Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
Full Post
Posted Tuesday, March 18, 2008 3:29 PM

You Say Sunnis, I Say Shia

Holly Bailey

One of John McCain’s biggest talking points is how he has more foreign-policy experience than any of the major presidential candidates in the field. “I’ve been involved in every major national security challenge for the last 20 years that has faced this country,” McCain told reporters in Arizona two weeks ago. “I look forward to having that debate as to who’s the most qualified in the event of a national crisis and the phone ringing at 3am in the White House.” Yet on Day Three of an overseas tour aimed in part at promoting those national security credentials, McCain proves he’s not infallible when it comes to telling the difference between the Sunnis and the Shia. According to the Washington Post, the Arizona senator, in a media availability with reporters in Jordan, repeatedly misidentified which Iraq extremist group is allegedly getting aid from Iran. The likely GOP nominee told reporters that he was concerned about Iranian operatives “taking Al Qaeda into Iran; training them and sending them back.” Asked to elaborate, McCain said, it’s “common knowledge and has been reported in the media that Al Qaeda is going back into Iran and receiving training and are coming back into Iraq from Iran. That’s well known. And it’s unfortunate.” In fact, U.S. officials have said they believe Iran, a predominately Shiite country, is helping Shiite extremists in Iraq, not Al Qaeda, considered a Sunni militant group. It didn’t take long for McCain to correct his mistake. During the presser, the Post reports, Sen. Joe Lieberman, a McCain ally who is traveling this week with the senator, stepped forward to whisper something in McCain’s ear. Afterwards, the senator corrected himself. “I’m sorry, the Iranians are training extremists, not al Qaida,” he said. A little too late. McCain’s opponents, including the Democratic National Committee, have already been emailing the clip around along with the transcript of a radio interview last night when McCain made the same gaffe.

NBC's First Read asks, "What if Clinton or Obama had made this mistake?" Good question.

Update: McCain campaign spokesman Brian Rogers responds:
“In a press conference today, John McCain misspoke and immediately corrected himself by stating that Iran is in fact supporting radical Islamic extremists in Iraq, not Al Qaeda -- as the transcript shows. Democrats have launched political attacks today because they know the American people have deep concerns about their candidates’ judgment and readiness to lead as commander in chief.”

Advertisement
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: votenic (March 20, 2008 at 7:55 PM)

<b>2008 Presidential Election Weekly Poll</b>

<a href="http://www.votenic.com">www.votenic.com</a>

New Polls! New Vids!

Remember To Vote Each Week!


Posted By: Lee Holmes (March 19, 2008 at 3:54 PM)

tc125231: Nope. I am,however,observing that the media is not a purveyor of ''inner wisdom''either,and may be completely wrong where McCain was correct. McCain has actualized as well as circumstantial evidence on his side. The Dec.2006 seizure of Iranian documents in Baghdad,not ''alluding to''but concretely establishing a rapport between Iran[through its Revolutionary Guards],and al Qaeda. The seziure of Iranian-made missle componants and arms from both Sunnis and Shias in Iraq,Sunnis in Afghanistan. The strange reluctance of the MSM to observe that less than one year ago,a Iraq-serving US General [ Caldwell],before a congressional committee,prefaced his testimony with the evidence that Iran was supplying Sunni terrorist insurgents in Iraq. McCain may yet change his mind on his remarks. Obama,on the other hand,has no hand worth playing insofar as the nuclear-determined Iranians are concerned. We have already been witness to the alleged effectiveness of Obaman-style diplomacy. It does not work. Not with these guys anyway. Ironically,the solution to Iranian meddling is brought forth with meddling of our own,forward,into the past. Say,1953,when the Shah was installed in Iran. Closely observe that all of those screaming that ''Bush Is Going To Attack Iran''were all wrong. Every last one of them.[vintage liberal and leftwinged blogs and articles even gave dates. For Sy Hersh of the NEW YORKER,it was ''Sept.2006''. For DAILYKOS,it was ''June,2007''. Hows this for ''inner wisdom''?

                             What can be done without Hershs hysterical assertions,and leaving the KOSSACKS out of the discussion as they suffer from perpetual St.Vitus Dance anyway,is to fund,train,and meet with Iranian opposition groups and foster their anti-totalitarian feelings. To actually forment a new Iranian revolution,in a nation that will see the rise of moderate forces. We cut deals,gas drops back to two bucks a gallon,no ''bomb,bomb Iran''everyones happy EXCEPT the Mullahs and the jihadis.


Posted By: tc125231 (March 19, 2008 at 12:01 AM)

So Mr. Holmes thinks Mr. McCain has approached the circle of inner wisdom?  It seems dubious to me --I think he is just an old man fighting a former war.  Now if his human teleprompter, Joe Lieberman, can just remind him that you can't pay for the second most expensive war in American history  with IOUs for 100 years, he might be able to articulate the conflict between Bush's tax cuts and perpetual war.

Who knows?  Anything is possible.  Even rational analysis from McCain.