Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
Full Post
Posted Friday, November 30, 2007 11:55 AM

The 'Sugar-Daddy' Ticket?

Andrew Romano

Ohmygodohmygodohmygod!!! Barack Obama and Mike Bloomberg had breakfast this morning! Together! Obama's eggs? Over easy! Bloomberg's? Scrambled! Obama toast? Wheat! Bloomberg's? White! There were also potatoes! The tab was $17.34! Obama paid--and left a $10 tip! They talked about the economy! Education! Homeland security! Global warming! They even "looked thoughtful"! What does it all mean???

Hear that annoying buzz? It's the Manhattan media, which descended on the New York Luncheonette at E. 50th Street this morning to film the hastily arranged Bloomberg-Obama summit taking place inside--and immediately started wagging its cable/talk radio/tabloid/Internet tongue "about the possibilities, the angles, the common interests" (in the words of MSM queen bee Mark Halperin).The actual footage, sadly, revealed nothing. It's hard to hear what people are saying indoors when you're shooting from the sidewalk. Outside. Through a window.

That, of course, hasn't stopped the speculation. Most of it revolves around whether Obama and Bloomberg will "form a ticket"--and whether Bloomberg, a billionaire many times over, could finance the bid out of pocket. This is asinine. Barring the fact that reasonable experts disagree on whether it's even legal-- "There isn't language in the law or reg[ulation]s that says clearly yes or no," FEC spokesman Bob Biersack tells Ben Smith--it's absurdly braindead politics. Self-financing is one thing. If Obama were billionaire like Bloomberg, fine; he's not beholden to anyone. But to pick a billionaire running mate and then take massive sums of his money would make Obama look 1) weak, as if he needs a "sugar daddy" and 2) corrupt, as if he were selling the vice presidency to the highest bidder. Neither charge would be true--but that wouldn't stop Republicans from repeating them ad infinitum.

Advertisement

Today's Bloomberg-Obama breakfast was nothing more than a photo op. Bloomberg wants to play a part in the "national conversation." Obama wants to burnish his indie cred. So instead of meeting behind closed doors at, say, Gracie Mansion, they meet at a diner, sit in a window seat, keep the cameras out of earshot--but still keep the cameras--and let us blowhards do the rest.

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: The Thane of Towson (February 27, 2008 at 8:27 PM)

I am a Jew.  There is more freedom of speech in Israel than in the USA about the Israeli-Palestinian Question.  Where is the CHANGE in Bosko Obama's position on Israel?  American Jews, like most other Americans, are idiots when it comes to politics.  They think it is the NBA or the NFL.  If Bloomberg does not run and as President brokers a deal in the MIdEast with reasonable people, we are lost.  For 2000 years, we Jews have suffered from Christian love.  The Arabs are out brothers.  They welcomed us when the Christians came after us.  We owe them justice.  Read I. F. Stone, you fools!


Posted By: The Thane of Towson (January 11, 2008 at 6:24 PM)

Looks good for a Bloomberg run.  The Dark Matter issue is starting to erode Obama's affirmative action candidancy.  The Yahoos are scattered.  Will America wind up with white trash or black trash?  Bloomberg will restore dignity to our highest office.  


Posted By: thejenster14@yahoo.com (December 1, 2007 at 1:59 PM)

Thane of Towson, you're ridiculous. First of all, I think a Jewish president would be great, but I think if he is a secular Jew, which he most likely is, he would be more of a Zionist. The secular movement tends toward Zionism and support of Israel, it is what us Jews believe in. So he would not assist Palestinian terrorists.