Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Tuesday, January 15, 2008 8:55 PM

Romneybot Reboots

Andrew Romano

Romney wins! Romney wins! 39-30 over McCain!

The networks are calling today's Michigan primary for former the Massachusetts governor, awarding him his first gold medal in a major contest (sorry, Wyoming) after a string of disappointing silvers in Iowa and New Hampshire. Romney defeats a resurgent John McCain, who in the wake of his shocking comeback in New Hampshire looked last week like he would march to victory in the Great Lakes State and become the first Republican candidate to fully claim the frontrunner mantle. Despite the McCain camp's early attempts to dismiss a potential Romney win as pure native-son favoritism--Romney's father George ran American Motors in Detroit and served as a popular Republican governor in the 1960s--tonight's results represent an unequivocal setback for the Arizona senator, a tenuous revival for Romney and, for the Republican field as a whole, a totally fractured, leaderless race heading into Saturday's South Carolina primary.

How did Romney win? By ditching the inauthentic "consensus conservative" guise, reminding local voters of his Michigan roots, promising to "rebuild" the auto industry (McCain admitted that jobs weren't coming back) and dropping more than $2 million on television advertising. On primary day, Democrats and Independents--a large chunk of McCain's base--stayed home, comprising only 25 percent of the GOP primary electorate as compared to the 35 percent they made up when McCain won in 2000. And more than half of voters told pollsters that the economy--which Romney, former CEO of Bain Capital and master "turnaround" artist, worked hard to dominate over the past week--was their top issue, up from 33 percent in McCain-friendly New Hampshire.

Where does Romney go from here? South Carolina, like the rest of the Republicans. It's undoubtedly harsher terrain. As commenter BinxBollings points out, Romney drew a huge chunk of his support from voters (four in 10) who said his ties to Michigan were very or somewhat important to their vote, while losing by 18 percent to McCain and almost losing to Huckabee among the 56 percent who thought his Michigan connection unimportant. In South Carolina, expect him to continue pushing his new message: "It’s a victory of optimism over Washington-style pessimism. The people of Michigan said they believe in someone who is going to fight for them." Will momentum--and money, considering he's been off the air in the Palmetto State for a week--be enough to push the Massachusetts Mormon past not only Mike Huckabee, whom he trails by six in the latest polling averages, but McCain, whom he trails by 10?

Advertisement

We'll see in four short days.

UPDATE: Commenter "Vital Centrist" hits the nail on the head re: the weirdness of Romney's "turnaround":

Perhaps Romney intentionally committed tactical errors early on---running as an evangelical conservative---as part of a genius strategy to show his ability to bail out sinking ships as a "turrnaround artist." Or maybe he hired Bain to consult on his campaign, and a bunch of nerdy Harvard 20-somethings stated the obvious: forget the rightward shift and focus on what you're good at, fundamentals. But then, wouldn't he be a failed company or a corrupt Olympics, and then that would negate his whole new theme? I'm so confused.

Indeed. 

UPDATE II: The McCain camp blasts out Ron Fournier's latest AP column: "MITT WON, AUTHENTICITY LOST." Make sense--but it's not quite fair, I suppose. Mitt was more "authentic" in Michigan than he's been since the start of the campaign. It's just that his authentic self is a salesman--and he'll go as far as he needs to go to seal the deal. Eager to see how that plays in South Carolina...
 

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: JoeE71 (January 21, 2008 at 1:15 PM)

Mitt Romney is the only financial genius that is able to stave off economic problems.  Why is anyonw voting for McCain or Hillary or Obama?  They are all Senators that are part of the problem!  Why send them back to do the same tax raising and over spending that they always have been doing?  It makes no sense.  I am voting for Mitt Romney because he is not part of the problem and actually is famous for turning things around.  Don't you all want a turn around in Washington?  Don't let the media vote for you!  I am for Mitt Romney!


Posted By: dclayton (January 16, 2008 at 2:24 PM)

As a turn around professional of a sort... myself, I find the media's coverage of the whole Republican Primary very revealing. As an early Romney supporter, I'm probably overly sensitive, but come on, I thought "journalism" was about being a News REPORTER, not an analyst. There seem to be no reporters left, everyone is in the business of spin, and doing a poor job at that. Not to mention the wide inacuracy in reporting the delegate counts. Yahoo had Huckabee in the lead this morning, and referecend another article that showed the additional delegates McCain won but not Romney. Then I can count nearly 100 reporters that referenced this as the 3rd GOP race, when it is the 4th. CNN tried to dismiss the correction by one guest, as Wyoming is such a small state. Well that tiny state has the same number of delegates as New Hampshire, and how much ink was spent there? I dont put much stock in conspiracies, but media agendas are clear. I believe Romney is the candidate that scares the left and its media alies the most. He is the clearest contrast to the status quo and the liberal agenda. He's proven an ability to draw moderates support and he bets on himself with his own money. I believe that worry is a result of the lable of flip-flopper that has worked to this point. The reality is it does not show a John Kerry-like character flaw, merely a willingness to consider all the facts. The more people know about the real Mitt and the more Mitt relaxes the better chance he will have.  


Posted By: haffaja (January 16, 2008 at 6:38 AM)

Romney has the real leader experience, skills, knowledge as well as the presidential presence needed to win the national election over either Obama or Clinton.  McCain is too old to win a broad based election - he has had his chance and cannot be trusted.  The only reason he won in NH was the independents swung his way when the liberal media put so much emphasis on Obama's expected huge win over Clinton.  Romney has won more GOP votes than either McCain or Huckabee.  So why is Newsweek saying that he won ONLY because of his native son credential instead of what he stands for???  Why? - Romney scares the heck out of Democrats and their liberal media!!