Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
Full Post
Posted Friday, March 14, 2008 3:31 PM

Newsflash: John McCain Still Exists

Andrew Romano

For John McCain, the battle between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama is a blessing and a curse.

On the one hand, while Team Obama accuses "insidious[ly]" racist Clinton of spooky secrecy and Team Clinton says the too-green Obama "really can't win the general election," McCain gets to kick back, relax and release videos reminding voters that he was released from the Hanoi Hilton 35 years ago today after more than five years of torturous captivity:

Advertisement

Not only does the clip define McCain in the best possible terms--steely, selfless war hero--but it works to frame the general election as a debate over, as Jonathan Martin puts it, "Big Issues like service, sacrifice and character." That's exactly where McCain wants to be. Not Democrat versus Republican. Not his domestic agenda versus, say, Obama's. Just "hero" versus, well, "not hero." With a "different kind of Republican" tour set to start in purple states next month, expect Team McCain to keep hammering on biography and character--especially while the Democrats keep hammering on each other.

The downside? Last week, McCain was a significant or dominant factor in only 28 percent of news stories about the election, according to the Pew Research Center. Obama and Clinton? 58 and 60 percent, respectively. It's difficult to define your candidate or frame the debate when no one's paying attention. But that's what happens when the press doesn't have bloody fisticuffs to feed on.

Maybe having Mike Huckabee as a "sparring partner" wasn't such a bad idea after all...

UPDATE, 5:37 p.m.: My colleague Michael Hirsh writes about the same subject in his latest column. Great minds:

Winning elections is about setting the agenda and, while creating a positive image of oneself, negatively defining one's opponent in the minds of the voters. This is happening for McCain—having Obama defined as unready and Hillary as lacking in integrity—without his having to lift a finger. If the current campaign keeps up—and there's every sign it will—it's likely that by summer irrepressible doubts about both Dems will have been lodged in the minds of the electorate.

That's no small thing. Especially in this age of terror and economic uncertainty, voters don't want doubts. They will want to pull the lever for the most trustworthy candidate. And who's making himself seem trustworthy? Why, John McCain, of course. Next week he's off to Europe and the Mideast to confer with "leaders I have strong relationships with," as he put it to reporters the other day.

Be sure to read the rest.

Tag(s):
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: votenic (March 17, 2008 at 9:32 PM)

<b>2008 Presidential Election Weekly Poll</b>

<a href="http://www.votenic.com">www.votenic.com</a>

Results Now Posted Instantly!

Check Back Weekly For New Polls!


Posted By: ericrsiny (March 14, 2008 at 4:24 PM)

Regardless of Obama's campaign saying that Obama does not agree with all that his pastor has said we have to look closer at a couple of things.First, if Hillary Clinton belonged to a church, group, or organization where the leader made the same type of statements that Obama's pastor has made the calls for her to leave that church, group, or organization would be deafening.Second, Senator Obama has stated in the past that this pastor is his "spritual advisor" and an inspiration for one of his books. This pastor has made comments such as these in the past so why is someone like this Obama's spirtual advisor? Is this the judgement that we should be enstrusting in Obama?Obama should be asked why he did not leave the church years ago when he knew of his pastor's comment history and why he is so closely associated with someone such as this. It is one thing to disagree with some comments and statements and something else to be such a close friend of the same person.As for Obama's comment about the "uncle" there are in fact plenty of people who have family members who say inappropriate things but if someone is using that person as a role model then perhaps we should call into the judgement and character of that person and not just the "uncle".