David Botti
|
Mar 11, 2008 01:03 PM
Thirty-seven years after John Kerry and the Vietnam Veterans Against the War
(VVAW) descended upon Washington, D.C. to protest against U.S.
atrocities in Vietnam, a new generation of veterans will do the same
later this week. The group Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW) is
heading to the Capital as part of an event called Winter Soldier: Iraq
& Afghanistan, named after the similar VVAW event four decades
ago. As IVAW puts it:
The four-day event will bring together veterans from across the country
to testify about their experiences in Iraq and Afghanistan - and
present video and photographic evidence. In addition, there will be
panels of scholars, veterans, journalists, and other specialists to
give context to the testimony. These panels will cover everything from
the history of the GI resistance movement to the fight for veterans'
health benefits and support.
There
hasn't been much U.S. press coverage on the event, but the UK's Sunday
Times, using the headline of "Patriot Missiles," had a lengthy magazine story on the subject:
The veterans are not against the military and seek not to indict it – instead
they seek to shine a light on the bigger picture: that the Abu Ghraib prison
regime and the Haditha massacre of innocent Iraqis are not isolated
incidents perpetrated by “bad seeds” as the military suggests, but evidence
of an endemic problem. They will say they were tasked to do terrible things
and point the finger up the chain of command, which ignores, diminishes or
covers up routine abuse and atrocities.
Other
veterans, and vet bloggers, aren't thrilled with this event. A group
called "Stop the Slander," described as a "coalition of concerned
veterans, family members, and friends," has even published a guide for reporter's covering IVAW.
The guide warns journalists that claims made by IVAW may be untrue.
The guide even provides an acronym to follow of questions to ask:
D: Date(s) – When did the incident occur?
U: Unit(s) – What military units were involved?
P: Personnel – What are the names of the participants and witnesses?
E: Event(s) – What exactly happened exactly where?
S:
Signature(s) – Was this reported at the time or later and were reports,
affidavits or depositions signed, or will they now be signed?
Veterans For Freedom blogger, Mark Seavey, took his own critical look at the IVAW's preparations
for the Winter Soldier event, but in the end wrote that both sides of
the debate should be heard -- without unnecessary contest or debate:
I think it speaks well of IVAW that they expect all testimony to be
true and verifiable. And there will plenty of eyes there to ensure
that. Hopefully we can all say our piece, discuss our views and then
go home with no violence on anyone’s part.
The term "Winter Soldier" is derived from Thomas Paine's passage
intended to motivate George Washington's troops suffering at Valley
Forge:
“These are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and
sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of his
country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man
and woman.”
This
is generating a huge amount of debate within the vocal veterans
community. What's interesting to note is that perhaps the only
demographic who can debate IVAW, without being called-out on their lack
of service, is other veterans. The issues goes above someone's service
record, and shows how the fabled, and perhaps cliched, military bond
can only go so far in such times of controversy. Or, is it still
there, above all the ruckus? We'll soon find out.
More
Loading Menu