A round-up of this morning's must-read stories.
PERFECT GAME
(Arian Campo-Flores, Newsweek)
Clinton suffered another wave of dispiriting losses against Sen. Barack Obama. He beat her in Virginia
64 to 35 percent, in Maryland 61 to 35 percent and in the District of
Columbia 75 to 24 percent, according to incomplete returns. These
trouncings give Obama a perfect 8-0 record against Clinton in the
primaries and caucuses held since Super Tuesday... Obama found plenty to celebrate in Tuesday's
exit polls. In Virginia--the most closely watched and contested of
Tuesday's competitions--it was no surprise that he trounced Clinton
among blacks and young voters. What was surprising, and surely
worrisome to the Clinton campaign, was that Obama beat her among women,
58 to 42 percent, and pulled nearly even with her among whites,
garnering 48 percent compared to her 51. He also defeated her in two
other categories that she has usually dominated: lower-income groups
and people without a college degree. All of which shows that Obama
succeeded in broadening his coalition.
SURGING, OBAMA MAKES HIS CASE
(Adam Nagourney, New York Times)
For weeks, Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Obama had approached this race the
same way: as state-by-state trench warfare, in the belief that the
nomination would go to whoever got the most delegates. But the
latest results suggest that the race might be tilting back to a more
normal form, where the goal is achieving a series of splashing
victories and thus momentum. That has provided Mr. Obama with the
opportunity, which he plans to seize in a more full-throated way
starting on Wednesday, to argue that voters across a wide cross-section
of the country have embraced his candidacy, and that the time has come
for the group that could hold the balance of power, those 796 unpledged
superdelegates — party leaders and elected officials who have an
automatic seat at the national convention — to follow suit.
SHIFTING LOYALTIES
(Jonathan Weisman, Washington Post)
For more than a month, the grand coalitions of Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama
battled to a draw: women, rural Democrats and the white working class
pairing almost evenly with African Americans, young voters and
affluent, educated whites. Then came Virginia and Maryland. Obama's thrashing of Clinton in the two states yesterday raised the
possibility that her coalition is beginning to crack, three weeks
before she reaches what will probably be more friendly territory in Ohio and Texas. Obama won among men, among women and among union voters. He won big
among the affluent, educated voters in the District's suburbs, but he
also won convincingly among rural voters and small-town Democrats.
CLINTON PLAYS ELECTION ROULETTE
(Jeanne Cummings, Politico)
Hillary Rodham Clinton is now on a path to the Democratic nomination
that is remarkably similar to the one that failed for Republican Rudy
Giuliani. Just as the former New York mayor pinned his hopes on a late Florida
victory to sling-shot him into front-runner status among Republican
candidates, the New York senator is banking on wins in Ohio and Texas
next month to revive her campaign after a February string of
back-to-back-to-back losses. It’s a high-risk play for the once undisputed Democratic front-runner.
It also may be the only maneuver she has left after rival Barack Obama
managed to effectively counter her planned Super Tuesday knock-out
punch.
INSIDE THE CLINTON SHAKE-UP
(Joshua Green, The Atlantic)
In one sense, Solis Doyle performed exactly as Hillary had hoped.
Somewhat to my surprise, the long-standing fissures in Hillaryland
never truly erupted when Clinton came under presidential-campaign
pressure, certainly not the way they did in 2000. For all the chaos and
disillusionment with Clinton’s performance so far inside the campaign,
very little of it had leaked to the press until just recently. And
despite her late start, Clinton did not lag on the money front: she has
raised $175 million since winning her Senate seat in 2000, which should
have been enough to fund a formidable campaign, even one that dragged
on as long as this one has. That the money was so obviously mismanaged
and Clinton was essentially left helpless to compete in last weekend’s
primaries and caucuses is the reason Solis Doyle ultimately had to go.
The problem, as before, was mismanagement — only this time against a
worthy enough opponent that the cost was obvious to everyone.
BUT WHICH DEMOCRAT CAN WIN IT ALL IN NOVEMBER?
(Christopher Cooper, Wall Street Journal)
Right now, Mr. Obama has the stronger argument: In
nine polls in the past two months that are posted by
RealClearPolitics.com, the Illinois senator tops Mr. McCain in eight of
them, with several of the most recent showing him winning by more than
the survey's margin of error. Mrs. Clinton, by contrast, loses seven of
the nine head-to-head contests, but only slightly. But polls have proven volatile this political season,
and at this point neither Democrat is close to a lock for a theoretical
November victory. Both candidates display weaknesses that could hinder
their electability.
DEBATE INTENSIFIES OVER ROLE OF SUPERDELEGATES IN CLINTON-OBAMA RACE
(Peter Wallsten and Peter Nicholas, Los Angeles Times)
Even as the primary schedule rolls on -- Wisconsin and Hawaii vote next
Tuesday -- the campaigns are devoting a huge amount of energy to
gaining the upper hand in the private conversation among the super
delegates, most of whom are members of Congress or party officials... In a breakthrough for Obama, his victories Tuesday pushed him ahead for
the first time in the race for delegates overall, according to an
Associated Press tally. Obama is certain to use his victories in Tuesday's so-called Potomac
primaries to try to change the minds of super delegates such as Parker
and Rodriguez by building the case that the party's elite insiders
would set off angry protests if they overturned the will of the voters. The strength of Obama's winning coalition Tuesday could help him in that effort.
MORE: The Democrats' Undemocratic System (Ruth Marcus, Washington Post)
The Democratic Party has come up with a characteristically muddled
method of choosing presidential nominees, with rules that are
simultaneously overly and inadequately democratic.
MCCAIN ROLLS ON, TAKES AIM AT OBAMA
(Jonathan Martin, Politico)
While the plucky Huckabee soldiers on, McCain made clear in his speech
tonight that he’s turning his focus to the man who stole the headlines
tonight with blowout wins on the Democratic side. “Hope, my friends, is a powerful thing,” McCain said, alluding to Barack Obama’s
chief selling point... But, McCain said, continuing to implicitly contrast his compelling POW
story with Obama’s lofty language, “to encourage a country with only
rhetoric rather than sound and proven ideas that trust in the strength
and courage of free people is not a promise of hope. It is a platitude.” In ending his speech, the 71-year-old McCain unmistakably threw down
the gauntlet, promising a fight against the 46-year-old Obama. “I am fired up and ready to go!” he said, cribbing Obama’s signature line.
WHERE HUCKABEE GOES FROM HERE
(Byron York, National Review)
The nomination is not secured until somebody has 1,191 delegates,”
Mike Huckabee said last night in Little Rock after losing primary
battles to John McCain in Virginia, Maryland, and Washington, D.C.... "So
we march on.” That’s what Huckabee says in public. But inside
the Huckabee camp these days, there is a distinct sense of pragmatism
about the campaign’s prospects. The time is coming — probably just
after the March 4 primary in Texas — when Huckabee, if he cannot
produce any more victories, will leave the Republican presidential race.