Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
  • Dear Diary: Here Comes the War, Part II

    David Botti | Mar 21, 2008 12:38 PM

    Earlier this week I posted excerpts from I journal I kept while serving in Iraq. During this fifth anniversary week of the war, I wanted to give readers a sense of what it was like preparing to deploy. Today I'm posting a few more entries from the journal. They all take place while I was at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, waiting to see if/when we'd get the call to deploy. 

    March 23, 2003


    A Sunday afternoon on the barracks' catwalk. Day four of the war. Nothing much else to do but bullsh*t and watch TV. There are an estimated 50 Marine casualties at this point. Mom said she watched a firefight on TV this morning. Some U.S. forces are less than 100 miles from Baghdad.  Other than that don't know what else to say...just waiting. A lot of us think that we'll end up going no where, just end up staying stateside. I don't believe that, I just hope we don't go somewhere for some bull*t mission. If we do something good I know I'll feel as though I've accomplished something worthwhile in my 23 years. 

    Things just get more surreal by the hour. First, we watched more footage of the front lines where Marines were fighting. These guys are just like us, it's so obvious but I just can't get my head around it. At one point the reporter mentioned he was with the 2nd Battalion 8th Marines--and we're staying in their barracks right now. It's getting more frustrating to see Marines dying and not being able to help them. Sgt. D- speculates that our leave date for Iraq might come sooner. He also says when we get there we'll probably wish for these long nights back in the U.S.  Funny, because he's never talked like that before.


    March 24, 2003

    Not much to say except that today I realized I could actually die. I mean I see vivid pictures of such things, and I see how easily this can happen in war. It may seem like an obvious statement.  I thought about these kinds of things the moment I enlisted. But never in those early, innocent, "good ol' days" when I rushed through weekend training to get back to school and finish my homework, did I ever think I'd be in a war. Then, once this became apparent, it has taken until now to really understand what war actually means...I mean, really means. It doesn't seem like me, David Botti, could be shot to death on a road in Iraq...but, it can so easily happen. So easy to become a name on the wall, and a cross in Arlington Nation Cemetery where thousands like me may have thought the same things. But I shouldn't think about such morbid things. The war is getting bloodier...especially for the Marines. Today I saw an Army convoy come under attack on TV.


    March 25, 2003

    Things have changed infinitely in a matter of a few hours. We learned today that we would be leaving for Kuwait by the weekend. Things kicked into high gear. The mood seems somber, uncertain, worried. Things are so real and so clear that it seems everyday the fog lifts revealing how things will really be. I could see it in the major's face as he told us we were going. Here are people's thoughts: H- is having trouble sleeping; B- is worried that he'll kill someone and go to hell; S- wishes he picked up a slutty girl last weekend; A- doesn't feel like talking to his parents (he also thinks he only has a 20 percent chance of coming home not wounded or dead); C- wants to go but is scared at the same time; N- is nervous. All I can really do is concentrate on the future, and put all this into perspective when I come back home.

    More
  • Dear Diary: Here Comes the War

    David Botti | Mar 19, 2008 09:13 AM

    Along with the Iraq war starting five years ago this week, this period was also the first time I began writing in the journal I kept while deployed.  I'm posting excerpts today and tomorrow, so you can get a sense of what was going through the mind of a lowly lance corporal on his way to Iraq.  The entries are not particularly eloquent, but they're real and I hope they just show what the calm was like before the storm.  I've omitted the names of my fellow Marines for their privacy.


    March 10, 2003


    Our platoon commander has been having meetings with all the squad leaders (planning and training stuff), and it sounds like we're going balls to the wall.  He says if we're going to the front we're dropping everything, and taking only food and ammo.  Morale seems relatively high -- probably from the adventure factor.  Sounds like we may be in Kuwait within 10 days if the training schedule at Camp Lejeune doesn't get lengthened.  

    We got a slightly propaganda-ish Iraq country briefing, and one on desert survival.  In terms of politics in the world I'm loosing track of all those resolutions, votes, "phone calls," etc.  I just want to get over there.  I've also realized I haven't thought about the future much.  Hopefully, I'll be too busy to think about it.  I wonder what they're doing back home right now.  Is it wrong of me to think that I feel almost lucky to be in this position, to see some facet of the world which is rare -- and then have the ability to come home and bring those experiences with me?  Well -- we'll see what kinds of experiences I actually take home...if I want them with me.  A- isn't sure if he wants to go back to school after our deployment.  He said he's not afraid of what's ahead of us, but that he's afraid of what it'll be like going back home.  He looks at other college students w/o a clue as to what's going on, and gets pissed off. B- said he always just wanted to work as a bureaucrat, and that because of this he doesn't want anything to do with that kind of work.  He just wants to "go west" when we get back, and figure everything else later.  


    March 11, 2003

    There are rumors today we may be at Camp Lejeune for two months.  I can't stand that thought of not being able to go overseas when the war's still going on.  

    K- got his family hardship exemption today, so he won't be coming with us.  Some in the platoon say it's a bad omen -- that that goofy bast*rd was our good luck charm.  

    A bunch of us went to Ruby Tuesday's at the mall last night.  C- showed up with his fiancée.  I feel bad for those two now that we're leaving.  It just doesn't seem fair to any of us.
    More
  • Advertisement
  • A Roundup of Iraq Anniversary Coverage

    David Botti | Mar 17, 2008 09:13 AM
    he fifth anniversary of the Iraq war is about to come upon us, and so too will an endless amount of media coverage on the issue.  Later in the week I'll be writing up some personal reflections on the anniversary, but today I've compiled some of the better anniversary stories that have already popped up.  First, take a look at NEWSWEEK's in-depth look at where the Army stands (plus these great video interviews with soldiers now in Iraq), and then see below for how other stories address the past five years.

    On Sunday The New York Times gave former Baghdad bureau chief John F. Burns a few column inches to give his take on where the war has taken us.  Burns penned this article at the war's outset which I've always considered to be an amazing piece of journalism.  For Sunday's article, Burns, who spent five years in Iraq, reflects on his position as a journalist covering he war, and on the larger meaning for both the U.S. and Iraq.  As his opening line puts it ("Five years on, it seems positively surreal"), Burns seems in awe of the course the war has taken; and frustrated over miscalculations that occurred.  He writes of watching the first U.S. air strikes from a Baghdad roof:
    ...from that first impact, among many on the roof, the mood was scarcely one of cool detachment, or at least not as cautioned as it might have been by the longer-term implications of what we were seeing. Part of it, no doubt, was the air show — the sheer, astonishing, overwhelming demonstration of power, more like an act of God than man, unleashing in those watching from the roof something approaching awe.
    More
  • Breakdown of Where War Stands in Public's Eyes

    David Botti | Mar 13, 2008 11:11 AM
    Here's a quick breakdown of the new Pew Research Center Study that finds the media and public are loosing sight of the war. If you read this blog, I assume you're not one of them. But here are the numbers anyway:

    • 28% of the public is aware that nearly 4,000 troops have been killed in Iraq over the past five years.
    • Nearly 50% think the number of U.S. deaths is 3,000 or fewer.
    • 23% of the public think the number of U.S. deaths is higher than 4,000.
    • In earlier surveys nearly half of the respondents recalled the correct number of deaths.
    • In 2007 the median of Iraq-associated news stories was 15% of all news stories.
    • During the last week in January, 36% of those surveyed said they were most closely following campaign news; 14% the stock market; 12% the death of Heath Ledger; and 6% the war in Iraq.
    • And, as the Associated Press quotes the survey director: "All education levels in the recent survey were similarly uninformed."


    The LA Times posts a photo slide show from the 2003 invasion next to their summary of the Pew survey. Whether they were trying to be ironic or not, you might want to take a short trip back to that time; a time when you couldn't get the war off of the TV.


    More
  • Video: How to Loose Your Hearing

    David Botti | Mar 13, 2008 11:05 AM
    ThisDudesArmy gave a personal response to a recent VA report saying that hearing loss (the "silent epidemic"), is the number one disability in the War on Terror. The report said at least 70,000 vets are on disability for having tinnitus--the "ringing in the ears" sort of hearing loss commonly associated with rockers such as Pete Townshend.  Here's what ThisDudesArmy had to say:

    Perhaps very recently they've started to evaluate hearing more closely, but when I returned from Iraq six months ago, we sat down for a simple hearing test like the one we did before we deployed. My roommate already was legally deaf in one ear and wasn't supposed to deploy, but he did anyway. He was on a patrol when an IED targeting dismounts went off right next to him, sending him sprawling to the ground with a concussion. He sat out for a few weeks to recover.

    Back in the states, hearing in his bad ear was even worse than when he left. The only compensation, he was told, was free hearing aids for life.

    The rest of us weren't lucky enough to receive that kind of slap in the face. Tests that showed degenerated hearing were looked at with suspicion and doubt, as if we had overstated our problems.

    He then posts a video to illustrate the kind of noise troops are dealing with. The guns firing along with him are two M16's and a SAW (Squad Automatic Weapon).



    More from the blogger:

    I had a trick where I covered my ear with my right index finger when my rifle was resting on the ledge. This did little but was far better than the cumbersome foam earplugs we were given. It's too little, too late for those of us who were already given our hearing to the wars. I'm now in a customer service job where I answer the phone constantly, and I can't use my left ear with the receiver.

     

    More
  • Veteran Vs. Veteran: A Visit to Washington

    David Botti | Mar 11, 2008 01:03 PM
    Thirty-seven years after John Kerry and the Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW) descended upon Washington, D.C. to protest against U.S. atrocities in Vietnam, a new generation of veterans will do the same later this week.  The group Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW) is heading to the Capital as part of an event called Winter Soldier: Iraq & Afghanistan, named after the similar VVAW event four decades ago.  As IVAW puts it:

    The four-day event will bring together veterans from across the country to testify about their experiences in Iraq and Afghanistan - and present video and photographic evidence. In addition, there will be panels of scholars, veterans, journalists, and other specialists to give context to the testimony. These panels will cover everything from the history of the GI resistance movement to the fight for veterans' health benefits and support.

    There hasn't been much U.S. press coverage on the event, but the UK's Sunday Times, using the headline of "Patriot Missiles," had a lengthy magazine story on the subject:

    The veterans are not against the military and seek not to indict it – instead they seek to shine a light on the bigger picture: that the Abu Ghraib prison regime and the Haditha massacre of innocent Iraqis are not isolated incidents perpetrated by “bad seeds” as the military suggests, but evidence of an endemic problem. They will say they were tasked to do terrible things and point the finger up the chain of command, which ignores, diminishes or covers up routine abuse and atrocities.


    Other veterans, and vet bloggers, aren't thrilled with this event. A group called "Stop the Slander," described as a "coalition of concerned veterans, family members, and friends," has even published a guide for reporter's covering IVAW.  The guide warns journalists that claims made by IVAW may be untrue.  The guide even provides an acronym to follow of questions to ask:

    D
    : Date(s) – When did the incident occur?
    U: Unit(s) – What military units were involved?
    P: Personnel – What are the names of the participants and witnesses?
    E: Event(s) – What exactly happened exactly where?
    S: Signature(s) – Was this reported at the time or later and were reports, affidavits or depositions signed, or will they now be signed?


    Veterans For Freedom blogger, Mark Seavey, took his own critical look at the IVAW's preparations for the Winter Soldier event, but in the end wrote that both sides of the debate should be heard -- without unnecessary contest or debate:

    I think it speaks well of IVAW that they expect all testimony to be true and verifiable.  And there will plenty of eyes there to ensure that.  Hopefully we can all say our piece, discuss our views and then go home with no violence on anyone’s part.

     

    The term "Winter Soldier" is derived from Thomas Paine's passage intended to motivate George Washington's troops suffering at Valley Forge:

    “These are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of his country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman.”

    This is generating a huge amount of debate within the vocal veterans community.  What's interesting to note is that perhaps the only demographic who can debate IVAW, without being called-out on their lack of service, is other veterans.  The issues goes above someone's service record, and shows how the fabled, and perhaps cliched, military bond can only go so far in such times of controversy.  Or, is it still there, above all the ruckus?  We'll soon find out.
    More
  • An Iraqi Mourns His Friend's Death

    David Botti | Mar 10, 2008 01:01 PM
    The New York Times Baghdad blog posted a moving account from an Iraq employee of the paper writing of his close friend's death as the victim took an evening stroll with his wife. Even though my blog is about U.S. troops and veterans, I posted this passage... More
  • 19-Year-Old Woman Earns Silver Star

    David Botti | Mar 10, 2008 12:17 PM
    In the realm of military awards, history was recently made when the military announced a 19-year-old soldier would become only the second woman since WWII to receive the Silver Star . Monica Lin Brown , an Army medic who served in Afghanistan, will be... More
  • Interview: An Iraq Vet Runs for Congress

    David Botti | Mar 5, 2008 12:57 PM
    Kieran Lalor is a former Marine reservist and Iraq veteran running for Congress in New York’s nineteenth district.  He’s also the founder of Iraq Vets for Congress, a group of 14 Republican, pro-war vets running in districts from Maine to California.  
     
    Lalor, 32, and I spent many years together as rifleman in the same infantry company based in upstate New York. We served in Iraq (although in different platoons), and experienced the military’s transition into wartime footing after 9/11.

    I spoke with Lalor about our shared military experiences, fallen comrades, his entry into politics, John McCain, and how he’s hoping to make 2008 the year of Republican war veterans elected to office. Excerpts:



    SOLDIER’S HOME: When we were over there in Iraq I barely thought about the politics of it all. I had some sense of what was going, but didn’t pay to much attention to it. Was it the same for you? When did you start really thinking hard about the political aspect of the war?

    LALOR: Officially my campaign began on November 25, 2007, but it really began on 9/11. One of my sisters worked in the north tower of the World Trade Center. On September 11th I was living in here in Westchester, about 40 miles from Ground Zero. I was watching TV with a year of reserve duty under my belt, so I was watching this as a U.S. Marine; watching our country get attacked, wondering if my sister was dead or alive.  I just felt helpless.  I didn’t ever want to feel that way again, and it just woke me up. I realized our generation had a big challenge.

    I went through the 90’s and everything was hunky dory: a prosperous economy, and at least the appearance of peace. I thought we were going to have a free ride. Our parents' generation had the Cold War, our grandparents had WWII and the depression. September 11th hit and I thought, "OK, our generation has some work to do."

    In Iraq I don’t think I really thought about the politics except that I just remember thinking of some of these pictures I had taken: the kids and the American flag, the kids running up to us, or hanging out by the gate [of our HQ]. If these scenes could have been brought home five years ago the impression of the war could’ve been different here. We got a lot of negative, and not a lot of positive.  

    It wasn’t Iraq so much as the wider War on Terror that got me to run. My passion became how do you secure a country of 300 million people, and protect civil liberties.


    Did anything specific happen while we were in Iraq that’s influenced your platform, or ideas about politics?

    One thing that informs my foreign policy view, and why I continue to support the war in Iraq, is how we were running patrols 24/7 out in the streets of Nasiriyah. We were being proactive. Well, the Italian [coalition forces] relieved us, and their doctrine was react to problems in the streets. And, they got hit [by a suicide bomber], and a good number of them died. I think that the Italian strategy of reacting, and staying home in the compound until something happened in the streets, was basically American foreign policy up until September 11th. On a small scale our [rifle company’s] doctrine of being proactive, and being omnipresent in the streets is what I believe is the best post-9/11 foreign policy.


    I asked Lalor about Lcpl Glover, a very good friend of his who was killed in Iraq in 2006.  Glover didn’t serve with us in Iraq, but he joined the unit later and volunteered for a subsequent deployment. He was killed along with another Marine from our unit during a sniper attack in Fallujah. I wrote about his funeral for a post on Veterans Day last year.

    Mike Glover was one of my best friends, and in some ways I feel responsible for getting him into the Marine Corps. I really feel like we owe it to all those guys, especially Glover because I knew him so well. I don’t want him to have died in vain. That happened three years after we got back, and his death really made me more resolved. I talked to Glover’s family a little bit about that aspect, and they don’t want his death to have been in vain. I’ve also gotten calls from Gold Star Mothers and Fathers saying thanks for carrying on my son’s legacy. It takes my breath away, and I take it seriously.

    I never talk about him in a political context. I’m comfortable talking about him to you because I know you. I told a story about him in a speech on Veterans Day, but I asked permission from his family to mention him. But, he kind of symbolizes all of the other guys [four marines from our unit killed in Iraq from 2004-2006]. What’s ironic is that they all volunteered, and didn’t have to go. It’s kind of eerie, but it says a lot.


    Why did you form the group Iraq Vets for Congress?

    To help individual campaigns. If there are veterans who vote because a guy is a fellow veteran, that individual person does that on his own. [I formed the group] because politics has become a millionaire's game. A high, high percentage of people in congress are millionaires. So, by joining forces with other veterans we’ve been able to get more national attention. We’re starting to break through nationally and what that does it raise our individual profiles. And, the biggest thing is fund raising. I have to raise more than a million dollars for this campaign. I have about a hundred thousand so far, and my opponent already has a million dollars.


    Does the fact that McCain, another Republican veteran, is also running have any affect on your individual campaigns?

    McCain always brings out a lot of veterans who vote. He’ll bring out a few thousand people that are veterans that don’t normally vote; that seems to be a trend. Also, because of Iraq Vets for Congress I’ve been contacted by the McCain campaign. What we offer him is 14 guys in districts where there’s no republican Congressman. There’s two guys in Ohio and two guys in Pennsylvania which are big states that you have to win. We can help him, and he can help us. Also, we try to hammer home that we want to make 2008 the year of the republican veteran. With McCain on the popular ticket, the 14 of us, some other Vietnam vets, and Gulf War vets running, that’s a theme we’re trying to build.

    A lot of people paint Republicans as chicken hawks: people who cheer lead for war, but don’t want to put their lives on the line. Our campaigns dispel that myth.


    Is there a danger of placing too much of your campaign’s emphasis on the fact you’re a veteran?

    I don’t think that’s enough to get somebody elected, but it definitely gets peoples' attention. There has to be a balance. You have to be more than just a guy who served in Iraq.


    What about the fact that you were a reservist? We were called up twice on relatively short notice, leaving behind or jobs, school, and families. What impact has that had on you?


    That kind of balancing act: living in a couple of different worlds and being well-rounded, is very helpful running for Congress. I’m not completely of the military mindset, which I think is good. Being half in the military world, and half in the civilian world gives you double the amount of perspective. I can see the other side: what it does to employers, and what it’s like trying to get back into the work force for example. Sometimes I’d go into interviews and I’d feel like I was sitting in that chair because this guy wanted someone to debate the Iraq war with–even though I had no chance of getting that job.


    How have people reacted on the campaign trail towards the fact that you’re a veteran?

    People have been pretty good.  There’s been positive feedback.  I don’t think it’s enough to get elected.  The Iraq war is a difficult issue for republicans, and every republican is going to have to deal with it.  And somebody who’s served in Iraq can deal with it better than anybody.  When I get questions about it I say, listen: I risked my life there, I lost friends there.  If I thought it wasn’t making our country safer I’d be the loudest voice saying that.  

    More
  • Disturbing Iraq Video Addresses Wider Issues

    David Botti | Mar 4, 2008 10:17 AM
    A disturbing new video out of Iraq has found its way onto the Internet and set off a flurry of condemnations and demands to reveal the identity of the U.S. serviceman involved. The video, which has been removed from YouTube, depicted a U.S. Marine grabbing a puppy by the neck and flinging the animal off a cliff. Due to the low quality of the video, there was no way to see where, or how, the dog landed. Some are still questioning the authenticity of this video, but it certainly did look real enough to solicit this interesting analysis of the video from media blogger Rex Sorgatz (via Gawker):

    Logically, we know this soldier has possibly killed people in Iraq, so it feels misplaced to vent about a puppy in a war zone; emotionally, we find hurting a helpless puppy beyond reproach. If the video weren't shot in Iraq (if it were, say, some tweens torturing a dog in a backyard -- you'll find plenty of this on YouTube), the tension wouldn't be there, and it wouldn't be today's viral hit. The contradiction -- people vs. puppies; war vs. peace-keeping -- will probably catapult this thing to network nightly news.

    As this blogger chronicles, a number of people immediately set off on a hunt to find the identity of the Marine involved in the incident. Some mainstream media sources picked up the story looking into the Marine Corps' response to the matter. From the Minneapolis Star Tribune:

    The named Marine returned to Hawaii in October from Haqlaniyah, Iraq, after a seven-month deployment, Maj. Chris Perrine, a Marine spokesman, told the Honolulu Advertiser.

    "We're still trying to figure out, is this a legitimate video?" Perrine told the newspaper. "Was it edited? Is it [that Marine] who's in it? We don't know. We'll find that out hopefully sooner rather than later."


    There seems to be larger issues at play here than just a disturbing video.  Echoing Sorgatz's views on the matter, others are wondering why the death of a puppy in the middle of a war is causing such outrage.  From Cenk Uygur, an AOL media blogger:

    But I'm not writing to say what a bad guy this Marine is for throwing the puppy like he does. That's obvious. I'm not writing to implicate the whole Marine Corps for the act of two goofballs who are not representative of our troops over there...No, I'm writing about our reaction as a society. I have now seen this story everywhere from all over the internet to the local news. Everyone is outraged. Are you kidding me? We caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians and we're outraged over a puppy?!

    Some may object to Uygur's characterization of the death of "hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians"--others may think it's right on--but what's interesting is how debate over the tastefulness of the video has grown to how we judge the degrees of right and wrong in war. Is it because the puppy is a symbol of innocence? Is it because people wonder what kind of conditions drove this Marine to throw a puppy off a cliff? There are far more stories about U.S. soldiers adopting stray dogs in Iraq. So, how does this fact relate to the behavior in the video? Perhaps a discussion on the matter is just starting; there's a lot of unanswered questions, and a lot of self-reflection still left.

    More
The Peek
 
 
STRATEGIES

Harmonix, creator of Rock Band and Guitar Hero, is changing videogames.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
CAMPAIGN 2008
republican gop convention periscope mccain

John McCain's choice to manage the GOP convention this summer is lobbyist Doug Goodyear, whose firm once represented Burma's repressive regime.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu