Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
Full Post
Posted Wednesday, June 25, 2008 4:48 PM

Darwin Must Be Smiling

Sharon Begley

Let me say this at the outset: I don’t expect the latest discovery of a “transitional fossil”—the kind of thing that was once called a missing link—to change anyone’s mind about evolution. I have gotten too many letters and emails from creationists and intelligent-design proponents to have any illusions that something as silly as, you know, data will persuade them that living things change through time as a result of random mutation and natural selection. (My favorite contained a sponge with a verse from the bible printed on it; the letter writer promised to pray for my immortal, if misguided, soul.)

With that preamble, it’s still worth noting what scientists are reporting in the journal Nature, for it’s a transitional fossil between transitional fossils. That is, the fish-like thing whose 365-year-old fossil was discovered by Per Ahlberg of Uppsala University in Sweden and colleagues in Latvia seems to lie half-way between the lobe-finned fish Tiktaalik (itself a transitional fossil between true fish and four-legged land animals) and primitive tetrapods such as Acanthostega and Ichthyostega.

The new fossil, of Ventastega curonica, is remarkably well preserved, allowing the scientists to scrutinize it from skull to pelvis. Its lower jaw resembles a tetrapod’s, while its fangs are more fish-like.

Advertisement

There was a time when those who rejected evolution asked where the transitional fossils were, but as more and more are discovered they’ve changed their tune (if my mail is any indication). According to one, he won’t believe in evolution until there are “billions” of transitional fossils. We’ll get back to you on that.

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: txok1972 (June 27, 2008 at 2:14 PM)

Posted By: C. MacLean (June 27, 2008 at 2:06 PM)

I used to believe in evolution, but after watching the Bush administration, it's tough to make any arguments that we have evolved; Darwin's theory just doesn't account for survival of the unfittest.


Posted By: umkano2 (June 26, 2008 at 7:13 PM)

My support to you. One email of an evolutionist or rather a REAL American who bases thier thinking on evidence. Crazy secular who is not afraid of death!! I also happen to be one of the best people I know. Another arguement of moral apathy rebounded, but alas, I did vote for gay marrige, It's the end of the world as we know it (and i feel fine), but it's from the distruction of the enviornment. Thats something the religious missed and took for granted. OOPs!! Talk about apathy.


 
The Peek
 
 
PROJECT GREEN

For decades, tiny Barrow, Alaska, has been largely unknown and unnoticed. But with increasing global activity in the Arctic--especially from oil speculators--things are changing … fast.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu