Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
  • Why Was AIDS Relief Chief Let Go?

    Newsweek | Jan 30, 2009 04:27 PM
    By Eve Conant

    Among the Bush administration’s few undisputed successes was its aggressive fight against the global spread of HIV and AIDS. Liberals and conservatives, evangelicals and scientists didn’t agree on much during the last eight years, but they were unified in their enthusiasm for PEPFAR, the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, which Congress recently voted to expand into a $48 billion commitment, the largest by any nation, to combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis worldwide. So when PEPFAR’s respected director, Dr. Mark Dybul, was swiftly and surprisingly pushed out of his job the day after President Obama’s inauguration, AIDS activists began to worry that the new administration might fumble the one thing the old group got right.

    According to a column in by Michael Gerson in The Washington Post, Dybul had been asked to stay on for “several months,” but then suddenly found himself out of a job on Jan. 21. Dybul, an openly gay physician, had been “scapegoated for the marginal portions of the Bush AIDS initiative such as an emphasis on sexual abstinence and a ban on aiding prostitutes,” according to a San Francisco Chronicle op-ed Friday. “These are intemperate charges that miss the big picture: a conservative in the White House that woke up to a global scourge and actually did something.” Since its launch in 2003, the program has supported life-saving antiretroviral treatment for more than 2.1 million men, women and children, and under Bush its funding and bipartisan support had both steadily grown. In a statement to Newsweek, Pastor Rick Warren, who gave the invocation at Obama’s inauguration, and his wife Kay said Dybul’s “abrupt removal leaves both the initiative and the millions of people who depend on it at risk at a critical time of growth.” But evangelical leaders and conservative columnists are hardly the only voices of concern. AIDS advocates, medical students and former Obama volunteers have been firing off letters to the new administration pleading for an open process to help identify top candidates for the job, which is an appointed post at the State Department. “[I]t is imperative that the move to fill this position is not made in haste,” urged an editorial in the British medical journal, The Lancet.

    Several names were in circulation this week around Washington, including Dr. Eric Goosby, a former Director of the Office of HIV/AIDS Policy during the Clinton administration and director of the Pangaea Global AIDS Foundation, which in 2002 partnered with the William Jefferson Clinton Foundation for work with the Rwandan government. (Some AIDS advocates are watching closely to see how the connections to the Clinton Foundation may play a role in State Department appointments over the coming weeks). Other possibilities: Harvard’s Jim Yong Kim, former director of the World Health Organization’s HIV/AIDS department, Nils Daulaire, former President and CEO of the Global Health Council. All three declined to comment, as did the State Department, except to say that a replacement has not yet been named. With the economy tanking, AIDS advocates are worried that PEPFAR’s $48 million pledge may be in jeopardy. And with the handling of Dybul’s departure, there are lingering concern that the office may not be accorded the same status as it was under the Bush administration. Looking ahead, they are pinning their hopes now on an open process, with a committee consisting of medical professionals, scientists and civil society leaders to help choose the next director. The argument? Millions of lives are at stake. “There are a lot of global stakeholders who want to be heard,” says Paul Zeitz, executive director of the Global AIDS Alliance. “We’ve been hoping this new administration will carry out business in the transparent way they’ve promised.”

    More
  • The Climate Comes to Washington

    Daniel Stone | Jan 27, 2009 10:39 PM
    The week since President Obama took office have been something of a coming out party for the environmental movement in Washington. It kicked off with several Green Inaugural Balls, bringing together the leading environmental advocates in Washington eager to celebrate having a friend back in the White House. Then Obama announced a series of clean and green energy initiatives, including a review of California's request to regulate its own emissions and the implementation of new fuel efficiency standards for cars.

    But the really groundbreaking announcement came not from Obama, but from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. She showed Monday that the administration wasn't just going to fill old positions with new science-minded and earth-friendly people. No, the administration would create some new ones too. Clinton announced at the State Department Monday a new department -- a special envoy on climate change -- to diplomatically lead, shape and broker America's influence on climate issues and global warming leading up to an important international climate conference later this year. To lead the envoy, Clinton named Todd Stern, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress who worked formerly on climate policy in the Clinton Administration. "Todd is a creative and clear thinker, a man of great sensibility and good judgment," Clinton boasted.

    Environmental leaders immediately started fawning. Stern's new position, and his record, showed that the new president, at least in terms of his promises on the environment, was keeping his promises. "He's actually doing what he said he'd do, look at that!" an excited Gene Karpinski, president of the League of Conservation Voters, told Newsweek. The broad consensus is that for many years, the world has doubted America's commitment to combating climate change, made clear by the Bush Administration's consistent refusal to ratify the Kyoto treaty that would have meant massive industrial cutbacks. But Obama staked nearly a third of his campaign on clean energy and the U.S.'s responsibility to lead the world on climate solutions.

    The federal government has lots of regulatory work to do on environmental and industrial policy. But in green circles, Stern is welcomed as the right man for his new job, which will force him to be half-advocate and half diplomat in order to convince the world that America is serious about curbing global warming. And he'll be on deadline, too. Copenhagen will play host to the all-inclusive United Nations climate conference in December, where Stern will have to ensure the U.S. will have a seat  front-row-center. Several heads of state are expected to attend, perhaps even Obama himself.

    In the new position as head of the envoy, Stern seemed eager and excited, beaming at Clinton's press conference announcing him. And he has surprisingly few critics from the broad green scene that often has trouble agreeing. LCV's Karpinksi likes him ("Todd has tremendous experience and is smart and strategic. What's more, he's politically savvy."), as does Alden Meyer, director of strategy and policy on global warming at the Union of Concerned Scientists, the Washington science advocacy group that was often frustrated with the science-lite Bush Administration. "This is a complicated game of three-dimensional chess and it's good news that Todd knows the issue," says Meyer. "He has relationships with people abroad. He comes in with a very good sense for the landscape."

    But with Stern beginning the work of amplifying Obama's intent to lead on climate change, the industries and leaders who have long fought against environmental issues as detrimental to future economic development see Stern's new job as a bad sign of what's to come. Oklahoma Senator James Inhofe, perennial climate change denier, belittled the value of the new position under the State Department, saying it was new in name, but not actually a new job and would have little effect. "Mr. Stern will have his work cut out for him trying to negotiate the details for developing nations to adhere to measurable, reportable, and verifiable emissions cuts as agreed to in the Bali Action Plan,” Inhofe wrote in an e-mail to Newsweek. Some contributors to online forums also tisked at the appointment, arguing that since early effects of climate change are inevitable, a truly visionary response would be to lead the way in trying to plan for what's to come. Not to try to play catch-up on the missteps of the past.

    More
  • Advertisement
  • Kanye West? Rosario Dawson? An Adorably 'Old School' Slow Dance? Things Just Ain't What They Used to Be.

    Andrew Romano | Jan 20, 2009 10:02 PM


    My, how things have changed.

    I first saw Barack Obama in person on Thursday, Sept. 27, 2007. As I wrote at the time, he'd "closed off Washington Square Park, 9.75 greenish acres at the heart of Greenwich Village and New York University, and welcomed dozens of Secret Service agents, scores of cops, four giant metal detectors, a herd of police dogs and, ultimately, 24,000 supporters, curious locals, ’60s holdovers, dog walkers, yoga devotees and punk rockers... to his first Big Apple rally (and largest event to date)." I didn't know what to expect. Not so much from the senator himself; I'd been following his career, like most other political junkies, for years. But the whole Obamastock experience was new to me. Which is why I was pleasantly surprised to discover that, despite all the security, I was able to wander wherever I wanted and interview whomever I wanted. I was even able to get one of Obama's top press people on the phone. No hassle.

    I mention the Washington Square Park rally because it's superficially similar to tonight's Youth Ball, which I just finished "covering" here at the Washington Hilton. Both events boasted rosters of "young" and/or "hip" recording artists (rapper Jin and indie-rock group The Northern at Washington Square Park; Kid Rock, Kanye West and Fall Out Boy at the Youth Ball). Both attracted a few celebs (Geoffrey Wright then, Rosario Dawson now). And both crowds were heavy on the 18-35 demographic. But as I said, things have changed. To get into tonight's gala--one of the hottest of the 10 official Inaugural Balls--we media types not only had to pass through the usual metal detector; we had to wait until the Secret Service dogs had approved our bags--an olfactory ordeal that took, oh, 30 minutes--then follow a vigilant volunteer past the souvenir stands (panoramic, prom-style portraits: only $423!), the partygoers and, most depressingly, the bar, only to arrive at a heavily guarded holding pen in the far corner of the ballroom. Want water? A volunteer must escort you. Need to pee? Same deal. Ask nicely, and they'll even fetch you a real, live youth to interview. Needless to say, actual "reporting" doesn't really thrive in such barren soil.

    Now, it's not like I'm complaining. I totally understand why tonight's measures were, if not necessary, then at least reasonable. But it's still worth noting how much of a difference a year and a half makes--not to mention a favorable outcome on Election Day. In most of the important ways, tonight's Youth Ball was far superior to the Washington Square Park event. Kanye West is, like, a million times awesomer than The Northern (he even wrote a special "Heartless" coda--"anything you dream can come true tonight"--for the occasion). It was pretty inspiring to watch my fellow millennials--who, believe it or not, were split between Hillary Clinton and Obama in September 2007--celebrating the candidate they wound up propelling to the presidency. And nothing I've seen since arriving in D.C. on Sunday has been as moving as the Michelle-Barack slow dance--or as funny as Obama's post-dance punchline. "That's what's called 'old school,'" he informed us.

    So yeah. Presidents can definitely throw better parties than struggling, second-place presidential candidates. Still, I couldn't help thinking back fondly on Washington Square Park--from my current seat in the press corral.

    Oh well. Four more years.

    P.S. Yes, I had to (briefly) give my minders the slip to capture the video above. The things I do for Newsweek.

    More
  • Obama to World: 'We're Ready to Lead Again'

    Michael Hirsh | Jan 20, 2009 08:10 PM
    It was all a bad dream. Or at least you can pretend it was. That was pretty much Barack Obama's message to the rest of the world in his inaugural address on Tuesday. Obama couldn't have been more clear if he had declared that he was filing for divorce from everything George W. Bush represented for the last eight years.

    Jammed in among the throng on the national mall, which included many visiting foreigners, I was one of those who waited for that signature line we were sure would become our generation's "Ask not..." moment. It never really came. Instead the new president delivered a devastating repudiation of his predecessor's policies and this workmanlike message: "We are ready to lead once again."

    Rather than evoke America's new rendezvous with destiny in lyrical but vague tones, Obama described the nation's challenge of "remaking" itself in clear but mostly negative terms: This, world, is what we will NOT do any longer. "We regard as false the choice between our safety and our ideals," Obama said. In other words, no more waterboarding. "Our power grows through its prudent use; our security emanates from the justness of our cause." In other words, we'll no longer go tearing off into new wars no one else supports and we can't afford.

    And in perhaps his most complete annulment of Bush's legacy--and what may have been his best line--Obama told the haters of America, the evil-doers Bush refused to speak to, that "we will extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist." The German woman standing next to me cheered wildly when she heard Obama conclude, "...nor can we consume the world's resources without regard to effect."

    It wasn't poetry. But to foreign ears, it was all music. Just as important, it is a clean slate. And maybe that's enough for now.

    More
  • Gibbs: 'I Hope They Have Furniture for Us'

    Daniel Stone | Jan 20, 2009 07:38 PM

    In the hallway to get back into the capitol after President Obama was sworn in, Robert Gibbs ran into a wall of security. The newly-minted White House press secretary was not allowed to pass, as agents prepared for Obama and President Bush to pass through the same hallway moments later. Stuck in the same holding pattern, I dutifully identified myself and we started to talk—a talk that was Gibb's first interview in his new official government role.

    When asked how quickly Obama will get to work, signing executive orders and new legislation, Obama won't make any major presidential moves until tomorrow. His first actions, according to Gibbs, will be assembling his economic and foreign policy teams to discuss quick action on both fronts. And when Obama does sign his first executive order "its going to focus on transparency in government," says Gibbs. "That's something he wants to start on first." He confirmed that anything the president signs will be available first on whitehouse.gov.

    When asked about Obamas mood this morning and over the past few days, Gibbs says that the new president is mindful of the significance. "This day has finally arrived and he understands how big it really is. Yesterday and today, I've seen him more calm and confident than I think I ever have."

    For now, Gibbs said that the new executive party will be enjoying the day, and the evenings galas, with no plans to get immediately to work. But, addressing earlier news reports, he confirmed that van loads of executive staff left the capitol after the ceremony to get immediately to work. "I just hope there is furniture in there for us" he said.

    Nearing the end of our short chat, Gibbs glanced down to look at his BlackBerry. "Oh look at that, they just turned my email on, and people are already writing" he laughed, referencing his new whitehouse.gov email address.

    Then, a friend of Gibbs standing with us, knocked on the door. "Excuse us" he pleaded with the police officer playing door keeper, "he needs to get through. He's the press secretary to the president."

    Clearly surprised, Gibbs looked around. "That sounds pretty good, doesn't it?" he said to me. "I've never heard my name like that before."

    More
  • The Speech: Conservatives Weigh In

    Katie Paul | Jan 20, 2009 06:57 PM

    Yeah, we know. You millions of Obama acolytes freezing your tuchises off today liked the Inaugural Address. We heard your approval, loud and clear. But enough with the cheering already, D.C. It's been hours. Time for a new take. We want to know what conservatives think of the speech. Out, damn hope! Bring on the haters!

    In that spirit, here's a roundup of conservative bloggers' reactions to the speech. Brace yourself: even some of them are (gasp!) cheering, too.

    “A very good speech,” proclaimed Michael Goldfarb at The Weekly Standard. Obama didn't revise American history to suit present celebrations, he said, as did others on the stage with him. "I think there was a lot to like there for those whose greatest concern is that Obama is soft--that he doesn't appreciate the role violence has played in forging our democracy." He quibbled that Obama refused to use the word "victory" in his discussion of Iraq and Afghanistan, but acknowledged it was a minor point.

    The team at National Review's The Corner had mixed opinions, but they skewed positive. Charles Kesler said ho-hum to the responsibility theme Obama chose, but gave props to his effort to take back patriotism and religion from their seemingly exclusively conservative domain. “President Obama’s speech was interesting, dignified, and unmemorable, like so many inaugural addresses,” he wrote, but gave Obama credit for handling "with grace" his unique place in history. Ramesh Ponnuru thought Obama a very compelling performer, but found the speech itself pedestrian. Jay Nordlinger admired its brevity, but ranted about its indirect slights to Bush, which he found quite rude. In the most ringing endorsement of all, Michael Knox Beran called the speech a home run. "On the whole I was impressed by the new President’s tone, by his précis of the American tradition, by the tribute he paid to our forebears and to those 'guardians of our liberty' who are making sacrifices today, and by my sense that he himself is acutely conscious of the preciousness of the legacy with which he has been entrusted."

    Michelle Malkin had few kind words
    for Obama and his supporters, but cooed over the musical acts by Aretha Franklin, Itzhak Perlman, and Yo-Yo Ma. Her whole take on the speech: “’Transform’ this and that. Wallet feeling emptier by the second.”

    Mitt Romney chimed in with some generally positive feedback at the Wall Street Journal’s Washington Wire. “Barack Obama gave a speech from the middle. He once again is communicating that he intends to govern from the middle and not from the wing,” he wrote. “It was a speech that could be offered by a leader from either party and that’s good.”

    At Redstate, Leon H. Wolf expressed his hope that Barack Obama will be a failure as president, despite many of his fellow conservatives’ inclinations to give the new guy the benefit of the doubt. When the trains run on time, he reasons, people are less likely to give their presidents a tough time about their moral failings, which he says Barack Obama has in abundance.

    “Quite good for what it was,” Paul Mirengoff at Powerline wrote, citing decent text and a strong oratory. The vision of postpartisan harmony is bunk, he maintains, but he’s confident that Obama believes more in his own greatness than in his own rhetoric. When it comes to politicians, that, at least, is a known quality.

    Update: I slighted Jay Nordlinger by failing to provide a link to his commentary, as he noted here. It was an inadvertent mishap. His original commentary can be found here.

    More
  • Holding Out in Hillaryland

    Newsweek | Jan 20, 2009 06:43 PM

    Will Bower, 36, walked around the Mall with millions of other Americans this morning. But unlike nearly everyone else in the crowd, Bower wasn’t cheering. He wore a Hillary Clinton tee shirt (adorned with a Hillary for President sticker) to show his support for the woman he feels the Democratic Party and a sexist media stole the election from. Bower recently left his job as an intellectual property researcher at Thomson Reuters in order to work full time for the pro-Clinton group he co-founded, PUMA (Party Unity My Ass) ‘08. Bower, who is now living off of savings to work full time on what he calls his “labor of love,” has focused his efforts on reforming the primary system, which he says is undemocratic. Newsweek's Suzanne Smalley spoke with Bower by phone today.

    NEWSWEEK: Is PUMA still active?


    Bower: Yes. People feel like we don’t have a clear objective. The problem is we have many clear objectives. During the 2008 primaries, so many things went wrong and we were inspired by so many of them–primary reform, misogyny in media, media reform….There are many different PUMAs [dedicated to different issues].

    What do you mean by many different PUMAs?

    There are a lot of different PUMA web sites and PUMA actions. There is still plenty of emailing and web activity. We all have different web sites and leaders. We all get along and agree on most things. My biggest thing is the need for primary reform...That’s probably not going to be a hot topic for a few years, but I’m working on it for down the road. I’m working on lobbying the Republican National Committee to work on primary reform there…I want them to learn from the mistakes the Democrats made in 2008. The primacy of Iowa and New Hampshire–why are we held hostage by these two small states? It’s insanity.

    Are they not representative states?

    No, they’re really not. Everyone thinks Iowa has this really engaged citizenry and they know what they’re doing. But fewer than 10 percent of Iowa voters participate….Since 1972 the caucuses have failed Democrats at every turn. [Some people will say] Obama won Iowa and went on to win. Well, we’ll see in four years whether Iowa has really served us. It’s basically about who has the best ground game.

    Do you plan on working for PUMA indefinitely?

    I intend on being critical of Barack Obama for the next four years. I do recognize him as president. I think he’s the rightful president, but I don’t think he’s the rightful leader of the Democratic Party. That sounds ironic, but I believe that Hillary Clinton…was the winner and represented the will of the people. She is my political leader….I wanted her to stay in the Senate, be the lion of the Senate, the next Ted Kennedy. I wanted her to be her own boss…and represent the 18 million who voted for her. Now that she’s in the executive branch I’m looking at her as our shadow president…A lot of us are taking comfort in the fact that she’ll be our shadow president and someone to look out for our interests abroad.

    Did you go to the inauguration?

    I wasn’t going to go out to the festivities, but I went out in my Hillary gear [a tee shirt depicting Clinton as Rosie the Riveter].…There were two thumbs ups, a couple of scoffs, and a lot of stares.

    Why did you go?

    I was going to lock myself in and not watch TV and I got a few calls from friends saying, ‘Aren’t you going to participate?’…And then I said I might as well go outside and watch and then I thought I might as well be supportive of Hillary while I do it.

    How does it make you feel seeing all of the exuberance over Obama and his inauguration?

    I feel that this is supposed to be Hillary’s day, to be honest. I feel he’s unqualified….A lot of what scares me is Obama mania and all. I feel like I’m living in "American Idol," a four-year episode of "American Idol"…It feels like mass hysteria–the pictures, the jargon….If this were all going on for Hillary I’d like to think I’d take a step back and say, ‘This is crazy.’ It is a little unsettling, the fanaticism.

    What is your reaction to what Jill Biden said on the Oprah Winfrey Show yesterday [that her husband, Vice President Joe Biden, was given his choice of jobs – secretary of state or vice president]?

    It seems like it’s a never-ending stream of minor insults. Every step of the way the Obama administration finds a way to insult Hillary. They’re finding a way to take another jab at Hillary–that she got sloppy seconds….The fact that Dr. Biden was so casual about something like that means a lot.

    When you say it means a lot what do you mean?


    I don’t think these are naïve people. She’s a politician’s wife…It’s hard to believe someone would be that careless on Oprah.

    Tell me more about your focus on primary reform.

    It took one state to determine who our candidate would be (in 2004). I’m from Ohio and knew John Kerry would not win Ohio so I felt trapped by what Iowa had done to us….When I saw what happened in 2004 I wrote a proposal in December 2007 and that was published. Then Huffington Post picked it up. I want a truly mathematical, geometrical system…to order primaries based on margins of victory in the general election before…to focus on the Ohios, Pennsylvanias and Wisconsins and Floridas – the states right in the middle, the purple states. Parties go after those states anyway; we might as well tailor our primaries that way, to appeal to voters in those states instead of getting candidates who appeal to extremes, John Kerry on one side and George Bush on the other.

    Were you one of the PUMAs supporting McCain?

    I was…for a few reasons. I wanted McCain to win so I could go back to being a Democrat, so the behavior in the primaries would not be rewarded. I went on to genuinely like McCain. It gave me a chance to get outside of the Democrat bubble I’ve been living in. I’ve voted for 18 years and never voted for anything but Democrats. It started as a protest vote and I ended up liking and admiring John McCain. Now I call myself an independent Democrat kind of like Joe Lieberman.

    Given all the problems facing us, are you rooting for Obama to succeed?

    Yes. I don’t want him to fail; that would be bad for the country. I plan on being critical of him though. He’s already dropped the ball. He campaigned on the fact that he would lift the Bush ban [on stem cells and] now is saying, ‘Leave it to Congress.’…The pledges [he made] were political in nature. There was very little conviction behind them and it surprises me how few Democrats see that. I’m going to do my best to get Democrats and liberals to hold him accountable.

    More
  • From Where I Sat - An Unscientific Roundup

    Katie Connolly | Jan 20, 2009 06:03 PM

    I was fortunate enough to be in the Orange section of the crowd at today's inauguration ceremony--yep, right down the front, on the southwest side of the Capitol. I couldn't really see much, and you've probably seen the best shots on TV already and heard the enormous applause and spontaneous "O-ba-ma" and "Yes We Can" chants. But for those who weren't lucky enough to be in the crowd, I thought you might enjoy a completely unscientific wrap-up of what I heard in the crowd around me.

    • Person who got a surprisingly passionate series of boos: Joe Lieberman
    • Person who got a surprisingly enthusiastic cheer: Colin Powell
    • Person who I thought would get a few cheers but was greeted with silence: John McCain
    • Person who elicited the funniest heckles: Dick Cheney
    • Person who got an uncomfortable spattering of golf claps and a few boos (and many boos in other sections): George W. Bush
    • People outside of the Obama family who got the biggest cheers: Bill and Hillary Clinton
    • Former official, outside of the Clinton family, who got the biggest cheers: Al Gore
    • Line of Obama's speech that elicited the biggest cheer (in my section): "We say to you now that our spirit is stronger and cannot be broken; you cannot outlast us, and we will defeat you."
    • Runner up for most popular line (amongst people in my section): "Know that your people will judge you on what you can build, not what you destroy."
    • Most amusing insult to naughty people trying to cut in line: "Obama can see you!"
    • Loudest exclamation of relief as Marine One took off, carrying Former President Bush one last time: "I can breathe again!"

    More
  • The Cabinet, With One Major Exception

    Daniel Stone | Jan 20, 2009 05:44 PM
    Immediately after the inaugural luncheon, a majority of the senate met in the chamber for a brief session before the inaugural parade and tonight's festivities. Several minutes into the session (and after a brief moment of silence for Senator Edward Kennedy, who suffered a seizure during the lunch), majority leader Harry Reid turned the chamber toward business.

    "President Obama has nominated a cabinet of exceptionally bright and capable people as indicated by the support from all over America," he said..."So I ask unanimous consent that the senate proceed to the executive session to consider nominations."

    With unanimous consent, the body then confirmed the following seven nominees:

    Steven Chu: secretary of energy
    Arne Duncan: secretary of education
    Janet Napolitano: secretary of homeland security
    Peter Orszag: director of the office of management and budget
    Ken Salazar: secretary of the interior
    Eric Shinseki: secretary of veterans affairs
    Tom Vilsack: secretary of agriculture

    The one name noticeably missing from the list is Hillary Clinton, Obama's appointee to be secretary of state. Early Tuesday, Texas Republican Senator John Cornyn raised objections to a speedy approval of Clinton, indicating that he had further questions he wanted answered regarding the donors to Bill Clinton's foundation. With senate confirmations, a single objection can hold up a vote on an appointee. A spokesperson for Reid said that Hillary's nomination will be voted on shortly, as early as tomorrow.

    More
  • Edward Kennedy Collapses at Obama Lunch

    Daniel Stone | Jan 20, 2009 04:07 PM

    Barack Obama's post-inaugural lunch had hardly begun when Massachusetts Senator Edward Kennedy collapsed with a seizure, according to a House spokesperson. Reporters in a room outside the luncheon heard a shriek, then witnessed several people running through the rotunda toward Statuary Hall. Kennedy was taken out of the room on a wheelchair into an adjacent room.

    The seizure lasted about a minute. Kennedy started shaking in his chair, then convulsing. After Teresa Heinz Kerry briefly tried to administer first aid, Utah Senator Orrin Hatch and Massachusetts Senator John Kerry left with Kennedy, who was in a wheelchair. According to Hatch, Kennedy was conscious the whole time. After he was taken out, a prayer was offered. Georgia Representative John Lewis says Kennedy is now doing better, responding to medication.

    In the room, everyone reports hearing people yell "Move!", almost before most people noticed that Kennedy was convulsing. President Obama, along with Hatch, helped get Kennedy out of the room. Connecticut Senator Christopher Dodd says that he escorted Kennedy to an ambulance: "He was joking as he got into the ambulance, saying 'well, I guess ill see you later' -- he's doing much better now and will be just fine." Several dozen senators left the luncheon in a clearly emotional state, especially Senator Kerry, who walked by yelling reporters but declined to talk.

    Early reports said that it was Senator Robert Byrd, not Kennedy, who collapsed. In fact, and to the confusion of several people in the room, Byrd had left moments earlier for a different health reason that's still unclear, though the Los Angeles Times reports that the senator's staff says he is in good condition.

    Later in the afternoon, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid took the senate floor to lead a brief session following the inaugural luncheon. "Our minds are not really on the events of today, but for the fact that senator Kennedy took ill during the lunch and is now in a Washington hospital. He and I sat together at the inauguration. We had such a wonderful time visiting and talking about where we were and where we are."

    He then asked the assembled senate to bow  and pray during a silent moment.

    More
  • Slideshow: Spotted at the Inauguration...

    Andrew Romano | Jan 20, 2009 03:13 PM
     
    ... Mr. James Taylor, awaiting security screening. As far as I could tell, Taylor was only packing a single weapon: his dulcet, understated tenor.
     

    ... Mr. Dustin Hoffman, seated a few rows in front of your humble correspondent.

    ... Mayor Michael Bloomberg, seated a few rows behind your humble correspondent. Clearly we were positioned in ascending order of political influence.

    ... Mr. President.

     
    ... and the only guy who may have provoked a noisier reaction from the crowd (where I was standing) than Barack Obama: former president George W. Bush. At least, that is, when his chopper finally took off. Most excited, perhaps, was the middle-aged black guy who shouted "Don't run out of gas before you get to Texas!" to the departing aircraft (he also offered to fly it himself, presumably on a kamikaze mission). "Shoulda taken that trip four years ago," he added. "I might still have some money." "Eight years ago," a nearby woman said. "Never should have been here in the first place." Over my shoulder, I heard a college student admit that she "felt kind of sorry for the guy." Judging by the cheers, she was in the minority.
    More
  • Text of the Obama Inauguration Speech

    Newsweek | Jan 20, 2009 12:06 PM

    My fellow citizens:

    I stand here today humbled by the task before us, grateful for the trust you have bestowed, mindful of the sacrifices borne by our ancestors.  I thank President Bush for his service to our nation, as well as the generosity and cooperation he has shown throughout this transition.  

    Forty-four Americans have now taken the presidential oath.  The words have been spoken during rising tides of prosperity and the still waters of peace.  Yet, every so often the oath is taken amidst gathering clouds and raging storms.  At these moments, America has carried on not simply because of the skill or vision of those in high office, but because We the People have remained faithful to the ideals of our forbearers, and true to our founding documents.  

    So it has been.  So it must be with this generation of Americans. 

    More
  • Guess the Kegs Didn't Make it Through Security

    Holly Bailey | Jan 20, 2009 11:52 AM
    After the service at St. John's Church, the Obamas drove the short block drive to the White House, where they were greeted on the North Portico by the President Bush and his wife, Laura. The two couples, joined by the Bidens, had coffee at the White House before departing in a combined motorcade on the way to the Capitol. Passing the Treasury Department along East Executive Drive, this reporter spied several cases of beer stashed on a Treasury balcony overlooking the East Wing of the White House. There appeared to be at least five cases of Budweiser and several cases of Amstel Light. Who can blame them? With the economy in the tank, we'd drink too.

    Driving along Pennsylvania Avenue, the motorcade passed thousands of cheering spectators—with some exceptions. Near the FBI building, there were several dozen protesters holding large signs that read "Arrest Bush." But Obama had some haters too. In the shadow of the Capitol, several dozen protesters held signs that read "Bloody Obama," "America is Doomed," and "The Beast," that featured a profile photo of Obama. A red, white and blue sign read, "God Hates You."

    More
  • On the Metro, We Hear America Sing

    Howard Fineman | Jan 20, 2009 11:13 AM
    From my seat facing the podium, I can see the flags and the somber dignitaries. On the subway ride here to the Capitol, I saw America smiling. With New York City cops expertly herding the crowds, more than a million riders worked their way to the Mall, and I talked to some of them on the Red and Blue lines here. Each had something to say about their hopes for and expectations of Barack Obama.

    People from across the country were on the trains. Ed Potocek and Amy Santacaterina had flown in from Chicago. Both 46, he was in software; she worked for city government. "To me Obama represents accountability and participation," said Ed. "The idea that everyone pitches in." Amy said she felt ties to everyone. "I never hugged so many strangers in my life. Obama is a citizen of America -- and the world."

    I met two families from New Orleans, the Bosticks and the Ramonds. For their teenage kids, Obama was about one word: change. "Change and history," said Ana Bostick, 17. "He's the first black president!!"

    Rose Cooper, a city school teacher from Galveston with more than 20 years of experience, sais that Obama was going to have to be about "sticking with his promises. We're losing so many jobs. He needs to turn it around." She had a special mission here: to record everything for her students. "They kept saying, 'Ms. Cooper we can't believe you're going!' Well, here I am!"

    I met Andy Towle and Corey Johnson, gay activists who run the popular blog towleroad.com. They were happy, too, but not about Obama's decision to ask the Rev. Rick Warren to give the invocation. "Obama's first and only big mistake so far," said Johnson.

    Even the press line into the grounds was wonderfully American in its diversity. There was Charles Hallman, who works for the oldest African-American newspaper in Minnesota. And I met Sara Hassan, 27, a fellow graduate of the Columbia Journalism School. She is Bangladeshi-American. She wore a headscarf. Her father teaches English literature at a college in South Carolina. His specialty is Irish modern poetry.

    Welcome to Obama's America!

    James Joyce wrote that his aspiring character Stephen yearned to "forge in the smithy of his soul" a new identity as an artist. America is forging (reforging) its own identity today.
    More
  • A Few Hints on the Speech Obama Will Give Today

    Holly Bailey | Jan 20, 2009 11:05 AM

    Barack Obama began working on his inaugural address almost two months ago, according to senior aides to the incoming president. The week before Thanksgiving, the president-elect sat down with his speechwriting team, including top writer Jon Favreau, to sketch out broad themes of what he wanted to say today. Favreau completed a first draft by the first week of December. Shortly before Obama left for Hawaii for his Christmas vacation, the incoming president went over the draft with Favreau, who wrote a second version of the speech over the holidays. Yet aides say it was Obama who ultimately wrote the bulk of the speech.  Two weekends ago, Obama holed up in his room at the Hay Adams Hotel in Washington, where he and his family stayed earlier this month, and worked on what aides described as “extensive writing” on his own. “He had very strong ideas early on about what he wanted to convey,” a senior Obama aide tells Newsweek. The speech you’ll hear today is more than 60 percent Obama’s own words, the aide adds.

    Obama has said he re-read inaugural addresses delivered by Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy, whose speech he described as “intimidating.” Indeed, upon completing the bulk of the speech today, Obama asked Ted Sorenson, Kennedy’s chief speechwriter, to read a draft of his speech and give input. According to Obama aides, the speech was also read by historians Doris Kearns Goodwin, author of the Lincoln biography “Team of Rivals,” which has been mentioned as one of Obama’s favorite books, and David McCullough. It’s unclear how much advice the group gave Obama and his team, though the broad overviews of the speech provided in advance by aides do hint at the sweeping rhetoric of JFK and Lincoln, two presidents who led the country at transformational times.

    In the speech, according to aides, Obama will acknowledge that America faces difficult challenges ahead. But, citing the nation’s history of overcoming past struggles without taking “short cuts,” the president-elect will “express optimism and hope” that the nation can rise to the challenge of the “enormity of the task we are facing,” says a senior Obama aide. “The speech will describe the moment we’re in, and the spirit required to emerge from this crisis even stronger and more united than before,” says a senior Obama aide.

    Over the last week, the president-elect has gone through several read-throughs of the speech, which aides say will run between 18 and 20 minutes. The Obama team is expected to release excerpts of what exactly the incoming president will say later this morning.

    More
  • T-Minus One Hour Inside the Capitol

    Daniel Stone | Jan 20, 2009 10:59 AM
    Down on the National Mall, the crowd is loud and fiercely excited, just an hour before the man they came to see will take the presidential oath. But inside the capitol building, you can barely hear a whisper. In the capitol's rotunda, the pool of reporters awaits the president-elect as TV cameras with the network news reporters in front of them practice their live shots and scribble notes. "When the executive party arrives, you'll have to step back," one of several hundred capitol police officers has told us repeatedly. On the other side of the rotunda, photographers review the angles they'll take when Obama enters the room.

    The arrivals have also begun. John Kerry and Al Gore, along with other high profile attendees walked through the rotunda moments ago. We're told many of Obama's cabinet appointees will walk onto the platform together.

    Not far from the media area is the door, adorned with a flag about eight feet tall, where Obama will exit the capitol and step onto the inaugural stand. From there, he'll get the first view of the crowd -- easily approaching two million by now -- that has come to see him take the oath of office. No matter how many people came to cheer for him during the campaign, the view of the entire mall completely covered with cheering people will certainly surprise him.

    Next to the rotunda is Statuary Hall, the traditional venue (dating back to president McKinley) for the inaugural luncheon, hosted by the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies. After the ceremony, Obama will be joined by 220 of his closest friends for a three course lunch. The menu was designed weeks ago, modeled after the tastes of Abraham Lincoln, rather than Obama's. More than 50 servers in white tuxedos await Obama and the high profile guests. Senior members of congress and the new executive staff will join him.

    Reporters, for some reason, weren't invited.
    More
  • A Rocking, Sleepless Night for W and Obama

    Andrew Romano | Jan 20, 2009 10:51 AM
    It's not unusual for an incoming president--or his predecessor, for that matter--to spend the evening before the Inauguration ceremony without the sweet relief of slumber. John Quincy Adams, beset by nerves, suffered through "two successive sleepless nights" before he was sworn in; Bill Clinton was awake until the wee hours frantically rewriting his speech. I suspect it was much the same last night for George W. Bush and Barack Obama. But not, I'm guessing, because of stress or sadness. Why? Because no one can reflect on his inner turmoil when being forced to endure deafening, continuous, all-night blasts of music directly outside his bedroom window.

    In what seems like one of the most brazen invasions of presidential peace and privacy I can imagine, the people in charge of putting on this afternoon's Inaugural parade down Pennsylvania Avenue spent the entire night last night--the entire night--broadcasting song after song after song at bone-crushing volume over the hundreds of massive speakers that dot the National Mall, which just so happens to abut both the White House and the Blair House, where the once and future leaders of the Free World were presumably trying (and failing) to get some shuteye. I know, because another building that abuts the Mall is the Newsweek bureau at 1750 Pennsylvania--where your humble correspondent, long regarded as one of the world's heaviest sleepers, was also trying (and failing) to drift off. Unfortunately for the three of us, the inaugural DJs needed to make sure they could spin, scratch, cut up and crossfade their inaugural records in preparation for today's big event. And they needed the hours from 2:00 to 7:00 to do it. Think of the largest, loudest nightclub you've ever been to. Then multiply it by a hundred.

    Lest I sound bitter, let me note for the record that there is a silver lining to my sleepless night: I can now bring you an exclusive preview of what to expect from this afternoon's soundtrack. According to my sources, which are attached to either side of my head and are still ringing, there may be some Backstreet Boys ("Backstreet's Back"). There may be some Beastie Boys ("Intergalatic Planetary"). And there may be some Bruce Springsteen (but isn't there always?).

    So if you think that Bush and Obama look a little tired today on TV, don't blame nerves. Really, it's all the Boss's fault.

    More
  • At Inaugural Day Prayer Service, Advice for Obama From T.D. Jakes

    Holly Bailey | Jan 20, 2009 10:30 AM
    Everyone’s a photographer today. This morning, Barack and Michelle Obama emerged from Blair House for the block and half drive to St. John’s Episcopal Church, the Lafayette Square institution where George W. Bush, Bill Clinton and other presidents have attended inaugural day prayer services. Inside, Obamas joined Joe Biden and his wife, Jill, on the front row. The service itself was off limits to cameras, but once inside, many attendees, especially those in a balcony overlooking the incoming president and vice president, could be seen snapping photos of the service on their cell phone cameras. Several pastors offered prayers and biblical guidance for Obama, including televangelist T.D. Jakes. “The problems are mighty and the solutions are not simple,” Jakes said, looking Obama square in the eye. “Everywhere you turn there will be a critic waiting to attack every decision that you make. But you are all fired up, Sir, and you are ready to go. And this nation goes with you. God goes with you.” But citing his 14-year-old son, Jakes offered a more pop culture-centric piece of advice. “May the force be with you,” Jakes said. More
  • Scenes From A Metro Stop

    Newsweek | Jan 20, 2009 07:41 AM
    By Jeffrey Bartholet

    A pre-dawn crush of people in the Washington DC Metro, eager to be part of history. The train passes one stop because the platform is overstuffed. At the Capital South Station, packed cars open. There's little room to take actual steps; everyone shuffles. It's a claustrophobic procession, clogging and pressing at a broken escalator. Then someone starts singing, and more join in:

    Oh when the saints go marching in
    When the saints go marching in
    Oh Lord I want to be there in that number
    When the saints go marching in!


    After a few rounds of this, a smaller group starts a new chorus:

    Oh when Obama goes marching in...


    But most people got the point the first time around.

    More
  • Just Another Typical Sunday at 19th Street Baptist Church

    Katie Connolly | Jan 19, 2009 11:18 PM

    Being a reporter in the President-elect’s press pool (that is, the small group of journalists who travels with Obama each day and shares reporting with other media outlets that don’t have a representative that day) is a strange experience. It involves a heck of a lot of waiting around in vans for Obama to do something we can report. Then when he does venture out, life becomes about running really fast to catch him, fumbling with notebooks and recorders, a lingering fear of the motorcade leaving without you, and, if you are me, getting shoved out of the way by burly cameramen desperate to get the perfect shot.

    For the most part, pool duty is a privilege, especially when you find yourself with a front row view of U2 serenading the President-elect with “City of Blinding Lights.” And every now and then you have the rare honor of seeing the President-elect in a moment that is as close to personal as one can be in public. That’s what happened yesterday when I had the opportunity to follow Obama to church.

    The Obama family worshipped at 19th Street Baptist Church on Sunday morning, a 170-year-old congregation in Northwest DC, attended by a largely African-American population. It’s a progressive church—the current pastor, Dr. Derrick Harkins, is a vocal advocate for HIV-AIDS issues. The entire Obama family, including First Mother-in-Law Marian Robinson, sat in the second row. At times Obama and his wife whispered to each other, occasionally sharing a warm moment with a quick chuckle and a flash of their expansive grins. Obama sang, clapped and swayed along with the rousing choir. Mrs. Obama helped her youngest daughter Sasha follow along in the hymnal, every now and then rubbing her back supportively. If they hadn’t received a standing ovation the moment they walked in, they could have been a regular young family at Sunday services.

    From my perch on the balcony, the support and goodwill Obama has engendered within this community felt palpable. Church-goers seemed like they bursting for an opportunity to vocally acclaim this storied figure in their midst. When 10 year old Nigel Sanders, a member of the church’s Kandelite Children’s Choir, tentatively stepped up to the microphone to say “Martin Luther King walked so Barack Obama could run,” the congregation erupted in such fierce cheers and applause that the rest of Sanders’ speech was nearly drowned out. “Just another typical Sunday at 19th Street Baptist Church,” quipped Pastor Harkins.

    Being raised Catholic, I’m used to fairly staid church services and a healthy dose of guilt, so it felt very wrong to be taking notes on my lap, nosily peering over the balcony at congregants, BlackBerry buzzing in one hand. It felt uncomfortable to act as a dispassionate, unmoved reporter amongst people engaged in private but energetic worship. (I’m sure my mother would be horrified to learn that I didn’t stand at the appropriate times during the service). But the moment I felt most deeply voyeuristic was when Pastor Harkins spoke directly to Obama in his sermon.

    Harkins’ sermon, entitled “For a Time Such as This”, drew from the Biblical story of Esther. Harkins told his flock that, like Esther, God prepares and locates people for moments in their lives when they will be called up on to do important, and sometimes difficult, work. Although he had already referenced Obama several times during the service, Harkins seemed intent on delivering a personal message in the sermon. After ruminating over the achievements of Rosa Parks, Dietrich Bonhoeffer and Martin Luther King, Harkins asked “How could it be that the first black president of the Harvard Law Review would do anything other than dwell in the lofty heights of the best corporate law firms?” Soon he addressed Obama directly. “Perhaps, just perhaps, you are where you are for a time such as this,” Harkins intoned. Later he stressed the importance of Obama’s family: “Perhaps a family has been shaped and fashioned for such a time as this.” Harkins said that in times of harsh criticism Obama could turn to his family and “know the foundation upon which you stand” or to look at his wife and be encouraged by her. “God prepared you. God placed you. God will not forsake you,” he said.

    Obama sat characteristically calm throughout the sermon. But I can't imagine there's too many people that deliver such personal messages to the directly President-elect these days and, as the President-elect presumably pondered and prayed, I couldn’t help feeling that I was intruding on a private moment.

    More
  • Sasha and Malia: Bigger Than Miley Cyrus?

    Andrew Romano | Jan 19, 2009 08:53 PM

    OK. I get it. I know I look a little young for my age. But this is just cruel. I'm referring, of course, to the relentless, blood-curdling screeching that's been filling Washington D.C.'s Verizon Center arena every, oh, five or six seconds.

    I knew something was fishy when Newsweek's Washington bureau chief offered me the magazine's sole ticket to the "Kids Inaugural: We Are the Future" concert. You might think that members of the press can just waltz right into any inauguration event they want. Not so much. Basically, each outlet gets a very limited number of tickets--like, one--to each official shindig. There's a lot of internal jockeying involved in determining who gets to go to what. But--surprise!--the Kids Inaugural pass just happened to land on my desk, no drama involved. And despite the fact that I've never actually heard anything by Miley Cyrus, the Jonas Brothers, Demi Lovato or Bow Wow--like any sane, childless person over the age of 16, even one who can't grow a beard yet--I knew that my eight-year-old cousin Robert would commit parricide if he ever found out that I'd skipped the show. So I decided to take the plunge.

    Thus: here I am at the Verizon Center, along with 15,000 adolescents. Who are screeching. All the time.

    But even though my tympanic membrane may be punctured, the "Kids Inaugural" is actually turning out to be, oddly enough, one of the more moving events I've attended since arriving yesterday in D.C. It's not because Miley Cyrus is, in fact, a pretty compelling performer, which she is. It's not because the Jonas Brothers' impossibly lustrous hair looks even more lustrous in person, which it does. It's not because George Lopez's advice to the crowd--"Can't survive on grilled cheese alone? Yes We Can! Can't eat 17 fruit roll-ups at a time? Yes We Can!"--is strangely convincing. It's not even because these kids, many of whom are the sons and daughters of members of the armed services, are finally getting at least one evening to make up, in some small way, for the months and years their moms and dads spent overseas, in harm's way.

    For me, it's something else entirely. When Sasha and Malia Obama appeared shortly before show time and took their seats in the front row, the entire arena erupted. Near me, a group of young white girls screamed, "We love you Sasha! We love you Malia!" As the cameraman crouched a few inches from the new First Kids, projecting their faces on the massive Jumbotrons hanging overhead, I couldn't help but feel sort of sorry for them, knowing that they're about to endure the most awkward years of their lives in the glare of the national spotlight. But assuming they emerge sane, safe and unscathed, as they undoubtedly will, the good that the Obama girls will do, just by being themselves, is truly staggering. Consider it. As of tomorrow, the most popular children in the country--in every rec room, every classroom, every cafeteria; the two kids that every one of their peers admires, adores and wants to be friends with--will be African-American. (Even Miley Cyrus ran over to shake their hands.) As Michelle Obama said on stage, "the children are the future." Judging by tonight, they won't even understand why putting a black family in the White House was such a big deal to begin with.

    And that's something worth screeching about.

    More
  • No Sweat--Yet

    Andrew Romano | Jan 19, 2009 04:39 PM


    (Charles Dharapak / AP)

    What is it with do-gooders and their costume changes? For Clark Kent, it was phone booths and blue tights. The less demure Peter Parker would reveal his spidey spandex by simply ripping off his whatever else he had on. And so it is, it seems, with Barack Obama, who was sporting a business suit when he entered Walter Reed Medical Center this morning to visit wounded soldiers--and a more rugged checked-shirt-and-gray-jeans ensemble when he emerged an hour later.

    The reason for the swap: a day of hands-on charity work meant to honor the memory of Martin Luther King, Jr., and set an example for volunteers participating in the 11,000 public service events organized, nationwide, at the president-elect's request.

    Obama's first stop was Sasha Bruce House, a stately 35-year-old homeless shelter for teens near Capitol Hill where volunteers were already busy painting and preparing dormitories for incoming boarders. Shrugging off his casual navy jacket amid a few eager cries of "Mr. Obama!," the president-elect at first cautioned that he should do "something simple 'cause I could screw something up" (no electrical work, for example), but still gamely attempted to pry a stubborn balking valance loose before switching to painting--a job, he informed the press, that he held his 17-year-old summer, earning minimum wage. "This is good practice ‘cause I’m moving to a new house tomorrow," Obama cracked. 

    “I do hope they’re watching my technique," he added, referring to the kids. “It’s not rocket science. You take the pole and the roller, then you roll. But you do need to apply some elbow grease – like everything we do.”

    As that last remark suggests, the real purpose of the Sasha Bruce visit was inspiration rather than preparation. Coating a nearby wall with Yosemite Blue, Obama quoted King--"everybody can be great because everybody can serve"--before explaining what he wanted Americans to take away from National Service Day. “This country is great because of its people," he said. “We can accomplish anything. One of the goals of my administration will be to make sure that we have a government that’s more responsive and more effective and more efficient at helping families. But don’t underestimate the power for people to pull together and to accomplish amazing things. This facility is an example of somebody with imagination and determination… These young people have huge potential that right now is not being tapped, and given the crisis that we’re in and the hardships that so many people are going through, we can’t allow any idle hands. Everybody’s got to be involved. Everybody’s going to have to pitch in, and I think the American people are ready for that.”

    A noble sentiment (and one, Obama added, that the Internet--"an amazing tool to organize people" that "we don't just want to use... in elections"--can possibly help make a reality). But as each of his predecessors learned soon enough, habit is often stronger than hope. Before Obama left for his next service event--an assembly at Calvin Coolidge High School in northwest D.C. where volunteers were decorating blankets, writing letters and taping video messages for deployed soldiers--Cara Fuller, a worker from Philadelphia, asked if he'd broken a sweat while painting.

    “Nah, I don’t sweat," he said. "You ever see me sweat?”

    We'll check back in four years.

    More
  • GOP Gatecrashers at the Obama Ball

    Katie Paul | Jan 19, 2009 04:36 PM

    It's not easy being red in Washington right now. Republican powerbrokers have fled, conservative commentators are bitter, and pretty much everyone is about to be out of a job by tomorrow. Once the hottest ticket in town, even attendance at tonight's Texas Black Tie & Boots inaugural ball is expected to be lackluster. So, going against the grain, I had a mission this weekend: find the good-natured young GOPers willing to take the Obama fever in stride and unbutton their top buttons with the rest of us.

    Fortunately, I stumbled upon one. Lauren Blaine, 25, is an Obama-mocking, Prius-bashing, committed conservative, and an eager partaker of inaugural bashes. "I'm a happy Republican who would love to go to the inauguration. If you know anyone who has tickets, let me know," she told me, adding that she's excited about the energy in D.C. these days. In the absence of tickets, she is teaming up with some fellow conservatives to ring in the new presidency together at a party just outside the city.

    So will the good will extend beyond the boozy celebrations? "I think people are just glad the election is over, because that was getting out of control," she said. "Now, it's more about [Obama] putting his money where his mouth is—OK, we're in a recession, so fix the country. It's not about winning, it's about governing. It's not a basketball game." Not quite willing to let the election dream die, she keeps a cardboard cutout of John McCain in her apartment. But these days, even John has gotten into the inaugural spirit with a few extra accessories.

    Yes, of course, one person keeping it real is hardly a scientific survey. I can't reach the diehards, because they've either skipped town or retreated into a bleak half-week hibernation. I did hear tell of one GOP stalwart planning to board himself in his room with LSD, painkillers and a poster of Ronald Reagan on his wall until the inaugural madness subsides. Another, an imminently unemployed staffer, had similar plans to cut the electricity in his apartment and make his way through the liquor cabinet.

    Fair enough. Losing a plush job in the middle of a recession probably wouldn't make me feel too warm and fuzzy either. But with more than 70 percent of Americans currently supporting Obama, I think it's fair to say that most of the country is on Lauren's side on this one.

    More
  • Change ... Your Furniture

    Newsweek | Jan 19, 2009 03:23 PM


    By Dina Fine Maron

    As change comes to Washington, the corporate world is directly tapping into the Obama lexicon.

    Ikea, the Swedish furniture company, is running ads in the D.C. Metro, spouting familiar rhetoric such as “Embrace change,” and “The time for domestic reform is now,” in the hopes of driving business to their two local stores. Ikea even went so far as to create a completely Ikea-furnished mock oval office in one of the city’s train stations last week.

    Pepsi, too, launched a “Refresh Everything” campaign, even adapting Obama’s signature “O” symbol into the newest Pepsi swoosh. The idea behind Pepsi’s new message is that this is the time for change--spiffying up their image, and sponsoring talks on education, revitalizing hip-hop, black America, and, yes, their cool refreshment.

    The “Yes We Can” motto has been applied to more abstract ideas as well--like wind energy. The American Wind Energy Association billboards around Washington question if we can “create jobs out of thin air” and then answer their own rhetorical question: “YES, with wind energy WE CAN.”

    But the slogans and symbols aren’t the only parts of Obama’s campaign to be appropriated by advertisers. His ability to mobilize voters and reach them through the Internet was a powerful tool during his campaign. That trial run at voter inclusion may have led the way for Pepsi and Ikea’s campaigns to get voters involved … as consumers. On Ikea’s Web site you can design your own oval office and then even e-mail it to the president. And Pepsi’s site suggests you think about what you would like to ask our new president--and then upload that video. As I munch on my “Yes Pecan!” Ben and Jerry’s ice cream (the unofficial Obama flavor), I find myself wondering: Is this all change you can believe in?

    More
  • Wait! We're Not Done with Bush Yet...

    Daniel Stone | Jan 19, 2009 03:18 PM

    Celebratory is a safe way to describe the mood in Washington. And not just for Barack Obama's big day on Tuesday. When Obama raises his right hand, it will mark for millions of his supporters the end of something else.

    At Dupont Circle in Northwest Washington, today is Bush's day. And more specifically, his last one as president. For much of liberal-leaning Washington and the millions of visitors expected for the week, it's something worth celebrating.

    Bill Moyer, president of the Backbone Campaign, took the inaugural week as an opportunity to almost literally turn the page on Bush's presidency by unveiling a 50 foot copy of the preamble of the Constitution. Set up in the middle of Dupont Circle, he wants anyone he can get to sign it -- a public commitment to upholding the constitution, reintroducing it after what he says is the document's tarnishing over Bush's term. "Now more than ever is a time not to delegate our role in where this nation needs to go," he says, standing in front of a dozen people, many on all fours, singing the document with Sharpies. After the inaugural, Moyer will take the document to 10 other cities around the country, adding an additional 200 feet of signing space before the banner is unveiled in New York in April.

    On the other side of the circle, a more spirited political statement depicts a blown-up Bush, standing nearly 20 feet high. His long nose is a fairly obvious nod toward a certain fairy tale. And in referencing a different less-than-flattering presidential moment, the organizers also encouraged passers-by to throw shoes at the inflated Bush. Several sign holders beside the statue stand advocating for federal indictments of top administration officials, including Bush and VP Dick Cheney.



    All over town, aversion to Bush is in full form on the president's last full day. When any president leaves office, the foes and critics he has picked up along the way are traditionally -- and reasonably -- pleased to see him go. But it seems that Bush's critics have created a new standard. (Don't forget that even at the beginning of Bush's first term, protesters shouted against the validity of Bush's electoral victory. The result of the 2000 election, eventually settled before the Supreme Court, was a nation far too divided to give Bush an Obama-like reception.)

    But now, are the blatant signals toward Bush's departure a bit much, especially during a week that's obviously supposed to be represent something completely new? After all, Obama did campaign on being a contrasting president to Bush, suggesting he's quite mindful of 43's slip ups.

    What do you think? In the comments section below, tell us what role Bush's presidency should play as the country turns to Obama.

     

    More
  • Slideshow: The Opening Ceremony

    Andrew Romano | Jan 18, 2009 05:22 PM

    "Star-studded" is a bit of a cliché, but there's no better way to describe the Inaugural Opening Ceremony that just concluded here on the Mall. Since pictures are worth a thousand words--on a roll today, no?--we've decided the best way to bring you the action is with a few snapshots from the press area (which, after all, was a heckuva lot closer to the stage than where the hoi polloi were forced to stand). Without any further ado...

    The view--reminiscent of another historic event--from just beneath the Lincoln Memorial stage: 



    The security, standing atop the monument:

     


    Bono and the boys of U2 performing "City of Blinding Lights" for the president-elect, who used it as one of his campaign theme songs:



    Tao Rodriguez-Seeger, Pete Seeger and Bruce "The Boss" Springsteen singing Woody Guthrie's classic folk anthem, "This Land Is Your Land":

    Beyoncé leading the crowd in "America the Beautiful"--with Bon Jovi, Garth Brooks, Sheryl Crow, Tom Hanks, Jamie Foxx, Tiger Woods and others as her rather high-wattage backdrop.

    Oh, and then there was this guy:

     


    Something tells me we'll be hearing more from him in the years to come...
     

    More
  • Today in Celeb Sightings, Israeli Government Officials Edition

    Katie Paul | Jan 18, 2009 02:46 PM

    This D.C. is a funny place. You may think you're just stepping into a CVS to pick up a pack of tissues, but actually you're heading on a collision course into the possible next prime minister of Israel.

    I'm here in the capital during the run-up to the inauguration to take in a little bit of history. As you might imagine, taking in history in the middle of January can be a chilly undertaking. Yesterday afternoon, after strolling a bit in the quiet, somewhat suburban part of town where we're staying, my friend and I take a quick break from the great outdoors to grab some tissues in CVS. This, however, is no ordinary trip to CVS. Making the turn down one of the aisles, I catch sight of a squad of black-clad men with matching red lapel pins. Amongst them is a blond woman mumbling in a language that sounds vaguely like Hebrew. Hmmm, I think. She looks like...nah, no way...

    Way. As I turn the corner at the end of the aisle, I slam into the mumbling Tzipi Livni, foreign minister of Israel, who, I later learn, is in town finalizing an agreement with Condoleezza Rice about Hamas' underground smuggling routes into Gaza. Oof! Sorry, I say. Mumble, mumble, she replies, looking peeved. I glance at the kafiya wrapped around my friend's neck, then at the bulky gentlemen making up Livni's Secret Service detail. Uh-oh. Fortunately for us all, the foreign minister has bigger fish to fry than two sniffling twenty-somethings, and she continues on her way to whatever toothpaste or shampoo she came to get.

    I didn't have a chance to ask her, but it's possible that she is prepping for tonight's Foreign Diplomats Inaugural Ball, hosted by the Ethiopian embassy at the James Monroe Mansion. (I also put in an inquiry with the Israeli embassy, and will update if they get back to me). I hope not, though. Although Israel may have unilaterally declared its ceasefire just in time for the inaugural festivities (Newsweek's Rod Nordland has a nice bit of reporting from Gaza city, here), this is one woman with some seriously big fish to focus on frying right now.

    More
  • The Clouds Part Over DC

    Daniel Stone | Jan 18, 2009 01:43 PM

    In context, it's not so bad. Earlier this morning in Washington, the weather forecasters gave an uplifting number: 35. Uplifting only in comparison to the low teens and negative wind chill temperatures that have frozen the city (and much of the country) for the past week. At one point, planning officials were talking about how to scale down the inaugural events and lowering crowd estimates, thinking that people might come to the wise realization that it still counts as witnessing history if you watch it on TV, ideally sitting next to a fire. Barack Obama, one person told me, would want me to be warm.

    But no! Keep the crowd estimates where they were. 35, with a good chance of temperatures approaching even (gasp!) 40 by Tuesday, means that the inaugural events won't just be for the thick skinned and weatherized. Nope, the presidential inaugural committee, with the direction of Obama himself, promised that this would be the people's inauguration, and apparently they meant it.

    Of course, let's not forget those visitors who see 35 as a temperature approaching that in your freezer, and thus humanly unnatural (we're looking at you, West Coasters).

    More
  • Inaugural Ball Watch: What are all Those People Lining up For?

    Katie Connolly | Jan 16, 2009 10:09 PM

    It could have been a line of fans waiting for Kanye West tickets to go on sale, or for the premiere a new Lord of the Rings flick. But the hundreds of well-dressed folks cuing at the Washington Convention Center today were no rag tag bunch of fans. They were there for tickets to a different kind of blockbuster: Tuesday night’s Official Presidential Inaugural Balls.

    Volunteers say that ball-goers have been lining up since before 9 a.m. this morning to get their hands on some of the hottest tickets around. DC resident Michael Jones was thrilled to receive tickets to the Mid-Atlantic States Ball after making an online contribution to the Presidential Inaugural Committee. Jones waited in line for over 45 minutes to pick up tickets for himself and his wife. (She’ll be scouring stores for the perfect gown this weekend.) Many more like Jones will be standing in long lines for their tickets throughout the next few days.

    There are ten official inaugural balls this year, including the first ever Neighborhood Ball, a free but invitation only event designed to allow DC residents their very own celebration. Six balls will be held at the Washington Convention Center, while the others will take place at Union Station, the Washington Hilton, the National Building Museum and the National Guard Armory. Between 5000 and 10,000 people are expected at each ball, with organizers anticipating that the Western ball (for residents of the Western states) will be the largest.

    No Obama event is complete without a merchandising table, and the ticket collection site is no exception. Those mavens of political branding over at Camp Obama have released a wide array of inauguration swag (proceeds go to the presidential inaugural committee). At the convention center you can purchase an Obama onesie for your baby, fleece blankets, hats, paperweights or an autographed frame for your inaugural invitation. For fashion conscious political junkies, the Obama folks have released the “Runway to Change” line, which includes designer tote bags from Diane Von Fustenburg and Tory Burch ($70 a pop), and 9 different t-shirts from designers like Zac Posen and Donna Karan. Most shirts sell for $45, but for those wanting to help kick start the economy, a bedazzled Gerald Matthews inauguration tee will set you back $150.

    Staffers at the Convention Center say that the most popular item has been the iconic Shepard Fairey t-shirt. The most expensive item, a $159 woven blanket featuring the Obama-Biden inauguration seal, has been a hit with those looking for some extra warmth at the swearing in ceremony. And the slowest mover? An $89 teacup and saucer. Look out for bargain basement deals on that after Tuesday.

    More
  • A Carefully Choreographed Move

    Daniel Stone | Jan 16, 2009 03:05 PM

    While the White House will become Barack Obama's new home on Jan. 20, the physical building is still George Bush's residence until ... Jan. 20. It's a peculiar move-out and move-in schedule that leaves White House staff exactly five hours to transform the three-story, 132-room structure from one family's house into a home for another. "To the first couple and their children, it's their home, and they need to feel at home the moment they arrive," says Gary Walters, former White House chief usher who has overseen every White House transition since Richard Nixon lived there.

    The flag drops the moment Bush and Obama head to Capitol Hill for the swearing-in ceremony. All 150 members of the White House staff go to work immediately, rearranging and redecorating in precisely the way the Obamas chose when they met with the chief usher during their first visit to the house in November. The process is finely documented in an official "choreography plan," as it's called, that details by the minute when everything is to be moved out of and into strategically parked moving trucks. Carpet, paint, everything down to bed linens and lamp shades are changed to reflect the new family's taste.

    Some rooms, like in the West Wing, are finished before others, in case the president is rushed back early to attend to urgent business. But under a very strict timetable, the rest of the transformation leaves little room for the unexpected. In 1989, George H.W. Bush's granddaughters walked into the madness before the end of the inaugural parade (the official deadline) because it was too cold. Caught completely off guard, a staff member sent the girls to be entertained by the White House florist until the residence was ready. In 1993, Bill and Hillary Clinton's inaugural gown and tuxedo went temporarily missing when an aide veered from the script and carried them to the wrong floor.

    The process is kept strictly secret and details of the house's decorative style are scarce. The White House declined to discuss the choices the Obamas made for their home (citing privacy reasons) and no spectators--and especially no reporters--are permitted in the house on Inauguration Day. "Not even the president has ever seen this happen," says Walters. The way it's designed, no president ever will.

    More
  • The Great News Dump?

    Daniel Stone | Jan 16, 2009 10:23 AM

    My inbox lit up this morning with a message from a fellow Washingtonian, apparently too eager to sleep on the eve of something so enormous. He wasn't talking about the inaugural next Tuesday, which locals expect to bring out either the best or worst in the city. No, he was talking about Friday, awaiting the last-minute actions on the last official work day of the Bush administration. "Epic day of news dumping!" wrote my friend, who's not exactly a fan of the president. "It's gonna be sweet to watch!"

    My friend could be right. Since Monday is a holiday, Friday is the effective last day of Bush's term, creating a deadline for everything else Bush wants to do in office: pardons, executive orders, even diplomatic shifts. With no press briefings remaining before Tuesday, anything the administration does on Friday won't be questioned by the press until after Bush leaves office. And the press corps, feverishly preparing for Tuesday's inaugural, has most of its attention elsewhere. In essence, the story isn't Bush anymore, and Bush's staff can use that to its advantage.

    It's a sneaky but strategic time to make controversial decisions. President Clinton released a list of pardons on the last day of his presidency, which included a controversial name--fugitive financier Marc Rich--that Clinton never had to answer questions about while in office. Other presidents have used last-minute executive orders to somehow tie the hands of their successors on a specific policy. Gee, thanks.

    Bush left early Friday for Camp David, signaling that all remaining action of his administration has already been set in motion. Will the Bush White House be trying to sweep anything under the rug? We'll be back on this page all day and over the weekend with updates.

    More
  • Obama to Pick Clinton Lawyer for Federal Probes

    Newsweek | Jan 9, 2009 07:18 PM

    By Michael Isikoff

    A former top Clinton White House lawyer is in line to be nominated by Barack Obama to head the Justice Department office in charge of all federal criminal investigations, according to three transition sources.

    Lanny A. Breuer, who played a key role in defending Bill Clinton during impeachment and related criminal and congressional probes during the 1990s, is slated to be nominated to assistant attorney general in charge of the criminal division, said the sources, all of whom asked not to be identified because of the sensitivity of the matter. One of the sources said a public announcement of the selection of Breuer, who is a partner of attorney general designate Eric Holder at the firm of Covington &Burling, could come as early as next week. 

    Breuer is a widely respected--and affable--Washington criminal defense lawyer who has represented a number of high-profile clients in recent years, including Bill Clinton’s former national security advisor Sandy Berger who was charged with removing classified papers from the National Archives while preparing for testimony before the 9/11 commission. Breuer’s success in getting what appeared to be a relatively lenient plea bargain for Berger from the Bush Justice Department was cited by Washingtonian magazine two years ago when it named him of the 30 “Big Guns” in the Washington legal community. Breuer was also retained last year to help represent baseball star Roger Clemens before a congressional committee investigating allegations of steroid abuse.

    But Breuer’s selection caused some minor debate within transition circles. He has never been a federal prosecutor, although he worked for fours years as a prosecutor in Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau’s office after he graduated from Columbia Law School in 1985. Although he is a law partner of Holder’s, Breuer was actually not chosen by Holder for the job, two transition sources said. Instead, his selection was advocated by former allies in the Clinton White House, including transition chief John Podesta and Rahm Emanuel, in line to be Obama’s chief of staff. 

    Breuer, who is likely to be confirmed without any difficulty, will be the political appointee with prime responsibility for making some of the most sensitive decisions in the Obama Justice Department. He will inherit a number of high-profile and closely watched investigations, including probes into frauds relating to the financial crisis, such as the Bernard Madoff case and the mortgage industry. Other ongoing probes include an investigation into the destruction of CIA tapes of waterboarding and another into the firing of U.S. attorneys where a special counsel is believed to be seeking testimony from former Bush White House officials Karl Rove and Harriet Miers. Breuer will also have line responsibility for criminal investigations conducted by current U.S. attorneys, most prominently, the probe by U.S. attorney Patrick Fitzgerald in Chicago into Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich.


  • What's for Lunch?

    Daniel Stone | Jan 9, 2009 04:23 PM
    Though Barack Obama is many things, one thing he is not is a foodie. As reporters on the campaign trail often noticed, the president elect eats for nutrition, not for taste. A healthy meal of chicken and broccoli was common, and only when he had to oblige local media did Obama smile through local specialties, like syrup-dripping waffles or greasy cheese steaks.

    But on the day Obama will become president, he will have no choice but to eat fancily -- tasting food that would make even the most hardened Top Chef judge drool. Early Friday, the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies released the menu for Obama's celebratory lunch that will immediately follow the swearing in ceremony. Here's the rundown:

    Appetizer
    Seafood Stew
    Duckhorn Vineyards, 2007 Sauvignon Blanc, Napa Valley

    Entree
    A brace of American birds (pheasant and duck), served with sour cherry chutney and molasses sweet potatoes
    Goldeneye, 2005 Pinot Noir, Anderson Valley

    Dessert
    Apple Cinnamon Sponge Cake and Sweet Cream Glacé
    Korbel Natural “Special Inaugural Cuvée,” California Champagne

    The wines come from California, a tip of the hat to Dianne Feinstein, chairwoman of the inaugural committee. The Korbel champagne was made specifically for the luncheon. The china and flatware were chosen as replications of china that Mary Todd Lincoln brought with her to the White House.

    According to Elizabeth Goldsmith, a professor at Florida State University who specializes in, among other things, inaugural luncheons, up to a dozen catering companies from the Washington region compete (in secret, for security reasons) for the opportunity to serve the new president and about 200 guests on his big day. This year, the winner was Design Cuisine, a catering company based in Arlington, VA, that tailored the menu perfectly to please the staff of the inaugural committee. The committee hosts a tasting before seeking a final decisions from Obama's staff. Traditionally, the caterer releases recipes for the dishes after the luncheon.

    The meal might be in honor of Obama, but it certainly doesn't reflect his food tastes. For weeks, Goldsmith had speculated that Obama and his staff would choose "some down-home dishes from Chicago" and maybe some pineapple or tropical fruit as a nod to the diverse background of Obama. But in a statement, the inaugural committee says that the full luncheon menu is actually shaped not around Obama, but on Abraham Lincoln. "Growing up in the frontier regions of Kentucky and Indiana, the sixteenth President favored simple foods including root vegetables and wild game. As his tastes matured, he became fond of stewed and scalloped oysters. For dessert or a snack, nothing pleased him more than a fresh apple or an apple cake."

    A detailed depiction of Lincoln's taste buds isn't too shabby for a man who died almost 150 years ago. A full mapping of Obama's seems much harder to come by.
    More
  • Management Consulting in the Government?

    Daniel Stone | Jan 7, 2009 11:16 PM

    In the world of management consulting, high-powered and often expensive contractors infiltrate all levels of a company to determine how it can run more efficiently--sorting out what sucks up the most money and what can be cut. Large corporations with loads of money to save are often open to the process. Paying a few million to save a billion is quite the bargain.

    But what if that large corporation is actually a really big company? One that's headquartered in Washington with more than 1.8 million employees in offices in every state and every major country. One with an annual budget of, say, $3 trillion.

    What if that company is... the government?

    Enter Nancy Killefer, Barack Obama's nominee to be the government's chief performance officer, a title with a not so-so-subtle nod to the private sector. Which is exactly the point. The new position is Obama's creation, and an indication that he thinks the federal government can, and should, be run a bit more like a company with goals to reach and money to save. "In order to make investments that we need, we'll have to cut the spending that we don't, and I'll be relying on Nancy to help guide that process," Obama told reporters early Wednesday.

    So to make it run smoother, faster and, of course, cheaper, Obama brought in Killefer, a partner with global consulting group McKinsey & Company that is widely respected in management consulting circles as one of the industries biggest firms. When nominating her, Obama said that Killefer will meet with cabinet officials to determine "how they can run their agencies with greater efficiency, transparency and accountability." She will set performance standards for federal agencies and monitor the progress of department heads. In essence, she'll be the government's management consultant with broad authority (and backing from Obama) to search for government processes that have either outlived their usefulness or never worked in the first place.

    On the question of power, how much weight Killefer's suggestions will carry won't depend on how well she does her job. Rather, her effectiveness will depend on Obama and on his managing style.

    As the decider, he'll have to figure how much credence he wants give to her suggestions. Alone, Killefer won't have the authority to make broad changes to administrative infrastructure. But if Obama hears her out when she reports that, for instance, the Attorney General is wasting thousands of dollars on an antiquated way of coordinating conference calls (which a source at Justice tells NEWSWEEK is indeed true), her suggestions could help streamline some of the ways Washington works.

    But if Obama decides to just set the ball rolling and limit Killefer's access to him, Killefer and her staff are likely to be perceived as auditors who come with little consequence. And since government departments traditionally have little incentive to innovate, if neither Obama nor department heads give the new chief performance officer much consideration, she may find that the department sucking up the most resources with little to show...is her own.

    More
  • Obama’s Spy Surprise

    Mark Hosenball | Jan 5, 2009 04:04 PM

    By Mark Hosenball

    In a move apparently designed to sidestep controversy over the CIA’s interrogation and detention practices, President-elect Barack Obama has decided to nominate a nonprofessional, Democratic Party grandee Leon Panetta, as his new director of the agency, Newsweek has learned.

    Two well-informed political sources, who both asked for anonymity when discussing personnel matters, said that Obama made known his CIA decision to other officials earlier today. Along with Obama's anticipated decision to appoint retired Navy Admiral Dennis Blair as the new Director of National Intelligence -- Panetta's future boss – the CIA nomination is expected to be announced in the near future.

    The choice is somewhat surprising in that Panetta has no specific background managing a sprawling and esoteric intelligence bureaucracy like the CIA, or supervising and planning byzantine undercover operations. But he was a senior Democratic congressman for many years and served in the Clinton administration first as director of the Office of Management and Budget and then as White House chief of staff. In the latter post, Panetta sat in on the daily intelligence briefing giving to the President by the CIA -- a task that has now been shifted to the office of the National Intelligence czar, which was created under intelligence reform legislation approved by Congress after 9/11. As Budget director, he had direct involvement in financial issues related to intelligence. Panetta also served on the Iraq Study Group and publicly opposed President Bush's "surge" of troops in 2006.

    Among Obama's reasons for choosing Panetta, one of the sources said, were his reputation as a "first rate manager," his White House experience handling issues related to "intelligence support" and his history of being able to establish friendly and cooperative relations between the executive branch and Capitol Hill. While unusual, the Panetta appointment will not come as a complete shock to those who have been following Obama's somewhat fraught efforts to produce a relatively non-controversial but nonetheless highly respected candidate to head the always-controversial CIA.

    In the weeks following his election victory, Obama was widely expected to appoint as his CIA chief John Brennan, a former top CIA and counter-terrorism official who is co-chair of the committee reviewing intelligence policy issues for the President-elect's transition team. But Brennan withdrew his name from consideration as CIA chief after he was slammed by bloggers for public statements he made defending the CIA's involvement in controversial counter-terrorism operations, including rough interrogations which Bush Administration critics and human rights advocates described as torture.

    The Brennan controversy cast a cloud over Obama's efforts to find a new CIA chief (though sources say that Obama decided some time ago on Adm. Blair, who was not involved with controversial Bush interrogation policies, as his new intelligence czar). The current CIA chief, retired Air Force Gen. Michael Hayden, signaled that he wouldn't mind being asked to stay on for a time. But critics noted that Hayden, like Brennan, had publicly defended the Bush administration’s counter-terror activities, including CIA interrogation policies (which Hayden himself had little to do with) and warrantless wiretapping by the National Security Agency (a program that Hayden, as NSA director, helped to create after 9/11). Obama had voted as a senator against Hayden's confirmation.

    More