Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Wednesday, March 26, 2008 11:29 AM

Could Clinton Drop Out on May 7?

Andrew Romano

First came Super Tuesday, with 24 contests and nearly 1,700 delegates up for grabs. Then it was the Texas two-step and primaries in Ohio, Vermont and Rhode Island on March 4. Now, according to Chris Bowers of Open Left, the latest, greatest Decision Day 2008 ® is May 6, when the good voters of North Carolina and Indiana cast their ballots for either the Hopemonger from Illinois or the Iron Lady from New York.

"If Obama sweeps Indiana and North Carolina," writes Bowers. "The campaign is over." 

It's an interesting prediction. For starters, there's absolutely no chance that the curtain will fall earlier. Clinton currently boasts an average lead of 16 points in Pennsylvania, so despite the fervent finger-crossing of Obamaniacs nationwide, she ain't goin' nowhere before May. That said, the Indiana/North Carolina pairing not only represents a bigger delegate prize (187) than Pennsylvania (158), but it's also expected to be closer contest--meaning that the conflict-obsessed media will put more stock in the results. ("Something unusual appears to be developing in the Democratic presidential race in [Indiana]," wrote the Washington Post earlier this week. "A fair fight." Case in point.) Which is why an Obama twofer would signal Clinton's demise, according to Bowers. "May 6th is the first date when Obama can reach 1,627 pledged delegates, or 50% + 1 of pledged delegates," he says. "Right now, he needs 173.5 pledged delegates to reach 1,627, or 49.7% of the 349 to be determined between April 22 and May 6." In Bowers' view, if Obama can win half of the delegates at stake in Pennsylvania, Indiana and North Carolina, he will simultaneously capture the majority of pledged delegates--an important symbolic victory--and erase Clinton's Pennsylvania gains, forcing the New York senator to contemplate a "final option" that involves "winning the support of more than 70% of the remaining superdelegates." That, he says, "would be game, set, match."

Advertisement

The only problem: it won't be. There are two reasons to be skeptical. One, it's far from certain that Obama will reach the 1,627 milestone on May 6. According to Slate's handy Delegate Calculator, if the returns in Pennsylvania and North Carolina hew to current polling averages, and Indiana results, as expected, in a tie, Obama would fall five or six short of the pledged-delegate majority. And while it's easy to imagine Obama exceeding this tally--the latest PPP poll predicts a 20-point win in the Tarheel State, for example, which would put him over the top--it's impossible to imagine Clinton actually conceding that such an accomplishment (or concern that her continued presence is hurting Obama for November) has any significance."This is a very close race and neither of us will reach the magic number of delegates," she told Time's Mark Halperin yesterday. "We're both going to be short, and when you think about the many millions of people who have already voted, we are separated by a relatively small percentage of votes. We're separated by, you know, a little more than a hundred delegates" As long as Clinton sets 2,025 (and not 1,627) as the finish line--and Florida and Michigan remain unresolved and the pledged-delegate/popular-vote disparity remains close--she'll stay in the race. And frankly, she has point. There's no precedent (see Kennedy in 1980 or Reagan in 1976) for a candidate with thousands of delegates, half the vote and a rival who's yet to clinch the nomination to simply say "sayonara" in the midst of primary season.

Which means that nothing short of a May 7 "Superdelegate Stampede" to Obama will end the race before June. Could that happen? I doubt it. While I suspect that these political poo-bahs, reluctant to overturn the "will of the people," will break for the pledged-delegate/popular-vote leader in the end--a la Clinton supporter Maria Cantwell--they're also highly unlikely (for the same reasons, really) to weigh in before all of the people express their will at the ballot box. As Clinton said yesterday in Greensburg, Pennsylvania, "Over the next months millions of people are going to vote. We should wait and see the outcome of those votes.” And so the slugfest rightfully, inexorably continues--even though we're 95 percent sure how it's going to end.

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: briguynv (April 6, 2008 at 5:44 PM)

Bullwinkle....I just now had the chance to come back and catch up on the postings here, and since you MISQUOTED me, I had to say something to it....just in case you come back to read!!  You said talking about ME: "Then, you want to go so far as to say when the man was in church and he wasn't because he "had to be?"

I NEVER said THAT!!  I said he is a LIAR because he CLAIMS he has been a Christian for 17 (or sometimes 20) years ....the timing changes week to week....YET Wright BROUGHT him to Christianity 17 (or 20) years ago....which means HE COULD NOT HAVE BEEN A CHRISTIAN HIS WHOLE LIFE!!!  Considering he IS older than 17 or 20 years!!!  Claiming that is a LIE!!

Also, I said I find it VERY hard to believe that Obama had NO idea that Wright speaks and FEELS the way he does in those "select" sermons (which I am SURE there have been MORE of that WERE NOT FILMED OR RECORDED), if they are AS CLOSE AS OBAMA CLAIMS THEY ARE!!  He CLAIMS they are VERY, VERY close, and if they are THAT CLOSE, I DON'T believe Wright would NEVER have mentioned these things in the past, would NEVER have spoken to Obama about it, so again I BELIEVE he is LYING!!  I believe Obama probably HAD conversations with Wright, and COULD EVEN have told Wright, "I'll become President, and we'll FIX all this stuff you are talking about."  Obama is THAT ARROGANT!!  I NEVER said he "HAD TO BE" there....I said it is HIGHLY UNLIKELY that he has NEVER heard this stuff before.....like a MILLION TO ONE in my opinion!!

Also, to some others, the reason I believe Obama is a "racist" is because of the fact that he USES the fact that he is black to get the black votes, but when someone CALLS him on that FACT, he cries RACISM, cries foul, cries "bad politics"....yet he has NO problem doing the SAME kind of stuff!!  Since it is STATING FACTS, considering ALL polls say MORE black voters have voted this year by HUGE percentages, than ANY other year, IT IS NOT RACISM TO SAY IT!  IT IS A PLAIN FACT  But it IS racist on HIS part to DENY it and claim it HURTS him!!  But then he USES it for his advantage!!!  I think the comments he has made about his "white grandmother" are also racist!!

I also believe Michelle is UNpatriotic and arrogant, and believes she is BETTER than everyone else!!  She is too high & mighty!!  Neither of these people have ANY place in the White House!  I don't TRUST either one AT ALL!!!!

And as for Hillary's "LIE".....As one of the newscasters said on one show, "I am SURE that with as MANY trips like this that Hillary has taken, AT LEAST ONE OF THOSE OTHER TRIPS MOST LIKELY DID ARRIVE UNDER FIRE, she MAY have just confused which trip!"  I didn't say that, some news guy did, I just didn't pay attention to his name....but I agree with it!!

And even if she DID lie!  It was about ONE moment, THAT DOES NOT AFFECT HER AT ALL!  Obama's MANY LIES AFFECT the type of UPBRINGING he has had, the TYPE OF LIFE he has LED!!  Sorry, his MANY LIES outweigh this ONE slip of Hillary's!  And I STILL don't even think her's WAS a lie....but that is MY opinion!!

I just know that the current POLLS show that if Obama runs against McCain, then McCain will win!  People are WAKING UP AND REALIZING OBAMA IS NOT WHAT HE CLAIMS HE IS!!  HE IS A FRAUD!

If Clinton runs against McCain, Clinton has a VERY GOOD chance to WIN!!  So all those Democrats out there pulling for Obama need to REALIZE...if you WANT a GOOD, STRONG DEMOCRAT in the White House, then it NEEDS to be Hillary!!  If you want another BUSH...then vote for Obama, or McCain....either way has the SAME outcome!


Posted By: PulSamsara (March 28, 2008 at 4:41 PM)

Barack Obama for President of the UNITED States of America.

Clinton supporters - An Obama Presidency will also work toward your greatest concerns.  They are quite valid and understood - and will join the list of all of OUR priorities.


Posted By: timrogers (March 27, 2008 at 7:03 PM)

Hillary will not quit until the nominee is picked in Denver.Even if she loses she still will not quit. Her obsession to be President will outlive this election should Obama win the nomination. If he does win, he can expect not only zero support from the Clinton machine but probably active opposition. Hillary will begin her campaign to be the nominee in four years on day one after the convention. Her desire to see Obama fail will remind us all of the old saying 'the enemy of my enemy is my friend'.