In the highly unlikely circumstance that you don't refresh the
Drudge Report every six seconds--as nearly every political editor I've
ever met does--you may have missed the story that's been hovering atop
the page the entire morning: CLINTON STAFFERS CIRCULATE 'DRESSED' OBAMA.
Needless to say, it's the buzz of the Beltway.
According to Drudge, "with a week to go until the Texas and Ohio
primaries, stressed Clinton staffers circulated a photo over the
weekend... [that] shows the Democrat frontrunner fitted as a Somali
Elder, during his visit to Wajir, a rural area in northeastern Kenya."
"Wouldn't we be seeing this on the cover of every magazine if it were
HRC?" Drudge quotes "one campaign staffer" asking in an email. Drudge
didn't post the message, which he claims to have "obtained"; but he
sure as hell posted the photo, which shows Barack Obama donning a local costume--white turban, white wrap, walking stick.
Let's
be clear about this: there's absolutely nothing wrong with Obama posing
for such a photo. Other U.S. politicians--including secret Vietnamese double-agent George W. Bush--regularly
suit up in local garb when touring far-flung corners of the world. The
problem here is that Barack Obama is not "other U.S. politicians." As I've written before, "over the past few months, it's become clear that there are some shady people out there bent on spreading the claim----completely, inarguably, demonstrably false--that Obama is a 'crypto-Muslim Manchurian candidate.'" (It's absurd, as Drudge's "Clinton staffer" likely knew, to suggest that
the media would crucify Clinton for donning similar
garb.) Meaning
that the photo, which shouldn't be controversial, will be---and the
fact the Clinton staffers "circulated" it looks a lot like an attempted
"smear."
But should we see it that way? I'm not sure.
For
their part, Obama staffers are pushing the "smear" angle hard. “On the
very day that Senator Clinton is giving a speech about
restoring respect for America in the world, her campaign has engaged in
the most shameful, offensive fear-mongering we’ve seen from either
party in this election," wrote Obama campaign manager David Plouffe
this morning in a statement to reporters. On comment boards
across the blogosphere, Obama supporters are dropping words like
"cynical," "disgusting," "despicable," "shameful" and, worst of all,
"Rovian." The point, of course, is to suggest that the Clintonistas are
slyly pressing for advantage among credulous, bigoted Americans who a)
believe (despite reality) that Obama is Muslim, b) consider being
Muslim a bad thing and c) would somehow see this innocuous image as
"evidence" of Obama's Muslimness.
Which, if true, would be pretty damn Rovian.
But at this point,
we're a long way from "Bush's brain" levels of evil. Obama
staffers and supporters are assuming that the Clinton campaign actively leaked the "dressed photo." But it's more likely that some
low-level staffer forwarded the image to another low-level staffer and
then it drifted, Drudgeward, through the series of tubes--unbeknownst
to campaign brass. "Circulated" is a capacious word, and it certainly
doesn't mean "leaked to the press." What's more, I'm reluctant believe
Drudge's account of the picture's provenance until I actually see the
"circulated" email; it's totally possible that some anti-Democratic
operative is attempting to tarnish both Clinton and Obama. It's called a bank shot. As the New Republic's Jason Zengerle wrote when the Muslim-madrassa story
first surfaced, "I suppose this
information about Obama could have originated with people in Clinton's
orbit. But
let's not forget where this information appeared. And let's be on the
lookout
for who goes on the cable shows and wonders whether "Barack Hussein
Obama" is "The Manchurian Madrassa Candidate." Something
tells me it isn't going to be Hillary, or any liberal for that matter." Drudge isn't exactly a Hillary fan, or a reliable fact witness--to put
it mildly.
So
let's stay tuned before coming to any conclusions. I expect the Obama
camp to keep assuming the worst of Hillaryland, and encouraging its
supporters to do the same; that's just good politics. And I expect the
Clinton camp to keep playing dumb. "If Barack Obama's campaign wants to
suggest that a photo of him wearing
traditional Somali clothing is divisive, they should be ashamed," said
campaign manager Maggie Williams this morning, with irritating feigned
ignorance of the charged "Muslim" context--and the fact that the original emailer allegedly implied that wearing such clothing should be cause for controversy. "Hillary Clinton has worn
the traditional clothing of countries she has
visited and had those photos published widely." Notably, Williams
didn't deny that the photo was circulated by the campaign, which--as Marc Ambinder
points out--"perhaps one can
justify under the assumption that Williams doesn't have access to the
e-mail records of all 700 of her employees." If it emerges that top
Clinton aides did, in fact, authorize the attempted "smear," then
Obama's outrage would be justified, and Clinton should book her flight back to Chappaqua. If an unauthorized staffer sent it out, then he or she should
be sacked--and the damage should stop at embarrassment. And in either
case, Obama supporters should recognize this flap for what it
is--another opportunity to, as Obama said yesterday in Ohio, "lift it up [i.e., the Muslim rumor] and actively debunk it."
"What
we have tried to do is just make sure that we are flooding the internet
with the accurate information and pushing back as much as possible," he
said. "I don't think that we are in an era anymore where you can just
ignore these things and not dignify them. There was a time when they
would be amplified as consequence of you calling attention to it. I
don't think that's the case any more because of our media age."
Here's hoping that some good might still come of this ugliness.