Archives » Tuesday, December 02, 2008
-
Daniel Stone
|
Dec 2, 2008 07:18 PM
Little of Barack Obama's press conference this week came as a surprise. The president elect's announcement of five top cabinet officials was hardly more than the confirmation of rumors that have swirled for weeks. Gates at Defense? Knew it. Holder at Justice? Old news. Even Hillary at State didn't come as a shock.
But the bigger name of the week is Janet Napolitano, the Arizona governor who Obama tapped to lead Homeland Security. Sure her named had floated for the position and the rumors that she was Obama's top choice had leaked out even before Thanksgiving, but that he actually chose her is, well, a bit surprising. Why? Because the effect of leaving her current post as governor of Arizona won't be all good news for Obama and the Democrats.
That's not to say that Napolitano won't make a good leader of DHS. She probably will. But she will for the exact same reason that any other qualified public official would also be good in the role. It's a brand new job (created by the Bush Administration after 9/11) with few specific duties. It's a monitoring agency that does things like threat assessment, setting the colored ladder of the threat level. (It now sits at Yellow, by the way). The broader objectives -- protecting against terror attacks and coordinating the federal response to natural disasters -- are things that other agencies, like the CIA, Department of Defense and FEMA used to do before DHS was created. Not to mention that even with the job description in mind, Napolitano has little public experience on issues of national security and disaster preparedness and relief. (To be fair, neither did Tom Ridge and Michael Chertoff, who were the first two to sit in DHS' corner office).
All of which is to say that Napolitano, sitting in an office that doesn't really fit her experience in a department that hasn't really existed long enough to assert its relevance, is kind of a waste.
Now before you write angry comments, here's why: Napolitano is an all-star governor, who's done good things for Arizona, like turning a large deficit into a surplus and cranking up education funding. But her absence means a much less balanced outlook for Arizona, especially in the view of Democrats. Upon resigning, her replacement will be Jan Brewer, Arizona's Secretary of State, who is a Republican. She will govern with the Republican house and the Republican senate, which means quite a red zone for Democratic policymakers and strategists. Napolitano's unique ability as a Democratic governor was to avoid partisan deadlock and provide political balance. Now, with her moving to Washington, Arizona becomes much harder to handle for Democrats. And they'll need to work with the state, especially on national policy issues like immigration and renewable energy production.
More
