Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
  • A New Times Baghdad Blog Gets the Details Right

    David Botti | Feb 28, 2008 07:05 PM

    On Wednesday the New York Times began a new blog written by correspondents in the paper's Baghdad bureau. The blog is billed as a chance for readers to discover stories from Iraq that lay beyond the spatial and stylistic constraints of traditional newspaper stories. Thursday's post offered up a great look at a story that's become vastly underreported as the war continues: the American soldier. Politics, sectarian strife, diplomacy, and infrastructure concerns have all but superseded any meaningful embedded coverage, in the mainstream media at least.

    Enter Thursday's post: a look at how a unit of Army soldiers spend their nighttime moments when the work day is through. This passage is very telling, and right on. Nighttime, in those last minutes before a soldier falls asleep, is virtually the only moment he or she has alone:


    For these soldiers, the day is spent as one — one platoon, one mission, a single role for each soldier with a collective goal to make the operation work.

    I have found that something unique happens when you are with soldiers at night.

    Then, when the job is done and there is no more light to work by, they can finally rest. While some choose to sleep, some play video games, some eat and some simply think. The only time they can disband from one another is at night. When the closest thing to quiet and privacy comes, they take it.


    For a wonderful series of accompanying photographs click here.


    More
  • The Latest Military Survey

    David Botti | Feb 28, 2008 12:01 PM
    Touting their new study as the most comprehensive survey of the U.S. military community in the past 50 years, Foreign Policy magazine is presenting the results of its discussions with more than 3,400 officers holding the rank of major, or lieutenant commander, and above.  Here is a brief sample of the survey's findings:

    These officers see a military apparatus severely strained by the grinding demands of war. Sixty percent say the U.S. military is weaker today than it was five years ago. Asked why, more than half cite the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the pace of troop deployments those conflicts require. More than half the officers say the military is weaker than it was either 10 or 15 years ago. But asked whether “the demands of the war in Iraq have broken the U.S. military,” 56 percent of the officers say they disagree. That is not to say, however, that they are without concern. Nearly 90 percent say that they believe the demands of the war in Iraq have “stretched the U.S. military dangerously thin.”

    The magazine also asked participants to rate the health of the branches of service on a scale of one to 10, with 10 meaning they are most concerned.  The Army came in highest with 7.9, followed by the Marine Corps with 7.0.  The average score for all for all four branches was 6.6.  The officers also said they would advise against waging a new war given the current state of the military.  Despite these findings, the survey also reported 64 percent of the participants characterized morale as high.

    The survey also asked officers their opinions on the governmental leadership of the nation.  On a scale of one to 10, with 10 saying they have a great deal of confidence, the study reports these numbers:

    • Presidency: 5.5 (16 percent had no confidence at all)
    • CIA: 4.7
    • State Department: 4.1
    • Veterans Administration: 4.5
    • Department of Defense: 5.6
    • U.S. Congress: 2.7

    To fix the state of the U.S. military
    , the study found 40 percent of participants say special operations capabilities should be expanded. In addition, there were more circuitous ideas:

    Above all, though, the officers are clear that the chances for victory do not rest on the shoulders of the military alone. Nearly three quarters of the officers say the United States must improve its intelligence capabilities—the highest percentage of any of the choices offered. Active-duty officers and those who have retired within the past year give a much higher priority to nonmilitary tools, including more robust diplomacy, developing a force of deployable civilian experts, and increasing foreign-aid programs.

    It's a fascinating study, and one that can help break down some uniform misconceptions people have of the military.  Now that this study is concluded, let's see a survey of 3,400 corporals and sergeants.
    More
  • Advertisement
  • Obama's Comment On Taliban Weapons

    David Botti | Feb 26, 2008 11:25
    Over at the IntelDump last Friday, Phil Carter was urged by his readers to examine an anecdote Barack Obama gave in the Democratic presidential debate the day before. In the military community Obama's recollection of his conversation with an Army captain about the use of captured weapons prompted curiosity, skepticism, and disbelief.  As Obama said:
    I heard from a Army captain, who was the head of a rifle platoon, supposed to have 39 men in a rifle platoon. Ended up being sent to Afghanistan with 24, because 15 of those soldiers had been sent to Iraq. And as a consequence, they didn't have enough ammunition; they didn't have enough humvees.

    They were actually capturing Taliban weapons because it was easier to get Taliban weapons than it was for them to get properly equipped by our current commander in chief. Now that's a consequence of bad judgment, and you know, the question is on the critical issues that we face right now who's going to show the judgment to lead.


    What's got everyone talking is the idea that U.S. troops are so ill-equipped that they are actually using the enemy's weapons to turn around and fight the same enemy. My rifle company landed in Iraq in 2003 with hardly any M240G machine gun ammo. The rumor was additional ammo was graciously provided to the machine gunners by some Navy SEAL's. But that was when the war first started. How about now?

    Carter provided a few follow-ups which sought to fact-check Obama's comments.  Here's what he found out through a friend:
    I talked this morning with two friends who led rifle platoons in Afghanistan. Both confirmed to me that they did, at times, use captured or found weapons or ammunition. One relayed the story of mounting a Soviet 12.7mm heavy machine gun (the equivalent of a U.S. .50 caliber machine gun) on his HMMWV because it was too difficult to get the spare parts needed to fix their G.I. (government issue) .50 cal. Another told me his platoon carried AKs anytime they patrolled with their Afghan counterparts, and that it was always much easier to get 7.62mm ammo for the AKs than to go through the U.S. bureaucracy for ammunition requisition.

    Then there was ABC News National Correspondent Jake Tapper who went straight to the Obama campaign staff seeking an interview with the Army soldier Obama referenced. The story checks out; but Tapper saw fit to elaborate:

    They also didn't have the humvees they were supposed to have both before deployment and once they were in Afghanistan, the Captain says.

    "We should have had 4 up-armored humvees," he said. "We were supposed to. But at most we had three operable humvees, and it was usually just two."

    So what did they do? "To get the rest of the platoon to the fight," he says, "we would use Toyota Hilux pickup trucks or unarmored flatbed humvees." Sometimes with sandbags, sometimes without.


    Carter also pointed out this post on the National Review Online which took issue with the idea that captains were commanding rifle platoons; a job normally reserved for lieutenants. At one point I had a captain commanding my rifle platoon; so, that takes care of that, fact-check. Particularly in the Marine Corps Reserves, where officers must complete a period of active duty service before switching to reserve duty, you find hardly any Lieutenants. The result is that higher ranks are sometimes taking up lower billeted job positions.

    Finally, over the weekend, the Associated Press fact-checked Obama's story. The article also mentioned that Sen. John Warner, ranking Republican member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, is seeking information about the anonymous captain and his platoon. Warner is looking to speak about the situation at the next committee meeting.


    More
  • A Car Ride Before the Invasion

    David Botti | Feb 22, 2008 08:04
    Usually about this time every year my occasional moments of personal reflection begin to ramp up as the war's anniversary draws closer. Back then, in 2003, it seemed we were about to embark on the defining moment of our generation. Five years later, those few months leading up to the invasion seem to be diluted by time. They were not singular months that would become labeled by history as the "War in Iraq"--they would simply mark the starting point. Through the distance of five years, it is difficult to remember what it felt like for the United States to actually go to war.

    Around this time my reserve rifle company, having just come off of a year of active duty in December, got the call for all Marines to show up for anthrax shots. It came unexpectedly and without explanation. No one said we were going to Iraq, but in his silence it was almost as if our company commander was winking his eye and nodding his head. The prospect of once again leaving our home so soon, left many of the Marines bitter and brooding. Emotions were running so high from our possible deployment and our recent return home that I barely remember even watching the news. I have no recollection of following the various UN resolutions and posturing by the U.S. and Iraq. I do not remember hearing of other military units being deployed to Kuwait, or the comments made by Secretary of State Powell at the UN regarding Iraq's weapons program. The only news we waited for, or cared about, was whether the phone call to mobilize came again.

    If a moment from that time can sum up the mood among my fellow Marines, it came during a three-hour long car ride from our company HQ to my house near Boston. My good friend was dropping me off on this way to Maine where his young wife and two dogs lived. When we first got in the car I remember him dropping into the driver's seat without a word, starting the car, and turning on the radio--all the while staring straight ahead. I know that his perceived unfairness of our situation--that we'd just spent one year mobilized already--was grinding away at any kind of happiness our recent homecoming had given him: he'd been screwed by the military again. 

    We did not speak for a good long while. Interstate 90 stretched before us into the night, visible only in the car's headlights as occasional rest-areas flashed past. At one point he asked, substituting his brooding expression with one of hopefulness: "You don't think they'll really activate us again, do you?"

    I had no answer, and that seemed to make him more frustrated. A few minutes later we had a burst of arguing over what radio station to listen to. He wanted to change it, I wanted to keep it. I was surprised how angry I was at him for such a stupid thing. He probably felt the same way about me.  After we compromised I felt better, and we barely talked for the rest of the drive. He dropped me off at my parents' house, said goodbye, and two months later we were in Iraq.
    More
  • In the News: 2.20.2008

    David Botti | Feb 20, 2008 12:33 PM
    A selection of military news stories over the recent days:

    Recognizing the needs of families with service member's deployed, the Department of Defense is setting up a new set of advisers tasked with evaluating the issue. As part of the 2008 Defense Authorization Act, money has been designated for a group of senior enlisted advisers, and spouses of senior enlisted service members. Each year the group is required to submit a report outlining its assessments of the family readiness program. As the Military Times reports:
    The new law puts the onus on the Defense Department to ensure family readiness programs are “comprehensive, effective and properly supported,” and that this support is continuously available to all military families — National Guard and reserve, as well as active duty — in peacetime and in war, and during periods of force structure change and relocation of military units.

    USA Today offers an important look at how the city of Worcester, Massachusetts has been affected by the Iraq war.  Unlike the city's casualties in other wars, Worcester has lost none of its citizens in Iraq. The article looks at how the lack of personal loss translates into awareness of the war. It's an interesting take, and worth reading, as this excerpt shows:

    Denis Leary, director of Massachusetts Veterans Inc., says his shelter is not serving a single Iraq war veteran. But the counselors see an increase in nightmares, delusions and flashbacks among vets of other wars, possibly because of memories revived by news from Iraq.

    For most people most of the time, however, Iraq seems less like a war than a rumor of war.

    "Gone are the yellow ribbons, gone are the flags flying everywhere so crisply and the banners on the overpasses," says Daniel Brennock, a retired Navy captain. "No one remembers the war until they sit down at 6:30 and watch the news."


    A new GAO report released yesterday reported there were 145 sexual assault cases reported at the nation's three military academies during the three years the report looked at. While praising the academies for increased measures to combat and treat sexual assaults, the report worried about inconsistencies with the reporting process. At one point surveys distributed to cadets found that 300 said they could report some kind of unwanted sexual contact -- a far cry from the actual 145 cases officially reported. 

    Marines based on the islands of Okinawa and Japan were placed under restrictions limiting movement throughout their immediate areas.  After the recent rape of a 14-year-old girl on Okinawa last week by a Marine Staff Sergeant, and a series of other less serious incidents committed by service members, the restrictions came as Okinawa's residents expressed outrage over their behavior.  As the Associated Press reports:

    Okinawans have complained about crime, crowding and noise brought by the troops for many years. Protests in the 1990s forced the closing of a Marine air station, and now a plan to build a new airstrip on the island has stirred persistent opposition.

    Over the past week, Okinawan lawmakers have passed resolutions demanding tighter discipline among American troops, and groups have held several protests. In the latest demonstration, some 300 people held a meeting on Tuesday in the town where the rape is alleged to happened.


    Also on the Military Times website, if you're looking for something different to watch, check out this video of the Navy's record-breaking electromagnetic rail gun.

    More
  • What Veterans Think of McCain

    David Botti | Feb 19, 2008 11:20
    As the only combat veteran among the remaining presidential candidates, John McCain has a unique relationship to the current generation of vets cycling home from the fronts in Iraq and Afghanistan. What do veterans think of McCain? Are they inclined to hold him in higher respect, or follow his candidacy with a more critical eye? Can he count on their vote, or does he need to work twice as hard to assure them his plan for Iraq is the right one?

    VoteVets.org (which lists Gen. Wesley Clark on its board of advisers) has a prominent feature linked off the homepage titled "Senator McCain's Real Record on the War in Iraq." The gist of their bullet-pointed argument is that Sen. McCain's policy toward the Iraq war is too closely aligned with President Bush. Among other points, VoteVets.org maintains:
    McCain echoed Bush and Cheney’s talking points that the U.S. would only be in Iraq for a short time.

    McCain said winning the war would be “easy.”

    Senator McCain has constantly moved the goal posts of progress for the war – repeatedly saying it would be over soon.

    Senator McCain opposed efforts to end the overextension of the military that is having a devastating impact on our troops.

    In January VoteVets.org chairman Jon Soltz addressed the issue of Sen. McCain's military service:

    John McCain is a true war hero, and we all respect his service. I don't doubt for a second that he cares for our troops. But, every time he opens his mouth, I'm less and less convinced that he realizes how dangerous his off the cuff words would imperil our men and women in harm's way, and our national security, if he said them as President.

    Earlier this month the San Jose Mercury News took a look at a group of veterans gathering at a California American Legion hall to cheer on Sen. McCain. Doug McNea, a 60-year-old Navy veteran, told the paper he admires the connection Sen. McCain can make with veterans of all wars:
    More
  • Marines and Family React to Slain Terrorist

    David Botti | Feb 15, 2008 01:53 PM
    The death of Hezbollah terrorist Imad Mughniyeh this week by a car bomb dominated world headlines in the days after. His funeral in Beirut drew massive crowds of supporters amid fears that violence would break out.  Much of the writing about Mughniyeh's death mentioned in passing his role in the 1983 bombing of the Marine Corps barracks in Beirut where 241 Marines were killed.  The bombing is a major event in Marine lore, one commonly recalled by Marines since the time they enter boot camp.

    Nearly 25 years later the wound brought about by the bombing still runs deep, and a few news articles took advantage of the Mughniyeh story to revisit the events of 1983.  Stars and Stripes offers a few choice quotes from former Marines present at their barracks' bombing:
    News of death is rarely greeted with enthusiasm, but Tim McCoskey said he got a good feeling when he learned the terrorist who helped plan the bombing of a Marine barracks in Beirut in 1983 had been killed.

    “At least he can go to hell now,”
    said McCoskey, 44, of Elloree, S.C.

    “Being raised Catholic, I fear [it’s] a sin to welcome another human being’s death, but in Imad Mughniyeh’s case, I’ll make an exception and take my chances in the confessional,” said Glenn Dolphin, 50, of Aiken, S.C.

    “I have to believe that the man upstairs is dealing out justice now, and for Imad Mughniyeh it not going to be pretty,”
    he said.
     
    Craig Renshaw, 45, called Mughniyeh’s death “payback.”

    “He got what’s coming to him and he got the same thing he did to others,” said the former lance corporal, who lives in Folkston, Ga.


    Alan Opra, 43, said he considers Mughniyeh’s death to be poetic justice.

    “I was happy that he died the way he died because he died in a car bomb and he orchestrated a truck bomb, so it was like karma,” said Opra, of Harrison Township, Mich., and a lance corporal at the time of the attack.


    In addition to Mughniyeh's responsibility for the barracks bombing, he is also pegged as being behind the kidnapping and murder of Marine Lt. Col. William Richard Higgins 20 years ago this Sunday.  The Courier-Journal has his sister's reaction:
    More
  • Treating (or Not Treating) Mental Health Issues at NY Base

    David Botti | Feb 13, 2008 12:53 PM

    The Army's 10th Mountain Division located in Fort Drum, NY, has been the most deployed unit since the 9/11 attacks. A new report highlights an inadequate system in place at the Army base for treating soldiers with mental health issues. The report, published by the advocacy group Veterans for America, said soldiers can wait more than a month before seeing a proper health care worker.

    Fort Drum is located near the Canadian border. Its remoteness and harsh winter weather doesn't exactly provide the most uplifting setting for soldiers recently back from combat tours in Iraq. Veterans for America notes this as the report begins, offering a glimpse into the setting where PTSD can begin to surface among veterans:

    Generally speaking, winter conditions at Fort Drum are dreary, with snow piled high and spring still months away. More than a dozen Soldiers reported low morale, frequent DUI arrests, and rising AWOL, spousal abuse, and rates of attempted suicide.  Soldiers also reported that given the financial realities of the Army, some of their fellow Soldiers had to resort to taking second jobs such as delivering pizzas to supplement their family income.


    The report illustrates an atmosphere where lack of trained mental health professionals, combined with a military culture of keeping things to one's self, can leave many veterans going untreated. As the systems stands now, soldiers can easily provide false information on questionnaires designed to seek out those who need counseling. The most common way a soldier can received treatment is through self-referral. Furthermore:

    In meeting with Fort Drum Soldiers, VFA found a number of disconcerting examples of inadequate mental health care at Fort Drum. Some Soldiers reported that the leader of the mental health treatment clinic at Fort Drum asked Soldiers not to discuss their mental health problems with people outside the base. Attempts to keep matters “in house” foster an atmosphere of secrecy and shame that is not conducive to proper treatment for combat-related mental health injuries. 



    The New York Times profiled Eli Wright, 26, an Army medic based at Fort Drum. He described common episodes of flashbacks and shot nerves as routine occurrences. 

    Mr. Wright said he waited weeks at Fort Drum to see a mental health professional, who diagnosed post-traumatic stress disorder. He was prescribed medication and pointed toward group therapy, where, he said, “half the time the group is staring at the floor.” At times, he was taking two pills at once. “I couldn’t stay awake,” he said.



    A few weeks ago NPR broadcast a lengthy report in which it detailed a number of the same issues outlined in today's report.  One soldier said he felt like he'd been tossed aside like a pair of worn-out boots. Last week Army Surgeon General Eric Schoomaker was interviewed by NPR about what was detailed in its initial story:

    NPR: What do you say to these people who've had less help with their paperwork because of what you've described as a misunderstanding?
    SCHOOMAKER: So far — you're giving me new information, I wasn't aware that anyone has not gotten the best advice. If anyone out there feels that they didn't get the best advice, they need to come forward and let us know about that.

     


    Meanwhile, last Friday 19-year-old Pfc. Jack Sweet, a Fort Drum soldier, was killed by a roadside bomb in Iraq.
     

    More
  • In Advance of the War's 5th Anniversary

    David Botti | Feb 12, 2008 02:02 PM

    The fifth anniversary of the start of our war in Iraq is a little more than a month away. There will be retrospectives looking back to those early days of shock and awe, in addition to news analysis and the nation's self-reflection. Even a month out from the anniversary, conversations about the upcoming day seem to revolve around the same theme: "can you believe it's already been five years?"  It is a sobering thought.  And even if you believe in the war, or are staunchly at odds with its premise, five years is a unit of time to view not so much in length, but in the various phases that occurred.

    The summer of 2003, as I saw it, was a honeymoon period. The optimism for Iraq's future still ran high (at least in some circles), and at the same time I could see questionable expressions on the faces of Iraq's citizens as we patrolled past them. No one knew how it would all play out. Personally the fragile tensions that held together a shaky peace ended on November 12, when a suicide bomber destroyed the building in An Nasiriyah that at one time was my platoon's headquarters.

    Homecoming was also different. There were no VA scandals, or talk of PTSD, or advocacy groups comprised of Iraq veterans. We simply came home and quickly immersed ourselves back into civilian life. To watch how that has changed is to examine the evolution of the war in Iraq and on the home front. To ask a veteran about his or her experiences in Iraq yields not an overall glimpse into the war, but an occasion to see just one phase of it. This is what needs to be remembered as the anniversary coverage begins. I remember seeing soldiers entering Iraq July 2003 and feeling bad for them. They'd missed the defining war of our generation. They would spend a few months in post-invasion mopping up, and go home on the tail end of the operation. Of course, the irony in this cannot be overstated.

    We have enough perspective over five years to eschew generic "looks back" for a more nuanced analysis of how our country has fared over this time. It must be broken into phases: the invasion, the time surrounding 2004's battle for Fallujah, the grinding years of 2005 and 2006, the Abu Ghraib and Haditha investigations, and the controversial surge plan that's brought us to this point. At home the fascination with the invasion's pyrotechnics has given way to simply reading of the daily casualty figures ticking away over the news wires. There's also the trends in media coverage to consider, the heightened focus of home front veterans issues, and how artistic mediums have sought to portray the war and inform us.

    Looking back on the fifth anniversary means not so much seeing what happened, but understanding how we got to where we are today, and how driven we are to look at Iraq not simply as a war, but as a series of distinct eras.

    More
  • Fallujah "Point Man" Earns Silver Star

    David Botti | Feb 8, 2008 01:43 PM
    A young Marine who once tested positive for marijuana use, went AWOL, and never told his parents he was deploying to Iraq for a third time, was posthumously awarded the Silver Star for his fierce fighting during 2004's battle for Fallujah. Corporal Sean Stokes actually made it through that battle, but was killed on July 30, 2007 by a roadside bomb. It was his third tour in Iraq.  As the Marine Corps Times reports of his actions in Fallujah:
    In the chaotic, intense house-to-house gun battles with insurgent fighters during the 2004 Battle of Fallujah, the point man of Lima Company’s 1st Platoon barreled his way through gunfire and exploding grenades...Several times during missions from Nov. 9-11, 2004, Stokes braved enemy fire — “fearless in the face of danger,” according to the Marine Corps — to kill insurgents and enable his platoon to gain control of houses...On Nov. 17, 2004, after a grenade exploded near him, wounding him, the private managed to continue to use his weapon so the fire teams could reassemble and launch a counterattack.

    A number of military blogs are pointing to this memorial piece written by Stokes' former platoon commander Lt. Jeffrey Sommers.  Among his anecdotes Sommers reflects on his frustration at not being able to promote Stokes due to his prior drug use:
    His work ethic and attitude prompted us to ask, almost beg, for his promotion. No matter what our argument (“He’s smart,” “He’s got charisma,” “Marines around listen when he talks because he’s dead on with his analysis,” “Give him rank, he’s not the drug pop that we thought we were getting hosed with, he’s making a difference”) the command couldn’t budge around the time restriction involved in his demotion; Pvt Stokes would remain a Private for the rest of the deployment no matter what he did or was capable of.

    Later he reflected on Stokes' superior performance working as "point man" during the fighting:

    The first man sees a lot, and a lot rests on his shoulders. The Marines behind him depend on what the point man passes back when enemy contact occurs, the squad leader’s plan is dependent on that flash of information the point man gives. Pvt Stokes found a deadly rhythm as the point man for second squad. Whenever a fight broke out, he would either kill the enemy immediately himself, or if he couldn’t give out a quick situation update so his squad could close with and kill.

    Stokes' aunt described to the Marine Corps Times how her nephew sought to keep his family from worrying about his last deployment:

    “To protect his family from worry, he told them before he left and during his third tour that his ship, the Bonhomme Richard, was stopping at different ports around the world and was not going to go to Iraq,” Leupp said by e-mail. “He had already been through so much during his first two tours. Sean was supposed to just see the world by stopping at different ports. So we thought he was safe during his third and we hoped his last deployment. But not the way we hoped.”

    Here's a local television station's coverage of the Silver Star presentation ceremony:


    More
  • America's WWI Ties Down to One Vet

    David Botti | Feb 7, 2008 10:54

    The timing of deaths among WWI's final survivors continues to be remarkable as today the Associated Press reports only one WWI veteran is now alive in the United States.  This comes after the death of Harry Richard Landis, 108, who passed away Monday in a Florida nursing home.  Over the past few weeks this blog has covered the deaths of French and German WWI veterans, as well as the last American commander who fought with volunteers in the Spanish Civil War.  Our ties to that era are disappearing at an alarming rate.  Frank Buckles, 107, is now the final remaining American vet of the WWI era.

    As the AP reports, Landis never served overseas but enlisted during wartime in 1918, training as a recruit for 60 days before the armistice came.  Here he recalls his unit's final march as the war ended:

    “We went down through the girls college, marching down the street. We got down to the courthouse square and there was a wall around this courthouse. We got to the wall and [the drill instructor] didn’t know what to do and we were hup, two, three, four, hup, two, three, four,” Landis said, laughing at the memory. “Finally, we jumped up on the wall and kept going until we got to the courthouse — hup, two, three, four — and he said dismissed.”
    Landis tried to sign-up for service in WWII at the age of 42, but was denied for being too old to fight.

    Of the roughly 4.7-million Americans who served during WWI, the Veterans Administration told the St. Petersburg Times that spotty record keeping makes it difficult to keep track of how many of these vets are still out there.

    The VA tried to reach out and find other survivors last year, said Jim Benson, VA spokesman. There were a few leads, but nothing panned out.

    "I think it's amazing for us to realize that you have this population of individuals who served during the first great war, and at that time, it was the war to end all wars," Benson said. "Soon, we will no longer have a living contact. It will all be from the histories left behind."


     

    More
  • Beyond Minnesota's Yellow Ribbons

    David Botti | Feb 6, 2008 10:19
    The name behind the Minnesota National Guard's new veterans assistance program says it all: Beyond the Yellow Ribbon. It references the iconic ribbons placed throughout local communities to display solidarity with troops serving overseas. Yet, as countless studies/news reports/personal experiences have shown, the war doesn't end for a veteran simply by returning home.

    As a result Minnesota has formed a comprehensive new program aimed at assisting veterans long after they come home. Beyond the Yellow Ribbon guides veterans through everything from making sure one's drivers license hasn't expired, to getting medical check-ups, to resolving conflicts with a spouse. The key here is that it's all under one program, making it (in theory) easy to take advantage of all the program has to offer.

    Here's a telling example from the Grand Forks Herald about what kinds of difficulties can arise from a homecoming:

    The phone rings in the St. Paul office of Maj. John Morris, a chaplain with the Minnesota National Guard and point man in the Guard's effort to “reintegrate” soldiers returning from Iraq.

    The caller is a woman from Crookston, wife of a soldier who came home last summer after an extended tour.

    “We've been walking on egg shells, and we can't take it anymore,” she tells Morris, her frustration billowing like black smoke from a sabotaged Iraqi oil well.

    “The kids come to me for everything, like they've been doing the past two years,” she said, as Morris recalled the conversation. “He doesn't want to spend time with our friends; he thinks their interests are trivial and they don't know anything about what his life has been like.

    “He says, ‘I just want to be with my war buddies.' ”

    How can we help? Morris asked her.

    “Send him back to Iraq.”


    Cue Beyond the Yellow Ribbon. Following this link one can listen to well-thought-out podcast on behavioral health dealing with family issues. Will one podcast resolve the issue?  Perhaps not, but it can help the parties begin to think about ways to resolve the conflict.

    The Herald also points to the very real notion that it's not always the case that a program like Beyond the Yellow Ribbon will be unconditionally embraced. As one National Guard Chaplin told the paper:
    "We took a unit that was extremely hostile - especially after their time in Iraq was extended - and they didn't want any help at all.  Soldiers can be very direct, and at first they told us, ‘Hey, this is a bunch of crap. I don't need it.'"


    In contrast:

    Family members often were more receptive to a helping hand than the returning soldiers were, he said. “They had seen things when the troops were home on leave - things like anger, feelings of isolation. They thought, ‘Boy, this is going to be harder than we thought it would be, pulling this family back together.' ”

    Also, family members “had been more exposed to media and had heard stories from other families about soldiers coming back with problems,” Morris said. “They had a better idea of what might be needed.”

     
    According to local news reports so far these two contrasting groups are now beginning meet halfway with the help of the National Guard program. Now lawmakers are seeking to make Beyond the Yellow ribbon a model for other states to follow.

    More
  • Vets and Defense Spending Through Proposed Budget

    David Botti | Feb 5, 2008 11:57
    President Bush's release of his $3 trillion budget yesterday included a number of veterans' and military-related provisions. Here's a few of particular interest:

    Pay Increase:
    For 2009 the new budget seeks a 3.4 percent pay raise for current active duty service members. As the Military Times reports this is the minimum raise allowed under federal law--and some advocates are displeased with the projected numbers. Here's the paper's rundown of sample salaries for the troops in 2009:

    • An E-4 with more than three years of service now earns $1,949.10 per month; that would rise to $2,015.40 per month on Jan. 1 under the Pentagon plan.
    • An E-7 with more than 10 years of service now earns $3,263.10 per month; a 3.4 percent raise would turn that into $3,374.10 per month.
    • An O-3 with more than six years of service now earns $4,763.10 per month; that officer would earn $4,925.10 per month with a 3.4 percent pay increase.


    A Hospital
    Veterans in the Orlando, FL area are speaking out against what they perceive as the proposed budget's lack of funds for a local VA hospital.  As the Orlando Sentinel reports:

    President Bush put $120 million in his proposed budget Monday for the long-awaited Orlando VA hospital, but area veterans said they were disappointed that more of the nearly $600 million needed will not come right away.  Michael Kussman, undersecretary of health at the Department of Veterans Affairs, said $120 million is all the agency needs this year to begin work on the facility...But area veterans are not so trusting after waiting years for a hospital. Orlando is the largest metropolitan area in the country without a VA hospital, forcing veterans to drive to Tampa or Gainesville for care.

    "What a disappointment," said retired Air Force Col. Joseph Kittinger, a decorated veteran. "All of the politicians give lip service to the veterans, but that is all it is, lip service." He added, though, that the $120 million "is a start and better than nothing."


    Long-term
    The Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America took a long-term look at where it sees facets of the budget allocated for veterans ultimately ending up.

    For veterans, the 2009 budget provides $47 billion in funding for veterans’ health care, benefits, and other services. This reflects a modest increase over 2008 levels. However, starting in 2010, the budget predicts sudden (and unrealistic) drops in costs for veterans’ care. The administration’s argument is that the deaths of earlier generations of veterans will reduce expenses, but this line of reasoning fails to account for the dramatic increase in the cost of caring for Iraq and Afghanistan veterans. This will push future budget expenditures up, not down. Like the budget as a whole, the long-term accounting in the VA budget is improbable.

    Defense Budget
    For the defense budget itself, USA Today provides a good summary of highlights covering where the money is intended to go:

    •Increasing the size of the Army and Marine Corps: $20.5 billion, an increase of $8.7 billion or 73%, compared with 2008. This year, the Army would grow to 532,000 soldiers, and the Marine Corps would increase its ranks to 194,000. By 2012, the plan would be complete, with the Army topping out at 547,000 soldiers, while there would be 202,000 members of the Marine Corps.

    •Aircraft and weapons: $45.6 billion, a $4.9 billion increase, that would include purchases of fighter planes such as the F-22A Raptor and F/A-18 Hornet and unmanned aircraft like the Predator and Reaper.

    •Cyberspace security: The budget shows at least $65 million for research and development projects tied to computer security. Some elements of the effort are secret, and funding levels are not disclosed.

    •Pay and health care: $149 billion to increase salaries and fund health care. Military salaries would increase by 3.4%.


    For an overall political view of how things are shaking out, the Associated Press provides this quick piece on reactions to the budget.


    More
  • The Image of a Veteran

    David Botti | Feb 1, 2008 04:18 PM
    The current series in the New York Times on veterans who've committed murder has spurred tremendous debate over the way vets are portrayed by the media. To understand origins of the prevailing portrayals of our current veterans, it's a good idea to take a step back and view the issue in a historical perspective.

    Jerry Lembcke is a Vietnam veteran and professor of sociology at Holly Cross college in Worcester, Massachusetts. Lembcke's book "The Spitting Image: Myth, Memory, and the Legacy of Vietnam," looked in part at how the news media and pop-culture cultivated narrow portrayals of Vietnam vets. He has also written op-eds for the Boston Globe, Newsday, and the San Francisco Chronicle among others. In 1968 Lembcke was drafted into the Army, serving as chaplain's assistant before returning home and joining the anti-war movement.  

    I talked to Lembcke about how the Vietnam-era vets experience impacts that of those men and women coming home from war today -- and how he thinks the media is handling its coverage of veterans and issues associated with them.



    SOLDIER'S HOME: You've written that a veteran's behavior can be influenced more from how past vets were portrayed in pop-culture, as opposed to personal experiences he/she might have had.  How does this happen?


    LEMBCKE: The post-Vietnam popular culture representations of veterans was so powerful and so long lasting, and it so overwhelmed the war itself in popular culture, that as people began to come home during the Gulf War in the 1990’s, and present these same symptoms as Vietnam veterans coming back, I thought there’s a connection here. I think I used the phrase “learned experience,” and it occurred to me that this was a generation of veterans who’d grown up immersed in this popular culture of what it looks like to be a war veteran coming home.

    This was very different than the culture Vietnam vets grew up in. Looking at representations of WWII veterans for example, which was not nearly as powerful in film for example. We got more war films about WWII, but not so many films about veterans coming home.


    What is being portrayed in these kinds of movies that can influence veterans?
    More
The Peek
 
 
STRATEGIES

Harmonix, creator of Rock Band and Guitar Hero, is changing videogames.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
CAMPAIGN 2008
republican gop convention periscope mccain

John McCain's choice to manage the GOP convention this summer is lobbyist Doug Goodyear, whose firm once represented Burma's repressive regime.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu