-
David Botti
|
Apr 9, 2008 10:09 AM
Since the start of the Iraq war, the importance and viability of
military blogs has stirred up tremendous debate. There have been
issues of military censorship, journalistic viability, and ethical
dilemmas. Recently, talk of where (and how) military blogs fit into
the war's narrative has seemed to intensify to some degree. Here's a
look at what's happening:
The Columbia Journalism Review published a lengthy article in its last issue profiling Bill Roggio, a U.S.-based military blogger who's set up his own media operation
aimed at reporting on terrorism and "small wars" beyond what the
mainstream media can do. Before the piece gets to Roggio, the intro
takes a look at the gap military blogs aim to fill:
When the United States invaded Iraq in 2003, among the
seven-hundred-odd journalists who embedded with combat units were few
who were familiar with the military in any intimate way. To many
critics, especially those with military experience, this revealed
itself in the press’s coverage of the war, which they felt often missed
the mark when it came to explaining the hows and the whys of the fight,
as well as the mundane realities of military life and culture.
Army veteran Roggio first started blogging about the wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan to put the events in perspective for his family. But, as
CJR notes, a transformation took place that's changed the way Roggio
operates—and underscores the significance these blogs can have:
It was during the second battle for Fallujah in November 2004,
however, that he began to focus his effort. He had been posting
detailed battle maps of Iraq’s Anbar province on his site, showing
where Marine and Army units were meeting the stiffest resistance from
insurgent groups who harassed them with roadside bombs and the
occasional ambush. In the spring of 2005, a new group of readers began logging on to
Roggio’s site. The Marines in Anbar province were embroiled in a deadly
game of cat-and-mouse, and looking for any tactical advantage they
could find. Officers with the Regimental Combat Team 2 discovered
Roggio’s site and began using it as an information source, calling his
site the “Command Chronology of Western Iraq.”
More
-
David Botti
|
Apr 7, 2008 01:13 PM
A young woman who lost her left leg to a roadside bomb attack in Baghdad recently became the first Iraq war veteran selected to compete in the Beijing Paralympics. Former Army 1st Lt. Melissa Stockwell was one of 18 women selected for the U.S. Paralympic...
More
-
David Botti
|
Mar 13, 2008 11:05 AM
ThisDudesArmy gave a personal response to a recent VA report saying
that hearing loss (the "silent epidemic"), is the number one disability
in the War on Terror. The report said at least 70,000 vets are on
disability for having tinnitus--the "ringing in the ears" sort of hearing loss commonly associated with rockers such as Pete Townshend. Here's what ThisDudesArmy had to say:
Perhaps very recently they've started to evaluate hearing more
closely, but when I returned from Iraq six months ago, we sat down for
a simple hearing test like the one we did before we deployed. My
roommate already was legally deaf in one ear and wasn't supposed to
deploy, but he did anyway. He was on a patrol when an IED targeting
dismounts went off right next to him, sending him sprawling to the
ground with a concussion. He sat out for a few weeks to recover.
Back in the states, hearing in his bad ear was even worse than
when he left. The only compensation, he was told, was free hearing aids
for life.
The rest of us weren't lucky enough to receive that kind of
slap in the face. Tests that showed degenerated hearing were looked at
with suspicion and doubt, as if we had overstated our problems.
He then posts a video to illustrate the kind of noise troops are
dealing with. The guns firing along with him are two M16's and a SAW
(Squad Automatic Weapon).
More from the blogger:
I had a trick where I covered my ear with my right index finger when
my rifle was resting on the ledge. This did little but was far better
than the cumbersome foam earplugs we were given.
It's too little, too late for those of us who were already
given our hearing to the wars. I'm now in a customer service job where
I answer the phone constantly, and I can't use my left ear with the
receiver.
More
-
David Botti
|
Mar 4, 2008 10:17 AM
A disturbing new video out of Iraq has found its way onto the Internet
and set off a flurry of condemnations and demands to reveal the
identity of the U.S. serviceman involved. The video, which has been
removed from YouTube, depicted a U.S. Marine grabbing a puppy by the
neck and flinging the animal off a cliff. Due to the low quality of the
video, there was no way to see where, or how, the dog landed. Some are
still questioning the authenticity of this video, but it certainly did
look real enough to solicit this interesting analysis of the video from
media blogger Rex Sorgatz (via Gawker):
Logically, we know this soldier has possibly killed people in Iraq, so
it feels misplaced to vent about a puppy in a war zone; emotionally, we
find hurting a helpless puppy beyond reproach. If the video weren't
shot in Iraq (if it were, say, some tweens torturing a dog in a
backyard -- you'll find plenty of this on YouTube), the tension
wouldn't be there, and it wouldn't be today's viral hit. The
contradiction -- people vs. puppies; war vs. peace-keeping -- will
probably catapult this thing to network nightly news.
As this blogger chronicles, a number of people immediately set off on a hunt
to find the identity of the Marine involved in the incident. Some
mainstream media sources picked up the story looking into the Marine
Corps' response to the matter. From the Minneapolis Star Tribune:
The named Marine returned to Hawaii in October from Haqlaniyah,
Iraq, after a seven-month deployment, Maj. Chris Perrine, a Marine
spokesman, told the Honolulu Advertiser.
"We're still trying to figure out, is this a legitimate video?"
Perrine told the newspaper. "Was it edited? Is it [that Marine] who's
in it? We don't know. We'll find that out hopefully sooner rather than
later."
There
seems to be larger issues at play here than just a disturbing video.
Echoing Sorgatz's views on the matter, others are wondering why the
death of a puppy in the middle of a war is causing such outrage. From Cenk Uygur, an AOL media blogger:
But
I'm not writing to say what a bad guy this Marine is for throwing
the puppy like he does. That's obvious. I'm not writing to implicate
the whole Marine Corps for the act of two goofballs who are not
representative of our troops over there...No, I'm writing about our
reaction as a society. I have now seen this story everywhere from all
over the internet to the local news. Everyone is outraged. Are you
kidding me? We caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent
Iraqi civilians and we're outraged over a puppy?!
Some
may object to Uygur's characterization of the death of "hundreds of
thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians"--others may think it's right
on--but what's interesting is how debate over the tastefulness of the
video has grown to how we judge the degrees of right and wrong in war.
Is it because the puppy is a symbol of innocence? Is it because people
wonder what kind of conditions drove this Marine to throw a puppy off a
cliff? There are far more stories about U.S. soldiers adopting stray
dogs in Iraq. So, how does this fact relate to the behavior in the
video? Perhaps a discussion on the matter is just starting; there's a
lot of unanswered questions, and a lot of self-reflection still left.
More
-
David Botti
|
Feb 8, 2008 01:43 PM
A young Marine who once tested positive for marijuana use, went AWOL,
and never told his parents he was deploying to Iraq for a third time,
was posthumously awarded the Silver Star for his fierce fighting during
2004's battle for Fallujah. Corporal Sean Stokes actually made it
through that battle, but was killed on July 30, 2007 by a roadside
bomb. It was his third tour in Iraq. As the Marine Corps Times reports of his actions in Fallujah:
In the chaotic, intense house-to-house gun battles with insurgent
fighters during the 2004 Battle of Fallujah, the point man of Lima
Company’s 1st Platoon barreled his way through gunfire and exploding
grenades...Several times during missions from Nov. 9-11, 2004, Stokes braved
enemy fire — “fearless in the face of danger,” according to the Marine
Corps — to kill insurgents and enable his platoon to gain control of
houses...On Nov. 17, 2004, after a grenade exploded near him,
wounding him, the private managed to continue to use his weapon so the
fire teams could reassemble and launch a counterattack.
A number of military blogs are pointing to this memorial piece
written by Stokes' former platoon commander Lt. Jeffrey Sommers. Among
his anecdotes Sommers reflects on his frustration at not being able to
promote Stokes due to his prior drug use:
His work ethic and attitude prompted us to ask, almost beg, for his
promotion. No matter what our argument (“He’s smart,” “He’s got
charisma,” “Marines around listen when he talks because he’s dead on
with his analysis,” “Give him rank, he’s not the drug pop that we
thought we were getting hosed with, he’s making a difference”) the
command couldn’t budge around the time restriction involved in his
demotion; Pvt Stokes would remain a Private for the rest of the
deployment no matter what he did or was capable of.
Later he reflected on Stokes' superior performance working as "point man" during the fighting:
The first man sees a lot, and a lot rests on his shoulders. The Marines
behind him depend on what the point man passes back when enemy contact
occurs, the squad leader’s plan is dependent on that flash of
information the point man gives. Pvt Stokes found a deadly rhythm as
the point man for second squad. Whenever a fight broke out, he would
either kill the enemy immediately himself, or if he couldn’t give out a
quick situation update so his squad could close with and kill.
Stokes' aunt described to the Marine Corps Times how her nephew sought
to keep his family from worrying about his last deployment:
“To protect his family from worry, he told them before he left and
during his third tour that his ship, the Bonhomme Richard, was stopping
at different ports around the world and was not going to go to Iraq,”
Leupp said by e-mail. “He had already been through so much during his
first two tours. Sean was supposed to just see the world by stopping at
different ports. So we thought he was safe during his third and we
hoped his last deployment. But not the way we hoped.”
Here's a local television station's coverage of the Silver Star presentation ceremony:
More
-
David Botti
|
Jan 25, 2008 11:01 AM
When movie-goers in the United Kingdom sit down to watch the Iraq war movie "In the Valley of Elah," they'll first be greeted by a new advertisement by the organization Combat Stress: Ex-Services Mental Welfare Society. As the Guardian reports,
Combat Stress was founded in 1919 to help WWI veterans recover mentally
from shell-shock. Today, after growing concern over the lack of
treatment available to today's veterans, Combat Stress is ramping up a
public relations campaign to highlight the issue:
Combat Stress is alarmed at the huge increase in veterans from the Falklands, Sierra Leone, Northern Ireland, Iraq
and Afghanistan, who come knocking on their door for help. A few are
still turning up suffering long-term effects from the second world war
and Korea. The oldest applicant for help recently was aged 100.
What's their reasoning for this alarm? Eight years ago 300
veterans sought help from Combat Stress; during the last fiscal year
the number jumped to 1,000. The number of Falklands War vets who've
committed suicide has risen to 300—more than the 256 British soldiers
who were killed in the war itself. Of particular note is how many view
the Iraq war's unpopularity in the UK as exacerbating vets' mental
health issues. From the Guardian:
The problems of veterans today are compounded by the widespread
recognition through much of the army that the Iraq campaign is
unpopular, nasty, unpredictable and brutal—and, in the views of a
significant minority of soldiers and officers in private conversation,
a pretty unnecessary conflict at that. In the first and second world wars, the plight of service personnel
was shared by almost everyone in the land. More than 1 million soldiers
served in Northern Ireland over 30 or so years, so that became part of
the national experience.
But combat in Iraq and Afghanistan is not a national experience, and
the services are worried that they appear in the minds of many now to
be detached from most of British national life. Though more American
soldiers have been involved—more than 3,000 killed and nearly 50,000
injured, physically or mentally—Iraq is not a shared experience
nationally for Americans in the way that Vietnam was.
Combat Stress' advertisement doesn't hold back any punches, as it
tries to impart what's going on behind the closed doors of veterans'
homes:
A well-trained fighting machine reduced to nothing more
than an empty shell. Combat stress is their calvary, the infantry to
fight off their demons. They were protecting you, now they need your
help.
You can view the advertisement here:
More
-
David Botti
|
Dec 14, 2007 03:06 PM
This is just a great video from CNN. A U.S. Army soldier back from Iraq wraps himself in a Christmas present box to surprise his two young daughters.
More
-
David Botti
|
Nov 29, 2007 10:04 AM
In lighter veterans news an Army National Guard sergeant is gearing up to participate in the next Miss America pageant. She's Jill Stevens, an Afghanistan veteran, a combat medic, and Miss Utah 2007. Stevens even has a personal website, hosted by the Army, detailing her Miss America run. "G.I. Jill," they call it.
Sgt. Stevens had just started nursing school at Southern Utah University in the fall of 2005 when the school's pageant director recruited her to run for Miss SUU.
"I was like, 'Yeah, right.' I wear combat boots; I don't do heels," she said.
Here's an interview Stevens did with Soldiers Radio and Television:
More
-
David Botti
|
Oct 22, 2007 01:25 PM
An Army soldier was impaled by a Rocket Propelled Grenade (RPG) in Afghanistan last year—but the warhead never went off. The Military Times has a remarkable video
interviewing the soldier, Specialist Channing Moss, the doctor who
operated on him unsure if/when the RPG would explode, and the
explosives expert on hand to deal with the warhead.
Moss was later treated at Walter Reed.
From the accompanying print story:
Moss was nearly dead as the Black Hawk landed at the battalion aid
station at Orgun-E, about 20 miles from the site of the ambush.
Collier
signaled wildly over the roar of the helicopter’s engines to alert the
aid-station staff that this was no ordinary patient.
Oh recalled
that it wasn’t apparent just how delicate the situation was until they
began cutting away Moss’s combat uniform and unraveling all the gauze
bandages.
When he saw the tail fin of the RPG round, he yelled, “everybody get out!”
“I had never even seen an RPG before, but I figured anything with a rod and fins on it had to be a rocket of some kind.”
Oh asked for volunteers to stay in the operating room and help him save Moss’s life. Several soldiers raised their hands.
More