Sharon Begley
|
Dec 5, 2007 04:36 PM
If your favorite “Grand Theft Auto” fan has not yet turned into a raging violent madman, you may be tempted to dismiss the huge pile of evidence linking exposure to media violence to an increase in aggressive and violent behavior. Not so fast.
In a clever study tracking how the brain responds to violent film
scenes, scientists at Columbia University found a very specific effect:
diminished activity in the region of the brain that controls reactive
aggression. In other words, watching gruesomely violent images might
not incite violence in someone who lives peacefully in a Buddhist
monastery. But in real life--where drivers cut you off, colleagues
undermine you, friends tease you and countless other provocations
ensue--the loss of control over a reflexively aggressive reaction can
have dangerous consequences.
The scientists showed seven men and seven women, mostly in their 20s,
two dozen movie clips. Among them: a teenager breaking a bottle over
someone’s head in “The Basketball Diaries,” a man getting shot in the
head in “The Patriot,” a man slashing another with a sword in “Pulp
Fiction,” one man hitting another with a meat cleaver in “Gangs of New
York,” and similar edifying footage. The 14 also saw some neutral
clips, as well as those of people being frightened (though not
meat-cleavered). During the mini-screenings, the volunteers’ brains
were scanned by functional MRI, which observes which regions are more
or less active during different activities.
The most striking change as the volunteers watched more and more
slashings, shootings and stabbings was in what’s called the right
lateral orbitofrontal cortex, the researchers report today in the journal PloS One.
The right ltOFC is a cluster of neurons nestled just behind the right
side of the forehead. A number of earlier studies have linked it to
control over reactive aggression. And although the scientists did not
see how aggressively their volunteers would react to someone cutting
them off in line, they did ask them so engage in some introspection by,
for instance, answering whether they agreed that, “given enough
provocation, I may hit another person.” The lower the activity in the
region controlling reactive aggression, the more likely the volunteers
were to answer with the equivalent of “hell yes.”
No wonder the scientists conclude that “even short-term exposure to
violent media can result in diminished responsiveness of a network
associated with behaviors such as reactive aggression.” Be careful not
to jostle a fellow audience member at “American Gangster,” or he might
deck you.
More seriously, the work goes some way toward getting beyond the
generalities of the effects of media violence--increasing
aggression--to pinpointing what kind of aggression is increased.
Watching beheadings and the like won’t send you into an unprovoked
violent rampage, but it lowers the threshold of provocation needed to
do so.
More