-
David Botti
|
May 8, 2008 02:52 PM
A war of words began recently between writer Stephen King and a
conservative blogger over remarks King made about literacy and the U.S.
Army. During an appearance at the Library of Congress last month King said:
"I don't want to sound like an ad, a public service ad on TV, but the
fact is if you can read, you can walk into a job later on. If you
don't, then you've got the Army, Iraq, I don't know, something like
that. It's not as bright."
Blogger Noel Sheppard of the Website NewsBusters: Exposing and Combating Liberal Media Bias, criticized King
and likened his words to those of John Kerry when he said in 2006 that
having a poor education would get someone stuck in Iraq. Sheppard
wrote further: "Nice sentiment when the nation is at war, Stephen."
After Sheppard's blog post appeared, King countered on his own Website:
I guess he also feels that the war in Iraq has
nationwide approval.
Well, it doesn’t have mine. It is a waste of national resources...and
that includes the youth and blood of the 4,000 American troops who
have lost their lives there and for the tens of thousands who have been
wounded. I live in a national guard town, and I support our troops, but
I don’t support either the war or educational policies that limit the
options of young men and women to any one career—military or otherwise.
King further instructed readers of his website to email Sheppard with the words: “Hi, Noel—Stephen King says to shut up and I agree.”
According to the Associated Press, the U.S. Army released a statement yesterday responding to King's remarks:
"America's soldiers are proudly serving and fighting for us all. We can
be proud of our soldiers' selfless service, their skill and their
ingenuity. They certainly are role models for every high-school student
in America considering a noble career...and many book authors."
Just
as John Kerry's 2006 remarks sparked the ire of veterans and average
citizens alike, King has found himself the subject some negative
blogging since Sheppard's original post. One commenter for the
original post did offer a point of view from the middle ground:
I actually don't think King meant to insult the troops. He made a
mistake of trotting out an outdated draft-era notion about the military
to prove a totally different point. But he compounded his error by
lashing out at those who pointed out his mistake. Now it's a "thing" in
the media, and he's not looking very good, or smart.
More
-
David Botti
|
Apr 29, 2008 10:41 AM
More than half a century after the GI Bill
was first enacted to help send vets to college, politicians and
advocates are touting a new proposed bill to expand these benefits. The
Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act was introduced by a
number of Republicans and Democrats in both the House and Senate. Among
them is Virginia Senator (and Vietnam vet) Jim Webb whose posted this
statement on his Website:
The Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act is designed to offer
the brave men and women who have served honorably since September 11,
2001 a level of educational benefits on par with those provided to
veterans of the World War II era.
In a profile of numerous veterans
struggling to capitalize on education opportunities after returning
home from war, the Washington Post helps to break down where the
current GI Bill stands now. The problem is that these benefits can no
longer fully fund higher education, as they once did for earlier
generations of veterans.
Many people enlist to earn money for college, and almost everyone signs
up for the education benefits -- which, in the case of the main GI
Bill, requires a service member to pay about $1,200 into the plan-- but
not everyone takes advantage of it. And that buy-in is not returned
even if the benefits are unused.
About 70 percent use at least some part of it, said Keith Wilson,
director of the education service, but the VA does not track how many
earn degrees.
An independent study found that just over half use some part of the
benefits, said Ray Kelley of AMVETS, a veterans support group, and only
8 percent use all. "Congress is realizing we're not giving them the
benefits we say we're giving them," Kelley said. "They only have 36
months from the time they start using it to the time they finish." That
means going to school full time, year-round.
Earlier this month NPR's Morning Edition broke down more of the specifics of the proposed bill.
More
-
David Botti
|
Apr 25, 2008 03:03 PM
The Air Force Times reported today
that the bankruptcy of a civilian airline under contract to provide
flights for the military is delaying homecoming for some troops. ATA
shut down the day after filing for bankruptcy on April 2--the airline's
second bankruptcy in nearly three years. An army spokesman told the AF
Times that troops could expect delays of two to six days for the next
several weeks.
ATA was part of the FedEx Teaming Arrangement, a
group of airlines contracted by the military to transport troops and
their families overseas. The Indianapolis Star reported on the circumstances of the local air carrier's demise:
Hampered by unprofitable routes, ATA lost $75 million last year and was
in talks with five potential suitors when FedEx, with apparently little
explanation, decided to cut off the Indianapolis carrier's only money
maker: military charters...Its roots were passenger charters that led the carrier, earlier known
as American Trans Air, to branch out into troop charters. ATA operates
a $340 million-a-year airborne bus line ferrying troops and their
families to and from places where the U.S. military stations troops
worldwide.
Back on the home front, military families awaiting the return of their stranded loved ones are speaking out. The Hartford Courant has the story of one father who reached out to his old college roommate, Miramax Films co-founder Harvey Weinstein, for help:
More
-
David Botti
|
Apr 23, 2008 09:57 AM
A trial in U.S. District Court is now underway as a group of veterans
challenge the Department of Veterans Affairs over the lack of care
afforded to returning troops. The case, Veterans for Common Sense v. Peake, is said by the plaintiffs' attorney to be the first of its kind. Yesterday a suicide expert testified on behalf of the plaintiffs that veterans are killing themselves at three to seven times the rate of the general population. The American Lawyer has a good summary of what the case is all about:
The suit claims that many disabled combat veterans are in dire need of
counseling and other services they are not currently receiving from the
U.S. government. Erspamer [the plaintiff's counsel] estimates that 120 veterans who served in
Iraq or Afghanistan commit suicide each week. The veterans' groups are
not seeking monetary damages but want reform of a health care system in
which they allege a huge backlog of cases prevents veterans from
receiving timely care.
The
San Francisco Chronicle outlined what suicide expert Ronald Maris sees
as a complete lack of readiness within the VA to deal with the great
number of veterans suicides:
A majority of the VA's
counselors, doctors, social workers and psychologists "don't have the
tools and the information that they need to intervene effectively with
suicidal vets," said Maris, a former president of the American
Association of Suicidology who has been a consultant to the Army on
suicide prevention.
He was particularly critical of the VA's top health care
administrator, William Feeley, who said in a pretrial deposition April
9 that the agency has no systematic national plan for suicide
prevention. Feeley also said he was unaware of any methods of tracking
veterans at risk of suicide and that suicide rates "are not a metric we
are measuring."
The impact of the trial is being felt in Washington, D.C. where two U.S. senators are now calling for the resignation
of the VA's chief mental health official, Dr. Ira Katz. Senator Patty
Murray (D-Wash.) is citing evidence learned in the trial showing that
the VA withheld information on the rising number of veterans suicides.
As her statement reads:
More
-
David Botti
|
Apr 22, 2008 11:25 AM
The army announced yesterday that the practice of "stop-loss," where a
solider is held past his/her enlistment contract, should continue for
at least another year. While military leaders are making efforts to
reduce combat tour lengths, and increase the size of the army, the Associated Press reports
there are roughly 12,000 soldiers serving under the stop-loss. The
numbers break down to: "6,800 active-duty Army, about 3,800 in the Army
National Guard and close to 1,500 in the Reserves."
USA Today breaks down the numbers even further, putting the latest stop-loss news into a wider historical context:
-In May 2007 the practice of stop-loss reached a three-year low of 8,540.
-"Since then, the number of soldiers forced to remain in the Army rose 43% to 12,235 in March."
-"Soldiers affected by stop loss now serve, on average, an extra 6.6
months...Key leaders at the
small-unit level — sergeants through sergeants first class — make up
45% of those soldiers. Soldiers typically enlist for four-year stints."
-58,300 soldiers have been affected by the stop-loss since 2002.
People have often asked me what exactly a stop-loss is --
especially after they hear it referred to as the "back door draft."
First, USA Today offers this concise summary of how the army views the
policy: "Stop loss can keep a soldier in the service if his or her unit
deploys
within 90 days of the end of the soldier's commitment. It is necessary,
the Army says, to maintain the integrity of units headed to war."
Second,
I sometimes use the example of my own unit on the eve of the invasion
into Iraq back in 2003. Most of us in my reserve unit enlisted under a
six-year contract. That meant that for six years were would actively
train with our home unit, and be subject to mobilizations if ordered by
the president. Afterwards, we would spend two years in the Inactive
Ready Reserve (IRR) during which time we would not train, but would
still "be on the books," in case the military needed more troops.
In
March 2003, when my unit got word it was heading to Iraq, a number of
marines were reaching the end of their six-year contract. Depending on
how long we stayed in Iraq, their contract might end while they were
over there. It was these marines who were subject to stop-loss. They
were senior members of the unit whose experience would be invaluable
during the deployment, and our company would be hurt if our numbers
decreased. So, they stayed and deployed with us; then left the
military after returning home.
Most did not complain about
serving past their enlistment contract. Their buddies were going to
war, and the stop-loss marines wanted to go with them -- and, at that
point, the war was still new. Many felt they'd miss out on a major
historical event that would go down in the history books. But, times
have changed, and the war is more than five years old. As James
Martin, a social work professor at Bryn Mawr College and retired Army
colonel, told USA Today: "These are the guys who bear the brunt of it.
They just get put back into the grinder continually."
More
-
David Botti
|
Apr 17, 2008 01:22 PM
A new comprehensive report
by the RAND Corporation has concluded that 300,000 veterans of Iraq and
Afghanistan suffer from depression or PTSD--and only about half have
sought out treatment, according to the Associated Press.
The report surveyed 1,965 vets in what the AP calls the first large
scale private study of its kind. The numbers show that 18.5 percent of
all Iraq and Afghanistan vets suffer from these these symptoms.
According to RAND, possible solutions to temper these problems may be
available:
Among our recommendations is that effective treatments documented in the scientific literature — evidence-based care
— are available for PTSD and major depression. Delivery of such care to
all veterans with PTSD or major depression would pay for itself within
two years, or even save money, by improving productivity and reducing
medical and mortality costs. Such care may also be a cost-effective way
to retain a ready and healthy military force for the future. However,
to ensure that this care is delivered requires system-level changes
across the Department of Defense, the Department of Veterans Affairs,
and the U.S. health care system.
The AP offered up more conclusions drawn from the study, including why vets are not seeking care:
They gave various reasons for not getting help, including that they
worried about the side effects of medication; believe family and
friends could help them with the problem, or that they feared seeking
care might damage their careers.
The
report also noted who is most susceptible to depression and PTSD,
although, in the end, it is a vet's exposure to combat trauma that is
the greatest predictor:
Rates of PTSD and major depression were highest among Army soldiers and
Marines, and among service members who were no longer on active duty
(people in the reserves and those who had been discharged or retired
from the military). Women, Hispanics and enlisted personnel all were
more likely to report symptoms of PTSD and major depressions.
Last November the Pentagon opened the Defense
Center of Excellence for Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain
Injury in an effort to bring together education, treatment, and
research. From the Department of Defense:
The center also will set standards and
assess, survey and validate DoD programs, and decide, in part, how
resources are directed... Center officials are
reviewing hundreds of research project proposals that hope to claim a
piece of the $300 million set aside by Congress last year for brain
injury research. The office also will work with the military services
to see which of the many programs funded with another $600 million from
Congress are working and how to direct those funds to programs most
beneficial to servicemembers and families.
More
-
David Botti
|
Apr 16, 2008 01:49 PM
A selection of military news stories over the recent days:
The Associated Press reports
on troubles with training the Iraqi Navy and Marine Corps, and cites
recent issues with Iraqi Army troops fighting in Basra as indicative of
the overall training situation. As the rebuilt Iraqi navy is tasked
with defending the country's two vital oil platforms, the AP tells of a
disconnect between the reality of the situation and how it is perceived
by the navy recruits:
The day when Iraq alone can defend its shores — and protect its critical offshore oil installations — seems remote.
Iraq’s
navy now has five Chinese-made patrol boats and 26 fast-attack aluminum
vessels — fewer than half of which are operational. Its personnel
number about 1,350, including 350 Marines.
“They think they are
an elite unit, but they are not,” said Capt. Jock Alexander of the
British Royal Marines, who is in charge of training Iraqi Marines to
guard the 1.8-mile exclusion zone around each of the country’s two oil
platforms.
The struggle to build a credible Iraqi navy is
mirrored — on larger scales — by the mounting delays and costs to form
a new Iraqi army and air force after Washington disbanded Saddam
Hussein’s military.
The San Francisco Chronicle reports
on a series of grass-roots efforts aimed at joining Iraq veterans in
need with U.S. citizens ready to help. Among the programs are an
upcoming online forum of therapists around the country who've offered
their services to treating Iraq veterans. Many of these therapists
have committed one hour of free counseling to Iraq vets per week, for
as long as they wish. Then there's a series of Websites dedicated to
linking vets with people willing to donate money for basic
necessities. Still, the VA is hesitant to get on board with these
groups:
While Veterans Affairs
officials appreciate the support of community groups like Bobrow's,
they're careful about embracing them. Because of privacy regulations,
the VA can't disclose who has used their services. Often, VA employees
are reluctant to even hand out flyers from fledgling groups until
thoroughly checking them out.
"The veterans and their families have suffered enough. So when they
put up a public profile or say they need help, we want to make sure
they don't get injured again," said Patricia Matthews, a spokeswoman
for the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Center.
In a profile of Elise Forbes Tripp,
author of "Surviving Iraq: Soldiers' Stories," the Portsmouth Herald
News details some of her most interesting findings through interviews
with Iraq vets, including this one:
She was surprised at the men being upset at
having women in their units. "I would get long responses about how
useless women are in war ...; not sexist but how they don't belong
there."
Men said they created sexual tension
and diverted attention. They require involvement from male colleagues
for their safety, for example, having to guard their showers or to calm
them during a difficult time. "And I think they felt it was unfair that
woman could get pregnant and go home," she says. "I was just listening,
thinking this is amazing."
The New York Times reports that Donald Rumsfeld is set to pen his own memoir:
Donald H. Rumsfeld,
who resigned as secretary of defense in late 2006, will write his
memoirs for the Sentinel imprint of Penguin Group USA. Mr. Rumsfeld,
75, will cover not only his years in the Bush administration but also
his experiences with Presidents Richard M. Nixon, Gerald R. Ford and Ronald Reagan;
his work in the private sector; and his early life. In contrast to
other recent political figures who have produced memoirs, Mr. Rumsfeld
is forgoing an advance and will donate profits to a nonprofit
foundation he recently established to make educational grants to young
people interested in public service and establishing links between the
United States and Central Asia.
The Marine Corps Times reports
that Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) is proposing new measures that
would provide homes for severely injured veterans on VA property. The
proposal came during a Senate defense appropriations subcommittee
hearing where issues of long-term veterans care were raised. Sen.
Feinstein cited VA property in West Los Angeles that includes 300 acres
of undeveloped land:
Feinstein said she offered VA’s West LA campus as an example because
she often visits the site, but she believes such housing also could be
built at other VA facilities around the country.
Feinstein and
other California lawmakers have been trying to block VA from leasing
out the unused land for commercial purposes, but they have not agreed
on what to do with the property. Some want the land to be public park
land, some have proposed building housing for homeless veterans and
others have talked about leaving it completely undeveloped so it can be
used by future generations.
More
-
David Botti
|
Apr 14, 2008 11:43 AM
Today we're taking at look at a New York Times article written by C.J. Chivers
around the time Donald Rumsfeld resigned from office. Chivers, a
former marine, is able to capture the mood and dialog of a Marine
infantry squad in a simple and straight forward manner. He let's the
marines do the talking, and in doing so offers an ironic depiction of
how some grunts relate to their leaders.
The November 2006 piece
occurs as Chivers is embedded with the squad in Zagarit, Iraq. They
have been sleeping in the house of a local Iraqi man, Hashim al-Menti,
who sees on the television that Rumsfeld has resigned from his position
as Secretary of Defense. He informs the squads sergeant:
More
-
David Botti
|
Apr 9, 2008 10:09 AM
Since the start of the Iraq war, the importance and viability of
military blogs has stirred up tremendous debate. There have been
issues of military censorship, journalistic viability, and ethical
dilemmas. Recently, talk of where (and how) military blogs fit into
the war's narrative has seemed to intensify to some degree. Here's a
look at what's happening:
The Columbia Journalism Review published a lengthy article in its last issue profiling Bill Roggio, a U.S.-based military blogger who's set up his own media operation
aimed at reporting on terrorism and "small wars" beyond what the
mainstream media can do. Before the piece gets to Roggio, the intro
takes a look at the gap military blogs aim to fill:
When the United States invaded Iraq in 2003, among the
seven-hundred-odd journalists who embedded with combat units were few
who were familiar with the military in any intimate way. To many
critics, especially those with military experience, this revealed
itself in the press’s coverage of the war, which they felt often missed
the mark when it came to explaining the hows and the whys of the fight,
as well as the mundane realities of military life and culture.
Army veteran Roggio first started blogging about the wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan to put the events in perspective for his family. But, as
CJR notes, a transformation took place that's changed the way Roggio
operates—and underscores the significance these blogs can have:
It was during the second battle for Fallujah in November 2004,
however, that he began to focus his effort. He had been posting
detailed battle maps of Iraq’s Anbar province on his site, showing
where Marine and Army units were meeting the stiffest resistance from
insurgent groups who harassed them with roadside bombs and the
occasional ambush. In the spring of 2005, a new group of readers began logging on to
Roggio’s site. The Marines in Anbar province were embroiled in a deadly
game of cat-and-mouse, and looking for any tactical advantage they
could find. Officers with the Regimental Combat Team 2 discovered
Roggio’s site and began using it as an information source, calling his
site the “Command Chronology of Western Iraq.”
More
-
David Botti
|
Apr 7, 2008 01:13 PM
A young woman who lost her left leg to a roadside bomb attack in Baghdad recently became the first Iraq war veteran selected to compete in the Beijing Paralympics. Former Army 1st Lt. Melissa Stockwell was one of 18 women selected for the U.S. Paralympic...
More
-
David Botti
|
Apr 2, 2008 11:10 AM
The Washington Post reports today
on the decrease in readiness among U.S. ground combat forces. Not only
are the soldiers and Marines worn down by continuous deployments, but
tactically there are few available forces to respond other potential
conflicts throughout the world. According to the Post, Army Vice Chief
of Staff Gen. Richard Cody told the Senate Armed Services Committee:
"When the five-brigade surge went in...that took all the stroke out of the shock absorbers for the United States Army."
Currently,
Army soldiers serve 15-month overseas deployments with 12 months at
home in between. Marines serve seven-month deployments separated by
another seven months. For the Marine Corps (a much smaller branch of
service than the Army) the fact that 3,200 Marines are now being sent to Afghanistan is considered by some to be severely degrading Marine assets.
"There has been little, if any, change of the stress or tempo for our
forces," [said Gen. Robert Magnus, assistant commandant of the Marine Corps], calling the current pace of operations
"unsustainable."
Magnus suggested that if more Marines are freed from Iraq they could
also go to Afghanistan. Marines "will move to the sound of the guns in
Afghanistan," he said. But he said it would be difficult to keep the
force split between the two countries because the Marine Corps has
limited resources to command a divided force and supply it
logistically.
The Marine Corps is "basically in two boats at the same time," he said.
The
Post further reported that efforts to increase the number of soldiers
and Marines will not translate into units able to provide operational
relief until 2011.
More
-
David Botti
|
Apr 2, 2008 10:36 AM
A reader recently pointed me to an incredibly detailed interactive map
indicating the hometowns of U.S. military casualties from Operations
Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom. Based on information available from
the Department of Defense, the map's creator has allowed viewers to
filter the map by branch of service, military operation, sex, and age. Check it out here. It first appears zoomed in on the New York City area, but one can view anywhere in the country.
From the Website's mission statement:
In mid 2007 oobgolf.com launched an advanced golf course finder for our users. We recently made the decision
to use that same technology and development resources to map the hometowns of soldiers who have died in
Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom.
This was not done as a political statement. We simply felt that this tool provided a unique way for Americans
to connect to these fallen soldiers in a new more personal way.
More
-
David Botti
|
Apr 1, 2008 10:54 AM
After a brief hiatus last week, I've come back to this blog just as
the news coverage of the Iraq war's fifth anniversary has winded down.
Now we're back to the daily routine of chronicling what soldier's face
on and off the battle front. In some ways these war anniversaries are
an excellent opportunity to pause and remember where we've been, and
where we're going. In other ways it is difficult to now find ourselves
with a popular interest that's once again subsided. Nevertheless, it's
crucial to keep moving on.
It is almost fitting then that today we focus on recent news that the remains of a soldier who went missing in 2004 have finally been found.
U.S. Army Staff Sergeant Matt Maupin went missing on April 9, 2004
during an ambush outside of Baghdad. A few months later a video
surfaced depicting the shooting to death of a man dressed in Army
fatigues--a man said to be Maupin. But because of the video quality,
investigators were unable to positively identify that the victim was
indeed Maupin.
The Associated Press reported on the reaction of Maupin's parents:
More
-
David Botti
|
Mar 21, 2008 12:38 PM
Earlier this week I posted excerpts from I journal
I kept while serving in Iraq. During this fifth anniversary week of the
war, I wanted to give readers a sense of what it was like preparing to
deploy. Today I'm posting a few more entries from the journal. They all
take place while I was at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, waiting to see
if/when we'd get the call to deploy.
March 23, 2003
A
Sunday afternoon on the barracks' catwalk. Day four of the war. Nothing
much else to do but bullsh*t and watch TV. There are an estimated 50
Marine casualties at this point. Mom said she watched a firefight on TV
this morning. Some U.S. forces are less than 100 miles from Baghdad.
Other than that don't know what else to say...just waiting. A lot of us
think that we'll end up going no where, just end up staying stateside.
I don't believe that, I just hope we don't go somewhere for some bull*t
mission. If we do something good I know I'll feel as though I've
accomplished something worthwhile in my 23 years.
Things just
get more surreal by the hour. First, we watched more footage of the
front lines where Marines were fighting. These guys are just like us,
it's so obvious but I just can't get my head around it. At one point
the reporter mentioned he was with the 2nd Battalion 8th Marines--and
we're staying in their barracks right now. It's getting more
frustrating to see Marines dying and not being able to help them. Sgt.
D- speculates that our leave date for Iraq might come sooner. He also
says when we get there we'll probably wish for these long nights back
in the U.S. Funny, because he's never talked like that before.
March 24, 2003
Not
much to say except that today I realized I could actually die. I mean I
see vivid pictures of such things, and I see how easily this can happen
in war. It may seem like an obvious statement. I thought about these
kinds of things the moment I enlisted. But never in those early,
innocent, "good ol' days" when I rushed through weekend training to get
back to school and finish my homework, did I ever think I'd be in a
war. Then, once this became apparent, it has taken until now to really
understand what war actually means...I mean, really means. It doesn't
seem like me, David Botti, could be shot to death on a road in
Iraq...but, it can so easily happen. So easy to become a name on the
wall, and a cross in Arlington Nation Cemetery where thousands like me
may have thought the same things. But I shouldn't think about such
morbid things. The war is getting bloodier...especially for the
Marines. Today I saw an Army convoy come under attack on TV.
March 25, 2003
Things
have changed infinitely in a matter of a few hours. We learned today
that we would be leaving for Kuwait by the weekend. Things kicked into
high gear. The mood seems somber, uncertain, worried. Things are so
real and so clear that it seems everyday the fog lifts revealing how
things will really be. I could see it in the major's face as he told us
we were going. Here are people's thoughts: H- is having trouble
sleeping; B- is worried that he'll kill someone and go to hell; S-
wishes he picked up a slutty girl last weekend; A- doesn't feel like
talking to his parents (he also thinks he only has a 20 percent chance
of coming home not wounded or dead); C- wants to go but is scared at
the same time; N- is nervous. All I can really do is concentrate on the
future, and put all this into perspective when I come back home.
More
-
David Botti
|
Mar 19, 2008 09:13 AM
Along with the Iraq war starting five years ago this week, this
period was also the first time I began writing in the journal I kept
while deployed. I'm posting excerpts today and tomorrow, so you can
get a sense of what was going through the mind of a lowly lance
corporal on his way to Iraq. The entries are not particularly
eloquent, but they're real and I hope they just show what the calm was
like before the storm. I've omitted the names of my fellow Marines for
their privacy.
March 10, 2003
Our platoon commander has been
having meetings with all the squad leaders (planning and training
stuff), and it sounds like we're going balls to the wall. He says if
we're going to the front we're dropping everything, and taking only
food and ammo. Morale seems relatively high -- probably from the
adventure factor. Sounds like we may be in Kuwait within 10 days if
the training schedule at Camp Lejeune doesn't get lengthened.
We
got a slightly propaganda-ish Iraq country briefing, and one on desert
survival. In terms of politics in the world I'm loosing track of all
those resolutions, votes, "phone calls," etc. I just want to get over
there. I've also realized I haven't thought about the future much.
Hopefully, I'll be too busy to think about it. I wonder what they're
doing back home right now. Is it wrong of me to think that I feel
almost lucky to be in this position, to see some facet of the world
which is rare -- and then have the ability to come home and bring those
experiences with me? Well -- we'll see what kinds of experiences I
actually take home...if I want them with me. A- isn't sure if he wants
to go back to school after our deployment. He said he's not afraid of
what's ahead of us, but that he's afraid of what it'll be like going
back home. He looks at other college students w/o a clue as to what's
going on, and gets pissed off. B- said he always just wanted to work as
a bureaucrat, and that because of this he doesn't want anything to do
with that kind of work. He just wants to "go west" when we get back,
and figure everything else later.
March 11, 2003
There
are rumors today we may be at Camp Lejeune for two months. I can't
stand that thought of not being able to go overseas when the war's
still going on.
K- got his family hardship exemption today, so
he won't be coming with us. Some in the platoon say it's a bad omen --
that that goofy bast*rd was our good luck charm.
A bunch of us
went to Ruby Tuesday's at the mall last night. C- showed up with his fiancée. I feel bad for those two now that we're leaving. It just
doesn't seem fair to any of us.
More