Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
Full Post
Posted Tuesday, November 18, 2008 1:57 PM

Obama's Attorney General

Michael Isikoff

President-elect Obama has decided to tap Eric Holder as his attorney general, putting the veteran Washington lawyer in place to become the first African-American to head the Justice Department, according to two legal sources close to the presidential transition.

Holder, who served as deputy attorney general during the Clinton administration, still has to undergo a formal “vetting” review by the Obama transition team before the selection is final and is publicly announced, said one of the sources, who asked not to be identified talking about the transition process. But in the discussions over the past few days, Obama offered Holder the job and he accepted, the source said. The announcement is not likely until after Obama announces his choices to lead the Treasury and State departments.

Holder, 57, has been on Obama’s “short list” for attorney general from the outset. A partner at the D.C. law firm of Covington & Burling, Holder served as co-chief (along with Caroline Kennedy) of Obama’s vice-presidential selection process. He also actively campaigned for Obama throughout the year and grew personally close to the president-elect. Holder has not returned a call seeking comment; a spokeswoman for the Obama transition team told Newsweek in an e-mail early Tuesday afternoon that no decision has been made.  

The sources said the Obama transition team is still debating over who should serve under Holder in the key post of deputy attorney general. One top candidate, favored by Obama chief of staff Rahm Emanuel and other former Clinton White House officials, is Elena Kagan, dean of the Harvard Law School and a former lawyer in the White House counsel’s office under Clinton. Another top candidate, favored by other Obama advisors, is David Ogden, a former chief of staff to Attorney General Janet Reno, who is currently heading Obama’s Justice Department transition team. Kagan brings legal policy credentials; Ogden has more experience in the Justice Department trenches.

The only hesitancy about Holder’s selection was that he himself had reservations about going through a confirmation process that was likely to revive questions about his role in signing off on the controversial pardon of fugitive financier Marc Rich. Although there is no evidence that Holder actively pushed the pardon, he was criticized for not raising with the White House the strong objections that some Justice Department lawyers and federal prosecutors in New York had to pardoning somebody who had fled the country. But after reviewing the evidence in the case, and checking with staffers on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Obama aides and Holder both decided the issue was highly unlikely to prove an obstacle to his confirmation, one of the sources said--especially given the Democrats’ more sizable post-election majority in the Senate.

A New York City native who graduated from Columbia University and Columbia Law School, Holder spent years as a federal prosecutor—a job in which he earned a reputation as tough and aggressive foe of public corruption. After serving in the public integrity section of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division and later a District of Columbia Superior Court judge, Holder was named by President Clinton as U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia. He became deputy attorney general in 1997 under Janet Reno and was viewed as a centrist on most law enforcement issues, though he has sharply criticized the secrecy and the expansive views of executive power advanced by the Bush Justice Department.

This story was updated Tuesday afternoon.

Advertisement
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: IsidoroRDL (December 29, 2008 at 8:29 AM)

RE:  INVESTIGATION OF CRIMINAL CONDUCT OF ERIC HOLDER

Good Morning,

My allegations of criminal conduct are very serious against Holder, DOJ and the Federal Courts.  The violation of Federal criminal law is foced on two issues:

First, how could Eric Holder have filed a valid bar complaint to take my license as an attorney in Virginia for my litigating to enforce his Treaty and statutory rights as a father and attorney?

Second, how could DOJ and the Federal courts deny me access to a jury trial and to an impartial court to challenge the void issue by a body that has acted without either Constitutional or statutory authority so to permit the violation of federal rights of the father and attorney?

What are the motives?  Why, for eight years my Son and I have been the target of government malfeasance which Eric Holder was in the lead?

My recent letters to all members of the Senate and House on need to use the confirmation proceeding of Eric Holder as a means to review and challenge the above criminal collusion of DOJ and the Federal Courts.

As I have stated repeatedly, based on my more than 32 years as a Federal human/civil rights litigation attorney, under Chief Justice Rehnquist and now Roberts a coup d'etate has been permitted to occur to usurp Congressional authority.  Through the Judicial Conference this policy is maintain by Chief Justice Roberts (a defendant in my RICO Federal Tort Claims action for false testimony to Congress at his confirmation).

In summary, this policy has the objective of isolating and minimize attorneys who were and are aggressive civil rights litigators and advocates, so to convert the profession of law now heavy with "transactional attorneys.". This has affected all aspects of our government and society--not only the area of family law and access to an impartial court--but to the way financial institutions are run. Does anyone believe that ENRON and the financial crises did not occur to a large extent because lawyers failed in their oath to protect the greater public interest.

Thus, for your information and use is my letter (enclosed are web sites relating to background info).

________________________________________________________

RE: REQUEST TO TESTIFY IN OPPOSITION TO THE CONFIRMATION OF

ERIC HOLDER FOR OBSTRUCTION OF THE STATUTORY RIGHTS OF A

FATHER AND VIOLATION OF THE RULE OF LAW.

Greetings,

Although not a constituent, as a citizen and Nam Vet who took an oath 44years ago to protect the Constitution I write to you as a member of the Senate to

permit me to testify and present evidence in opposition to the confirmation of Eric

Holder to be the next attorney General of the U. S. Department of Justice ("DOJ"),

at the Committee on the Judiciary hearing scheduled for January 15, 2008. I note

that although posting other letters in support of Eric Holder's confirmation, your

staff has yet to post on the Committee's site any of my letters in opposition or

request his response to the allegations of misconduct by obstructing my federal

statutory rights as a father.

As I have explained the evidence to be presented will confirm that the pardon

of Marc Rich from accountability for his alleged criminal acts was not an anomaly,

but in fact a pattern and practice of Eric Holder in his capacity as both a Beltway

attorney/lobbyist and a former official in DOJ. As such the evidence will confirm

that Eric Holder has repeatedly violate his oath as an attorney to "serve the

American public," by his use of his position to prevent accountability for bad acts:

First, Eric Holder in his previous senior positions at DOJ supported the

policy of non compliance with Congressional statutes, i.e. the use of signing

statements to disregard the protections of the Right to Financial Privacy Act and

the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. Also, Eric Holder supported the policy

that the public has no right to hold DOJ accountable for malfeasance under the

Federal Tort Claims Act.

This will be confirmed by a review of the record of past civil trials/appeals

against DOJ's violation of the right of U.S. citizen and nonresident Hispanics before

the U.S. Tax Court, the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 11th, and District of Columbia Circuits, as

well as the United States Supreme Court, all of which coincide with Eric Holder's

tenure in senor positions at DOJ, i.e., See Martinez v. Lamagno and DOJ/DEA, 515

U.S. 417 (1995)(DOJ asserted absolute immunity for negligent driving by DEA

agent having sex and drunk while driving causing an accident-"James Bond

Defense"), see also Organization JD Lida. v. Assist U.S. Attorney Arthur P. Hui and

U.S. Dept of Justice, 2nd Cir. No. 93-6019 and 96-6145; and, Lopez v. First Union,

129 F3.rd. 1186 (11th Cir. 1997)(Litigation successfully stopped the unlawful

disclosing of information by financial institutions and the illegal seizing by DOJ of

all nonresident Hispanic bank accounts in the

U.S.)(http://justiciaportodo.webs.com).

Second, Eric Holder has been the linchpin in an ongoing federal criminal

conspiracy by DOJ against me for petitioning for an investigation of the collusion

and malfeasance of the DOJ and the Federal Court by developing policies in

violation of the Constitutional and statutory rights of my U.S. citizen Son and I as a

fathers (http://www.liamsdad.org/others/isidoro.shtml). Here the courts too have held that DOJ and they are absolutely immune from suit for tortious and criminal acts!

As such Eric Holder did provide a fraudulent bar complaint to retaliate,

punish and stigmatize me in violation of 18 U.S.C. 241, 242, 1204, and 1513: (a)

because I litigated against DOJ for damages and to compel it to comply with its

ministerial duty under Treaty, US Code and Va UCCJEA, to enforce my statutoryrights as a father and attorney (http://www.liamsdad.org/others/isidoro.shtml); and,

(b) because I exercised my First Amendment right to petition Congress to oppose

the confirmation of John G. Roberts based on his false statement to Congress and

other acts outside of his judicial capacity in furtherance of aiding and abetting the

criminal obstruction of my right as a father to compel DOJ to comply the Treaty

and Virginia's UCCJEA (http://www.home.earthlink.net/~isidoror/id6.html) (Void

order of 11/27/06 http://www.vsb.org/profguides/actions_jul06-dec06.html) .

Based on the above act, as explained in open letters to members of both the

Senate and House, Eric Holder will be sued in a civil action under the Racketeer

Influence and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"), 18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq.,

http://capwiz.com/congressorg/sbx/f/?aid=12313551&r=1; and,

http://capwiz.com/congressorg/sbx/f/?aid=12332481&r=1. Therefore, it would be

inappropriate to name Eric Holder as the chief law enforcement officer of the

United States, pending the outcome of a jury verdict.

At this critical time for our Republic the Congress must restore the Rule of

Law, as well as the integrity and public confidence in DOJ and the Courts by

assuring that all proposed appointees to DOJ comply with the words inscribed on

the Robert F. Kennedy Justice Department Building: "No Free Government Can

Survive That Is Not Based on The Supremacy of Law. Where Law ends, Tyranny

Begins, Law Alone Can Give Us Freedom." As President-elect Obama stated the

"Attorney General serves the American people."

The dangers to our Republic and citizens by the policy of collusion of DOJ

with the Federal Courts to usurp Congress' authority are real. As explained by

former Senator Dennis DeConcini (Ret),

". . . the Courts in our judicial system have, in fact, become the lawmakers,

when it is very clear . . . that our Constitution delegated that responsibility to the

Congress of the United States and the State Legislatures . . . the legal profession

has truly changed from being one of the premier professions in our society to a

business where the number one objective or bottom line is financial profit . . . " The

Fraternity: Lawyers and Judges in Collusion, by John Fitzgerald Molloy. St. Paul,

Minn.: Paragon House.

Thus, the Senate must confirm that the next Attorney General is an attorney

who "serves the American people," not just Administration or President. The

Senate must now take the opportunity to make certain that both DOJ and the

Courts return to the Rule of Law and comply with the mandate of separation of

power and checks and balances.

This is because the lessons from history have shown that,

Once certain checks and balances are destroyed, and once certain institutions

have been intimidated, the pressure that can turn an open society into a closed

one-turn into direct assaults; at that point events tend to occur very rapidly, and a

point comes at which there is no easy turning back to the way it used to be. Naomi

Wolf, The End of America: Letter of Warning To A Young Patriot, p. 14, Chelsea

Green Publishing, Vermont, 2007.

Remember, "..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,

tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." - Samuel Adams

For the foregoing reasons, I respectfully request your assistance in my

obtaining time to testify and present evidence in opposition to confirmation of Eric

Holder at the Senate's Judiciary Committee hearing on January 15, 2009.

___________________________________--

Finally, Regarding my fight against the malfeasance of both the Federal and Virginia judiciary, in collusion with the U.S. Department of Justice and respective State law enforcement authority, as explained I will be suing Holder and Roberts again in their individual capacity-since the courts too have denied access to a jury trial and access to an impartial court by hold that DOJ and they are absolutely immune from suit for tortious and criminal acts!

How this relates all of us is:

First, to secure this policy, the U.S. Judicial Conference moved from an administrative arm of the courts, to a policy arm which provided a forum where the Chief Justice and the Attorney General are legislative authorized to confer on judicial policy. Thus over the past 30 years the evidence confirms their doing almost totally away with jury civil trials, the use of Article I Magistrates, the expanded use of summary judgments, the use of unpublished opinions, complicated local rules which make null and void the objective of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to simplify civil litigation, and the almost doing way with aggressive pro hoc vice civil rights attorneys; and,

Second, to secure this policy through the U.S. Judicial Conference in the Federal Courts have permitted State Bars the role of "courts" and their member as "judges,"--in violation of the Constitutions.

This has usurped the legislative authority of Congress and the State legislature. This is why it is a good time to take the issue to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary.

In closing, "[f]ind out just what the people will submit to and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress. -- Frederick Douglass, civil rights activist, Aug. 4, 1857.

If you have not lease review and sign a Petition to General Assembly of Virginia to Investigate the illegal collusion of the Executive Branch with the Judicial Branch to usurp the restrictions and limitations placed on them by the Constitution: http://www.PetitionOnline.com/RDL/petition.html

I wish you all the best for the Holidays and New Year.

Very truly yours,

Isidoro Rodriguez, Esq.

THE LAW OFFICES OF ISIDORO RODRIGUEZ

ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW

Northern Virginia Office

7924 Peyton Forest Trail

Annandale, Virginia 22003-1560

Telephone: 703.573.1571/telefax: 571.423.5066

Mobil: 703.470.1457

Email: isidoror@earthlink.net


Posted By: Anonymous (November 25, 2008 at 1:09 PM)

"'You could have had an administration with a sprinkling of Clinton people, it would have been fine,' said Robert Kuttner,...


Posted By: jrseaver36@msn.com (November 25, 2008 at 8:25 AM)

Change is not something you watch like a football game. President-elect Obama isn't even in office yet, and some of these commenters criticize the transition for lack of change?

If most of the negative commenters forgot their own viewpoints for a few minutes, a different storyline could unfold. Regardless of your political affiliation, the speed of the transition in forming a Cabinet is really surprising as is the fact that a major stimulus package is now being worked on for passage in January. It has only been three weeks since election day!

The most amazing thing about this presidential transition is the change in selection (what we have seen so far) of people with experience in government and industry, with outstanding credentials among their peers, with solid ideas and creative ingenuity. Compare the team we have so far with the present Bush Cabinet. Compare George W. Bush and Barack H. Obama for that matter. Nothing negative is intended here, but everyone has to admit the big advantage the Illinois senator has in intellect, education and organizational skills with the present occupant of the White House.

If you forget politics for a while, you might discover that this organizing of an administration is far more impressive than organizing a football team for a run to the Superbowl. And the biggest change to watch for is in how you think of yourself in relation to this country as a whole and how you participate in the decisions that shape your life. As Gandhi taught, we must become the change we expect to see in the world. Take a look at what you write and say and see what changes each of us can make to improve the community where we live and work. Life next year has to be better than what we experience now simply because we all decide to make it so.