-
David Botti
|
Jan 31, 2008 12:18 PM
Yesterday we learned from the Washington Post
of the record-breaking number of Army suicides during 2007. This is the
latest edition of veteran suicide news that's made national
headlines--further evidence that this is one aspect of the homecoming
experience that isn't getting any better despite all the attention.The
latest figures as reported by the Post:
- In 2007, suicides among active-duty soldiers reached their highest point since the Army began keeping records in 1980.
- 121 soldiers committed suicide in 2007, a 20 percent increase over 2006.
- Attempted suicides or self-inflicted injuries rose sixfold since
the Iraq war began: there were 350 cases in 2002 compared to 2,100 in
2007.
- Historically, suicide rates within the military decreases during wartime; the current trend is the opposite of that.
- In 2001 the suicide rate was 9.8 per 100,000 active-duty soldiers--in 2006 the rate jumped to 17.5 per 100,000.
- In 2007 twice as many soldiers committed suicide in the U.S. as they did in Iraq or Afghanistan.
The Post provides this sober passage about a young Army reservist currently hospitalized after her suicide attempt:
On Monday night, as President Bush
delivered his State of the Union address and asked Congress to "improve
the system of care for our wounded warriors and help them build lives
of hope and promise and dignity," Whiteside was dozing off from the
effects of her drug overdose.
Taking a look at the issue of veterans suicides it's somewhat alarming to read this USA Today article from 2003.
The language, the sense of urgency, the utter surprise in statistical
findings can make one wonder if five years from now we'll still be
reading the same type of articles--waiting for things to get better.
The lead paragraph from the article could easily be substituted for a
story about the current findings:
Alarmed by the number of suicides among soldiers in Iraq, the Army has
asked a team of doctors to determine whether the stress of combat and
long deployments is contributing to the deaths.
Everyone knows it's an issue. But, what can actually be done? Jon Soltz of VoteVets.org has this to say via the Huffington Post:
One very simple idea that would have helped relieve the mental burden
of our troops (short of finding a way out of Iraq), and help them get
the care that they need, is to give them substantial time off between
deployments. Spend two years in Iraq, spend two years at home. And, on
the homefront, aggressively test, treat, and monitor troops for mental
injuries...
...Even without dwell time, and a much deserved rest for our forces, we
have got to be more diligent about mandatory and exhaustive screening
of returning troops, and providing adequate care and monitoring.
The Washington Post itself provides a summary of online reader comments for the article, and highlights particular entries. Here's an excerpt:
Our
Readers Who Comment for the most part commend The Post and
reporter Dana Priest for continuing to report on what happens to
mentally and physically wounded soldiers returning from Iraq. They
express sympathy for the individual around whom this story is built,
call for a change in political leadership, improved patient car...Some
contend that such reporting aids the enemy and question the
patriotism of the journalist and her news organization. And, as
sometimes happens, commenters take the opportunity to issue boilerplate
condemnations of the Iraq War, some of which are anti-Semitic.
With
almost regular headline-making reports of the suicide issues it can
sometimes get confusing where things stand. Here are some key stories
to revisit from 2007:
OCTOBER 30 -- A study by the American Journal of Public Health
reports findings that younger veterans are more prone to suicide.
This is the opposite of suicide trends among the general public.
NOVEMBER 13 -- CBS News concludes a five-month investigation into the "hidden epidemic" of military suicides.
DECEMBER 12 -- The House Veterans Affairs Committee holds a hearing on how to stop veterans suicides.
More
-
David Botti
|
Jan 28, 2008 10:45 AM
Last week Soldier's Home took a look
at the passing of Louis de Cazenave, one of France's two remaining WWI
veterans. Since then we've heard news of two more veterans dying as
the final representatives from a fading era.
Erich Kaestner, said to be Germany's last surviving WWI veteran, is
making headlines not so much for his death but for the amount of time
it took to realize his significance. He died on January 1 at the age of
107, but it was not until recently that word got out he was Germany's
last living link to the Great War. As the BBC reports:
Reports in Die Welt daily and Der Spiegel magazine
identified Kaestner as Germany's last World War I veteran, but
verification of the claim was difficult as the country keeps no record
of its war veterans.
In a country where the shame of the Nazi
genocide and memories of two world war defeats still cast long shadows,
both publications focused more on the German national psyche than the
death itself.
"The German public was within a hair's breadth of
never learning of the end of an era," wrote Der Spiegel, until someone
updated his death notice on the internet encyclopaedia site, Wikipedia.
In
its obituary for Kaestner, Die Welt noted: "The losers hide themselves
in a state of self-pity and self denial that they happily try to
mitigate by forgetting."
CBC News
has Der Spiegel magazine's interview with an official from Germany's
Military Research Institute. He offers us a better understanding how
Germany views its veterans:
"Any form of commemoration of military events is seen as problematic here," Chiari told Spiegel Online.
"Our veterans only take part in public ceremonies when they are
invited abroad to join commemorative events with veterans from other
countries. World War I is seen as part of a historical line that led to
World War II. You can't equate the two but there is much debate about
it."
Before word of Kaestner's death, and as world headlines focused
on the passing of France's de Cazenave, over here in the U.S., the
veteran of a war obscure to many Americans died on January 14th.
Milton Wolff, 92, was the last surviving commander of American
volunteers fighting in the Spanish Civil War, a conflict which pitted
Franco's fascist forces against a fragmented leftist army headed by
Spain's government. Among those serving on the government's side were
thousands of international volunteers. According to news reports Wolff
left a factory job in New York City and traveled to Spain inspired by
his membership in the Young Communist League. Adventure is what he
got. From the LA Times:
More
-
David Botti
|
Jan 25, 2008 11:01 AM
When movie-goers in the United Kingdom sit down to watch the Iraq war movie "In the Valley of Elah," they'll first be greeted by a new advertisement by the organization Combat Stress: Ex-Services Mental Welfare Society. As the Guardian reports,
Combat Stress was founded in 1919 to help WWI veterans recover mentally
from shell-shock. Today, after growing concern over the lack of
treatment available to today's veterans, Combat Stress is ramping up a
public relations campaign to highlight the issue:
Combat Stress is alarmed at the huge increase in veterans from the Falklands, Sierra Leone, Northern Ireland, Iraq
and Afghanistan, who come knocking on their door for help. A few are
still turning up suffering long-term effects from the second world war
and Korea. The oldest applicant for help recently was aged 100.
What's their reasoning for this alarm? Eight years ago 300
veterans sought help from Combat Stress; during the last fiscal year
the number jumped to 1,000. The number of Falklands War vets who've
committed suicide has risen to 300—more than the 256 British soldiers
who were killed in the war itself. Of particular note is how many view
the Iraq war's unpopularity in the UK as exacerbating vets' mental
health issues. From the Guardian:
The problems of veterans today are compounded by the widespread
recognition through much of the army that the Iraq campaign is
unpopular, nasty, unpredictable and brutal—and, in the views of a
significant minority of soldiers and officers in private conversation,
a pretty unnecessary conflict at that. In the first and second world wars, the plight of service personnel
was shared by almost everyone in the land. More than 1 million soldiers
served in Northern Ireland over 30 or so years, so that became part of
the national experience.
But combat in Iraq and Afghanistan is not a national experience, and
the services are worried that they appear in the minds of many now to
be detached from most of British national life. Though more American
soldiers have been involved—more than 3,000 killed and nearly 50,000
injured, physically or mentally—Iraq is not a shared experience
nationally for Americans in the way that Vietnam was.
Combat Stress' advertisement doesn't hold back any punches, as it
tries to impart what's going on behind the closed doors of veterans'
homes:
A well-trained fighting machine reduced to nothing more
than an empty shell. Combat stress is their calvary, the infantry to
fight off their demons. They were protecting you, now they need your
help.
You can view the advertisement here:
More
-
David Botti
|
Jan 24, 2008 03:18 PM
The veterans advocacy organization Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans for
America is ramping up its criticism against Bill O'Reilly's recent
comments on homeless vets. Users of IAVA's website can sign an online letter protesting O'Reilly's statement that:
“They may be out there, but there’s not many of them out there.
Okay? … If you know where there's a veteran sleeping under a bridge,
you call me immediately, and we will make sure that man does not do it.”
O'Reilly
pulled presidential politics into the mix as well accusing John Edwards
of using the homeless veterans issue for his own political gain. Today a transcript
from one of O'Reilly's "Talking Points Memos" was published on the Fox
News Website. It referenced an exchange between Edwards and David
Letterman:
DAVID LETTERMAN: Tell me a
little bit about your feud with Bill O'Reilly. Now there's a tough guy.
He's been on the show a couple of times. And he's a tough guy. What's
going on there? What's at the core of the feud?
JOHN EDWARDS:
Well, the core of the feud is I've been talking about homeless veterans
and the fact that we have a couple hundred thousand homeless veterans
who have no place to sleep at night. They're either in shelters...
LETTERMAN: It's embarrassing, isn't it?
EDWARDS:
It's incredibly embarrassing for America. Huge moral issue facing the
country. And he kind of went on his show and said that I was
exaggerating, making it up. And I think he got a lot of correspondence,
a lot of homeless veterans have been calling in.
LETTERMAN:
Well, you know what I've noticed about Bill O'Reilly — and he's a
marvelous communicator. But he's not — he doesn't really care much
about telling the truth.
O'Reilly then countered:
As Laura Ingraham might say, tedious. Edwards and
Letterman could not care less about the truth unless it fits into their
far-left vision of the world. Using homeless veterans to make a
dishonest political point is wrong. That's one of the reasons Edwards
is going nowhere in his campaign. The man simply cannot be trusted.
Recently the Associated Press reported on an interesting program giving wounded Marines and Navy Corpsmen job placement in the film industry. Working with the Wounded Marine Careers Foundationgives
these vets hands on training in the various aspects of filmmaking--even
the camera equipment can be modified to suite any injuries the
vets may have. As the center's co-founder Kev Lombard tells the AP,
the idea for the program came out of his own project:
Lombard came up with the idea for the foundation's Wounded Marine
Training Center for Careers in Media program after being asked by a
friend in the military nearly two years ago to document the stories of
wounded veterans at military hospitals.
"It wasn't our story to tell. It was theirs," he said. "So I said how about we teach them to tell their own story."
Throughout the story we follow one young wounded Marine who's
filming a mock scene of helmets atop inverted rifles set
as battlefield memorials to those killed. If movies about Iraq
will continue to be made in the future, his lens offers an idea of just
how valuable these aspiring filmmakers may be:
Frey focuses on the helmets, which sit near a box of blank ammunition.
For a moment he considers taking pictures. But then he decides against
it, saying later that the scene didn't look real.
More
-
David Botti
|
Jan 22, 2008 02:05 PM
Both the Army National Guard and the Marine Corps had recruitment ads
before the previews at the movie I saw this weekend. The National Guard
ad in part depicted post-Katrina-esque scenarios where guardsmen went
to the aid of civilians. The filming was sweeping and highly
dramatized. The Marine Corps ad offered not so much long scenes, but
quick clips of intensity as infantry stormed houses and drill
instructors marched recruits. They were both obvious sales pitches. The
mere fact you could see two military recruitment ads before a Sunday
matinée gave a nice little reminder of what kind of times we're living
in.
It did another thing. It made me feel for a fleeting moment like I had to get the hell out of there and reenlist.
Recently
my good Marine friend thought about doing just that. On inactive
reserve, he signed back up to rejoin our old unit for one very specific
reason: the scuttlebutt says they'll be heading back to Iraq soon, and
he wanted to be with them. The unit was both of ours for six years. We
were mobilized with its Marines and still feel the pull of bonds we'd
cemented there.
He arrived to find just a handful of Marines left whom we'd known in the old days. They all asked the same thing: why the heck are you here?
They told him he had a good thing going in civilian life, and that'd he
done his time in the Corps and with the unit. Even the officers thanked
him for offering to return, but said it wouldn't be the best thing for
him to do. So, that was it. He left the headquarters never to return.
Still, it was only by going to see these Marines face-to-face that he
could be sure that chapter in his life was over.
I'm certain
most of the Marines I've known have contemplated "re-upping" at one
time or another. Each man has his own personal reasons why he did or
didn't go through with it. I've also seen the same phrase uttered over
and over again by friends and family trying to dissuade their Marine
from going back to war: "you did your time." That one phrase
can grate at your own thoughts already conflicted over having to make
such a difficult decision. But it wasn't until my friend was told he'd
done his time by Marines themselves it suddenly became valid.
With
a war still on it's difficult to think that you will never wear a
uniform again--even if you have no real intention of ever doing so.
Even seeing over-dramatized recruitment ads in a movie theater can make
you feel guilty for sitting there instead of in a patrol base. I've
often wondered if veterans of wars long since gone feel the same way.
My father, a Korean War veteran of the Air Force, still insists he'd
strap himself into a fighter jet if they'd let him. How much do they
see of themselves in the young veterans coming home, and what have they
learned since their own homecoming that today's vets don't know?
In
the end there's nothing much one can do except offer support, look at
old pictures, and tell war stories with your friends--and think with
faint jealousy of that young image of yourself, pulling up to the gates
of boot camp totally scared sh*tless.
More
-
David Botti
|
Jan 21, 2008 01:54 PM
Last week we took a look at a great website following the letters written by a WWI soldier. Now comes news that one of France's two remaining WWI veterans, Louis de Casenave, has died in his sleep at the age of 110. Here are some numbers to consider (via...
More
-
David Botti
|
Jan 18, 2008 01:45 PM
A Marine Corps infantry battalion deploying to Iraq in early 2008 will have among its ranks a new breed of infantryman. According to the Marine Corps Times
the 3rd Battalion 4th Marines is testing a new program that brings
intelligence gathering and assessment efforts to the company level.
The Company Level Intelligence Cells (C-LIC's) were formed, in part,
from the lack of a streamlined way rifle companies deal with
intelligence in the battlefield. Over the course of the Iraq war many
units have developed their own programs, but information rarely gets
passed down to replacement units. Master Sgt. Willard Dickey,
intel-ops chief for the 1st Marine Division, told the paper:
Rifle companies use the databases for vital intelligence procured
from the local area, which can help avoid much of the time lost sending
intelligence requests to the battalion or regimental level, Dickey said.
“If
we can train ourselves at this level, we can produce the intelligence
we’re asking for,” which could save days of waiting for responses over
the duration of a unit’s deployment, he said.
To
staff the C-LIC program the Marine Corps is training Marines whose
primary specialty is as infantrymen. This gives them the advantage of
prior combat experience coupled with a new knowledge of the
intelligence field. Each rifle company (roughly 150 Marines) will have
with it one full intelligence Marine and four to five C-LIC Marines.
Capt. Gabe Diana, project officer for the C-LIC's, explained real-world
use of these Marines:
If, for example, a company commander wanted more information about
roadside bombs and small-arms attacks in his area, the C-LIC would
compile and analyze recent recorded events, then present the findings
to the company, Diana said.
“They give the brief, and then squad
leaders in the company can start putting requests for information in,”
Diana explained. “Squad leaders, team leaders, are starting to see what
the [C-LICs] can produce for them. And then, in turn, ‘here are areas
where I’d like more information’ and now it becomes cyclical. It
becomes a process, a battle drill, where the guys who are down on the
ground and are going to be conducting the patrolling can now go back
and pull information from these [C-LICs].”
The paper also reports the battalion will receive 48 micro-unmanned aerial vehicles with night vision.
More
-
David Botti
|
Jan 17, 2008 12:21 PM
On Monday we took a look at the fallout over a New York Times article
looking at recent war veterans who have committed murder. Some critics
said this article perpetuated the myth of "wacko" veterans returning
from war. Additionally, a lack of comparison to murder rates among the
civilian population was said to unfairly highlight the 121 veterans
mentioned in the article. At the time of my last post most of the
criticism seemed to be stemming from the online community. By today,
however, we've seen this wave of thought reach the mainstream press.
In yesterday's New York Times the op-ed page printed letters from readers reacting to the story. Some excerpts:
CON:
Your article about veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars who
have committed or been charged with murder perpetuates the myth about
crazed war veterans. You note that in researching “homicides
involving all active-duty military personnel and new veterans for the
six years” after the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, there have been
349 cases. There are more than 1.4 million Americans on active
duty. Philadelphia, a city with a similar population, alone had 392
murders in 2007. As a veteran of both Iraq and Afghanistan, I
find articles like yours do a disservice to America’s combat veterans
by shaping a public perception that they are damaged people, prone to
violence.
PRO:
It was simply not manly to seek psychiatric help during and after
Vietnam. In my own case, I suffered for some 40 years. After all the
nightmares, sleepwalking, waking myself up with my own screams and
causing my near relatives anxiety and fear, a police officer introduced
me to a talk group of Vietnam veterans at the local V.A. hospital...You are never the same when you return from combat. The
American people must therefore be absolutely sure of the engaged war
because of the terrible things war does to the psyches of those
soldiers. It may be worth it, but only if the objectives of the war are
worth it...Deep down, those images and sounds never go away. I am
happy that today the military has recognized the humanity and manhood
of those who seek help.
Citing the reporting done by "a platoon of Times reporters" the Wall Street Journal published this commentary in which it took issue with the Times' statistical approach:
More
-
David Botti
|
Jan 16, 2008 12:29 PM
Over at the English blog "WW1: Experiences of an English Soldier"
there's a fascinating history lesson going on in real-time. Bill
Lamin, the grandson of WWI English soldier Harry Lamin, has been
posting the wartime letters of his grandfather exactly ninety years to
the day from when they were first sent. On this blog the first days of
2008 are actually the first days of 1918. The latest post (from Monday) is fascinating in its mundane nature--Harry is thanking the letter's recipient for sending a package:
I have received your letter. I have also received two parcels of woollen goods from Mrs. Higgins but you can’t carry a lot of stuff about we have enough to carry about...Your biscuits was grand and I enjoyed them. I have also had a nice parcel from Kate she said she enjoyed the Christmas alright at home...It is still very cold out here at night and we have had some snow. it is different to being out in France, very quiet.
Bill Lamin told CBC news
his grandfather was an "unexceptional, quiet, let's get on with it sort
of person." That's what makes this blog so great--it's just the
stories of an average grunt writing home to his family. At a time when
the last WWI veterans are dying the blog presents us with a first
person glimpse into a war that soon no living person will have
experienced. As the BBC put it:
A young English soldier wrote [his
thoughts] down on scraps of paper, gun fire ringing out all around. He
could not have known that nearly a century later thousands of computer
users would be hanging on his every word.
The blog is the story of Harry
Lamin's wartime experiences, and his grandson refuses to give away the
ending; no one knows whether Harry made it out of the war alive. Bill
told the BBC:
We're in the position of his family.
We're waiting for the next letter or maybe a telegram from the war
office saying he's been killed. That's really the whole point of the
blog. We're as close as we can be to his family waiting for more news.
Here's a selected post describing Harry's experience in battle:
Three days after, we were called up the line again
of course I went this time. We had to go to the front line were it was
on the Menin Road no doubt you have heard about it. We were there for three days it was awful the shelling day and night. We relieved the KOYLI about
10 o’clock and what do you think Fritz came over about 5 o’clock next
morning we had an exciting time for about one hour and a half I can
tell you. but we beat him off he never got in our trenches he was about
two hundred strong it was a picked storming party so the prisoners say
that captured, they brought liquid fire with them and bombs and all
sorts but not many got back we had twenty casuals and the captain got
killed a jolly good fellow too. I was pleased to get out of it but did
not feel nervous when I saw them coming over. No 1 in our section was
on the gun and we used our rifles. Our Coy as to go before the general
for the good work we have done. We have just been given a long trousers
again as we have had had Short ones all summer.
Thinking
about the deaths of remaining WWI veterans today one can't help but
think of a time when Iraq/Afghanistan vets will be in the same
situation. Despite the enormous amounts of press coverage and
documentation, in the future perhaps only one man or woman will be
alive to remember what it was actually like patrolling the streets of
Baghdad.
More
-
David Botti
|
Jan 14, 2008 04:18 PM
Over the weekend the New York Times published an in-depth look
at murders committed by current war veterans in the United States. In
what the article called a "quiet phenomenon" many of these crimes were
said to be in part the result of emotional trauma caused by the
veterans' wartime experiences. Through it's investigation the Times
reported 121 confirmed murders committed by veterans, while also saying
there were probably more. There's no central database that keeps track
of such figures.
Here are some of the major facts presented by the Times:
More
-
David Botti
|
Jan 10, 2008 02:04 PM
It's been widely reported recently that movies dealing with veterans
and the Iraq war are mostly flopping at the box office. Peoples'
opinions on the cause of this are varied, but a common line of thinking
is that it's just too soon. Recently, however, I came across a movie
from 1946 which astounded me in the accuracy and relevance of the
veterans issues addressed. The movie is called "The Best Years of Our Lives,"
and while it won the 1947 Oscar for best picture I'd never heard about
it until my father mentioned the film at the Christmas dinner table.
If
conventional wisdom within my own generation believes that many
mainstream movies from that time period are sanitized and fail to
address complex issues, "The Best Years of Our Lives" is an exception.
The film traces the lives of three WWII veterans and their return to a
small town and their families. One of the actors, Harold Russell, was a veteran himself and lost both hands while serving in the U.S. Army.
While
watching the movie I was struck how veterans of Iraq could easily
replace these WWII-era characters. We see their apprehension as
one-by-one a taxi drops the men off at their respective homes. None of
the vets want to get out of the car, and face their families for the
first time. The ensuing story line involves alcoholism, depression,
joblessness, financial troubles, broken relationships, and opposition
to the war. Even among their families and old friends the vets feel out
of place, with images of their wartime experience always present. The
plot is subtle and methodical. In portraying the assimilation of these
vets back into civilian society, we see how they initially depend on
each other, and how they eventually come to depend on their families as
well.
More
-
David Botti
|
Jan 9, 2008 03:02 PM
The Army Times writes of missing soldier Sgt. Alex Jimenez
and his new promotion given under a policy issuing MIA servicemembers
promotions. Family members receive salaries and benefits accorded the
missing soldier. The event is a good reminder that there are still four
U.S. soldiers who've gone missing while serving in Iraq.
Sgt. Jimenez and Pvt. Byron Fouty went missing in an ambush on May 12, 2007 in Al Taqa, Iraq (bodies of the other soldiers mentioned in this press release were eventually found). A local Massachusetts paper has this audio slideshow featuring Jimenez's mother thanking her community for its support.
CNN provides a good online graphic
of where things stand with the missing. Perhaps the most familiar name
on the list is that of Sgt. Keith Maupin, who disappeared April 9, 2004
after his convoy came under attack. A Website
kept by his parents has a running clock listing Maupin's time in
captivity. After Maupin's disappearance Al Jazeera broadcast a
videotape claiming to show his death by a gun shot, but U.S.
authorities could not confirm it was indeed Maupin--and therefore he is
still listed as missing.
In October 2006 Specialist Ahmed Altaie
was kidnapped in Baghdad as he made an unauthorized visit to his wife,
an Iraqi college student. Later Altaie's mother-in-law provided this account of the events:
More
-
David Botti
|
Jan 8, 2008 12:08 PM
A number of stories out there worth a look:
Here's a comprehensive USA Today article on the mental health needs of women veterans:
Master Sgt. Cindy Rathbun knew something was wrong three weeks after
she arrived in Iraq in September 2006. Her blond hair began "coming out
in clumps," she says.
The overarching theme of the piece shows an increasing
awareness of gender-specific issues women face both in the combat zone
and on the home front. A look at the numbers presented:
--More
than 182,000 women have been deployed to Iraq, Afghanistan, or
surrounding regions--about 11 percent of U.S. troops who have served
there.
--7,500 women (mostly nurses) served in Vietnam; 41,000 women deployed during the Gulf War.
--More than 100 female servicemembers have died, and nearly 570 were wounded in Iraq and Afghanistan.
--According
to USA Today, "In 2006, nearly 3,800 women diagnosed with PTSD were
treated by the VA. They accounted for 14 percent of a total 27,000
recent veterans treated for PTSD last year."
--Also according to USA Today, "The Defense Department's 2-year-old Sexual Assault Prevention and
Response Office says there were 201 sexual assaults in 2006 within the
U.S. Central Command, which includes Iraq and Afghanistan. That's up
from 167 in 2005, when the Pentagon began a policy that allows victims
to get medical help without launching a criminal investigation."
For a better understanding at issues related to Military Sexual Trauma, take a look at this interview Soldier's Home did with an author who's extensively studied the subject.
Over in the U.K. the largest medical investigation of its Armed Forces is about to get underway, according to The Times.
Researchers will look at how public opposition to the war in Iraq and
Afghanistan affects soldiers' mental health. In particular they'll be
focusing on British reservists who, unlike their active duty
counterparts, are faced with assimilating back into civilian society
almost immediately following combat deployments. The leader of the
study told the paper:
More
-
David Botti
|
Jan 7, 2008 11:24 AM
An American soldier and blogger was killed in action last Thursday , and per his wishes a final posthumous blog post was published the day after. Major Andrew Olmsted, 37, wrote an Iraq-specific blog for the Rocky Mountain News called "From the Front...
More
-
David Botti
|
Jan 4, 2008 02:08 PM
In keeping with this week's theme of veterans and politics, today we'll look at a veteran who's seeking Florida's 22nd District in Congress. Former Lt. Col. Allen West isn't known so much for his stance on the issues, but for an incident in 2003 that got him kicked out of the Army. As the Military Times reports, West stands by his actions:
He was punished after admitting [in October 2003] that
two months earlier, he fired a shot from his 9mm pistol as he held it
next to the head of a recalcitrant detainee who West said had been
stonewalling interrogators at a base near Taji, just north of Baghdad.
But the cop quickly caved in after West's phony death threat.
After the gunshot, West recalled, the detainee screamed "ok, OK,
OK!" and gave up the names of three individuals who were then taken off
the streets, ending a cycle of roadside bomb attacks on West's men that
had been escalating the previous three weeks.
West said he knew firing the gun would probably end his career but nevertheless did it to protect his soldiers.
West was fined $5000 and forced to retire from the Army. He'll
be trying to unseat the incumbent, Democratic freshman representative Ron Klein,
whose campaign funds are vastly greater than West's. However, as Fox
News reports, West may be using dismissal from the Army as a reason
Florida citizens should support his candidacy--citing a loyalty
afforded to his soldiers by his actions. Of course, others may say his
interrogation techniques were harsh and illegal. But as West told the network:
It's about taking a stand for the country, and I
think that the entire episode in 2003 will let people know the measure
of a man that I am.
Among
conservatives this line of West's thinking may work. At the time of his
departure from the Army many conservatives rallied around West's
actions. As the New York Times reported in 2004:
The conservative media personalities and Web sites that raised money
for his legal defense portrayed a military hamstrung by concern for the
human rights of Iraqi detainees. The more than 2,300 letters and e-mail
messages that he received were mostly "thank you" notes for putting his
men first and resisting the pressure to treat suspects with kid gloves.
Ninety-five members of Congress signed a letter to the secretary of the Army supporting the colonel.
West isn't the only veteran vying for the chance to run against Klein. Mark Flagg, a former Navy pilot, will run against West in an August 2008 primary.
More
-
David Botti
|
Jan 3, 2008 11:32 AM
Yesterday we took at look
at four presidential candidates and examples of how veterans issues
factored into their campaigns. Today's post contains five more
front-runners:
JOHN EDWARDS: In November Edwards laid out a $400 million,
five-point plan to aid in treating veterans with PTSD. A main focus of
the plan is to allow veterans to seek mental care outside of the VA
system, and to increase the number of counselors available. As the Associated Press reports:
"I strongly believe we must restore the sacred contract we have with
our veterans and their families, and that we must begin by reforming
our system for treating PTSD. We also must act to remove the stigma
from this disorder," [Edwards said]...
...The VA currently has a backlog of as many as 600,000 claims, increasing
delays for initial treatment by up to six months, according to the
campaign. Edwards pledged the entire backlog would be eliminated by
Memorial Day 2009 - four months after he might take office - and would
cut the processing time by half.
MIKE HUCKABEE: Long before Huckabee enjoyed the
level of attention he has now, the candidate spoke to New Hampshire
voters in April about priority care for veterans [New Hampshire Telegraph]:
More
-
David Botti
|
Jan 2, 2008 12:34 PM
With the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primaries approaching, I
thought we'd begin taking a look at how the candidates address veterans
issues. Whether a candidate's platform calls for an end to the Iraq war
or not, vets will continue to be a highly visible presence in American
life. Today and tomorrow we'll examine what the contenders are saying.
The first four:
More