Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com

HEADLINE HEADLINE HEADLINE

SPONSORED BY
Pop Vox Blog - Newsweek.com
  • 8 Reasons Why the Oscars Bombed This Year

    Ramin Setoodeh | Feb 23, 2009 12:30 AM

    Was it just me, or were the Oscars like the longest episode of "American Idol" ever? First, Ryan Seacrest interviewed all the contestants—oops, make that nominees—on the red carpet. Then, the stage was suspiciously similar to the circular "Idol" platform, and the live show began with a musical number from host Hugh Jackman. The first winner was announced by a panel, though unfortunately Paula Abdul wasn't on it. And at some point in the evening, Jackman appeared with Beyonce, Zac Efron and Vanessa Hudgens to cover a strange assortment of Broadway tunes.

    That latter number was awfully schizophrenic, and it only made sense when we learned that it was directed by the king of excess himself, Baz Luhrmann. The flashy, uneven choreography summed up the entire evening. This year was the Academy's biggest push to make the Oscars young and more relevant. Too bad they failed, even worse than when they tapped Jon Stewart as host. Throughout the telecast, my BlackBerry buzzed with messages from friends, all in their 20s, about how un-hip and un-young and unwatchable the Oscars felt.

    It's not the Academy's fault the show was so predictable—nothing could stop "Slumdog Millionaire"'s unstoppable march to victory. At the same time, what the heck was going on onstage? It felt as though MTV executives tried to hatch a new Oscars, with two strange parents: the old Oscars and the Tonys. Needless to say, the result was a weird-looking baby.

    Without further ado, let's get rid of the envelopes, please. Here are the eight strangest moments of the strangest Oscars of all time.

    More
  • Our Critics Call the Oscars: The Reckoning

    Patrick Enright | Feb 23, 2009 12:21 AM
    Last week, our critics Devin Gordon and Ramin Setoodeh went head to head to pick the winners in the top categories at the Academy Awards. Now that Hollywood's big night has ended, here's the final tally. And the winner is ... drumroll, please ... Mr. Setoodeh! He correctly picked the winner in seven out of the eight categories, with Mr. Gordon a close second, at six out of eight. (Though, to be fair, Setoodeh hedged a little bit in his Best Picture pick.) More
  • Advertisement
  • The Angry Professor: My (Failed) Attempt to Interview Jerry Lewis

    Newsweek | Feb 22, 2009 01:25 PM
    By Marc Peyser
     
    My Oscar prediction: no matter how long Kate Winslet burbles and beams at her little gold man tonight, she's won't get the evening's biggest ovation. That honor will go to Hollywood's longest-serving court jester, Jerry Lewis. Tucked in among all the other coronations, Lewis will be given the royalest of treatments: the Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award. Never mind that this is something of a consolation prize—the Academy has never bestowed an actual Oscar on the man in his six decades of work— Hollywood is still delirious over having him for the evening. My guess is that he'll commandeer a good 10 minutes of camera time, wherein he will: A) cry; B) bellow, "Hey, Lady!" at least once; and C) remain utterly emotionless at the mention of the name Dean Martin, his longtime comedy partner and almost-as-longtime enemy, who Lewis believed pushed him out of their comedy spotlight.
     
    Far be it for me to tarnish such a joyous occasion, but I have two words for those tuning in to see Lewis honored: Be afraid. Actually, make that three: Be very afraid. This is, admittedly, an irrational thing to say. Lewis hasn't self-destructed on camera for almost two years now, since he referred to an audience member as a "f-g" during the 18th hour of his 2007 Labor Day telethon. (He called cricket a "f-g game" the next year, but that doesn't count; he was in Australia.) But I base my fear on more personal experience. I have been terrified of Jerry Lewis for 13 years, ever since the first—and last—time I met him.
    More
  • Why I Hate the Oscars (But Can't Stop Watching)

    Patrick Enright | Feb 20, 2009 07:00 AM

     

    Photo, Hector Mata/AFP-Getty Images. 

    Am I alone in finding the annual self-indulgent, self-congratulatory spectacle that is the Academy Awards simultaneously repellent and unmissable? When I settle into my wingback chair with a snifter of brandy at around the crack of dawn on Oscar Sunday for the red carpet pre-pre-pre-pre-show, watching F-list Hollywood Pretty People foam at the mouth as they express inhuman delight about dress styles I couldn't tell apart with a pattern book, am I the only one measuring the length of my nose as I look down it upon the idiots who might find this kind of programming edifying?

    Can we agree that it takes true, steely-eyed grit to endure Cuba Gooding Jr. leaping about like a hyperactive child after six bowls of Cocoa Puffs or Antonio Banderas practically spraying the audience with emotion while crooning a song from "The Motorcycle Diaries"?

    More
  • Oscar Unknowns: A Chat With Nominees Michael Shannon and Melissa Leo

    Newsweek | Feb 17, 2009 10:57 AM

    Photos, courtesy of Sony Classics (left); Paramount Vantage

      By Nicki Gostin



    Each year, scattered among the Jack Nicholsons, Meryl Streeps and Sean Penns on the list of Academy Award nominees are a few lesser-known actors, names that make the average moviegoer sit up in befuddlement and ask "Who?" This time around, joining superstars such as Heath Ledger and Angelina Jolie in the running for Oscar statuettes are Michael Shannon (who has had roles in "8 Mile," "Vanilla Sky" and "Pearl Harbor") and indie standby Melissa Leo (whom you might recognize from TV series "Homicide: Life on the Street," bit parts in "21 Grams" and "Mr. Woodcock," and a host of independent films). NEWSWEEK's Nicki Gostin sat down with each of the formerly unknown actors to find out whether they think they'll win, how the nominations have helped their careers and what they're doing to prepare for the big night.

    [CLICK MORE>> TO READ FULL INTERVIEW] 

    More
  • The Gold Digger: Watch Viola Davis in 'Doubt' -- Without Leaving Your Couch

    Ramin Setoodeh | Jan 30, 2009 04:00 PM
    The most curious thing about this year's Oscars won't be if "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button" upsets for Best Picture (nah, it doesn't have a shot). It'll be who will take home the gold in the Best Supporting Actress race. The Golden Globe went to Kate Winslet for "The Reader." The SAG went to Kate Winslet for "The Reader." And the Oscar won't go to Kate Winslet for "The Reader," since she's nominated in the lead, not supporting, category. That means the Academy will have to choose from five unpracticed-at-giving-a-speech-at-the-podium names.

    Actually, it's more like two.
     
    The supporting-actress race is shaping up to be a smackdown between Penelope Cruz (the frontrunner from last summer for "Vicky Cristina Barcelona") and Viola Davis (for "Doubt"). Cruz has the Weinstein company in its corner, as well as a previous Oscar nod for "Volver" and the whole gorgeous-beauty-in-a-Woody-Allen-movie factor. Davis is in a movie that seems to be more adored by the Academy (four acting nominations!). Plus, she holds her own against Meryl Streep. But, eh, she's only in the movie for one really long scene. Miramax is trying to hush those doubts -- no doubt! -- by posting a seven-minute clip that showcases almost all of Davis's performance.  Watch it here.

    Oh no, Penelope! How are you going to fight back?
     
    For the sake of equal airtime, we'll post the 44 second scene where you kiss Scarlett Johansson:


    More
  • Four of a Kind: The Academy, "The Reader," and "Rare, Extraordinary Circumstances"

    Sarah Ball | Jan 28, 2009 03:30 PM

    Read the below-reproduced statement from the AMPAS, announcing that the full four producers of "The Reader" -- rather than the customary three -- will be listed as the nominees in the Best Picture category.  Two of those producers -- Anthony Minghella and Sydney Pollack -- died during the post-production.  This is the second time in a week that "The Reader" is associated with upending Academy precedent; when Kate Winslet nabbed a surprise Best Actress nomination for her role in the film, beating out herself in "Revolutionary Road," it marked the first time that a Golden Globe winner's performance in the Drama category wasn't even nominated for the Oscar.  And here's the Academy:

    Because four producers were listed on the credits form submitted for Oscar® consideration and Academy rules allow for only three producers – except in “a rare and extraordinary circumstance” – to be nominated and potentially receive Oscar statuettes, a meeting of the executive committee was necessary. In the end, the committee determined that the circumstances of “The Reader” – in which the two original producers (Minghella and Pollack) both died partway through the process – met its definition of “rare and extraordinary” and that all four submitted individuals should be named as nominees.

    For a bit about each departed director-turned-producer, read (1.) Frank Gehry's essay from our Periscope section, about Gehry's old friend Sydney and the Renoir-like quality of "The Interpreter;" or (2.) David Ansen's remembrance of Minghella's "rare sensitivity," conveyed in films like "The English Patient," "The Talented Mr. Ripley" and "Cold Mountain."  Pollack was 73; Minghella was 54.

     

    More
  • Golddigger: Tap-Dancing Gene Kelly Does Not A 'Best Picture' Make

    Patrick Enright | Jan 27, 2009 03:37 PM


    Golddigger, NEWSWEEK's Oscars blog, continues with Patrick Enright's Academy Awards reality check.

    Every year, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences offers a whole host of well-earned awards to films, actors, directors and writers. And every year, the Academy completely screws up and hands out a couple of Oscars to performances and movies that in no way deserved them. Herewith, our list of the most noteworthy of those missteps -- feel free to tell us how right (or how wrong) we are in the comments:

     

    Angelina Jolie, for 1999's "Girl, Interrupted"

    Sure, it's just a Best Supporting Actress Oscar, but Angie still didn't earn it. She was fine playing a mental patient, but how tough is that really? And when you're up against Chloë Sevigny in the brilliant "Boys Don't Cry," well, you should throw out the "It's an honor just to be nominated" line and walk home empty-handed.

     

    "Around the World in 80 Days" (1956)

    It's not as though the rollicking adventure flick starring David Niven and legendary Mexican actor Cantinflas isn't a good time. But Best Picture? When the competition includes Yul Brynner's "The King and I"; James Dean's final film, "Giant"; and Cecil B. DeMille's legendary "The Ten Commandments"? No, really, "The Ten Commandments." Here's a question: Which of the four has held up best in the last half-century? If you said "80 Days," you're as wrong as the Academy was.

     

    John Ford, for 1941's "How Green Was My Valley"

    The Academy's probably kicking itself for this one—Orson Welles' "Citizen Kane," which lost Best Picture and Best Director Oscars to John Ford's flick, is No. 1 on the American Film Institute's list of the top 100 movies of all time and widely considered the best film ever made. "How Green Was My Valley"? Not on the list. At all. Sorry, John, but you didn't earn that golden statuette.

     

    "An American in Paris" (1951)

    "How can Gene Kelley prancing through Paris with Leslie Caron not be worth the Best Picture Oscar?" you ask? Easy: when it's competing against the phenomenal Marlon Brando-starring adaptation of Tennessee Williams' "A Streetcar Named Desire." Not only did "Streetcar" launch the career of one of the greatest actors of the 20th century, it's riveting from start to finish. Give "American in Paris" the Best Score prize, but save the big one for a movie with some weight.

     

    Kevin Costner, for 1990's "Dances With Wolves"

    Costner's ponderous, "Look, Native Americans are people too!" western has its charms, and its place, but Kev didn't deserve the Best Director Oscar, and not just because he beat out cinematic legend Martin Scorsese, nominated for "Goodfellas." "Dances" marked his first time behind the camera, and it shows. The next two films he helmed, "Waterworld" and "The Postman," reflected his, um, lackluster directing talent.

     

    Al Pacino, for 1992's "Scent of a Woman"

    Al's deserved plenty of Oscars in his career—for "The Godfather," "Dog Day Afternoon," "Glengarry Glen Ross"—but it's a travesty that the only one he's won is for his much-mocked "HOO-ah!" role in Chris O'Donnell vehicle "Scent of a Woman." Just because he was snubbed by the Academy six (!) previous times doesn't mean he should win for drivel. "Look, I'm driving a sports car and I'm blind!" Seriously?

     

    Cher, for 1987's "Moonstruck"

    It's Cher. 'Nuff said.

     

    "Shakespeare in Love" (1998)

    Why do people like this movie again? Oh, right, because they're stupid. Think that's unnecessarily harsh? Perhaps, but even fans of the fluffy Gwyneth Paltrow period dramedy have to admit that "Shakespeare" isn't nearly as good as any of the other nominees: "Elizabeth," "Saving Private Ryan," "The Thin Red Line" (better than "Ryan," and by far) and "Life Is Beautiful." This one's perhaps the least-deserving Best Picture winner ever.

     

    Marisa Tomei, for 1992's "My Cousin Vinny"

    The year 1993 was clearly not a good one for the Academy. Nor were the '90s a good decade, come to think of it ... Tomei was fine in silly Joe Pesci comedy "Vinny." Nothing to write home about. Judy Davis in "Husbands and Wives"? Brilliant. Stunning. Genius. This should have been a gimme. Maybe the voting members were afraid Pesci would come around and break their kneecaps if they didn't pick Marisa?

     

    More
  • Gold Digger Reacts to the Oscar Nominations: Surprises, Snubs and Snores

    Ramin Setoodeh | Jan 22, 2009 09:30 AM

    OK it's the crack of dawn--like 8:25 a.m.--and we're up to watch the Oscar nominations announced live! I hope hope hope Brad Pitt is nominated for either "Benjamin Button" or "Burn After Reading," and not just because we invited him to Newsweek's Oscar roundtable, on stands Monday. I'm also excited for Anne Hathaway, who I followed--as a journalist!--at Toronto, where "Rachel Getting Married" premiered, and the crowds yelled "Oscar! Oscar!" at her as she left the theater.

    Here's the president of the Academy Sid Ganis, and Forrest Whitaker:

    (1) Amy Adams get in for best supporting actress over Kate Winslet for "The Reader." So much for Winslet's chances of winning two Oscars in the same year.

    (2) No Dev Patel in "Slumdog Millionaire." Does that mean he could land in lead? (No.) When was the last time a movie won best picture with no acting nominations? Was it "Crash"? Michael Shannon gets in instead for "Revolutionary Road"

    (3) Best actress, the big whoa category. They snub Kate Winslet for ... Kate Winslet. She gets in for "The Reader," not "Revolutionary Road," which she had been campaigning herself for. The other big surprise is that they nominate both Angelina Jolie for "The Changeling" and Melissa Leo for "Frozen River," but no Sally Hawkins for "Happy-Go-Lucky."

    (4) Best actor, and it's Richard Jenkins for "The Visitor" over Clint Eastwood for "Gran Torino." Clint's love affair with the Academy is over. Brad Pitt is in! He and Angie are now an Oscars couple.

    (5) And best picture ... has a big shock. "No Dark Knight." But "The Reader" gets in. I can live with that. "The Reader" is the better film, but I bet the Batman fans are bummed.

    More
  • Gold Digger Returns! NEWSWEEK Movie Guru Ramin Setoodeh Predicts the Oscar Slate

    Ramin Setoodeh | Jan 21, 2009 01:30 PM
    <3s 
     
    Photo courtesy AMPAS.
     
    The Gold Digger, aka NEWSWEEK's Oscar blogger Ramin Setoodeh, is back to handicap who will win the world's second most important campaign (after the presidential election, naturally). Below, his predictions for who Academy will love -- and snub -- when it announces its nominations tomorrow-morning-at-8:30-a.m.-EST-not-that-we're-counting-down-the-hours-or-anything:


    Best Picture

    About three months ago, a funny thing happened. No one had any idea what would be nominated for best picture--in fact, most of the best picture nominees hadn't even been released or screened for the critics. So it's somewhat of a letdown that this category is so anticlimactic. The directors and producers guilds lined up perfectly, and the Academy will likely do the same and nominate "Slumdog Millionaire," "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button," "Milk," "Frost/Nixon" and "The Dark Knight."

    Batman is the most vulnerable, since it's a comic book movie, was released over the summer and--can I be honest here?--is at times incoherent, especially in that last big action scene. But I can't think of a single movie that could displace it. "Revolutionary Road" and "Doubt" fizzled with the critics. "The Wrestler" and "Rachel Getting Married" never gained the momentum they deserved. "Gran Torino" opened too late--it clobbered the box office the weekend ballots were due. I wish "Vicky Cristina Barcelona" had a shot. Or "The Reader," the most overlooked movie of the year. But alas, they don't.

    And the nominees will be:


    • "Slumdog Millionaire"
    • "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button"
    • "Milk"
    • "Frost/Nixon"
    • "The Dark Knight"
     

    Best Director

    This category will probably line up with best picture, and the directors guild. But for fun, let's look at some outside hopefuls.

    Wouldn't it be delicious if Woody Allen showed up for "Vicky Cristina Barcelona?" Jonathan Demme seemed like he had a chance earlier in the year, but Hathaway might be the only "Rachel" contender (though it'll be a shame if it doesn't get recognized for best supporting actress or screenplay). I think the most likely upset is Darren Aronofsky for "The Wrestler." He not only engineered his own comeback, after "The Fountain," but resurrected the career of one of the most difficult actors in Hollywood, Mickey Rourke. It's tempting to pick him, but who do you leave out? I'm going to wimp out and go with the expected list.

    The nominees:

    • Danny Boyle, "Slumdog Millionaire"
    • David Fincher, "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button"
    • Gus van Sant, "Milk"
    • Ron Howard, "Frost/Nixon"
    • Christopher Nolan, "The Dark Knight"


    Best Actor

    A pretty straightforward category. Mickey Rourke is a lock for "The Wrestler," as are Sean Penn for "Milk" and Frank Langella for "Frost/Nixon." Clint Eastwood delivers one of the best performances of his career in "Gran Torino"--it's a box office hit and a crowd pleaser. The only mystery is why the SAGs and Globes both ignored him. On the other hand, the Academy loves Clint, so he's probably a safe bet.

    Leonardo DiCaprio digs deep for marital angst in "Revolutionary Road," but the movie has become Winslet's vehicle. Richard Jenkins is a well respected actor, but "The Visitor" is such a small--and at times unrealistic--film, that I think he'll just miss out. Dev Patel could sneak in for "Slumdog Millionaire," even though Fox Searchlight is campaigning him in the supporting category, he delivers a lead performance. But I'm betting on Brad Pitt's performance in "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button" to take the final spot.

    The nominees:


    • Mickey Rourke, "The Wrestler"
    • Sean Penn, "Milk"
    • Frank Langella, "Frost Nixon"
    • Clint Eastwood, "Gran Torino"
    • Brad Pitt, "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button"


    Best Actress


    Something weird is going to happen in this category, because we've got the most overcrowded actress race in years. There are as many as 9 performances that could pop up on nomination day, though some of them are longshots. Let's start with the frontrunners, the women who got nominated for both the Globe and the Screen Actors Guild awards. Kate Winslet for "Revolutionary Road"; Anne Hathaway for "Rachel Getting Married;" Meryl Streep for "Doubt;" and Angelina Jolie for "The Changeling."

    Ok, that's four already. Then there's Sally Hawkins, the critic's darling, who pretty much has won every award out there for her whimsical performance in "Happy-Go-Lucky," until she was snubbed by the SAGs. Melissa Leo, who gives a haunting, gritty performance as a single mom in the indie "Frozen River," was supposed to be the critics' favorite until Sally came along (she got the SAG nomination, but no Globes love).

    Then there are the outsiders, who could easily upset simply because there are so many women competing in the category. Kristin Scott Thomas was considered an early lock for her heartbreaking work in "I've Loved You So Long." But the movie is in French and has fallen off the radar. Cate Blanchett ages like 100 years in "Benjamin Button"--it's a showy, chewy role that has strangely gotten no notice yet. But as she proved last year when she snatched a nomination for "Elizabeth 2," you can never count Cate out. And finally, there's Michelle Williams in the indie "Wendy and Lucy." She carries every scene in the film and is often acting alone on screen (the performance is like the female equivalent to Tom Hanks in "Castaway," but the movie might be too small).

    Ah, how do we only get to five? Sometimes it's harder to play this game when you've seen all the movies because you let your own emotions get tangled up in the predicting. But I'm going to go start with the three three leaders (Winslet, Hathaway, Streep). The fourth slot is Hawkins, though she might be more vulnerable than people think. And the fifth slot is the toughest to pick. It's tempting to go with Jolie--the Academy owes her after snubbing her for "A Mighty Heart," she's in a Clint Eastwood movie, it would be nice to nominate her with Brad--but did anybody really love "The Changeling"? Then maybe it'll be Melissa. Or maybe they will snub both Leos, along with DiCaprio. I'm going to go with the performance that's stuck with me the longest, and hope the Academy feels the same way.

    The nominees:


    • Kate Winslet, "Revolutionary Road"
    • Anne Hathaway, "Rachel Getting Married"
    • Meryl Streep, "Doubt"
    • Sally Hawkins, "Happy-Go-Lucky"
    • Kristin Scott Thomas, "I've Loved You so Long"

     

    Best Supporting Actor

    Heath Ledger will win this award for playing the Joker in "The Dark Knight." So let's see who the four gracious losers will be. Josh Brolin will get nominated for "Milk"--he deserves some recognition for two years of solid performances going back to "No Country for Old Men," "American Gangster" and the underappreciated "W." I think this is the category where Dev Patel will likely show up for "Slumdog Millionaire;" they'll want to nominate someone from the movie favored to win best picture. And while the Academy generally doesn't award comedy, Robert Downey Jr. is playing an egotistical actor in "Tropic Thunder"--so how could they not relate?--and he had a stellar year with "Iron Man."

    That leaves one last spot. Michael Shannon received a lot of early buzz for "Revolutionary Road," but lack of love for the film could cost him. James Franco deserves a nomination for playing Sean Penn's lover in "Milk." I think he could pull it off, and if he does, it'll show how much support the movie really has (there are murmurs that it could upset and win it all on Oscar night.) But the safer bet is Philip Seymour Hoffman in "Doubt." It's not a tremendously exciting performance, but he yells a lot at Meryl and the Academy will like that.

    My predictions for best supporting actor

    • Heath Ledger, "The Dark Knight"
    • Josh Brolin, "Milk"
    • Dev Patel, "Slumdog Millionaire"
    • Robert Downey, Jr., "Tropic Thunder"
    • Philip Seymour Hoffman, "Doubt"

     

    Best Supporting Actress


    The lead contenders are Penelope Cruz for "Vicky Cristina Barcelona" and Viola Davis for "Doubt." Kate Winslet is probably a lock too for "The Reader," unless there's a surprise and she's nominated in the lead category (she's in almost every scene). Then there's Marisa Tomei for "The Wrestler" and Taraji P. Henson for "Benjamin Button."

    Oops. Are we at five already? That's too bad, because that means the Academy will likely leave out one of the most striking performances of the year. As the title character in "Rachel Getting Married," Rosemarie DeWitt is so real and vulnerable, it's almost as if she's not even acting. Which is always a problem for the Academy--subtlety is never their strong point.

    My predictions for best supporting actress

    • Penelope Cruz, "Vicki Cristina Barcelona"
    • Viola Davis, "Doubt"
    • Kate Winslet, "The Reader"
    • Marisa Tomei, "The Wrestler"
    • Taraji P. Henson, "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button"

     
    More