A round-up of this morning's must-read stories.
BUSH, GIULIANI WEIGH IN ON CLINTON, OBAMA (Michael Finnegan, Los Angeles Times)
It was a day of attacks and parries over the credentials of the
Democratic candidates for president, exchanges that saw Hillary Rodham
Clinton belittle Barack Obama, John Edwards tweak Clinton and -- in the
oddest twist -- President Bush praise the New York senator's
experience. At least on Tuesday, the Democratic race for president
looked more like a shoving match than a civil airing of policy
differences.
Time's Mark Halperin on "what it all means."
FOR EDWARDS, A RELATIONSHIP THAT NEVER QUITE FIT (Kate Zernike, New York Times)
Mr. Edwards felt frustrated by Mr. Kerry’s public agonizing over the
war in Iraq and a campaign that seemed to change consultants and
message constantly. To Mr. Edwards, Mr. Kerry seemed unable to get out
of his own way. He ignored Mr. Edwards’s warning not to go windsurfing,
one aide recalled, which led to the infamous “whichever way the wind
blows” advertisement mocking Mr. Kerry’s statements on the war. And in
the end, Mr. Edwards concluded that Mr. Kerry lacked fight for not
filing a legal challenge to the election results. Today, Mr.
Edwards insists he is “the same person I’ve always been.” But his
experience as a vice-presidential candidate who went down in defeat has
clearly influenced his current run for the Democratic presidential
nomination... Kerry loyalists, meanwhile, seethe as they watch his new
aggressiveness. Stephanie Cutter, who was Mr. Kerry’s communications
director, said, “A lot of what I’m seeing now, I wish I’d seen in 2004.”
HUCKABEE GAINING GROUND IN IOWA (Dan Balz and Jon Cohen, Washington Post)
Huckabee has tripled his support in Iowa since late July, eclipsing former New York mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani, former senator Fred D. Thompson (Tenn.) and Sen. John McCain (Ariz.). Huckabee now runs nearly evenly with Romney, the longtime Iowa front-runner. Huckabee's rise from dark horse to contender in Iowa is one more
unexpected twist in a race that has remained fluid throughout the year
and adds another unpredictable element to the competition for the GOP nomination. His support in Iowa appears stronger and more enthusiastic than that of his rivals. Still, there are other signs in the poll suggesting that Romney remains
the candidate to beat in the state and that gains for Huckabee may be
harder to achieve in the next 43 days than they were over the past four
months.
ROMNEY CAMP IS BUOYED BY SKIN-CELL NEWS (Michael Levenson, Boston Globe)
Mitt Romney was accused of a sop to social conservatives when, in his
last months as Massachusetts governor, he imposed a controversial limit
on stem cell research that said scientists could not use stem cell
lines from embryos created for the sole purpose of scientific
exploration. s his presidential campaign contended yesterday, he may have been
vindicated by yesterday's announcement that scientists have created
stem cells without having to make or destroy embryos. It pointed out
that Romney has long called for a less ethically charged alternative,
and it highlighted an opinion piece published online yesterday that
praises Romney for his position... Romney has long said he is keenly aware that such research could lead
to cures for diseases such as multiple sclerosis, with which his wife,
Ann, was diagnosed in 1998. But his views on the ethics of such
research have not always been so clear...
More on the politics of stem cells.
BIDEN: TIMING IS EVERYTHING (Joe Oliphant, Chicago Tribune)
Joe Biden's story starts and ends, and starts again here: The Polk
County Fairgrounds, home of the Iowa State Fair. Twenty years ago it
all went wrong in a few poorly chosen words. Now it is the place to
exorcise the ghosts. Twenty years ago, Biden was his generation's New Voice, the Democrat
whose rhetoric and youthful exuberance recalled the Kennedy mystique.
For a time, he seemed the ideal antidote to the autumnal stagger of the
Reagan administration's latter days... Now he's the seasoned hand. He is a high
priest of the Senate, a master of its mores and a beneficiary of its
homage to seniority. He chairs the prestigious Foreign Relations
Committee, and before that the Judiciary Committee; and has long been a
regular on the Sunday talk shows. The question is whether he... was first too young, and then too old, for the ultimate prize.
STILL STUMBLING ON NATIONAL SECURITY (Joe Klein, Time)
If the Democrats want to win in 2008, they can't be mealymouthed on
issues of national security. That doesn't mean they need to be
witlessly hawkish. It doesn't mean they have to join the
neoconservative frenzy for war with Iran. It means they have to make
the arguments against folly with clarity, toughness and a heavy dose of
Realpolitik. It means they will have to convince the public that they
will be more effective and realistic overseas than the Republicans have
been. No more "Freedom Agendas." No more quagmires. A renewed emphasis
on cleaning out al-Qaeda, even if it means special operations against
the terrorist camps in Pakistan (as Obama has suggested). It also means
that in each and every debate, the Dems should acknowledge the progress
being made in Iraq and ask the question, So why can't we start bringing
home the troops now?