Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
Full Post
Posted Monday, November 19, 2007 1:07 PM

HRC: TCB in Vegas. A Conversion Story.

Andrew Romano
 
She came, she saw--and she conquered.

After a year of polls, pundits, fundraising, ads, endorsements and "debates," the 2008 presidential election can start to seem like, well, sound and fury, signifying nothing (to coin a phrase). Which is exactly what I expected to find Saturday morning when Sen. Hillary Clinton addressed the Sheet Metal Workers' International Association (SMWIA) in Las Vegas, Nevada.
 
Why would I expect otherwise? The event was a victory lap--an appearance in front of a group, recently merged with the United Transportation Union to form the 230,000-strong Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation (SMART) conglomerate, that had already decided to support Clinton for president. No wooing necessary Just order up a few hundred yellow "SMART Choice" t-shirts and blue "SMART Choice" buttons, pass out the "SMART Choice" placards, stand at the "SMART Choice" podium in front of the "SMART Choice" backdrop and let the flashbulbs flash.
 
Not that union endorsements aren't useful and all. But announcement ceremonies aren't typically the best place to experience the unique frisson of retail politics--the skepticism, the seduction, the sale--in person.
 
Unless, you know, they are. With Bruce Springsteen's "The Rising" warming up the crowd--and Clinton herself still touring the next-door SMWIA Apprenticeship Facility--I approached Jerry Waller and asked why he's supporting Clinton. His answer? "I'm not." Two of his yellow-shirted union brothers rolled their eyes. Waller, 54, moved from Detroit to Las Vegas ten years ago; a former military police officer, he was broke until the Local 88 "took him in." That said, his loyalty doesn't necessarily extend to his union's presidential pick. "A lot of guys hate her, actually," he said. "There's a lot of anger. I remember when they passed out fliers a few weeks back. One guy just threw it to the ground."
 
Waller's top concern this cycle is health care. On Sept. 21, 1984, he was "completely buried" when an underground pipe he was working on collapsed. "You New Yorkers have 9/11," he said. "I have 9/21. I was out of commission for five years. Workingman's comp blew me off." I asked who he is supporting. "Don't know yet. I'm still researching. John Edwards came by here, oh, five months ago. I was impressed. It was more informal than all this. If Hillary wants my vote, she needs to turn more human. She's too staged."
 
Clinton's speech wasn't a barnburner, by any stretch. But it was relatively rousing. In addition to the usual labor-friendly lines ("You can't say you're pro-family if you're anti-union"), attacks on the Bush administration ("We gave them a $5.6 million surplus...") and local appeals ("Vegas is the fastest-growing city in America, right? Lots of things to build!"), she delivered a spirited "analysis" of last Thursday's debate. "This time what happened in Vegas didn't stay in Vegas!" she said. "I loved the debate because we finally got into some real issues. For example, my health care plan covers every American. Sen. Obama's doesn't. He didn't make that decision. I think it takes strength and experience to make the tough decisions."
 
Still, as the applause died down and I asked Waller what he thought, I was surprised by his response. "I'm impressed," he said. "She was better than I expected. Sounds a lot smarter than I expected, actually. I heard what I wanted to hear: heath care, taking care of our military guys, the middle class. " He was smiling. Wait, are you, like, a supporter now? I asked. "I am. I'm leaning more this way." But what about the "human" thing?  Did that give you a sense of warmth? "It's not a problem for me any more. I got a good feeling."
 
Just goes to show: anti-Clinton sentiment might be broad (recall those 49 percent unfavorable ratings), but it's not always deep. Especially if, after a year of polls, pundits, fundraising, ads, endorsements and "debates," all it takes to win over a guy like Jerry Waller is a standard 20-minute speech, delivered live in person.
 
Bravo, Hillary. Only a few million more converts to go. 
Advertisement
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: RuthieM (November 20, 2007 at 11:44 AM)

Uggh, don't make me throw up.


Posted By: jqpublic (November 20, 2007 at 8:49 AM)

All I can say to those of you who are Bush backers is....are you kidding?  In eight years this president has destroyed our economy, put our troops and citizens in harms way and filled his own pockets with tons of cash from rising oil prices.  Bill Clinton may have involved himself in some very shady deals, however we never had to worry about our constituional rights being eroded to little or nothing and we could get on an airplane and fly to see our familes without being concerned whether or not we would make it.  Our economy is worse now than it has been in decades and we are looking at far bigger consequences in the near future.  People are afraid of Hillary because she ie a woman, but she is well spoken and has an understanding of the White House and how it runs.  If she were a man her politcal views would be considered differently and she would be seen as a strong candidate by many more of her detractors, but since she is a woman she is labeled as a **tch.  Another eight years of the same thing and this country will have only two economic classes left, the rich and the poverty stricken.....and take a guess where most of the population will be.  Most of our tax dollars now are being funneled into a a war over oil, foreign oil I might add.  Do you really think that the American public will benifit from this?  Not a chance, it's going to be a select few that capitalize and the rest of us are left to pay the bill or parish.  It's time for a change and time for a new way of thinking or we are all going to be in major trouble.


Posted By: HillaryforPresident (November 20, 2007 at 1:45 AM)

to cerrulis,

Absolutely!  What's good for Bush is good enough for Hillary.  If enough Americans thought it was bad policy for the current administration to have to such power, why not speak out and demand a halt to power grabbing.  Power and influence are not bad in and of its self.  It's who has it and what they do with it.  Hillary stands for positive changes and is a forthright candidate who will return the U.S. to it's former greatness.  As a man, as I'm assuming you are, you need to ask yourself, am I protesting her because she's a women or because of her stance?  If women, you should be ashamed of yourself for being narrow minded, if the latter, you obviously haven't read much about her and her accomplishements aside from the garbage the conservative right publish.  They have the agenda and it's not pretty or moral.