Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
Full Post
Posted Wednesday, November 28, 2007 12:09 PM

Stumper's Top 10 Must-Ask CNN/YouTube Debate Questions

Andrew Romano

After months of delays, the hour is nigh. Tonight at 8:00 p.m., the Republican presidential candidates will finally stride on stage in St. Petersburg, Fla. for the CNN/YouTube debate, subjecting themselves to a few dozen videotaped questions from--gasp!--the American people. Plus the occasional Mr. Potato-Head.

This almost didn't happen. After the Democrats clashed on CNN in July, Mitt Romney mocked the format. “I think the presidency ought to be held at a higher level than having to answer questions from a snowman," he said. Romney and Rudy Giuliani soon declined to participate; they apparently had better places to be on Sept. 17, the original date. When CNN rescheduled, only three Republicans--John McCain, Ron Paul and Tommy Thompson--had signed on. The rest begrudgingly followed. “I think it would have looked very badly if the Democrats were eager, and the Republicans didn’t seem to address questions directly from the American people,” says moderator Anderson Cooper.

So which questions will the candidates address? Only CNN, who picks the clips (despite criticism from the Web community), knows for sure. But that doesn't mean the rest of us can't weigh in. With a little help from David Colarusso and the good folks at TechPresident, I've whittled the 40 most-viewed submissions--Web 2.0-style--down to 10 must-ask questions.

Advertisement

CNN might think it's "dangerous" to let citizens vote videos onto the show. But the 40 most popular clips were remarkably intelligent, issue-based and even moving. Nearly all of my Top 10 take advantage of what I consider the format's greatest strength--when ordinary Americans ask about issues that affect their lives, politicians can't bluster, posture or blame the media for bias. Here's hoping these questions make the broadcast--and get the candid, revealing, difficult answers they deserve.

And don't worry, Mitt. No snowmen in sight. 

(Ranked in order of YouTube views, not personal preference) 

37. Gay IED Disarmament Specialist: Why Can't I Serve Openly?


33. Immigrant/Soldier: How Can You Deport Those Who Risk Their Lives for the U.S.?


30. Atheist: Mike Huckabee, Would You Ever Vote for an Atheist for President?


28. Cancer Survivor: How Many of You Would Cut or Freeze the Medicaid Benefits That Helped Me?


26. Gay Businessman: Would You Discourage People from Using Religion to Discriminate Against Gays?


17. African-American Man: Ron Paul, Why Did You Make Racist Statements?


9. Will You Punish Journalists for Giving Aid and Comfort to the Enemy?

7. What Problem Has the Bush Administration Most Neglected?


2. Gun Enthusiasts: Which Three Gun Laws Would You Repeal?


1.Spanish Language Student: How Would You Prepare America for a Bilingual Future?

Tag(s):
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: kirt (November 29, 2007 at 1:45 PM)

How can you support spending billion on a war with no true victory, and if you say we can have victory then tell us what is that victory. When will we spend that kida of money and intrest in the domestic problems, education, jobs, infrustructure and enviroment issues?


Posted By: blacksmithn (November 29, 2007 at 12:18 PM)

proudtoberepublican, who was in charge when 9/11 happened? Who was in charge when Katrina hit? Hint: That would be the GOP. Who ignored warnings about bin Laden being determined to strike US targets? Hint: that would be the current, GOP, administration. Who decided to invade an entirely unrelated foreign power as a response to 9/11 and then set about justifying such a warrantless attack on a sovereign nation with orchestrated lies-- or, if one wanted to be charitable, carefully cherrypicked "intelligence"? Hint: That would again be the GOP. Who pooh-poohed the concern of American generals that an occupation of Iraq would require many thousands more personnel than we were prepared to commit?  Hint: A Republican administration.  Who has allowed the situation there to fester like an unlanced boil? Hint: that would be the Commander-in-Chief, who is-- surprise!-- a Republican.

Who appointed "Brownie" to be head of FEMA? Hint: That would be a Republican president, running a Republican administration. Who has allowed a major American city-- a whole, entire city fer crissake-- to struggle with rebuilding while turning a blind eye to the problem? Hint: Can you guess by now?

How can I blame a political party? Well, when the party in question is responsible, I guess it's pretty darned easy!

Sorry, but contrary to your assertion, mindsets like yours, which value party loyalty over loyalty to the country as a whole, are directly and implicitly the reason that politics and statesmanship in this nation are in the dumper that they are currently in.


Posted By: tennisbum937 (November 29, 2007 at 10:24 AM)

To understand where all these Republicans stand is a simple yes or no question as follows. If you are the Rebublican nominee will you ask George Bush and Dick Cheney to actively campaign for you?