Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com

Why It Matters

Full Post
Posted Monday, April 21, 2008 12:17 PM

Carter Rejects Criticism of Hamas Talks

Newsweek

By Kevin Peraino 

Jimmy Carter has been roundly pilloried on the cable news channels for his meetings last week in Damascus and Cairo with senior Hamas leaders. When I saw the former president at the King David Hotel in Jerusalem this afternoon, I asked him why he thought American public opinion was so harshly critical of his trip. "You know the answer to that," Carter replied. "Let me say this without criticizing the news media in America. There is no balanced coverage of what goes on in the Holy Land in the American news media. It's ridiculous, if you analyze it column by column and headline by headline. I would say it's not a bias on the part of the Washington Post or The New York Times or The L.A. Times or so forth. Or Newsweek. It's a fact that in the political discussion – which is the origin of most of your news – it's politically suicidal for any candidate to say anything that's displeasing to Israel. It's suicide. So far as I know, there's only one member of Congress since my book ["Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid"] came out that's had one thing to say that wasn't completely compliant with what the Israeli government's policy was at a certain time. And what you [in the media] have to do is cover what McCain says, and what Hillary says, and what Obama says, about my trip. They're all critical. It's inconceivable that Obama or Clinton could say 'We approve of Jimmy Carter's meeting with Hamas.' I'm not complaining. I've been in politics myself. There's no discussion, no debate, in the United States."

The ironic thing is that some recent polls have shown that a majority of Israelis – including large segments of the hawkish Likud party – favor direct negotiations with Hamas. "I was impressed with that," Carter said when I asked him about the polls. "These are people who know what they're talking about, and they know that there's no way to have peace unless Hamas is brought into the discussion. They also know – sometimes they may be reluctant to admit it – that in an honest and free and fair and transparent election, Hamas candidates prevailed."

Advertisement
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: C. MacLean (April 23, 2008 at 2:57 PM)

What Jimmy Carter failed to mention is that this is an election year. Nobody is going to publicly support talking to Hamas until after the election, because a politician's first job is to get elected. Their second job is to get re-elected.

Jimmy Carter is no longer a politician, he is a stateman, so he can speak the truth without fear of reprisal - as a former polician, he is used to scorn.

After the election, when the job of getting elected is over, there will be time to talk to Hamas. As the Hamilton-Baker report made clear, we will have to start talking to these people if we are ever to make any headway into the difficut problems that are rampant in the Middle East. The Israelis know it, the American policy makers know it, and Hamas knows it. Only the American people, and especially, American Jews, don't know it.

After the election, everyone will talk to Hamas.


Posted By: pollnut (April 21, 2008 at 11:41 PM)

Hamas is playing Carter and everyone else for fools, and Carter thinks he deserves another Nobel Peace Prize.  Consider the following explanation of the meaning of the "ten-year cease fire" that Hamas promised to Carter:

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=118AB751-DE8B-4DC8-BE0C-3CBF69C8C588  

"Hudna has a distinct meaning to Islamic fundamentalists, well-versed in their history: The prophet Mohammad struck a legendary, ten-year hudna with the Quraysh tribe that controlled Mecca in the seventh century. Over the following two years, Mohammad rearmed and took advantage of a minor Quraysh infraction to break the hudna and launch the full conquest of Mecca, the holiest city in Islam."

In light of the fact that a Hamas spokesman denied willingness to recognize Israel immediately after Carter claimed they had indicated it, why should we believe he has achieved a breakthrough?  No one can negotiate religious people out of their beliefs.


Posted By: Aldous21 (April 21, 2008 at 11:04 PM)

coolrepublica:

There are very large differences between Repuglican and Democratic policies. While the essence of US Policy does not change, the Fine Print and execution of such policies do.


 
The Peek
 
 
PROJECT GREEN
NWK Caption: At the Excel High School in Oakland, California a group of students, their teacher and members of community groups pose with air pollution monitors in front of a mural at the school.  July 26, 2008.       Left to Right:   Randy Colosky, a member of Global Community Monitor  wearing brown shirt ,Juan Hernandez, student (seated) ,   Ina Bendich, teacher Danyale Willingham,student in blue top).Elizabeth de Rham far right, member of the Rose Foundation.

Young pollution sleuths and community activists fight for healthier air.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
PAKISTAN
nuclear pakistan khan kabul bomb
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu