Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
Full Post
Posted Tuesday, December 11, 2007 12:51

Should Out-of-State Students Caucus in Iowa?

Andrew Romano
 
David Yepsen, the chief political writer and columnist for the Des Moines Register, has the words "Dean of the Iowa Political Press Corps" permanently affixed to his name, so I don't doubt that he's a bright fellow who's forgotten more than Stumper will ever know about caucus arithmetic and arcana.

That said, his crusade against Barack Obama's aggressive campaign to turn out non-Iowans who attend college in Iowa--even if they'll be home for winter break on Jan. 3--strikes me as sort of silly.

It started on Nov. 30 with a column called "The Illinois Caucus." "These are the Iowa caucuses," he wrote. "Asking people who are 'not from Iowa' to participate in them changes the nature of the event." (Obama had recently released a four-page "Students for Barack Obama" brochure that said “if you are not from Iowa, you can come back for the Iowa caucus.") On Dec. 3, Yepsen told other reporters, including NBC's Aswini Anburajan, that Obama's collegiate push was "politically dumb." Now, Yepsen's latest column expands on that observation. "Obama... has built an impressive organization and can win this on the legit," he writes. "He doesn't need to give opposition spinners a way to discredit a victory." Cue a breathless "Yepsen Warns Obama Again" headline at The Page, Time's CW clearinghouse, and a buzzy items on the blogs.

Reading Yepsen's collected works on the subject, it's difficult to discern what he finds so offensive about Obama's effort. It's not illegal for out-of-state students to caucus--Yepsen himself admits "its all quite legal." (In fact, it's encouraged by the Iowa Secretary of State.) And Obama isn't the only candidate targeting out-of-state undergrads--Yepsen confesses that "other campaigns are signing up nonresident Iowa college students, too." Yepsen does say that "no presidential campaign in memory has ever made such a large, open attempt to encourage students from another state to participate in Iowa's caucuses," but I'm not sure you can fault Obama for going "large" and "open" with an effort that Yepsen agrees is both legal and nonexclusive. And unless "the Dean" is accusing Obama of voter fraud, his insinuations about corrupt Illinois politics--"they do elections a little differently in Illinois than we do in Iowa"--are completely irrelevant.

Simply put, all of Yepsen's sound and fury boils down to one weird argument: it's illegitimate (if "barely legal") for the 21,000 out-of-state Iowa students to caucus. These are the same students, mind you, who live at least nine months a year for four to six years at a time in Iowa, where they pay sales tax on every purchase and income tax on the money they earn working part-time jobs--all while their fellow undergrads in, say, Indiana register and vote in their newly adopted state without any static.

Advertisement

But, you know, the Iowa caucuses are for Iowans. The rest of the Hawkeye State's students should sit on the presidential sidelines from the time they're old enough to vote until long after they're old enough to drink, right? Isn't that what XBoxes are for?

As I said, silly. And sad, too. Obama's rivals--including Clinton and Dodd--have already jumped on the nativist, ageist Yepsen bandwagon, and his odd complaints (as a real, live Iowa expert!) only serve to stoke the sort of spin he says he anticipates in the wake of an Obama victory.

I just hope the rest of us don't buy it.

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: BenMurphyNYC (December 16, 2007 at 11:23 AM)

username100 - good guess. the paper endorsed.


Posted By: username100 (December 13, 2007 at 12:29 AM)

sorry, I meant "commando mission"


Posted By: username100 (December 13, 2007 at 12:24 AM)

It doesn't make sense for a veteran journalist like Yepsen to contradict himself like he is doing in this case;admitting other candidates do it but Obama shouldn't do it openly and aggressively.

My suspicion is he wants his paper to endorse Hillary as there has been a lot of lobbying from her campaign. Since these days there is no momentum nor good news in camp Hillary to justify an endorsement he has to manufacture a non exsitent cotroversy about her closest rival. Sometimes these papers come up with ridiculous explanations of why they endorsed a candidate - 2 days ago some Iowa news paper endorsed Hillary. One of the reasons they gave was the "leadership" she showed during the hostage situation in New Hampshire. If you didn't follow the news and just read this paper you would think Hillary performed some special command mission and came out with the hostages. What she really did was talked to reporters calmly and once the situation was over talked to the hostages. Now, which of the candidates can't or won't do the same thing she did? It sounds what she did was pretty standard. But since they can't come up with a really distinguishing reason they give us some silly reason why they did or did not endorse a candidate.


 
The Peek
 
 
PROJECT GREEN

For decades, tiny Barrow, Alaska, has been largely unknown and unnoticed. But with increasing global activity in the Arctic--especially from oil speculators--things are changing … fast.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu