-
David Botti
|
May 9, 2008 01:58
Though he was killed in Afghanistan in 2004, Pat Tillman's death is
still a subject of controversy and tremendous reflection. Tillman, you
will recall, was the NFL player turned Army Ranger who was originally
said to have died under enemy fire (he was awarded the Silver Star),
but later reports found he was killed by friendly fire.
Now his
mother, Mary, has published a book in which she charges that former
Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld knew about the cover-up over the
details of her son's death. As she writes [via MSNBC]:
“... I believe Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld knew Pat was killed
by fratricide and permitted the cover-up. It is not
believable that a man known for his propensity to micromanage would not
want to know what happened to his most high-profile soldier. I informed
the committee that Pat received a personal letter from Rumsfeld shortly
after he and his brother enlisted, commending him for his commitment to
serve. Pat was obviously in Rumsfeld's consciousness."
During a recent 60 Minutes interview,
Katie Couric questioned Army Secretary Pete Geren over the alterations
of eyewitness accounts of Tillman's death used for his Silver Star
citation. She asked if he knew who manipulated the statements, and he
replied:
"Well, that's one of the questions that we will never completely
answer. But it certainly is one of the areas that
that raises questions. There are so many mistakes. So many things that
happened. If you add them all together, it certainly calls into
question the credibility of those who handled this. And raises the kind
of questions that Ms. Tillman raises. I don't blame her for that. And I
don't expect her ever to believe us. But there was no effort to
deceive. There were mistakes and grievous errors by the legions. And as
a result, we fell short of our duty to her as a mother of one of our
heroes."
Over at the IAVA blog,
Perry Jefferies takes issue with Sec. Geren's uncertainty, saying that
the process for awarding medals should clearly indicate who writes a
citation:
Only a certain amount of people handle the citation
for the Silver Star, one of our highest military awards. Each commander
signs a block on the document and there is a document called a
transmittal letter that accompanies it from office to office. Only
organizational will prevents the Army from prosecuting the criminal
that a) faked an official document and b) tried to leave a lower grade
enlisted Soldier to take the blame.
If indeed the medal was awarded under dishonest conditions, should it still stand? A letter to the Arizona Republic newspaper took this stance:
The awarding of the decoration was illegal, as
the incident obviously
didn't represent "gallantry in action against an armed enemy," as
required by the Army's own regulations. This award does a disservice
to all of our veterans who have legitimately earned this august award.
The Tillman family should return the award to the Army, which should
then rescind the award as unjustified and issued illegally.
Another reader then responded:
Yes, it may be true that this star represents "gallantry in action
against an armed enemy." What could be more gallant than a young man
giving up not only his career but his life? Pat Tillman gave up his life to serve in an illegal war that has ruined
our economy with the billions of dollars being wasted but, more
important, the loss of the respect of the rest of the world.
In the New York Times' look at Mary Tillman's new book, there's an interesting historical note of other athletes who've been killed in action.
Eddie Grant, the Giants’
third baseman, died in France in 1918. Christy Mathewson, the great
Giants pitcher, had his life shortened from a mustard-gas accident in
training near the end of World War I. And Nile Kinnick, the star
running back from Iowa, died in a training flight in 1943. But Pat
Tillman’s death was different because of the way he was used,
posthumously, blatantly.
You can read a Newsweek Q&A with Mary Tillman here.
More
-
David Botti
|
May 8, 2008 02:52
A war of words began recently between writer Stephen King and a
conservative blogger over remarks King made about literacy and the U.S.
Army. During an appearance at the Library of Congress last month King said:
"I don't want to sound like an ad, a public service ad on TV, but the
fact is if you can read, you can walk into a job later on. If you
don't, then you've got the Army, Iraq, I don't know, something like
that. It's not as bright."
Blogger Noel Sheppard of the Website NewsBusters: Exposing and Combating Liberal Media Bias, criticized King
and likened his words to those of John Kerry when he said in 2006 that
having a poor education would get someone stuck in Iraq. Sheppard
wrote further: "Nice sentiment when the nation is at war, Stephen."
After Sheppard's blog post appeared, King countered on his own Website:
I guess he also feels that the war in Iraq has
nationwide approval.
Well, it doesn’t have mine. It is a waste of national resources...and
that includes the youth and blood of the 4,000 American troops who
have lost their lives there and for the tens of thousands who have been
wounded. I live in a national guard town, and I support our troops, but
I don’t support either the war or educational policies that limit the
options of young men and women to any one career—military or otherwise.
King further instructed readers of his website to email Sheppard with the words: “Hi, Noel—Stephen King says to shut up and I agree.”
According to the Associated Press, the U.S. Army released a statement yesterday responding to King's remarks:
"America's soldiers are proudly serving and fighting for us all. We can
be proud of our soldiers' selfless service, their skill and their
ingenuity. They certainly are role models for every high-school student
in America considering a noble career...and many book authors."
Just
as John Kerry's 2006 remarks sparked the ire of veterans and average
citizens alike, King has found himself the subject some negative
blogging since Sheppard's original post. One commenter for the
original post did offer a point of view from the middle ground:
I actually don't think King meant to insult the troops. He made a
mistake of trotting out an outdated draft-era notion about the military
to prove a totally different point. But he compounded his error by
lashing out at those who pointed out his mistake. Now it's a "thing" in
the media, and he's not looking very good, or smart.
More
-
David Botti
|
May 6, 2008 10:36 AM
There's been some pointed discussions lately over the future of West Point cadet Caleb Campbell,
who was a seventh round NFL draft pick of the Detroit Lions late last
month. While many of his classmates may be deploying to Iraq and
Afghanistan in the future, Campbell will (if he makes the roster) do
recruiting and PR events for the Army during the offseason. The Army's
point of view is that Campbell can use his NFL status in a unique way
to help the service. The New York Times provides the Army's official policy:
Any member of the Army with an
exceptional skill who could provide recruiting and public affairs
benefits to the Army could be assigned to the nearest recruiting unit
for their two-year active-duty period. Those approved can participate
in their professional activity — in Campbell’s case, pro football — as
long as it does not interfere with military duties. Then they can apply
for early release from active duty.
Campbell also described to the Times how he came to the decision to pursue football:
More