Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
  • A New Medal of Honor Recipient

    David Botti | May 23, 2008 04:58 PM
    Just a quick note to let you know the White House gave word today of a new Medal of Honor recipient.  Nineteen-year-old Army Pfc. Ross McGinnis was killed in late-2006 when he jumped on a grenade to save his comrades.  From the Associated Press:

    McGinnis was perched in the gunner's hatch of a Humvee when a grenade sailed past him and into the truck where four other soldiers sat. He shouted a warning to the others, then jumped on the grenade. The grenade, which was lodged near the vehicle's radio, blew up and killed him.

    McGinnis is the fourth service member to received the Medal of Honor for service in Iraq.
    More
  • In the News: Night Patrols, Psych Units, and Military Town Money

    David Botti | May 13, 2008 12:53 PM

    News roundup: 


    *Bill Ardolino of The Long War Journal takes his readers along on a night patrol with U.S. soldiers and members of a Baghdad neighborhood watch called Sons of Iraq:

     

    Co-founded seven months ago by local leaders and members of the 82nd Airborne, the Al Sadria branch of the neighborhood watch is composed of about 250 members who are paid by and coordinate with American units. The branch is responsible for a series of predominantly Shia neighborhoods in central Baghdad that include part of the Shorja Market. Though leader Faris Abdul-Hassan refers to his group as “the first Shia Awakening” against criminals and terrorists, he refuses to hire anyone with sectarian allegiances.

    According to Ardolino, with a decrease in the number of U.S. troops, the Sons of Iraq have been successful in shouldering the burden of peacekeeping in their own section of Baghdad.  While the final goal is integration with the Iraqi police, many in the Sons of Iraq are weary of high infiltration rates within the police by members of the Mahdi Army.  See a photo slideshow of the patrol here.


    *The Marine Corps Times reports that the Navy plans to expand the number of mobile psychiatric teams embedded within Marine units.  A bit of context: the Marine Corps doesn't have its own medical services, but rather relies on the Navy to provide personnel (the Marine Corps is part of the Department of the Navy).  The units, known as Navy Operational Stress Control and Readiness (or OSCAR), should number at 23 within two years.  The purpose is to provide initial psychiatric counseling to Marines while they are still serving out in the field:

    “We want to put mental health professionals with our small-unit leaders,” Navy Surgeon General Vice Adm. Adam Robinson said. “We think if we can train them there. Tere’s a real synergy that can come. We can be there to help with treatment, training and surveillance.”


    *One doesn't see much reporting out of Basra these days, but the New York Times Baghdad Bureau blog has an interesting piece today.  An Iraqi member of the Times staff took a four-day reporting trip to Basra to see just what the situation is there.  Some selections:

    I stopped for a while and I saw many Iraqi Army cars riddled with bullets. I saw troops deployed everywhere I looked: on the roof of every high building, every road intersection, occupying government offices that before were occupied by political factions.

    I was shocked when I saw traces of the fight, which was clear on the buildings close to the main streets.

    As an Iraqi from the south who knows exactly what was going on, with the militias controlling everything in particular cities or ports, I did not expect that the Iraqi forces – which are majority Shia - would be able to confront the militia influence.

    There was a new feeling. I had never seen before the Iraq Army, without hesitation, accusing the Mahdi Army of being involved in all the disorder there.

    One of the soldiers told me: “The Mahdi Army are a group of criminals, they will destroy everything if we don’t stop them.”

    In the past, I have never seen soldiers dare to say anything about them. I felt the reign of fear is broken, and that is it. Exactly the same feeling as when the Baathist regime fell.



    *Military.com recently posted an article taking a look at the rise in per capita income within military communities:

    The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan could be behind the jumps in income, according to experts. Combat pay and re-enlistment bonuses for professional soldiers, combined with the activation of National Guard and Reserve units, put more money in the bank accounts of personnel shipping out of Fort Bragg, said David G. Lenze of the U.S. Commerce Department's Bureau of Economic Analysis, which issued the income data.

     

    According to the piece, in North Carolina two major military communities ranked first and second in areas of the state with the highest per capita growth.  The first of these, the Fort Bragg area, saw personal income rise more than $8,900 over five years.  Military towns in Georgia and Tennessee saw these numbers rise by between 35 and 37 percent. 

     

    More
  • Advertisement
  • In the News: Iraqi Recruits, Grassroots, and a New Memoir

    David Botti | Apr 16, 2008 01:49 PM
    A selection of military news stories over the recent days:

    The Associated Press reports on troubles with training the Iraqi Navy and Marine Corps, and cites recent issues with Iraqi Army troops fighting in Basra as indicative of the overall training situation.  As the rebuilt Iraqi navy is tasked with defending the country's two vital oil platforms, the AP tells of a disconnect between the reality of the situation and how it is perceived by the navy recruits:

    The day when Iraq alone can defend its shores — and protect its critical offshore oil installations — seems remote.

    Iraq’s navy now has five Chinese-made patrol boats and 26 fast-attack aluminum vessels — fewer than half of which are operational. Its personnel number about 1,350, including 350 Marines.

    “They think they are an elite unit, but they are not,” said Capt. Jock Alexander of the British Royal Marines, who is in charge of training Iraqi Marines to guard the 1.8-mile exclusion zone around each of the country’s two oil platforms.

    The struggle to build a credible Iraqi navy is mirrored — on larger scales — by the mounting delays and costs to form a new Iraqi army and air force after Washington disbanded Saddam Hussein’s military.


    The San Francisco Chronicle reports on a series of grass-roots efforts aimed at joining Iraq veterans in need with U.S. citizens ready to help.  Among the programs are an upcoming online forum of therapists around the country who've offered their services to treating Iraq veterans.  Many of these therapists have committed one hour of free counseling to Iraq vets per week, for as long as they wish.  Then there's a series of Websites dedicated to linking vets with people willing to donate money for basic necessities.  Still, the VA is hesitant to get on board with these groups:

    While Veterans Affairs officials appreciate the support of community groups like Bobrow's, they're careful about embracing them. Because of privacy regulations, the VA can't disclose who has used their services. Often, VA employees are reluctant to even hand out flyers from fledgling groups until thoroughly checking them out.

    "The veterans and their families have suffered enough. So when they put up a public profile or say they need help, we want to make sure they don't get injured again," said Patricia Matthews, a spokeswoman for the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Center.


    In a profile of Elise Forbes Tripp, author of "Surviving Iraq: Soldiers' Stories," the Portsmouth Herald News details some of her most interesting findings through interviews with Iraq vets, including this one:

    She was surprised at the men being upset at having women in their units. "I would get long responses about how useless women are in war ...; not sexist but how they don't belong there."

    Men said they created sexual tension and diverted attention. They require involvement from male colleagues for their safety, for example, having to guard their showers or to calm them during a difficult time. "And I think they felt it was unfair that woman could get pregnant and go home," she says. "I was just listening, thinking this is amazing."


    The New York Times reports that Donald Rumsfeld is set to pen his own memoir:
    Donald H. Rumsfeld, who resigned as secretary of defense in late 2006, will write his memoirs for the Sentinel imprint of Penguin Group USA. Mr. Rumsfeld, 75, will cover not only his years in the Bush administration but also his experiences with Presidents Richard M. Nixon, Gerald R. Ford and Ronald Reagan; his work in the private sector; and his early life. In contrast to other recent political figures who have produced memoirs, Mr. Rumsfeld is forgoing an advance and will donate profits to a nonprofit foundation he recently established to make educational grants to young people interested in public service and establishing links between the United States and Central Asia.


    The Marine Corps Times reports that Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) is proposing new measures that would provide homes for severely injured veterans on VA property.  The proposal came during a Senate defense appropriations subcommittee hearing where issues of long-term veterans care were raised.  Sen. Feinstein cited VA property in West Los Angeles that includes 300 acres of undeveloped land:

    Feinstein said she offered VA’s West LA campus as an example because she often visits the site, but she believes such housing also could be built at other VA facilities around the country.

    Feinstein and other California lawmakers have been trying to block VA from leasing out the unused land for commercial purposes, but they have not agreed on what to do with the property. Some want the land to be public park land, some have proposed building housing for homeless veterans and others have talked about leaving it completely undeveloped so it can be used by future generations.

     

    More
  • New Looks at Military Blogging

    David Botti | Apr 9, 2008 10:09 AM
    Since the start of the Iraq war, the importance and viability of military blogs has stirred up tremendous debate.  There have been issues of military censorship, journalistic viability, and ethical dilemmas.  Recently, talk of where (and how) military blogs fit into the war's narrative has seemed to intensify to some degree.  Here's a look at what's happening:

    The Columbia Journalism Review published a lengthy article in its last issue profiling Bill Roggio, a U.S.-based military blogger who's set up his own media operation aimed at reporting on terrorism and "small wars" beyond what the mainstream media can do.  Before the piece gets to Roggio, the intro takes a look at the gap military blogs aim to fill:
    When the United States invaded Iraq in 2003, among the seven-hundred-odd journalists who embedded with combat units were few who were familiar with the military in any intimate way. To many critics, especially those with military experience, this revealed itself in the press’s coverage of the war, which they felt often missed the mark when it came to explaining the hows and the whys of the fight, as well as the mundane realities of military life and culture.

    Army veteran Roggio first started blogging about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to put the events in perspective for his family.  But, as CJR notes, a transformation took place that's changed the way Roggio operates—and underscores the significance these blogs can have:
    It was during the second battle for Fallujah in November 2004, however, that he began to focus his effort. He had been posting detailed battle maps of Iraq’s Anbar province on his site, showing where Marine and Army units were meeting the stiffest resistance from insurgent groups who harassed them with roadside bombs and the occasional ambush. In the spring of 2005, a new group of readers began logging on to Roggio’s site. The Marines in Anbar province were embroiled in a deadly game of cat-and-mouse, and looking for any tactical advantage they could find. Officers with the Regimental Combat Team 2 discovered Roggio’s site and began using it as an information source, calling his site the “Command Chronology of Western Iraq.”
    More
  • An Exhausted Military

    David Botti | Apr 2, 2008 11:10 AM
    The Washington Post reports today on the decrease in readiness among U.S. ground combat forces. Not only are the soldiers and Marines worn down by continuous deployments, but tactically there are few available forces to respond other potential conflicts throughout the world. According to the Post, Army Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Richard Cody told the Senate Armed Services Committee:
    "When the five-brigade surge went in...that took all the stroke out of the shock absorbers for the United States Army."

    Currently, Army soldiers serve 15-month overseas deployments with 12 months at home in between.  Marines serve seven-month deployments separated by another seven months.  For the Marine Corps (a much smaller branch of service than the Army) the fact that 3,200 Marines are now being sent to Afghanistan is considered by some to be severely degrading Marine assets.

    "There has been little, if any, change of the stress or tempo for our forces," [said Gen. Robert Magnus, assistant commandant of the Marine Corps], calling the current pace of operations "unsustainable."

    Magnus suggested that if more Marines are freed from Iraq they could also go to Afghanistan. Marines "will move to the sound of the guns in Afghanistan," he said. But he said it would be difficult to keep the force split between the two countries because the Marine Corps has limited resources to command a divided force and supply it logistically.

    The Marine Corps is "basically in two boats at the same time," he said.

    The Post further reported that efforts to increase the number of soldiers and Marines will not translate into units able to provide operational relief until 2011.

    More
  • MIA Soldier is Finally Found

    David Botti | Apr 1, 2008 10:54 AM

    After a brief hiatus last week, I've come back to this blog just as the news coverage of the Iraq war's fifth anniversary has winded down. Now we're back to the daily routine of chronicling what soldier's face on and off the battle front. In some ways these war anniversaries are an excellent opportunity to pause and remember where we've been, and where we're going. In other ways it is difficult to now find ourselves with a popular interest that's once again subsided. Nevertheless, it's crucial to keep moving on.

    It is almost fitting then that today we focus on recent news that the remains of a soldier who went missing in 2004 have finally been found. U.S. Army Staff Sergeant Matt Maupin went missing on April 9, 2004 during an ambush outside of Baghdad. A few months later a video surfaced depicting the shooting to death of a man dressed in Army fatigues--a man said to be Maupin. But because of the video quality, investigators were unable to positively identify that the victim was indeed Maupin.

    The Associated Press reported on the reaction of Maupin's parents:

     

    More
  • A Roundup of Iraq Anniversary Coverage

    David Botti | Mar 17, 2008 09:13 AM
    he fifth anniversary of the Iraq war is about to come upon us, and so too will an endless amount of media coverage on the issue.  Later in the week I'll be writing up some personal reflections on the anniversary, but today I've compiled some of the better anniversary stories that have already popped up.  First, take a look at NEWSWEEK's in-depth look at where the Army stands (plus these great video interviews with soldiers now in Iraq), and then see below for how other stories address the past five years.

    On Sunday The New York Times gave former Baghdad bureau chief John F. Burns a few column inches to give his take on where the war has taken us.  Burns penned this article at the war's outset which I've always considered to be an amazing piece of journalism.  For Sunday's article, Burns, who spent five years in Iraq, reflects on his position as a journalist covering he war, and on the larger meaning for both the U.S. and Iraq.  As his opening line puts it ("Five years on, it seems positively surreal"), Burns seems in awe of the course the war has taken; and frustrated over miscalculations that occurred.  He writes of watching the first U.S. air strikes from a Baghdad roof:
    ...from that first impact, among many on the roof, the mood was scarcely one of cool detachment, or at least not as cautioned as it might have been by the longer-term implications of what we were seeing. Part of it, no doubt, was the air show — the sheer, astonishing, overwhelming demonstration of power, more like an act of God than man, unleashing in those watching from the roof something approaching awe.
    More
  • Breakdown of Where War Stands in Public's Eyes

    David Botti | Mar 13, 2008 11:11 AM
    Here's a quick breakdown of the new Pew Research Center Study that finds the media and public are loosing sight of the war. If you read this blog, I assume you're not one of them. But here are the numbers anyway:

    • 28% of the public is aware that nearly 4,000 troops have been killed in Iraq over the past five years.
    • Nearly 50% think the number of U.S. deaths is 3,000 or fewer.
    • 23% of the public think the number of U.S. deaths is higher than 4,000.
    • In earlier surveys nearly half of the respondents recalled the correct number of deaths.
    • In 2007 the median of Iraq-associated news stories was 15% of all news stories.
    • During the last week in January, 36% of those surveyed said they were most closely following campaign news; 14% the stock market; 12% the death of Heath Ledger; and 6% the war in Iraq.
    • And, as the Associated Press quotes the survey director: "All education levels in the recent survey were similarly uninformed."


    The LA Times posts a photo slide show from the 2003 invasion next to their summary of the Pew survey. Whether they were trying to be ironic or not, you might want to take a short trip back to that time; a time when you couldn't get the war off of the TV.


    More
  • The Latest Military Survey

    David Botti | Feb 28, 2008 12:01 PM
    Touting their new study as the most comprehensive survey of the U.S. military community in the past 50 years, Foreign Policy magazine is presenting the results of its discussions with more than 3,400 officers holding the rank of major, or lieutenant commander, and above.  Here is a brief sample of the survey's findings:

    These officers see a military apparatus severely strained by the grinding demands of war. Sixty percent say the U.S. military is weaker today than it was five years ago. Asked why, more than half cite the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the pace of troop deployments those conflicts require. More than half the officers say the military is weaker than it was either 10 or 15 years ago. But asked whether “the demands of the war in Iraq have broken the U.S. military,” 56 percent of the officers say they disagree. That is not to say, however, that they are without concern. Nearly 90 percent say that they believe the demands of the war in Iraq have “stretched the U.S. military dangerously thin.”

    The magazine also asked participants to rate the health of the branches of service on a scale of one to 10, with 10 meaning they are most concerned.  The Army came in highest with 7.9, followed by the Marine Corps with 7.0.  The average score for all for all four branches was 6.6.  The officers also said they would advise against waging a new war given the current state of the military.  Despite these findings, the survey also reported 64 percent of the participants characterized morale as high.

    The survey also asked officers their opinions on the governmental leadership of the nation.  On a scale of one to 10, with 10 saying they have a great deal of confidence, the study reports these numbers:

    • Presidency: 5.5 (16 percent had no confidence at all)
    • CIA: 4.7
    • State Department: 4.1
    • Veterans Administration: 4.5
    • Department of Defense: 5.6
    • U.S. Congress: 2.7

    To fix the state of the U.S. military
    , the study found 40 percent of participants say special operations capabilities should be expanded. In addition, there were more circuitous ideas:

    Above all, though, the officers are clear that the chances for victory do not rest on the shoulders of the military alone. Nearly three quarters of the officers say the United States must improve its intelligence capabilities—the highest percentage of any of the choices offered. Active-duty officers and those who have retired within the past year give a much higher priority to nonmilitary tools, including more robust diplomacy, developing a force of deployable civilian experts, and increasing foreign-aid programs.

    It's a fascinating study, and one that can help break down some uniform misconceptions people have of the military.  Now that this study is concluded, let's see a survey of 3,400 corporals and sergeants.
    More
  • In the News: 2.20.2008

    David Botti | Feb 20, 2008 12:33 PM
    A selection of military news stories over the recent days:

    Recognizing the needs of families with service member's deployed, the Department of Defense is setting up a new set of advisers tasked with evaluating the issue. As part of the 2008 Defense Authorization Act, money has been designated for a group of senior enlisted advisers, and spouses of senior enlisted service members. Each year the group is required to submit a report outlining its assessments of the family readiness program. As the Military Times reports:
    The new law puts the onus on the Defense Department to ensure family readiness programs are “comprehensive, effective and properly supported,” and that this support is continuously available to all military families — National Guard and reserve, as well as active duty — in peacetime and in war, and during periods of force structure change and relocation of military units.

    USA Today offers an important look at how the city of Worcester, Massachusetts has been affected by the Iraq war.  Unlike the city's casualties in other wars, Worcester has lost none of its citizens in Iraq. The article looks at how the lack of personal loss translates into awareness of the war. It's an interesting take, and worth reading, as this excerpt shows:

    Denis Leary, director of Massachusetts Veterans Inc., says his shelter is not serving a single Iraq war veteran. But the counselors see an increase in nightmares, delusions and flashbacks among vets of other wars, possibly because of memories revived by news from Iraq.

    For most people most of the time, however, Iraq seems less like a war than a rumor of war.

    "Gone are the yellow ribbons, gone are the flags flying everywhere so crisply and the banners on the overpasses," says Daniel Brennock, a retired Navy captain. "No one remembers the war until they sit down at 6:30 and watch the news."


    A new GAO report released yesterday reported there were 145 sexual assault cases reported at the nation's three military academies during the three years the report looked at. While praising the academies for increased measures to combat and treat sexual assaults, the report worried about inconsistencies with the reporting process. At one point surveys distributed to cadets found that 300 said they could report some kind of unwanted sexual contact -- a far cry from the actual 145 cases officially reported. 

    Marines based on the islands of Okinawa and Japan were placed under restrictions limiting movement throughout their immediate areas.  After the recent rape of a 14-year-old girl on Okinawa last week by a Marine Staff Sergeant, and a series of other less serious incidents committed by service members, the restrictions came as Okinawa's residents expressed outrage over their behavior.  As the Associated Press reports:

    Okinawans have complained about crime, crowding and noise brought by the troops for many years. Protests in the 1990s forced the closing of a Marine air station, and now a plan to build a new airstrip on the island has stirred persistent opposition.

    Over the past week, Okinawan lawmakers have passed resolutions demanding tighter discipline among American troops, and groups have held several protests. In the latest demonstration, some 300 people held a meeting on Tuesday in the town where the rape is alleged to happened.


    Also on the Military Times website, if you're looking for something different to watch, check out this video of the Navy's record-breaking electromagnetic rail gun.

    More
  • Marines and Family React to Slain Terrorist

    David Botti | Feb 15, 2008 01:53 PM
    The death of Hezbollah terrorist Imad Mughniyeh this week by a car bomb dominated world headlines in the days after. His funeral in Beirut drew massive crowds of supporters amid fears that violence would break out.  Much of the writing about Mughniyeh's death mentioned in passing his role in the 1983 bombing of the Marine Corps barracks in Beirut where 241 Marines were killed.  The bombing is a major event in Marine lore, one commonly recalled by Marines since the time they enter boot camp.

    Nearly 25 years later the wound brought about by the bombing still runs deep, and a few news articles took advantage of the Mughniyeh story to revisit the events of 1983.  Stars and Stripes offers a few choice quotes from former Marines present at their barracks' bombing:
    News of death is rarely greeted with enthusiasm, but Tim McCoskey said he got a good feeling when he learned the terrorist who helped plan the bombing of a Marine barracks in Beirut in 1983 had been killed.

    “At least he can go to hell now,”
    said McCoskey, 44, of Elloree, S.C.

    “Being raised Catholic, I fear [it’s] a sin to welcome another human being’s death, but in Imad Mughniyeh’s case, I’ll make an exception and take my chances in the confessional,” said Glenn Dolphin, 50, of Aiken, S.C.

    “I have to believe that the man upstairs is dealing out justice now, and for Imad Mughniyeh it not going to be pretty,”
    he said.
     
    Craig Renshaw, 45, called Mughniyeh’s death “payback.”

    “He got what’s coming to him and he got the same thing he did to others,” said the former lance corporal, who lives in Folkston, Ga.


    Alan Opra, 43, said he considers Mughniyeh’s death to be poetic justice.

    “I was happy that he died the way he died because he died in a car bomb and he orchestrated a truck bomb, so it was like karma,” said Opra, of Harrison Township, Mich., and a lance corporal at the time of the attack.


    In addition to Mughniyeh's responsibility for the barracks bombing, he is also pegged as being behind the kidnapping and murder of Marine Lt. Col. William Richard Higgins 20 years ago this Sunday.  The Courier-Journal has his sister's reaction:
    More
  • Fallujah "Point Man" Earns Silver Star

    David Botti | Feb 8, 2008 01:43 PM
    A young Marine who once tested positive for marijuana use, went AWOL, and never told his parents he was deploying to Iraq for a third time, was posthumously awarded the Silver Star for his fierce fighting during 2004's battle for Fallujah. Corporal Sean Stokes actually made it through that battle, but was killed on July 30, 2007 by a roadside bomb. It was his third tour in Iraq.  As the Marine Corps Times reports of his actions in Fallujah:
    In the chaotic, intense house-to-house gun battles with insurgent fighters during the 2004 Battle of Fallujah, the point man of Lima Company’s 1st Platoon barreled his way through gunfire and exploding grenades...Several times during missions from Nov. 9-11, 2004, Stokes braved enemy fire — “fearless in the face of danger,” according to the Marine Corps — to kill insurgents and enable his platoon to gain control of houses...On Nov. 17, 2004, after a grenade exploded near him, wounding him, the private managed to continue to use his weapon so the fire teams could reassemble and launch a counterattack.

    A number of military blogs are pointing to this memorial piece written by Stokes' former platoon commander Lt. Jeffrey Sommers.  Among his anecdotes Sommers reflects on his frustration at not being able to promote Stokes due to his prior drug use:
    His work ethic and attitude prompted us to ask, almost beg, for his promotion. No matter what our argument (“He’s smart,” “He’s got charisma,” “Marines around listen when he talks because he’s dead on with his analysis,” “Give him rank, he’s not the drug pop that we thought we were getting hosed with, he’s making a difference”) the command couldn’t budge around the time restriction involved in his demotion; Pvt Stokes would remain a Private for the rest of the deployment no matter what he did or was capable of.

    Later he reflected on Stokes' superior performance working as "point man" during the fighting:

    The first man sees a lot, and a lot rests on his shoulders. The Marines behind him depend on what the point man passes back when enemy contact occurs, the squad leader’s plan is dependent on that flash of information the point man gives. Pvt Stokes found a deadly rhythm as the point man for second squad. Whenever a fight broke out, he would either kill the enemy immediately himself, or if he couldn’t give out a quick situation update so his squad could close with and kill.

    Stokes' aunt described to the Marine Corps Times how her nephew sought to keep his family from worrying about his last deployment:

    “To protect his family from worry, he told them before he left and during his third tour that his ship, the Bonhomme Richard, was stopping at different ports around the world and was not going to go to Iraq,” Leupp said by e-mail. “He had already been through so much during his first two tours. Sean was supposed to just see the world by stopping at different ports. So we thought he was safe during his third and we hoped his last deployment. But not the way we hoped.”

    Here's a local television station's coverage of the Silver Star presentation ceremony:


    More
  • In the News: Bill O'Reilly, Filmmaker Vets

    David Botti | Jan 24, 2008 03:18 PM
    The veterans advocacy organization Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans for America is ramping up its criticism against Bill O'Reilly's recent comments on homeless vets.  Users of IAVA's website can sign an online letter protesting O'Reilly's statement that:

    “They may be out there, but there’s not many of them out there. Okay? … If you know where there's a veteran sleeping under a bridge, you call me immediately, and we will make sure that man does not do it.”

    O'Reilly pulled presidential politics into the mix as well accusing John Edwards of using the homeless veterans issue for his own political gain.  Today a transcript from one of O'Reilly's "Talking Points Memos" was published on the Fox News Website.  It referenced an exchange between Edwards and David Letterman:

    DAVID LETTERMAN: Tell me a little bit about your feud with Bill O'Reilly. Now there's a tough guy. He's been on the show a couple of times. And he's a tough guy. What's going on there? What's at the core of the feud?

    JOHN EDWARDS: Well, the core of the feud is I've been talking about homeless veterans and the fact that we have a couple hundred thousand homeless veterans who have no place to sleep at night. They're either in shelters...

    LETTERMAN: It's embarrassing, isn't it?

    EDWARDS: It's incredibly embarrassing for America. Huge moral issue facing the country. And he kind of went on his show and said that I was exaggerating, making it up. And I think he got a lot of correspondence, a lot of homeless veterans have been calling in.

    LETTERMAN: Well, you know what I've noticed about Bill O'Reilly — and he's a marvelous communicator. But he's not — he doesn't really care much about telling the truth.


    O'Reilly then countered:

    As Laura Ingraham might say, tedious. Edwards and Letterman could not care less about the truth unless it fits into their far-left vision of the world. Using homeless veterans to make a dishonest political point is wrong. That's one of the reasons Edwards is going nowhere in his campaign. The man simply cannot be trusted.


    Recently the Associated Press reported on an interesting program giving wounded Marines and Navy Corpsmen job placement in the film industry.  Working with the Wounded Marine Careers Foundationgives these vets hands on training in the various aspects of filmmaking--even the camera equipment can be modified to suite any injuries the vets may have.  As the center's co-founder Kev Lombard tells the AP, the idea for the program came out of his own project:

    Lombard came up with the idea for the foundation's Wounded Marine Training Center for Careers in Media program after being asked by a friend in the military nearly two years ago to document the stories of wounded veterans at military hospitals.

    "It wasn't our story to tell. It was theirs," he said. "So I said how about we teach them to tell their own story."


    Throughout the story we follow one young wounded Marine who's filming a mock scene of helmets atop inverted rifles set as battlefield memorials to those killed.  If movies about Iraq will continue to be made in the future, his lens offers an idea of just how valuable these aspiring filmmakers may be:

    Frey focuses on the helmets, which sit near a box of blank ammunition. For a moment he considers taking pictures. But then he decides against it, saying later that the scene didn't look real.
    More
  • More Fallout from New York Times Murder Story

    David Botti | Jan 17, 2008 12:21 PM

    On Monday we took a look at the fallout over a New York Times article looking at recent war veterans who have committed murder. Some critics said this article perpetuated the myth of "wacko" veterans returning from war. Additionally, a lack of comparison to murder rates among the civilian population was said to unfairly highlight the 121 veterans mentioned in the article. At the time of my last post most of the criticism seemed to be stemming from the online community.  By today, however, we've seen this wave of thought reach the mainstream press. 

    In yesterday's New York Times the op-ed page printed letters from readers reacting to the story. Some excerpts:

    CON:

    Your article about veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars who have committed or been charged with murder perpetuates the myth about crazed war veterans.  You note that in researching “homicides involving all active-duty military personnel and new veterans for the six years” after the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, there have been 349 cases.  There are more than 1.4 million Americans on active duty. Philadelphia, a city with a similar population, alone had 392 murders in 2007.  As a veteran of both Iraq and Afghanistan, I find articles like yours do a disservice to America’s combat veterans by shaping a public perception that they are damaged people, prone to violence.

    PRO:

    It was simply not manly to seek psychiatric help during and after Vietnam. In my own case, I suffered for some 40 years. After all the nightmares, sleepwalking, waking myself up with my own screams and causing my near relatives anxiety and fear, a police officer introduced me to a talk group of Vietnam veterans at the local V.A. hospital...You are never the same when you return from combat. The American people must therefore be absolutely sure of the engaged war because of the terrible things war does to the psyches of those soldiers. It may be worth it, but only if the objectives of the war are worth it...Deep down, those images and sounds never go away. I am happy that today the military has recognized the humanity and manhood of those who seek help.

    Citing the reporting done by "a platoon of Times reporters" the Wall Street Journal published this commentary in which it took issue with the Times' statistical approach:
    More
  • Article on Veterans Committing Murder Stirs Debate

    David Botti | Jan 14, 2008 04:18 PM
    Over the weekend the New York Times published an in-depth look at murders committed by current war veterans in the United States.  In what the article called a "quiet phenomenon" many of these crimes were said to be in part the result of emotional trauma caused by the veterans' wartime experiences.  Through it's investigation the Times reported 121 confirmed murders committed by veterans, while also saying there were probably more.  There's no central database that keeps track of such figures. 

    Here are some of the major facts presented by the Times:
    More
The Peek
 
 
SPORTS

Speedo's new and controversial high-tech LZR suit is helping swimmers smash dozens of records. How the company plans to capitalize on Olympic gold.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
AFRICA

These are among the ruling party's weapons against opposition voters. Still, the population clearly didn't cooperate in Friday's vote.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu