Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
  • One Countercyclical Business

    Daniel Gross | Jan 29, 2009 02:33 PM
    Spend a day or two here, and it seems that every business, in every sector, in every geographic area, is suffering. There seem to be no safe havens, and few truly countercyclical industries this time around. But I think I may have found one: white-collar networking. Reid Hoffman, the CEO of LinkedIn, says that the site, essentially a networking site for yuppies, is expanding rapidly. It has 34 million members, and is adding one million every 17 days. Advertising is holding up. Hoffman expects revenues and employment to rise in 2009, and expects the company to be profitable. “Networking is cycle resistant,” Hoffman said. “In an environment with lots of jobs and few free employees, people feel a need for LinkedIn and the access it offers. And in a market with lots of employers and few jobs, members feel like they need it.” Membership growth, in other words, is tied in part to white-collar job anxiety. “It was interesting to see all the people from Lehman Brothers join” after the company went bankrupt in September, Hoffman said. More
  • The World According to Putin

    Michael Freedman | Jan 29, 2009 11:39 AM

    There were two views on Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin's speech at the World Economic Forum Wednesday evening. The first, expressed in this morning's International Herald Tribune, was that Putin "struck a conciliatory tone" with the West, talking about "mutual interests" and "mutual dependencies" rather than pounding the drum against the West. The second is that the speech was essentially a pack of lies coming from a man who has proved time and again that any talk of mutual dependence and foreign investment masked the vast human rights abuses in his own country, a history of pushing foreigners out and his aggression toward neighbors and other world leaders. According to the Financial Times, he "mocked the American delegates" in attendance.

    Both views are wrong. If anything, Putin's speech yesterday was surprising because he had an audience of some of the most important people in the world, yet managed to say virtually nothing that hadn't been heard before. He sounded familiar themes about energy security, the need for regional reserve currencies and his desire to build new international structures that are better equipped to deal with the crises like the one now at hand. Indeed, his only tough remark was aimed at Michael Dell, in response to a question from Dell about how his company (and the technology sector more broadly) could help Russia. "We don't need help. We are not invalids," Putin said.

    But those who walked away with the view that Putin's tone was either conciliatory or mocking missed the point of the Russian prime minister's speech altogether. What he was stating in bold, sometimes blunt terms, is his view that Russia is a big, confident player in the world and therefore ought to receive respect from other sovereign nations. In this view, what's needed to solve Russia and the world's problems is more cooperation among all the big countries -- Russia included. In other words, as Putin told Dell, Russia does not want "help"; it wants its interests to be understood and taken into account. A simple message, and those who try to read more deeply into it do so at their peril.

    See text of Putin's remarks after the jump:

    More
  • Advertisement
  • Davos Dispatch: 'Somber and Grim'

    Daniel Gross | Jan 29, 2009 11:38 AM

  • The Financial Crisis and the Underworld

    Stefan Theil | Jan 29, 2009 04:33 PM
    Trying to get a break from all financial crisis, all the time, I went to a dinner discussion about global organized crime last night. The worry among international prosecutors, crime-fighting agencies and anti-corruption NGOs was that the world’s attention... More
  • Redefining Terrorism

    Michael Freedman | Jan 29, 2009 07:49 AM
    Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has taken heat from Jewish groups and others for his tough remarks about Israel, remarks that his critics say helped spark a recent upsurge in sometimes violent anti-Semitism in Turkey. At a briefing this morning, Erdogan said Israel used "disproportionate force" in its campaign in Gaza, but insisted that those people who have tried to portray him or his country as anti-Semitic are doing an "injustice." He also said something that is perhaps more provocative, although in a different way. He called upon Barack Obama to "redefine" the meaning of terrorist and terrorist organizations in the Middle East, and develop a new U.S. policy in the region based on this definition. What should this definition be? Erdogan sidestepped the question--one of the most politically emotional questions one can pose--but merely by raising it again, this time in the context of Gaza, he has perhaps ensured that it won't go away anytime soon.