The psychiatrist told me that it was especially hard to get officers to seek help because they feared it would impede their career or undermine their reputations. He tried to argue that it would help them avoid career-ruining incidents. The words seemed apt today as Maj. Gen. Daniel P. Bolger talked about the military’s efforts to get people to go for help. “It’s particularly challenging for a fellow like Sgt. Russell. He’s a non-commissioned officer,” Bolger said. “He’s in a leadership capacity and to make that trip down there is a tough decision for him or his chain of command to make, but we’re willing to make it.”