Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
Full Post
Posted Thursday, February 07, 2008 3:05 PM

How Romney Decided

Editors

contributed by Suzanne Smalley

So how did Mitt Romney decide to exit the race? Eric Fehrnstrom, the former Massachusetts governor’s traveling press secretary, said the first clue came at a meeting of about 10 senior staffers at headquarters in Boston yesterday. At that session, Fehrnstrom says, Romney indicated that he “didn’t want to do anything that would hurt the party or hurt the nation." That comment gave Fehrnstrom, a longtime Romney aide, an inkling that something was up. But Romney went on to attend a meeting of all staff at headquarters, at which he was “cheered and encouraged by his campaign workers and volunteers to go forward.” At about 3 p.m. yesterday, the New York Times reported that Romney strategists said the candidate intended to stay in the race, indicating they were discussing the possibility of winning over unbound delegates as a way of cobbling together a win. Romney headed home to Belmont late yesterday afternoon, to write up the speech he would give Thursday at the Conservative Political Action Committee’s winter meeting. As he wrote, the address “turned into a farewell speech,” Fehrnstrom said.

As always with Romney, family was key. He consulted with his five sons and wife, Ann, before making the decision. Ann and son Tagg were both present at yesterday’s senior staff session. Word spread among his top aides, as they swapped copies of the speech. Fehrnstrom himself was taking in a Celtics game when he learned his boss was getting out.

Advertisement

Following the CPAC speech, Romney immediately got on the phone with his national finance co-chairs and later Thursday afternoon will head up to Capitol Hill and meet with congressional supporters (who learned of his decision along with the CPAC audience).

Meanwhile, McCain was preparing for his own talk to the CPAC crowd. At about 2 p.m., he entered the lobby of DC's Omni Shoreham to the cheers of some 200 screaming, sign-waving supporters-who presented a stark contrast to Romney’s faithful, who wandered dejectedly through the lobby. Alexandra Smith, an 18-year-old Catholic student, was typical of them. She said she began receiving texts about news reports about Romney's decision a few minutes before the CPAC speech but didn’t know whether to believe them. But when Romney began talking and referred in his speech to this not being 1976, when Reagan went all the way to the convention, she said she knew. "I'll sit home on Election Day," she said. "There's no conservative [left]."

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: JohnGaltlaketahoe (February 7, 2008 at 7:20 PM)

Comment: One month into the Presidential election year, leading candidates have yet to address issues of urgent importance for every day life for Americans.

Health insurance industry, agribusiness giants, corporate criminals, nuclear power, energy providers pollution controls, big oil, big banks, drug companies, union busters, war profiteers, credit card companies, corporate Democrats in Congress and Corporate Republicans in Congress.

This list of issues has been ignored by the so called leading candidates for President of the United States. The private cable networks, who now sponsor Presidential debates, have worked overtime to exclude questions on these issues, not to mention the candidates and the civic groups supporting these issues.

What issues are the leading candidates now supposed to speak on while they wait out the American electorate until the Democrat???s and Republican Party???s convention?

The message is that the natives are restless. The leading candidates do not represent whom they claim to represent, if they did, issues would be on the table for discussion during Presidential debates.


 
The Peek
 
 
PROJECT GREEN
NWK Caption: At the Excel High School in Oakland, California a group of students, their teacher and members of community groups pose with air pollution monitors in front of a mural at the school.  July 26, 2008.       Left to Right:   Randy Colosky, a member of Global Community Monitor  wearing brown shirt ,Juan Hernandez, student (seated) ,   Ina Bendich, teacher Danyale Willingham,student in blue top).Elizabeth de Rham far right, member of the Rose Foundation.

Young pollution sleuths and community activists fight for healthier air.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu