-
Newsweek
|
Jan 30, 2009 04:27 PM
By Eve Conant
Among the Bush administration’s few undisputed successes was its
aggressive fight against the global spread of HIV and AIDS. Liberals
and conservatives, evangelicals and scientists didn’t agree on much
during the last eight years, but they were unified in their enthusiasm
for PEPFAR, the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, which
Congress recently voted to expand into a $48 billion commitment, the
largest by any nation, to combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis
worldwide. So when PEPFAR’s respected director, Dr. Mark Dybul, was
swiftly and surprisingly pushed out of his job the day after President
Obama’s inauguration, AIDS activists began to worry that the new
administration might fumble the one thing the old group got right.
According to a column in by Michael Gerson in The Washington Post,
Dybul had been asked to stay on for “several months,” but then suddenly
found himself out of a job on Jan. 21. Dybul, an openly gay physician,
had been “scapegoated for the marginal portions of the Bush AIDS
initiative such as an emphasis on sexual abstinence and a ban on aiding
prostitutes,” according to a San Francisco Chronicle op-ed Friday.
“These are intemperate charges that miss the big picture: a
conservative in the White House that woke up to a global scourge and
actually did something.” Since its launch in 2003, the program has
supported life-saving antiretroviral treatment for more than 2.1
million men, women and children, and under Bush its funding and
bipartisan support had both steadily grown. In a statement to Newsweek,
Pastor Rick Warren, who gave the invocation at Obama’s inauguration,
and his wife Kay said Dybul’s “abrupt removal leaves both the
initiative and the millions of people who depend on it at risk at a
critical time of growth.” But evangelical leaders and conservative
columnists are hardly the only voices of concern. AIDS advocates,
medical students and former Obama volunteers have been firing off
letters to the new administration pleading for an open process to help
identify top candidates for the job, which is an appointed post at the
State Department. “[I]t is imperative that the move to fill this
position is not made in haste,” urged an editorial in the British
medical journal, The Lancet.
Several names were in circulation this week around Washington,
including Dr. Eric Goosby, a former Director of the Office of HIV/AIDS
Policy during the Clinton administration and director of the Pangaea
Global AIDS Foundation, which in 2002 partnered with the William
Jefferson Clinton Foundation for work with the Rwandan government.
(Some AIDS advocates are watching closely to see how the connections to
the Clinton Foundation may play a role in State Department appointments
over the coming weeks). Other possibilities: Harvard’s Jim Yong Kim,
former director of the World Health Organization’s HIV/AIDS department,
Nils Daulaire, former President and CEO of the Global Health Council.
All three declined to comment, as did the State Department, except to
say that a replacement has not yet been named. With the economy
tanking, AIDS advocates are worried that PEPFAR’s $48 million pledge
may be in jeopardy. And with the handling of Dybul’s departure, there
are lingering concern that the office may not be accorded the same
status as it was under the Bush administration. Looking ahead, they are
pinning their hopes now on an open process, with a committee consisting
of medical professionals, scientists and civil society leaders to help
choose the next director. The argument? Millions of lives are at stake.
“There are a lot of global stakeholders who want to be heard,” says
Paul Zeitz, executive director of the Global AIDS Alliance. “We’ve been
hoping this new administration will carry out business in the
transparent way they’ve promised.”
More
-
Daniel Stone
|
Jan 27, 2009 10:39 PM
The week since President Obama took office have been something of a
coming out party for the environmental movement in Washington. It
kicked off with several Green Inaugural Balls, bringing together the
leading environmental advocates in Washington eager to celebrate having
a friend back in the White House. Then Obama announced a series of
clean and green energy initiatives, including a review of California's
request to regulate its own emissions and the implementation of new fuel efficiency standards for cars.
But
the really groundbreaking announcement came not from Obama, but from
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. She showed Monday that the
administration wasn't just going to fill old positions with new
science-minded and earth-friendly people. No, the administration would
create some new ones too. Clinton announced at the State Department
Monday a new department -- a special envoy on climate change
-- to diplomatically lead, shape and broker America's influence on
climate issues and global warming leading up to an important
international climate conference later this year. To lead the envoy,
Clinton named Todd Stern, a senior fellow at the Center for American
Progress who worked formerly on climate policy in the Clinton
Administration. "Todd is a creative and clear thinker, a man of great
sensibility and good judgment," Clinton boasted.
Environmental
leaders immediately started fawning. Stern's new position, and his
record, showed that the new president, at least in terms of his
promises on the environment, was keeping his promises. "He's actually
doing what he said he'd do, look at that!" an excited Gene Karpinski,
president of the League of Conservation Voters,
told Newsweek. The broad consensus is that for many years, the world
has doubted America's commitment to combating climate change, made
clear by the Bush Administration's consistent refusal to ratify the
Kyoto treaty that would have meant massive industrial cutbacks. But
Obama staked nearly a third of his campaign on clean energy and the
U.S.'s responsibility to lead the world on climate solutions.
The
federal government has lots of regulatory work to do on environmental
and industrial policy. But in green circles, Stern is welcomed as the
right man for his new job, which will force him to be half-advocate and
half diplomat in order to convince the world that America is serious
about curbing global warming. And he'll be on deadline, too. Copenhagen
will play host to the all-inclusive United Nations climate conference
in December, where Stern will have to ensure the U.S. will have a seat
front-row-center. Several heads of state are expected to attend,
perhaps even Obama himself.
In the new position as head of the
envoy, Stern seemed eager and excited, beaming at Clinton's press
conference announcing him. And he has surprisingly few critics from the
broad green scene that often has trouble agreeing. LCV's Karpinksi
likes him ("Todd has tremendous experience and is smart and strategic.
What's more, he's politically savvy."), as does Alden Meyer, director
of strategy and policy on global warming at the Union of Concerned Scientists,
the Washington science advocacy group that was often frustrated with
the science-lite Bush Administration. "This is a complicated game of
three-dimensional chess and it's good news that Todd knows the issue,"
says Meyer. "He has relationships with people abroad. He comes in with
a very good sense for the landscape."
But with Stern beginning
the work of amplifying Obama's intent to lead on climate change, the
industries and leaders who have long fought against environmental
issues as detrimental to future economic development see Stern's new
job as a bad sign of what's to come. Oklahoma Senator James Inhofe,
perennial climate change denier, belittled the value of the new
position under the State Department, saying it was new in name, but not
actually a new job and would have little effect. "Mr. Stern will have
his work cut out for him trying to negotiate the details for developing
nations to adhere to measurable, reportable, and verifiable emissions
cuts as agreed to in the Bali Action Plan,” Inhofe wrote in an e-mail
to Newsweek. Some contributors to online forums also tisked at the
appointment, arguing that since early effects of climate change are
inevitable, a truly visionary response would be to lead the way in
trying to plan for what's to come. Not to try to play catch-up on the
missteps of the past.
More
-
Andrew Romano
|
Jan 20, 2009 10:02 PM
My, how things have changed.
I first saw Barack Obama in person on Thursday, Sept. 27, 2007. As I wrote at the time,
he'd "closed off Washington Square Park, 9.75
greenish acres at the heart of Greenwich Village and New York
University, and welcomed dozens of Secret Service agents, scores of
cops, four giant metal detectors, a herd of police dogs and,
ultimately, 24,000 supporters, curious locals, ’60s holdovers, dog
walkers, yoga devotees and punk rockers... to his first Big Apple rally
(and largest event to date)." I didn't know what to expect. Not so much
from the senator himself; I'd been following his career, like most
other political junkies, for years. But the whole Obamastock experience
was new to me. Which is why I was pleasantly surprised to discover
that, despite all the security, I was able to wander wherever I wanted
and interview whomever I wanted. I was even able to get one of Obama's
top press people on the phone. No hassle.
I
mention the Washington Square Park rally because it's superficially
similar to tonight's Youth Ball, which I just finished "covering" here
at the Washington Hilton. Both events boasted rosters of "young" and/or
"hip" recording artists (rapper Jin and indie-rock group The Northern
at Washington Square Park; Kid Rock, Kanye West and Fall Out Boy at the
Youth Ball). Both attracted a few celebs (Geoffrey Wright then, Rosario
Dawson now). And both crowds were heavy on the 18-35 demographic. But
as I said, things have changed. To get into tonight's gala--one of the
hottest of the 10 official Inaugural Balls--we media types not
only had to pass through the usual metal detector; we had to wait until
the
Secret Service dogs had approved our bags--an olfactory ordeal that
took, oh, 30 minutes--then follow a vigilant volunteer past the
souvenir stands (panoramic, prom-style portraits: only $423!),
the partygoers and, most depressingly, the bar, only to arrive at a
heavily guarded holding pen in the far corner of the ballroom. Want
water? A volunteer must escort you. Need to pee? Same deal. Ask nicely,
and they'll even fetch you a real, live youth to interview. Needless to
say, actual "reporting" doesn't really thrive in such barren soil.
Now,
it's not like I'm complaining. I totally understand why tonight's
measures were, if not necessary, then at least reasonable. But it's
still worth noting how much of a difference a year and a half
makes--not to mention a favorable outcome on Election Day. In most of
the important ways, tonight's Youth Ball was far superior to the
Washington Square Park event. Kanye West is, like, a million times
awesomer than The Northern (he even wrote a special "Heartless"
coda--"anything you dream can come true tonight"--for the occasion). It
was pretty inspiring to watch my fellow millennials--who,
believe it or not, were split between Hillary Clinton and Obama in
September 2007--celebrating the candidate they wound up propelling to
the presidency. And nothing I've seen since arriving in D.C. on Sunday
has been as moving as the Michelle-Barack slow dance--or as funny as
Obama's post-dance punchline. "That's what's called 'old school,'" he
informed us.
So yeah. Presidents can definitely throw better
parties than struggling, second-place presidential candidates. Still, I
couldn't help thinking back fondly on Washington Square Park--from my
current seat in the press corral.
Oh well. Four more years.
P.S. Yes, I had to (briefly) give my minders the slip to capture the video above. The things I do for Newsweek.
More
-
Michael Hirsh
|
Jan 20, 2009 08:10 PM
It was all a bad dream. Or at least you can pretend it was. That was
pretty much Barack Obama's message to the rest of the world in his
inaugural address on Tuesday. Obama couldn't have been more clear if he
had declared that he was filing for divorce from everything George W.
Bush represented for the last eight years.
Jammed in among the throng on the national mall, which included many
visiting foreigners, I was one of those who waited for that signature
line we were sure would become our generation's "Ask not..." moment. It
never really came. Instead the new president delivered a devastating
repudiation of his predecessor's policies and this workmanlike message:
"We are ready to lead once again."
Rather than evoke America's new rendezvous with destiny in lyrical but
vague tones, Obama described the nation's challenge of "remaking"
itself in clear but mostly negative terms: This, world, is what we will
NOT do any longer. "We regard as false the choice between our safety
and our ideals," Obama said. In other words, no more waterboarding.
"Our power grows through its prudent use; our security emanates from
the justness of our cause." In other words, we'll no longer go tearing
off into new wars no one else supports and we can't afford.
And in perhaps his most complete annulment of Bush's legacy--and what
may have been his best line--Obama told the haters of America, the
evil-doers Bush refused to speak to, that "we will extend a hand if you
are willing to unclench your fist." The German woman standing next to
me cheered wildly when she heard Obama conclude, "...nor can we consume
the world's resources without regard to effect."
It wasn't poetry. But to foreign ears, it was all music. Just as
important, it is a clean slate. And maybe that's enough for now.
More
-
Daniel Stone
|
Jan 20, 2009 07:38 PM
In the hallway to get back into the capitol after
President Obama was sworn in, Robert Gibbs ran into a wall of security.
The newly-minted White House press secretary was not allowed to pass,
as agents prepared for Obama and President Bush to pass through the
same hallway moments later. Stuck in the same holding pattern, I
dutifully identified myself and we started to talk—a talk that was
Gibb's first interview in his new official government role.
When asked how quickly Obama will get to work,
signing executive orders and new legislation, Obama won't make any
major presidential moves until tomorrow. His first actions, according
to Gibbs, will be assembling his economic and foreign policy teams to
discuss quick action on both fronts. And when Obama does sign his first
executive order "its going to focus on transparency in government,"
says Gibbs. "That's something he wants to start on first." He confirmed
that anything the president signs will be available first on
whitehouse.gov.
When asked about Obamas mood this morning and over
the past few days, Gibbs says that the new president is mindful of the
significance. "This day has finally arrived and he understands how big
it really is. Yesterday and today, I've seen him more calm and
confident than I think I ever have."
For now, Gibbs said that the new executive party will be enjoying
the day, and the evenings galas, with no plans to get immediately to
work. But, addressing earlier news reports, he confirmed that van loads
of executive staff left the capitol after the ceremony to get
immediately to work. "I just hope there is furniture in there for us"
he said.
Nearing the end of our short chat, Gibbs glanced down to look at his
BlackBerry. "Oh look at that, they just turned my email on, and people
are already writing" he laughed, referencing his new whitehouse.gov
email address.
Then, a friend of Gibbs standing with us, knocked on
the door. "Excuse us" he pleaded with the police officer playing door
keeper, "he needs to get through. He's the press secretary to the
president."
Clearly surprised, Gibbs looked around. "That sounds
pretty good, doesn't it?" he said to me. "I've never heard my name like
that before."
More
-
Katie Paul
|
Jan 20, 2009 06:57 PM
Yeah, we know. You millions of Obama acolytes freezing your tuchises
off today liked the Inaugural Address. We heard your approval, loud and
clear. But enough with the cheering already, D.C. It's been hours. Time
for a new take. We want to know what conservatives think of the speech.
Out, damn hope! Bring on the haters!
In that spirit, here's a
roundup of conservative bloggers' reactions to the speech. Brace
yourself: even some of them are (gasp!) cheering, too.
“A very good speech,” proclaimed Michael Goldfarb at The Weekly Standard.
Obama didn't revise American history to suit present celebrations, he
said, as did others on the stage with him. "I think there was a lot to
like there for those whose greatest concern is that Obama is soft--that
he doesn't appreciate the role violence has played in forging our
democracy." He quibbled that Obama refused to use the word "victory" in
his discussion of Iraq and Afghanistan, but acknowledged it was a minor
point.
The team at National Review's The Corner had mixed opinions, but they skewed positive. Charles Kesler said ho-hum
to the responsibility theme Obama chose, but gave props to his effort
to take back patriotism and religion from their seemingly exclusively
conservative domain. “President Obama’s speech was interesting,
dignified, and unmemorable, like so many inaugural addresses,” he
wrote, but gave Obama credit for handling "with grace" his unique place
in history. Ramesh Ponnuru thought Obama a very compelling performer, but found the speech itself pedestrian. Jay Nordlinger admired its brevity, but ranted about its indirect slights to Bush, which he found quite rude. In the most ringing endorsement of all, Michael Knox Beran called the speech a home run.
"On the whole I was impressed by the new President’s tone, by his
précis of the American tradition, by the tribute he paid to our
forebears and to those 'guardians of our liberty' who are making
sacrifices today, and by my sense that he himself is acutely conscious
of the preciousness of the legacy with which he has been entrusted."
Michelle Malkin had few kind words
for Obama and his supporters, but cooed over the musical acts by Aretha
Franklin, Itzhak Perlman, and Yo-Yo Ma. Her whole take on the speech:
“’Transform’ this and that. Wallet feeling emptier by the second.”
Mitt Romney chimed in
with some generally positive feedback at the Wall Street Journal’s
Washington Wire. “Barack Obama gave a speech from the middle. He once
again is communicating that he intends to govern from the middle and
not from the wing,” he wrote. “It was a speech that could be offered by
a leader from either party and that’s good.”
At Redstate, Leon H. Wolf expressed his hope
that Barack Obama will be a failure as president, despite many of his
fellow conservatives’ inclinations to give the new guy the benefit of
the doubt. When the trains run on time, he reasons, people are less
likely to give their presidents a tough time about their moral
failings, which he says Barack Obama has in abundance.
“Quite good for what it was,” Paul Mirengoff at Powerline wrote,
citing decent text and a strong oratory. The vision of postpartisan
harmony is bunk, he maintains, but he’s confident that Obama believes
more in his own greatness than in his own rhetoric. When it comes to
politicians, that, at least, is a known quality.
Update: I slighted Jay Nordlinger by failing to provide a link to his commentary, as he noted here. It was an inadvertent mishap. His original commentary can be found here.
More
-
Newsweek
|
Jan 20, 2009 06:43 PM
Will Bower, 36, walked around the Mall with millions of other Americans this morning. But unlike nearly everyone else in the crowd, Bower wasn’t cheering. He wore a Hillary Clinton tee shirt (adorned with a Hillary for President sticker) to show his support for the woman he feels the Democratic Party and a sexist media stole the election from. Bower recently left his job as an intellectual property researcher at Thomson Reuters in order to work full time for the pro-Clinton group he co-founded, PUMA (Party Unity My Ass) ‘08. Bower, who is now living off of savings to work full time on what he calls his “labor of love,” has focused his efforts on reforming the primary system, which he says is undemocratic. Newsweek's Suzanne Smalley spoke with Bower by phone today.
NEWSWEEK: Is PUMA still active?
Bower: Yes. People feel like we don’t have a clear objective. The problem is we have many clear objectives. During the 2008 primaries, so many things went wrong and we were inspired by so many of them–primary reform, misogyny in media, media reform….There are many different PUMAs [dedicated to different issues].
What do you mean by many different PUMAs?
There are a lot of different PUMA web sites and PUMA actions. There is still plenty of emailing and web activity. We all have different web sites and leaders. We all get along and agree on most things. My biggest thing is the need for primary reform...That’s probably not going to be a hot topic for a few years, but I’m working on it for down the road. I’m working on lobbying the Republican National Committee to work on primary reform there…I want them to learn from the mistakes the Democrats made in 2008. The primacy of Iowa and New Hampshire–why are we held hostage by these two small states? It’s insanity.
Are they not representative states?
No, they’re really not. Everyone thinks Iowa has this really engaged citizenry and they know what they’re doing. But fewer than 10 percent of Iowa voters participate….Since 1972 the caucuses have failed Democrats at every turn. [Some people will say] Obama won Iowa and went on to win. Well, we’ll see in four years whether Iowa has really served us. It’s basically about who has the best ground game.
Do you plan on working for PUMA indefinitely?
I intend on being critical of Barack Obama for the next four years. I do recognize him as president. I think he’s the rightful president, but I don’t think he’s the rightful leader of the Democratic Party. That sounds ironic, but I believe that Hillary Clinton…was the winner and represented the will of the people. She is my political leader….I wanted her to stay in the Senate, be the lion of the Senate, the next Ted Kennedy. I wanted her to be her own boss…and represent the 18 million who voted for her. Now that she’s in the executive branch I’m looking at her as our shadow president…A lot of us are taking comfort in the fact that she’ll be our shadow president and someone to look out for our interests abroad.
Did you go to the inauguration?
I wasn’t going to go out to the festivities, but I went out in my Hillary gear [a tee shirt depicting Clinton as Rosie the Riveter].…There were two thumbs ups, a couple of scoffs, and a lot of stares.
Why did you go?
I was going to lock myself in and not watch TV and I got a few calls from friends saying, ‘Aren’t you going to participate?’…And then I said I might as well go outside and watch and then I thought I might as well be supportive of Hillary while I do it.
How does it make you feel seeing all of the exuberance over Obama and his inauguration?
I feel that this is supposed to be Hillary’s day, to be honest. I feel he’s unqualified….A lot of what scares me is Obama mania and all. I feel like I’m living in "American Idol," a four-year episode of "American Idol"…It feels like mass hysteria–the pictures, the jargon….If this were all going on for Hillary I’d like to think I’d take a step back and say, ‘This is crazy.’ It is a little unsettling, the fanaticism.
What is your reaction to what Jill Biden said on the Oprah Winfrey Show yesterday [that her husband, Vice President Joe Biden, was given his choice of jobs – secretary of state or vice president]?
It seems like it’s a never-ending stream of minor insults. Every step of the way the Obama administration finds a way to insult Hillary. They’re finding a way to take another jab at Hillary–that she got sloppy seconds….The fact that Dr. Biden was so casual about something like that means a lot.
When you say it means a lot what do you mean?
I don’t think these are naïve people. She’s a politician’s wife…It’s hard to believe someone would be that careless on Oprah.
Tell me more about your focus on primary reform.
It took one state to determine who our candidate would be (in 2004). I’m from Ohio and knew John Kerry would not win Ohio so I felt trapped by what Iowa had done to us….When I saw what happened in 2004 I wrote a proposal in December 2007 and that was published. Then Huffington Post picked it up. I want a truly mathematical, geometrical system…to order primaries based on margins of victory in the general election before…to focus on the Ohios, Pennsylvanias and Wisconsins and Floridas – the states right in the middle, the purple states. Parties go after those states anyway; we might as well tailor our primaries that way, to appeal to voters in those states instead of getting candidates who appeal to extremes, John Kerry on one side and George Bush on the other.
Were you one of the PUMAs supporting McCain?
I was…for a few reasons. I wanted McCain to win so I could go back to being a Democrat, so the behavior in the primaries would not be rewarded. I went on to genuinely like McCain. It gave me a chance to get outside of the Democrat bubble I’ve been living in. I’ve voted for 18 years and never voted for anything but Democrats. It started as a protest vote and I ended up liking and admiring John McCain. Now I call myself an independent Democrat kind of like Joe Lieberman.
Given all the problems facing us, are you rooting for Obama to succeed?
Yes. I don’t want him to fail; that would be bad for the country. I plan on being critical of him though. He’s already dropped the ball. He campaigned on the fact that he would lift the Bush ban [on stem cells and] now is saying, ‘Leave it to Congress.’…The pledges [he made] were political in nature. There was very little conviction behind them and it surprises me how few Democrats see that. I’m going to do my best to get Democrats and liberals to hold him accountable.
More
-
Katie Connolly
|
Jan 20, 2009 06:03 PM
I was fortunate enough to be in the Orange section of the crowd at
today's inauguration ceremony--yep, right down the front, on the
southwest side of the Capitol. I couldn't really see much, and you've
probably seen the best shots on TV already and heard the enormous
applause and spontaneous "O-ba-ma" and "Yes We Can" chants. But for
those who weren't lucky enough to be in the crowd, I thought you might
enjoy a completely unscientific wrap-up of what I heard in the crowd
around me.
- Person who got a surprisingly passionate series of boos: Joe Lieberman
- Person who got a surprisingly enthusiastic cheer: Colin Powell
- Person who I thought would get a few cheers but was greeted with silence: John McCain
- Person who elicited the funniest heckles: Dick Cheney
- Person who got an uncomfortable spattering of golf claps and a few boos (and many boos in other sections): George W. Bush
- People outside of the Obama family who got the biggest cheers: Bill and Hillary Clinton
- Former official, outside of the Clinton family, who got the biggest cheers: Al Gore
- Line of Obama's speech that elicited the biggest cheer (in my
section): "We say to you now that our spirit is stronger and cannot be
broken; you cannot outlast us, and we will defeat you."
- Runner up for most popular line (amongst people in my section):
"Know that your people will judge you on what you can build, not what
you destroy."
- Most amusing insult to naughty people trying to cut in line: "Obama can see you!"
- Loudest exclamation of relief as Marine One took off, carrying Former President Bush one last time: "I can breathe again!"
More
-
Daniel Stone
|
Jan 20, 2009 05:44 PM
Immediately after the inaugural luncheon, a majority of the senate met
in the chamber for a brief session before the inaugural parade and
tonight's festivities. Several minutes into the session (and after a
brief moment of silence for Senator Edward Kennedy, who suffered a
seizure during the lunch), majority leader Harry Reid turned the
chamber toward business.
"President Obama has nominated a cabinet of exceptionally bright and
capable people as indicated by the support from all over America," he
said..."So I ask unanimous consent that the senate proceed to the
executive session to consider nominations."
With unanimous consent, the body then confirmed the following seven nominees:
Steven Chu: secretary of energy
Arne Duncan: secretary of education
Janet Napolitano: secretary of homeland security
Peter Orszag: director of the office of management and budget
Ken Salazar: secretary of the interior
Eric Shinseki: secretary of veterans affairs
Tom Vilsack: secretary of agriculture
The one name noticeably missing from the list is Hillary Clinton,
Obama's appointee to be secretary of state. Early Tuesday, Texas
Republican Senator John Cornyn raised objections to a speedy approval
of Clinton, indicating that he had further questions he wanted answered
regarding the donors to Bill Clinton's foundation. With senate
confirmations, a single objection can hold up a vote on an appointee. A
spokesperson for Reid said that Hillary's nomination will be voted on
shortly, as early as tomorrow.
More
-
Daniel Stone
|
Jan 20, 2009 04:07 PM
Barack Obama's post-inaugural lunch had hardly begun when
Massachusetts Senator Edward Kennedy collapsed with a seizure,
according to a House spokesperson. Reporters in a room outside the
luncheon heard a shriek, then witnessed several people running through
the rotunda toward Statuary Hall. Kennedy was taken out of the room on
a wheelchair into an adjacent room.
The seizure lasted about a
minute. Kennedy started shaking in his chair, then convulsing. After
Teresa Heinz Kerry briefly tried to administer first aid, Utah Senator
Orrin Hatch and Massachusetts Senator John Kerry left with Kennedy, who
was in a wheelchair. According to Hatch, Kennedy was conscious the
whole time. After he was taken out, a prayer was offered. Georgia
Representative John Lewis says Kennedy is now doing better, responding
to medication.
In the room, everyone reports hearing people yell
"Move!", almost before most people noticed that Kennedy was convulsing.
President Obama, along with Hatch, helped get Kennedy out of the room.
Connecticut Senator Christopher Dodd says that he escorted Kennedy to
an ambulance: "He was joking as he got into the ambulance, saying
'well, I guess ill see you later' -- he's doing much better now and
will be just fine." Several dozen senators left the luncheon in a
clearly emotional state, especially Senator Kerry, who walked by
yelling reporters but declined to talk.
Early reports said
that it was Senator Robert Byrd, not Kennedy, who collapsed. In fact,
and to the confusion of several people in the room, Byrd had left
moments earlier for a different health reason that's still unclear,
though the Los Angeles Times reports that the senator's staff says he is in good condition.
Later
in the afternoon, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid took the senate
floor to lead a brief session following the inaugural luncheon. "Our
minds are not really on the events of today, but for the fact that
senator Kennedy took ill during the lunch and is now in a Washington
hospital. He and I sat together at the inauguration. We had such a
wonderful time visiting and talking about where we were and where we
are."
He then asked the assembled senate to bow and pray during a silent moment.
More
-
Andrew Romano
|
Jan 20, 2009 03:13 PM
... Mr. James Taylor, awaiting security screening. As far as I could
tell, Taylor was only packing a single weapon: his dulcet, understated
tenor.
... Mr. Dustin Hoffman, seated a few rows in front of your humble correspondent.
... Mayor Michael Bloomberg, seated a few rows behind your humble correspondent. Clearly we were positioned in ascending order of political influence.
...
Mr. President.
... and the only guy who may have provoked a noisier reaction from the crowd
(where I was standing) than Barack Obama: former president George W.
Bush. At least, that is, when his chopper finally took off. Most
excited, perhaps, was the middle-aged black guy who shouted "Don't run
out of gas before you get to Texas!" to the departing aircraft (he also
offered to fly it himself, presumably on a kamikaze mission).
"Shoulda taken that trip four years ago," he added. "I might still have
some money." "Eight years ago," a nearby woman said. "Never should have
been here in the first place." Over my shoulder, I heard a college
student admit that she "felt kind of sorry for the guy." Judging by
the cheers, she was in
the minority.
More
-
Newsweek
|
Jan 20, 2009 12:06 PM
My fellow citizens:
I stand here today humbled by the task before us, grateful for the trust you have bestowed, mindful of the sacrifices borne by our ancestors. I thank President Bush for his service to our nation, as well as the generosity and cooperation he has shown throughout this transition.
Forty-four Americans have now taken the presidential oath. The words have been spoken during rising tides of prosperity and the still waters of peace. Yet, every so often the oath is taken amidst gathering clouds and raging storms. At these moments, America has carried on not simply because of the skill or vision of those in high office, but because We the People have remained faithful to the ideals of our forbearers, and true to our founding documents.
So it has been. So it must be with this generation of Americans.
More
-
Holly Bailey
|
Jan 20, 2009 11:52 AM
After the service at St. John's Church, the Obamas drove the short
block drive to the White House, where they were greeted on the North
Portico by the President Bush and his wife, Laura. The two couples,
joined by the Bidens, had coffee at the White House before departing in
a combined motorcade on the way to the Capitol. Passing the Treasury
Department along East Executive Drive, this reporter spied several
cases of beer stashed on a Treasury balcony overlooking the East Wing
of the White House. There appeared to be at least five cases of
Budweiser and several cases of Amstel Light. Who can blame them? With
the economy in the tank, we'd drink too.
Driving along Pennsylvania Avenue, the motorcade passed thousands of
cheering spectators—with some exceptions. Near the FBI building, there
were several dozen protesters holding large signs that read "Arrest
Bush." But Obama had some haters too. In the shadow of the Capitol,
several dozen protesters held signs that read "Bloody Obama," "America
is Doomed," and "The Beast," that featured a profile photo of Obama. A
red, white and blue sign read, "God Hates You."
More
-
Howard Fineman
|
Jan 20, 2009 11:13 AM
From my seat facing the podium, I can see the flags and the somber
dignitaries. On the subway ride here to the Capitol, I saw America
smiling. With New York City cops expertly herding the crowds, more than
a million riders worked their way to the Mall, and I talked to some of
them on the Red and Blue lines here. Each had something to say about
their hopes for and expectations of Barack Obama.
People from
across the country were on the trains. Ed Potocek and Amy Santacaterina
had flown in from Chicago. Both 46, he was in software; she worked for
city government. "To me Obama represents accountability and
participation," said Ed. "The idea that everyone pitches in." Amy said
she felt ties to everyone. "I never hugged so many strangers in my
life. Obama is a citizen of America -- and the world."
I met two
families from New Orleans, the Bosticks and the Ramonds. For their
teenage kids, Obama was about one word: change. "Change and history,"
said Ana Bostick, 17. "He's the first black president!!"
Rose
Cooper, a city school teacher from Galveston with more than 20 years of
experience, sais that Obama was going to have to be about "sticking
with his promises. We're losing so many jobs. He needs to turn it
around." She had a special mission here: to record everything for her
students. "They kept saying, 'Ms. Cooper we can't believe you're
going!' Well, here I am!"
I met Andy Towle and Corey Johnson, gay activists who run the popular blog towleroad.com.
They were happy, too, but not about Obama's decision to ask the Rev.
Rick Warren to give the invocation. "Obama's first and only big mistake
so far," said Johnson.
Even the press line into the grounds
was wonderfully American in its diversity. There was Charles Hallman,
who works for the oldest African-American newspaper in Minnesota. And I
met Sara Hassan, 27, a fellow graduate of the Columbia Journalism
School. She is Bangladeshi-American. She wore a headscarf. Her father
teaches English literature at a college in South Carolina. His
specialty is Irish modern poetry.
Welcome to Obama's America!
James
Joyce wrote that his aspiring character Stephen yearned to "forge in
the smithy of his soul" a new identity as an artist. America is forging
(reforging) its own identity today.
More
-
Holly Bailey
|
Jan 20, 2009 11:05 AM
Barack Obama began working on his inaugural address almost two
months ago, according to senior aides to the incoming president. The
week before Thanksgiving, the president-elect sat down with his
speechwriting team, including top writer Jon Favreau, to sketch out
broad themes of what he wanted to say today. Favreau completed a first
draft by the first week of December. Shortly before Obama left for
Hawaii for his Christmas vacation, the incoming president went over the
draft with Favreau, who wrote a second version of the speech over the
holidays. Yet aides say it was Obama who ultimately wrote the bulk of
the speech. Two weekends ago, Obama holed up in his room at the Hay
Adams Hotel in Washington, where he and his family stayed earlier this
month, and worked on what aides described as “extensive writing” on his
own. “He had very strong ideas early on about what he wanted to
convey,” a senior Obama aide tells Newsweek. The speech you’ll hear
today is more than 60 percent Obama’s own words, the aide adds.
Obama
has said he re-read inaugural addresses delivered by Abraham Lincoln
and John F. Kennedy, whose speech he described as “intimidating.”
Indeed, upon completing the bulk of the speech today, Obama asked Ted
Sorenson, Kennedy’s chief speechwriter, to read a draft of his speech
and give input. According to Obama aides, the speech was also read by
historians Doris Kearns Goodwin, author of the Lincoln biography “Team
of Rivals,” which has been mentioned as one of Obama’s favorite books,
and David McCullough. It’s unclear how much advice the group gave Obama
and his team, though the broad overviews of the speech provided in
advance by aides do hint at the sweeping rhetoric of JFK and Lincoln,
two presidents who led the country at transformational times.
In
the speech, according to aides, Obama will acknowledge that America
faces difficult challenges ahead. But, citing the nation’s history of
overcoming past struggles without taking “short cuts,” the
president-elect will “express optimism and hope” that the nation can
rise to the challenge of the “enormity of the task we are facing,” says
a senior Obama aide. “The speech will describe the moment we’re in, and
the spirit required to emerge from this crisis even stronger and more
united than before,” says a senior Obama aide.
Over the last
week, the president-elect has gone through several read-throughs of the
speech, which aides say will run between 18 and 20 minutes. The Obama
team is expected to release excerpts of what exactly the incoming
president will say later this morning.
More
-
Daniel Stone
|
Jan 20, 2009 10:59 AM
Down on the National Mall, the crowd is loud and fiercely excited, just
an hour before the man they came to see will take the presidential
oath. But inside the capitol building, you can barely hear a whisper.
In the capitol's rotunda, the pool of reporters awaits the
president-elect as TV cameras with the network news reporters in front
of them practice their live shots and scribble notes. "When the
executive party arrives, you'll have to step back," one of several
hundred capitol police officers has told us repeatedly. On the other
side of the rotunda, photographers review the angles they'll take when
Obama enters the room.
The arrivals have also begun. John Kerry and Al Gore, along with other
high profile attendees walked through the rotunda moments ago. We're
told many of Obama's cabinet appointees will walk onto the platform
together.
Not far from the media area is the door, adorned with a flag about
eight feet tall, where Obama will exit the capitol and step onto the
inaugural stand. From there, he'll get the first view of the crowd --
easily approaching two million by now -- that has come to see him take
the oath of office. No matter how many people came to cheer for him
during the campaign, the view of the entire mall completely covered
with cheering people will certainly surprise him.
Next to the rotunda is Statuary Hall, the traditional venue (dating
back to president McKinley) for the inaugural luncheon, hosted by the
Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies. After the
ceremony, Obama will be joined by 220 of his closest friends for a
three course lunch. The menu was designed weeks ago, modeled after the
tastes of Abraham Lincoln, rather than Obama's. More than 50 servers in
white tuxedos await Obama and the high profile guests. Senior members
of congress and the new executive staff will join him.
Reporters, for some reason, weren't invited.
More
-
Andrew Romano
|
Jan 20, 2009 10:51 AM
It's not unusual for an incoming president--or his predecessor, for
that matter--to spend the evening before the Inauguration ceremony
without the sweet relief of slumber. John Quincy Adams, beset by
nerves, suffered through "two successive sleepless nights" before he
was sworn in; Bill Clinton was awake until the wee hours frantically
rewriting his speech. I suspect it was much the same last night for
George W. Bush and Barack Obama. But not, I'm guessing, because of
stress or sadness. Why? Because no one can reflect on his inner turmoil
when being forced to endure deafening, continuous, all-night blasts of
music directly outside his bedroom window.
In what seems like one of the most brazen invasions of presidential
peace and privacy I can imagine, the people in charge of putting on
this afternoon's Inaugural parade down Pennsylvania Avenue spent the
entire night last night--the entire night--broadcasting song after song
after song at bone-crushing volume over the hundreds of massive
speakers that dot the National Mall, which just so happens to abut both
the White House and the Blair House, where the once and future leaders
of the Free World were presumably trying (and failing) to get some
shuteye. I know, because another building that abuts the Mall is the
Newsweek bureau at 1750 Pennsylvania--where your humble correspondent,
long regarded as one of the world's heaviest sleepers, was also trying
(and failing) to drift off. Unfortunately for the three of us, the
inaugural DJs needed to make sure they could spin, scratch, cut up and
crossfade their inaugural records in preparation for today's big event.
And they needed the hours from 2:00 to 7:00 to do it. Think of the
largest, loudest nightclub you've ever been to. Then multiply it by a
hundred.
Lest I sound bitter, let me note for the record that there is a silver
lining to my sleepless night: I can now bring you an exclusive preview
of what to expect from this afternoon's soundtrack. According to my
sources, which are attached to either side of my head and are still
ringing, there may be some Backstreet Boys ("Backstreet's Back"). There
may be some Beastie Boys ("Intergalatic Planetary"). And there may be
some Bruce Springsteen (but isn't there always?).
So if you think that Bush and Obama look a little tired today on TV, don't blame nerves. Really, it's all the Boss's fault.
More
-
Holly Bailey
|
Jan 20, 2009 10:30 AM
Everyone’s a photographer today. This morning, Barack and Michelle
Obama emerged from Blair House for the block and half drive to St.
John’s Episcopal Church, the Lafayette Square institution where George
W. Bush, Bill Clinton and other presidents have attended inaugural day
prayer services. Inside, Obamas joined Joe Biden and his wife, Jill, on
the front row. The service itself was off limits to cameras, but once
inside, many attendees, especially those in a balcony overlooking the
incoming president and vice president, could be seen snapping photos of
the service on their cell phone cameras. Several pastors offered
prayers and biblical guidance for Obama, including televangelist T.D.
Jakes. “The problems are mighty and the solutions are not simple,”
Jakes said, looking Obama square in the eye. “Everywhere you turn there
will be a critic waiting to attack every decision that you make. But
you are all fired up, Sir, and you are ready to go. And this nation
goes with you. God goes with you.” But citing his 14-year-old son,
Jakes offered a more pop culture-centric piece of advice. “May the
force be with you,” Jakes said.
More
-
Newsweek
|
Jan 20, 2009 07:41 AM
By Jeffrey Bartholet
A pre-dawn crush of people in the Washington DC
Metro, eager to be part of history. The train passes one stop because
the platform is overstuffed. At the Capital South Station, packed cars
open. There's little room to take actual steps; everyone shuffles. It's
a claustrophobic procession, clogging and pressing at a broken
escalator. Then someone starts singing, and more join in:
Oh when the saints
go marching in
When the saints go marching in
Oh Lord I want to be there in that number
When the saints go marching in!
After a few rounds of this, a smaller group starts a new chorus:
Oh when Obama
goes marching in...
But most people got the point the first time around.
More
-
Katie Connolly
|
Jan 19, 2009 11:18 PM
Being a reporter in the President-elect’s press pool (that is, the
small group of journalists who travels with Obama each day and shares
reporting with other media outlets that don’t have a representative
that day) is a strange experience. It involves a heck of a lot of
waiting around in vans for Obama to do something we can report. Then
when he does venture out, life becomes about running really fast to
catch him, fumbling with notebooks and recorders, a lingering fear of
the motorcade leaving without you, and, if you are me, getting shoved
out of the way by burly cameramen desperate to get the perfect shot.
For the most part, pool duty is a privilege, especially when
you find yourself with a front row view of U2 serenading the
President-elect with “City of Blinding Lights.” And every now and then
you have the rare honor of seeing the President-elect in a moment that
is as close to personal as one can be in public. That’s what happened
yesterday when I had the opportunity to follow Obama to church.
The Obama family worshipped at 19th Street Baptist Church on
Sunday morning, a 170-year-old congregation in Northwest DC, attended
by a largely African-American population. It’s a progressive church—the
current pastor, Dr. Derrick Harkins, is a vocal advocate for HIV-AIDS
issues. The entire Obama family, including First Mother-in-Law Marian
Robinson, sat in the second row. At times Obama and his wife whispered
to each other, occasionally sharing a warm moment with a quick chuckle
and a flash of their expansive grins. Obama sang, clapped and swayed
along with the rousing choir. Mrs. Obama helped her youngest daughter
Sasha follow along in the hymnal, every now and then rubbing her back
supportively. If they hadn’t received a standing ovation the moment
they walked in, they could have been a regular young family at Sunday
services.
From my perch on the balcony, the support and goodwill Obama
has engendered within this community felt palpable. Church-goers seemed
like they bursting for an opportunity to vocally acclaim this storied
figure in their midst. When 10 year old Nigel Sanders, a member of the
church’s Kandelite Children’s Choir, tentatively stepped up to the
microphone to say “Martin Luther King walked so Barack Obama could
run,” the congregation erupted in such fierce cheers and applause that
the rest of Sanders’ speech was nearly drowned out. “Just another
typical Sunday at 19th Street Baptist Church,” quipped Pastor Harkins.
Being raised Catholic, I’m used to fairly staid church
services and a healthy dose of guilt, so it felt very wrong to be
taking notes on my lap, nosily peering over the balcony at congregants,
BlackBerry buzzing in one hand. It felt uncomfortable to act as a
dispassionate, unmoved reporter amongst people engaged in private but
energetic worship. (I’m sure my mother would be horrified to learn that
I didn’t stand at the appropriate times during the service). But the
moment I felt most deeply voyeuristic was when Pastor Harkins spoke
directly to Obama in his sermon.
Harkins’ sermon, entitled “For a Time Such as This”, drew from
the Biblical story of Esther. Harkins told his flock that, like Esther,
God prepares and locates people for moments in their lives when they
will be called up on to do important, and sometimes difficult, work.
Although he had already referenced Obama several times during the
service, Harkins seemed intent on delivering a personal message in the
sermon. After ruminating over the achievements of Rosa Parks, Dietrich
Bonhoeffer and Martin Luther King, Harkins asked “How could it be that
the first black president of the Harvard Law Review would do anything
other than dwell in the lofty heights of the best corporate law firms?”
Soon he addressed Obama directly. “Perhaps, just perhaps, you are where
you are for a time such as this,” Harkins intoned. Later he stressed
the importance of Obama’s family: “Perhaps a family has been shaped and
fashioned for such a time as this.” Harkins said that in times of harsh
criticism Obama could turn to his family and “know the foundation upon
which you stand” or to look at his wife and be encouraged by her. “God
prepared you. God placed you. God will not forsake you,” he said.
Obama sat characteristically calm throughout the sermon. But I
can't imagine there's too many people that deliver such personal
messages to the directly President-elect these days and, as the
President-elect presumably pondered and prayed, I couldn’t help feeling
that I was intruding on a private moment.
More
-
Andrew Romano
|
Jan 19, 2009 08:53 PM

OK. I get it. I know I look a little young for my age.
But this is just cruel. I'm referring, of course, to the relentless,
blood-curdling screeching that's been filling Washington D.C.'s Verizon
Center arena every, oh, five or six seconds.
I knew something
was fishy when Newsweek's Washington bureau chief offered me the
magazine's sole ticket to the "Kids Inaugural: We Are the Future"
concert. You might think that members of the press can just waltz right
into any inauguration event they want. Not so much. Basically, each
outlet gets a very limited number of tickets--like, one--to each
official shindig. There's a lot of internal jockeying involved in
determining who gets to go to what. But--surprise!--the Kids Inaugural
pass just happened to land on my desk, no drama involved. And despite
the fact that I've never actually heard anything by Miley Cyrus, the
Jonas Brothers, Demi Lovato or Bow Wow--like any sane, childless person
over the age of 16, even one who can't grow a beard yet--I knew that my
eight-year-old cousin Robert would commit parricide if he ever found
out that I'd skipped the show. So I decided to take the plunge.
Thus: here I am at the Verizon Center, along with 15,000 adolescents. Who are screeching. All the time.
But
even though my tympanic membrane may be punctured, the "Kids Inaugural"
is actually turning out to be, oddly enough, one of the more moving
events I've attended since arriving yesterday in D.C. It's not because
Miley Cyrus is, in fact, a pretty compelling performer, which she is.
It's not because the Jonas Brothers' impossibly lustrous hair looks
even more lustrous in person, which it does. It's not because George
Lopez's advice to the crowd--"Can't survive on grilled cheese alone?
Yes We Can! Can't eat 17 fruit roll-ups at a time? Yes We Can!"--is
strangely convincing. It's not even because these kids, many of whom
are the sons and daughters of members of the armed services, are
finally getting at least one evening to make up, in some small way, for
the months and years their moms and dads spent overseas, in harm's way.
For
me, it's something else entirely. When Sasha and Malia Obama appeared
shortly before show time and took their seats in the front row, the
entire arena erupted. Near me, a group of young white girls screamed,
"We love you Sasha! We love you Malia!" As the cameraman crouched a few
inches from the new First Kids, projecting their faces on the massive
Jumbotrons hanging overhead, I couldn't help but feel sort of sorry for
them, knowing that they're about to endure the most awkward years of
their lives in the glare of the national spotlight. But assuming they
emerge sane, safe and unscathed, as they undoubtedly will, the good
that the Obama girls will do, just by being themselves, is truly
staggering. Consider it. As of tomorrow, the most popular children in
the country--in every rec room, every classroom, every cafeteria; the
two kids that every one of their peers admires, adores and wants to be
friends with--will be African-American. (Even Miley Cyrus ran over to
shake their hands.) As Michelle Obama said on stage, "the children are
the future." Judging by tonight, they won't even understand why putting
a black family in the White House was such a big deal to begin with.
And that's something worth screeching about.
More
-
Andrew Romano
|
Jan 19, 2009 04:39 PM

(Charles Dharapak / AP)
What
is it with do-gooders and their costume changes? For Clark Kent, it was
phone booths and blue tights. The less demure Peter Parker would reveal
his spidey spandex by simply ripping off his whatever else he had on.
And so it is, it seems, with Barack Obama, who was sporting a business
suit when he entered Walter Reed Medical Center this morning to visit
wounded soldiers--and a more rugged checked-shirt-and-gray-jeans
ensemble when he emerged an hour later.
The
reason for the swap: a day of hands-on charity work meant to honor the
memory of Martin Luther King, Jr., and set an example for volunteers
participating in the 11,000 public service events organized,
nationwide, at the president-elect's request.
Obama's
first stop was Sasha Bruce House, a stately 35-year-old homeless
shelter for teens near Capitol Hill where volunteers were already busy
painting and preparing dormitories for incoming boarders. Shrugging off
his casual navy jacket amid a few eager cries of "Mr. Obama!," the
president-elect at first cautioned that he should do "something simple
'cause I could screw something up" (no electrical work, for example),
but still gamely attempted to pry a stubborn balking valance loose
before switching to painting--a job, he informed the press, that he
held his 17-year-old summer, earning minimum wage. "This is good
practice ‘cause I’m moving to a new house tomorrow," Obama cracked.
“I do hope they’re watching my
technique," he added, referring to the kids. “It’s not rocket science. You take the pole and
the roller, then you roll. But you do need to apply some elbow grease –
like everything we do.”
As
that last remark suggests, the real purpose of the Sasha Bruce visit
was inspiration rather than preparation. Coating a nearby wall with
Yosemite Blue, Obama quoted King--"everybody can be great because
everybody can serve"--before explaining what he wanted Americans to
take away from National Service Day. “This country is great because of
its people," he said. “We can accomplish anything. One of the goals of
my administration will be to make sure that we have a government that’s
more responsive and more effective and more efficient at helping
families. But don’t underestimate the power for people to pull together
and to accomplish amazing things. This facility is an example of
somebody with imagination and determination… These young people have
huge potential that right now is not being tapped, and given the crisis
that we’re in and the hardships that so many people are going through,
we can’t allow any idle hands. Everybody’s got to be involved.
Everybody’s going to have to pitch in, and I think the American people
are ready for that.”
A
noble sentiment (and one, Obama added, that the Internet--"an amazing
tool to organize
people" that "we don't just want to use... in elections"--can possibly
help make a reality). But as each of his predecessors learned soon
enough, habit is often stronger than hope. Before Obama left for his
next service event--an assembly at Calvin Coolidge High School in
northwest D.C. where volunteers were decorating blankets, writing
letters and taping video messages for deployed soldiers--Cara Fuller, a
worker from Philadelphia, asked if he'd broken a sweat while painting.
“Nah, I don’t sweat," he said. "You ever see me sweat?”
We'll check back in four years.
More
-
Katie Paul
|
Jan 19, 2009 04:36 PM
It's not easy being red in Washington right now. Republican
powerbrokers have fled, conservative commentators are bitter, and
pretty much everyone is about to be out of a job by tomorrow. Once the
hottest ticket in town, even attendance at tonight's Texas Black Tie
& Boots inaugural ball is expected to be lackluster.
So, going against the grain, I had a mission this weekend: find the
good-natured young GOPers willing to take the Obama fever in stride and
unbutton their top buttons with the rest of us.
Fortunately, I stumbled upon one. Lauren Blaine, 25, is an
Obama-mocking, Prius-bashing, committed conservative, and an eager
partaker of inaugural bashes. "I'm a happy Republican who would love
to go to the inauguration. If you know anyone who has tickets, let me
know," she told me, adding that she's excited about the energy in D.C.
these days. In the absence of tickets, she is teaming up with some
fellow conservatives to ring in the new presidency together at a party
just outside the city.

So
will the good will extend beyond the boozy celebrations? "I think
people are just glad the election is over, because that was getting out
of control," she said. "Now, it's more about [Obama] putting his money
where his mouth is—OK, we're in a recession, so fix the country. It's
not about winning, it's about governing. It's not a basketball game."
Not quite willing to let the election dream die, she keeps a cardboard
cutout of John McCain in her apartment. But these days, even John has
gotten into the inaugural spirit with a few extra accessories.
Yes,
of course, one person keeping it real is hardly a scientific survey. I
can't reach the diehards, because they've either skipped town or
retreated into a bleak half-week hibernation. I did hear tell of one
GOP stalwart planning to board himself in his room with LSD,
painkillers and a poster of Ronald Reagan on his wall until the
inaugural madness subsides. Another, an imminently unemployed staffer,
had similar plans to cut the electricity in his apartment and make his
way through the liquor cabinet.
Fair enough. Losing a plush job in the middle of a recession
probably wouldn't make me feel too warm and fuzzy either. But with more
than 70 percent of Americans currently supporting Obama, I think it's fair to say that most of the country is on Lauren's side on this one.
More
-
Newsweek
|
Jan 19, 2009 03:23 PM
By Dina Fine Maron
As change comes to Washington, the corporate world is directly tapping into the Obama lexicon.
Ikea, the Swedish furniture company, is running ads in the D.C. Metro, spouting familiar rhetoric such as “Embrace change,” and “The time for domestic reform is now,” in the hopes of driving business to their two local stores. Ikea even went so far as to create a completely Ikea-furnished mock oval office in one of the city’s train stations last week.
Pepsi, too, launched a “Refresh Everything” campaign, even adapting Obama’s signature “O” symbol into the newest Pepsi swoosh. The idea behind Pepsi’s new message is that this is the time for change--spiffying up their image, and sponsoring talks on education, revitalizing hip-hop, black America, and, yes, their cool refreshment.
The “Yes We Can” motto has been applied to more abstract ideas as well--like wind energy. The American Wind Energy Association billboards around Washington question if we can “create jobs out of thin air” and then answer their own rhetorical question: “YES, with wind energy WE CAN.”
But the slogans and symbols aren’t the only parts of Obama’s campaign to be appropriated by advertisers. His ability to mobilize voters and reach them through the Internet was a powerful tool during his campaign. That trial run at voter inclusion may have led the way for Pepsi and Ikea’s campaigns to get voters involved … as consumers. On Ikea’s Web site you can design your own oval office and then even e-mail it to the president. And Pepsi’s site suggests you think about what you would like to ask our new president--and then upload that video. As I munch on my “Yes Pecan!” Ben and Jerry’s ice cream (the unofficial Obama flavor), I find myself wondering: Is this all change you can believe in?
More
-
Daniel Stone
|
Jan 19, 2009 03:18 PM
Celebratory is a safe way to describe the mood in Washington. And
not just for Barack Obama's big day on Tuesday. When Obama raises his
right hand, it will mark for millions of his supporters the end of
something else.
At Dupont Circle in Northwest Washington, today
is Bush's day. And more specifically, his last one as president. For
much of liberal-leaning Washington and the millions of visitors
expected for the week, it's something worth celebrating.
Bill Moyer, president of the Backbone Campaign,
took the inaugural week as an opportunity to almost literally turn the
page on Bush's presidency by unveiling a 50 foot copy of the preamble
of the Constitution. Set up in the middle of Dupont Circle, he wants
anyone he can get to sign it -- a public commitment to upholding the
constitution, reintroducing it after what he says is the document's
tarnishing over Bush's term. "Now more than ever is a time not to
delegate our role in where this nation needs to go," he says, standing
in front of a dozen people, many on all fours, singing the document
with Sharpies. After the inaugural, Moyer will take the document to 10
other cities around the country, adding an additional 200 feet of
signing space before the banner is unveiled in New York in April.
On the other side of the circle, a more spirited political statement
depicts a blown-up Bush, standing nearly 20 feet high. His long nose is
a fairly obvious nod toward a certain fairy tale.
And in referencing a different less-than-flattering presidential
moment, the organizers also encouraged passers-by to throw shoes at the
inflated Bush. Several sign holders beside the statue stand advocating
for federal indictments of top administration officials, including Bush
and VP Dick Cheney.

All
over town, aversion to Bush is in full form on the president's last
full day. When any president leaves office, the foes and critics he has
picked up along the way are traditionally -- and reasonably -- pleased
to see him go. But it seems that Bush's critics have created a new
standard. (Don't forget that even at the beginning of Bush's first
term, protesters shouted against the validity of Bush's electoral
victory. The result of the 2000 election, eventually settled before the
Supreme Court, was a nation far too divided to give Bush an Obama-like
reception.)
But now, are the blatant signals
toward Bush's departure a bit much, especially during a week that's
obviously supposed to be represent something completely new? After all,
Obama did campaign on being a contrasting president to Bush, suggesting
he's quite mindful of 43's slip ups.
What do you think? In the comments section below, tell us what role Bush's presidency should play as the country turns to Obama.
More
-
Andrew Romano
|
Jan 18, 2009 05:22 PM
"Star-studded" is a bit of a cliché, but there's no better way to describe the Inaugural Opening Ceremony that just concluded here on the Mall. Since pictures are worth a thousand words--on a roll today, no?--we've decided the best way to bring you the action is with a few snapshots from the press area (which, after all, was a heckuva lot closer to the stage than where the hoi polloi were forced to stand). Without any further ado...
The view--reminiscent of another historic event--from just beneath the Lincoln Memorial stage:
The security, standing atop the monument:
Bono and the boys of U2 performing "City of Blinding Lights" for the president-elect, who used it as one of his campaign theme songs:
Tao Rodriguez-Seeger, Pete Seeger and Bruce "The Boss" Springsteen singing Woody Guthrie's classic folk anthem, "This Land Is Your Land":
Beyoncé leading the crowd in "America the Beautiful"--with Bon Jovi, Garth Brooks, Sheryl Crow, Tom Hanks, Jamie Foxx, Tiger Woods and others as her rather high-wattage backdrop.
Oh, and then there was this guy:
Something tells me we'll be hearing more from him in the years to come...
More
-
Katie Paul
|
Jan 18, 2009 02:46 PM
This D.C. is a funny place. You may think you're just
stepping into a CVS to pick up a pack of tissues, but actually you're
heading on a collision course into the possible next prime minister of
Israel.
I'm here in the capital during the run-up to the
inauguration to take in a little bit of history. As you might imagine,
taking in history in the middle of January can be a chilly undertaking.
Yesterday afternoon, after strolling a bit in the quiet, somewhat
suburban part of town where we're staying, my friend and I take a quick
break from the great outdoors to grab some tissues in CVS. This,
however, is no ordinary trip to CVS. Making the turn down one of the
aisles, I catch sight of a squad of black-clad men with matching red
lapel pins. Amongst them is a blond woman mumbling in a language that
sounds vaguely like Hebrew. Hmmm, I think. She looks like...nah, no
way...
Way. As I turn the corner at the end of the aisle, I
slam into the mumbling Tzipi Livni, foreign minister of Israel, who, I
later learn, is in town finalizing an agreement with Condoleezza Rice
about Hamas' underground smuggling routes into Gaza. Oof! Sorry, I say.
Mumble, mumble, she replies, looking peeved. I glance at the kafiya
wrapped around my friend's neck, then at the bulky gentlemen making up
Livni's Secret Service detail. Uh-oh. Fortunately for us all, the
foreign minister has bigger fish to fry than two sniffling
twenty-somethings, and she continues on her way to whatever toothpaste
or shampoo she came to get.
I didn't have a chance to ask her, but it's possible that she is prepping for tonight's Foreign Diplomats Inaugural Ball,
hosted by the Ethiopian embassy at the James Monroe Mansion. (I also
put in an inquiry with the Israeli embassy, and will update if they get
back to me). I hope not, though. Although Israel may have unilaterally
declared its ceasefire just in time for the inaugural festivities (Newsweek's Rod Nordland has a nice bit of reporting from Gaza city, here), this
is one woman with some seriously big fish to focus on frying right now.
More
-
Daniel Stone
|
Jan 18, 2009 01:43 PM
In context, it's not so bad. Earlier this morning in Washington, the weather forecasters gave an uplifting number: 35. Uplifting only in comparison to the low teens and negative wind chill temperatures that have frozen the city (and much of the country) for the past week. At one point, planning officials were talking about how to scale down the inaugural events and lowering crowd estimates, thinking that people might come to the wise realization that it still counts as witnessing history if you watch it on TV, ideally sitting next to a fire. Barack Obama, one person told me, would want me to be warm.
But no! Keep the crowd estimates where they were. 35, with a good chance of temperatures approaching even (gasp!) 40 by Tuesday, means that the inaugural events won't just be for the thick skinned and weatherized. Nope, the presidential inaugural committee, with the direction of Obama himself, promised that this would be the people's inauguration, and apparently they meant it.
Of course, let's not forget those visitors who see 35 as a temperature approaching that in your freezer, and thus humanly unnatural (we're looking at you, West Coasters).
More
-
Katie Connolly
|
Jan 16, 2009 10:09 PM
It could have been a line of fans waiting for Kanye West tickets to
go on sale, or for the premiere a new Lord of the Rings flick. But the
hundreds of well-dressed folks cuing at the Washington Convention
Center today were no rag tag bunch of fans. They were there for tickets
to a different kind of blockbuster: Tuesday night’s Official
Presidential Inaugural Balls.
Volunteers say that ball-goers have been lining up since
before 9 a.m. this morning to get their hands on some of the hottest
tickets around. DC resident Michael Jones was thrilled to receive
tickets to the Mid-Atlantic States Ball after making an online
contribution to the Presidential Inaugural Committee. Jones waited in
line for over 45 minutes to pick up tickets for himself and his wife.
(She’ll be scouring stores for the perfect gown this weekend.) Many
more like Jones will be standing in long lines for their tickets
throughout the next few days.
There are ten official inaugural balls this year, including
the first ever Neighborhood Ball, a free but invitation only event
designed to allow DC residents their very own celebration. Six balls
will be held at the Washington Convention Center, while the others will
take place at Union Station, the Washington Hilton, the National
Building Museum and the National Guard Armory. Between 5000 and 10,000
people are expected at each ball, with organizers anticipating that the
Western ball (for residents of the Western states) will be the largest.
No Obama event is complete without a merchandising table, and
the ticket collection site is no exception. Those mavens of political
branding over at Camp Obama have released a wide array of inauguration
swag (proceeds go to the presidential inaugural committee). At the
convention center you can purchase an Obama onesie for your baby,
fleece blankets, hats, paperweights or an autographed frame for your
inaugural invitation. For fashion conscious political junkies, the
Obama folks have released the “Runway to Change” line, which includes
designer tote bags from Diane Von Fustenburg and Tory Burch ($70 a
pop), and 9 different t-shirts from designers like Zac Posen and Donna
Karan. Most shirts sell for $45, but for those wanting to help kick
start the economy, a bedazzled Gerald Matthews inauguration tee will
set you back $150.
Staffers at the Convention Center say that the most popular
item has been the iconic Shepard Fairey t-shirt. The most expensive
item, a $159 woven blanket featuring the Obama-Biden inauguration seal,
has been a hit with those looking for some extra warmth at the swearing
in ceremony. And the slowest mover? An $89 teacup and saucer. Look out
for bargain basement deals on that after Tuesday.
More
-
Daniel Stone
|
Jan 16, 2009 03:05 PM
While the White House will become Barack Obama's new home on
Jan. 20, the physical building is still George Bush's residence until
... Jan. 20. It's a peculiar move-out and move-in schedule that leaves
White House staff exactly five hours to transform the three-story,
132-room structure from one family's house into a home for another. "To
the first couple and their children, it's their home, and they need to
feel at home the moment they arrive," says Gary Walters, former White
House chief usher who has overseen every White House transition since
Richard Nixon lived there.
The flag drops the moment Bush and
Obama head to Capitol Hill for the swearing-in ceremony. All 150
members of the White House staff go to work immediately, rearranging
and redecorating in precisely the way the Obamas chose when they met
with the chief usher during their first visit to the house in November.
The process is finely documented in an official "choreography plan," as
it's called, that details by the minute when everything is to be moved
out of and into strategically parked moving trucks. Carpet, paint,
everything down to bed linens and lamp shades are changed to reflect
the new family's taste.
Some rooms, like in the West Wing, are
finished before others, in case the president is rushed back early to
attend to urgent business. But under a very strict timetable, the rest
of the transformation leaves little room for the unexpected. In 1989,
George H.W. Bush's granddaughters walked into the madness before the
end of the inaugural parade (the official deadline) because it was too
cold. Caught completely off guard, a staff member sent the girls to be
entertained by the White House florist until the residence was ready.
In 1993, Bill and Hillary Clinton's inaugural gown and tuxedo went
temporarily missing when an aide veered from the script and carried
them to the wrong floor.
The process is kept strictly secret and
details of the house's decorative style are scarce. The White House
declined to discuss the choices the Obamas made for their home (citing
privacy reasons) and no spectators--and especially no reporters--are
permitted in the house on Inauguration Day. "Not even the president has
ever seen this happen," says Walters. The way it's designed, no
president ever will.
More
-
Daniel Stone
|
Jan 16, 2009 10:23 AM
My inbox lit up this morning with a message from a fellow Washingtonian, apparently too eager to sleep on the eve of something so enormous. He wasn't talking about the inaugural next Tuesday, which locals expect to bring out either the best or worst in the city. No, he was talking about Friday, awaiting the last-minute actions on the last official work day of the Bush administration. "Epic day of news dumping!" wrote my friend, who's not exactly a fan of the president. "It's gonna be sweet to watch!"
My friend could be right. Since Monday is a holiday, Friday is the effective last day of Bush's term, creating a deadline for everything else Bush wants to do in office: pardons, executive orders, even diplomatic shifts. With no press briefings remaining before Tuesday, anything the administration does on Friday won't be questioned by the press until after Bush leaves office. And the press corps, feverishly preparing for Tuesday's inaugural, has most of its attention elsewhere. In essence, the story isn't Bush anymore, and Bush's staff can use that to its advantage.
It's a sneaky but strategic time to make controversial decisions. President Clinton released a list of pardons on the last day of his presidency, which included a controversial name--fugitive financier Marc Rich--that Clinton never had to answer questions about while in office. Other presidents have used last-minute executive orders to somehow tie the hands of their successors on a specific policy. Gee, thanks.
Bush left early Friday for Camp David, signaling that all remaining action of his administration has already been set in motion. Will the Bush White House be trying to sweep anything under the rug? We'll be back on this page all day and over the weekend with updates.
More
-
Newsweek
|
Jan 9, 2009 07:18 PM
By Michael Isikoff
A former top Clinton White House lawyer is in line to be nominated by Barack Obama to head the Justice Department office in charge of all federal criminal investigations, according to three transition sources.
Lanny A. Breuer, who played a key role in defending Bill Clinton during impeachment and related criminal and congressional probes during the 1990s, is slated to be nominated to assistant attorney general in charge of the criminal division, said the sources, all of whom asked not to be identified because of the sensitivity of the matter. One of the sources said a public announcement of the selection of Breuer, who is a partner of attorney general designate Eric Holder at the firm of Covington &Burling, could come as early as next week.
Breuer is a widely respected--and affable--Washington criminal defense lawyer who has represented a number of high-profile clients in recent years, including Bill Clinton’s former national security advisor Sandy Berger who was charged with removing classified papers from the National Archives while preparing for testimony before the 9/11 commission. Breuer’s success in getting what appeared to be a relatively lenient plea bargain for Berger from the Bush Justice Department was cited by Washingtonian magazine two years ago when it named him of the 30 “Big Guns” in the Washington legal community. Breuer was also retained last year to help represent baseball star Roger Clemens before a congressional committee investigating allegations of steroid abuse.
But Breuer’s selection caused some minor debate within transition circles. He has never been a federal prosecutor, although he worked for fours years as a prosecutor in Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau’s office after he graduated from Columbia Law School in 1985. Although he is a law partner of Holder’s, Breuer was actually not chosen by Holder for the job, two transition sources said. Instead, his selection was advocated by former allies in the Clinton White House, including transition chief John Podesta and Rahm Emanuel, in line to be Obama’s chief of staff.
Breuer, who is likely to be confirmed without any difficulty, will be the political appointee with prime responsibility for making some of the most sensitive decisions in the Obama Justice Department. He will inherit a number of high-profile and closely watched investigations, including probes into frauds relating to the financial crisis, such as the Bernard Madoff case and the mortgage industry. Other ongoing probes include an investigation into the destruction of CIA tapes of waterboarding and another into the firing of U.S. attorneys where a special counsel is believed to be seeking testimony from former Bush White House officials Karl Rove and Harriet Miers. Breuer will also have line responsibility for criminal investigations conducted by current U.S. attorneys, most prominently, the probe by U.S. attorney Patrick Fitzgerald in Chicago into Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich.
-
Daniel Stone
|
Jan 9, 2009 04:23 PM
Though Barack Obama is many things,
one thing he is not is a foodie. As reporters on the campaign trail
often noticed, the president elect eats for nutrition, not for taste. A
healthy meal of chicken and broccoli was common, and only when he had
to oblige local media did Obama smile through local specialties, like
syrup-dripping waffles or greasy cheese steaks.
But on the day
Obama will become president, he will have no choice but to eat fancily
-- tasting food that would make even the most hardened Top Chef judge
drool. Early Friday, the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural
Ceremonies released the menu for Obama's celebratory lunch that will
immediately follow the swearing in ceremony. Here's the rundown:
Appetizer
Seafood Stew
Duckhorn Vineyards, 2007 Sauvignon Blanc, Napa Valley
Entree
A brace of American birds (pheasant and duck), served with sour cherry chutney and molasses sweet potatoes
Goldeneye, 2005 Pinot Noir, Anderson Valley
Dessert
Apple Cinnamon Sponge Cake and Sweet Cream Glacé
Korbel Natural “Special Inaugural Cuvée,” California Champagne
The
wines come from California, a tip of the hat to Dianne Feinstein,
chairwoman of the inaugural committee. The Korbel champagne was made
specifically for the luncheon. The china and flatware were chosen as
replications of china that Mary Todd Lincoln brought with her to the
White House.
According to Elizabeth Goldsmith, a professor at
Florida State University who specializes in, among other things,
inaugural luncheons, up to a dozen catering companies from the
Washington region compete (in secret, for security reasons) for the
opportunity to serve the new president and about 200 guests on his big
day. This year, the winner was Design Cuisine, a catering company based
in Arlington, VA, that tailored the menu perfectly to please the staff
of the inaugural committee. The committee hosts a tasting before
seeking a final decisions from Obama's staff. Traditionally, the
caterer releases recipes for the dishes after the luncheon.
The
meal might be in honor of Obama, but it certainly doesn't reflect his
food tastes. For weeks, Goldsmith had speculated that Obama and his
staff would choose "some down-home dishes from Chicago" and maybe some
pineapple or tropical fruit as a nod to the diverse background of
Obama. But in a statement, the inaugural committee says that the full
luncheon menu is actually shaped not around Obama, but on Abraham
Lincoln. "Growing up in the frontier regions of Kentucky and Indiana,
the sixteenth President favored simple foods including root vegetables
and wild game. As his tastes matured, he became fond of stewed and
scalloped oysters. For dessert or a snack, nothing pleased him more
than a fresh apple or an apple cake."
A detailed depiction of
Lincoln's taste buds isn't too shabby for a man who died almost 150
years ago. A full mapping of Obama's seems much harder to come by.
More
-
Daniel Stone
|
Jan 7, 2009 11:16 PM
In the world of management consulting, high-powered and often
expensive contractors infiltrate all levels of a company to determine
how it can run more efficiently--sorting out what sucks up the most
money and what can be cut. Large corporations with loads of money to
save are often open to the process. Paying a few million to save a
billion is quite the bargain.
But what if that large corporation
is actually a really big company? One that's headquartered in
Washington with more than 1.8 million employees in offices in every
state and every major country. One with an annual budget of, say, $3
trillion.
What if that company is... the government?
Enter Nancy Killefer, Barack Obama's nominee to be the government's chief performance officer,
a title with a not so-so-subtle nod to the private sector. Which is
exactly the point. The new position is Obama's creation, and an
indication that he thinks the federal government can, and should, be
run a bit more like a company with goals to reach and money to save.
"In order to make investments that we need, we'll have to cut the
spending that we don't, and I'll be relying on Nancy to help guide that
process," Obama told reporters early Wednesday.
So to make it run smoother, faster and, of course, cheaper, Obama brought in Killefer, a partner with global consulting group McKinsey & Company
that is widely respected in management consulting circles as one of the
industries biggest firms. When nominating her, Obama said that Killefer
will meet with cabinet officials to determine "how they can run their
agencies with greater efficiency, transparency and accountability." She
will set performance standards for federal agencies and monitor the
progress of department heads. In essence, she'll be the government's
management consultant with broad authority (and backing from Obama) to
search for government processes that have either outlived their
usefulness or never worked in the first place.
On the question of
power, how much weight Killefer's suggestions will carry won't depend
on how well she does her job.
Rather, her effectiveness will depend on Obama and on his managing
style.
As the decider, he'll have to figure how much credence he
wants give to her suggestions. Alone, Killefer won't have the authority
to make broad changes to administrative infrastructure. But if Obama
hears her out when she reports that, for instance, the Attorney General
is wasting thousands of dollars on an antiquated way of coordinating
conference calls (which a source at Justice tells NEWSWEEK is indeed
true), her suggestions could help streamline some of the ways
Washington works.
But if Obama decides to just set the ball
rolling and limit Killefer's access to him, Killefer and her staff are
likely to be perceived as auditors who come with little consequence.
And since government departments traditionally have little incentive to
innovate, if neither Obama nor department heads give the new chief
performance officer much consideration, she may find that the
department sucking up the most resources with little to show...is her
own.
More
-
Mark Hosenball
|
Jan 5, 2009 04:04 PM
By Mark Hosenball
In a move apparently designed to sidestep controversy over the CIA’s interrogation and detention practices, President-elect Barack Obama has decided to nominate a nonprofessional, Democratic Party grandee Leon Panetta, as his new director of the agency, Newsweek has learned.
Two well-informed political sources, who both asked for anonymity when discussing personnel matters, said that Obama made known his CIA decision to other officials earlier today. Along with Obama's anticipated decision to appoint retired Navy Admiral Dennis Blair as the new Director of National Intelligence -- Panetta's future boss – the CIA nomination is expected to be announced in the near future.
The choice is somewhat surprising in that Panetta has no specific background managing a sprawling and esoteric intelligence bureaucracy like the CIA, or supervising and planning byzantine undercover operations. But he was a senior Democratic congressman for many years and served in the Clinton administration first as director of the Office of Management and Budget and then as White House chief of staff. In the latter post, Panetta sat in on the daily intelligence briefing giving to the President by the CIA -- a task that has now been shifted to the office of the National Intelligence czar, which was created under intelligence reform legislation approved by Congress after 9/11. As Budget director, he had direct involvement in financial issues related to intelligence. Panetta also served on the Iraq Study Group and publicly opposed President Bush's "surge" of troops in 2006.
Among Obama's reasons for choosing Panetta, one of the sources said, were his reputation as a "first rate manager," his White House experience handling issues related to "intelligence support" and his history of being able to establish friendly and cooperative relations between the executive branch and Capitol Hill. While unusual, the Panetta appointment will not come as a complete shock to those who have been following Obama's somewhat fraught efforts to produce a relatively non-controversial but nonetheless highly respected candidate to head the always-controversial CIA.
In the weeks following his election victory, Obama was widely expected to appoint as his CIA chief John Brennan, a former top CIA and counter-terrorism official who is co-chair of the committee reviewing intelligence policy issues for the President-elect's transition team. But Brennan withdrew his name from consideration as CIA chief after he was slammed by bloggers for public statements he made defending the CIA's involvement in controversial counter-terrorism operations, including rough interrogations which Bush Administration critics and human rights advocates described as torture.
The Brennan controversy cast a cloud over Obama's efforts to find a new CIA chief (though sources say that Obama decided some time ago on Adm. Blair, who was not involved with controversial Bush interrogation policies, as his new intelligence czar). The current CIA chief, retired Air Force Gen. Michael Hayden, signaled that he wouldn't mind being asked to stay on for a time. But critics noted that Hayden, like Brennan, had publicly defended the Bush administration’s counter-terror activities, including CIA interrogation policies (which Hayden himself had little to do with) and warrantless wiretapping by the National Security Agency (a program that Hayden, as NSA director, helped to create after 9/11). Obama had voted as a senator against Hayden's confirmation.
More