Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Monday, March 24, 2008 1:33 PM

Assessing the First Two Rounds

Mark Starr

There's the real tournament and, far more important, there is the private tournament-—namely, each of our pools. And since the latter is far more important, let's start there. I profited from one lesson I have learned through the years, but suffered grievously from another I haven't quite mastered. My winning strategy was not to get excited about any underdog that got hot in its conference tournament. That enabled me to dispatch Georgia in the first round and, more important, to stay away from the fashionable Pittsburgh pick. Pittsburgh is a perennial finalist and frequent winner in the Big East tournament, but it apparently leaves its game in Madison Square Garden come the Big Dance. Having been burned by Pittsburgh in the past, I vowed never again, enabling me to nail their usual one-and-out.

The lesson I haven't mastered is to eschew sentiment, even noble sentiment.  I managed to be remarkably unsentimental when it came to my own alma mater; I have Stanford going out to Texas in the next round. But while my gut wanted to pick Wisconsin coming out of the MIdwest to the Final Four,  my heart steered me to Georgetown, where my best buddies are administrators with longstanding ties to the basketball program. I didn't want to root against them and their team, even though I had serious misgivings about Roy Hibbert's capacity to come up big in critical moments. Still, I never would have foreseen how it actually happened—that Georgetown, with its defensive prowess, would let a team like Davidson crawl back from so far down and then stand around and watch as they ran over them. Despite my considerable regret, you've got to like sweet-faced, sweet-shooting Stephen Curry as the player of the tournament so far.

After a slow start, this tournament has been decidedly "A" quality through the weekend. We've had the requisite upsets with five lower seeds (three of them from the double-digit seeds), four overtime games and some spectacular game-winners at the buzzer (San Diego, Stanford and Western Kentucky the most memorable.) Of the 16 remaining teams, only four have been on cruise control—North Carolina, Kansas, Louisville, Washington St.—and three of the most popular picks for winning it all—UCLA, Tennessee and Memphis—barely survived the weekend.

Advertisement

CBS' commitment to stick with the closest games is a winner for fans, but, as a result, I have seen very little of the two teams, Kansas and North Carolina, that might be the top two picks if folks were starting anew. Still, I caught enough of North Carolina running Arkansas ragged to have no regrets about going with UNC for the title. I have UCLA as my other finalist and they appear to have a relatively easy path to San Antonio. But after watching Texas A&M give them fits, UCLA better find somebody else besides Love and Collison who can actually put the ball in the net.

Memphis, Tennessee, Louisville and Texas all impressed me with their athleticism, but, still, I can't get overly excited about teams that can't make their free throws (15-32, 19-29, 5-15 and 12-21 respectively). Three of them were lucky to survive; Georgetown, 8-17 from the line, didn't. The appalling bottom line on yesterday: only 4 teams of the 16 teams that played shot at least 75% from the free throw line and Louisville, remarkably, shot .529 from the three-point line and .333 from the stripe.

Tag(s):
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

No Comments