Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
Full Post
Posted Friday, May 02, 2008 1:23 PM

Hey, Blue-Collar Voters of Indiana: This Bud's for You

Andrew Romano

Seems like somebody's been reading Newsweek--or at least taking a long, hard look at our latest cover.

Tasked with choosing a shot to sum up "Obama's Bubba Gap"--a story about the candidate's struggle to overcome the impression that he's out of touch with ordinary Americans--my bosses settled on a pair of iconic images: a mug of beer and a stalk of arugula. (In July, Obama asked Iowa farmers if they'd "gone into Whole Foods lately and see[n] what they charge for arugula?"; fairly or unfairly, the peppery, leafy green has served as a symbol of his supposed "elitism" ever since.)

Turns out the cover also sums up Obama's dilemma in the final stretch before Indiana's May 6 primary. For the past few days, the senator has relied on something of an "arugula" argument to reinvigorate his creaky campaign: that the gas-tax "holiday" proposed by John McCain and seconded by Hillary Clinton "isn't a real solution" so much as "a gimmick"-- a way for politicians to "pretend that they’re solving [a big problem] to try to get though a political season." The point, of course, is to prove that he's above pandering. But while Obama (as we've written ad nauseam) is inarguably right on the details--every economist on the planet says the Clinton-McCain scheme would actually raise prices at the pump, and cause a host of other problems to boot--it seems that blue-collar Indianans aren't really absorbing his plea. Polls show Clinton opening a six-point average lead in the Hoosier State, up from two earlier this week, and at a retirement community in Columbia City, Ind. yesterday, an older voter chided Obama for opposing Clinton's proposal, claiming (erroneously) that it would offer short-term relief. "A lot of us are short term," she said. The exchange neatly illustrated the major political risk of Obama's truthtelling gas-tax gambit: that voters won't see "Obama [a]s an independent reformer," as the New Republic's Michael Crowley put it, "but simply that Hillary is fretting about cash-strapped blue-collar folks while Obama is up in an ivory tower."

Advertisement

Obama's answer: it's Miller Time.

Actually, make that Bud. Visiting VFW Post 1954 in North Liberty, Ind. yesterday evening for a "mix and mingle" photo op, Obama suddenly had nothing but booze on the brain. “I’m going to see if I might get a beer in there,” he announced, unprovoked, as he strode through the parking lot--with an armada of pool photographers in tow. Arriving inside, the senator immediately told the crowd why he'd come: “I’m not going to give a speech or anything, I just want to stop by … and maybe get a beer as well.” Still, he managed to shake a few hands--before abruptly noticing that the cameramen were “blocking the bartender.” "I’m going to have a Bud," he declared with a quick glance at what the assembled vets were drinking. "I’m going to vote for you if you drink Budweiser," shouted Vic Vukovits, who works for Anheuser-Busch. That was apparently the point. After fielding questions about gas prices, the foreclosure crisis and merit pay, Obama, sleeves rolled up, quickly drained his can, signed it for a supporter and left the hall. A second can, meant for the senator, sat unopened on the bar.

This isn't the first time that Obama has downed a tall boy on trail with the cameras watching. Visiting a Pennsylvania sportsbar early last month, Obama ordered the local favorite--a Yeungling--while making sure a male patron noticed that "it's not some designer beer or something." "Trying a Pennsylvania beer, that’s what I’m talking about," he said, smiling. And a few days later, the senator went out of his way to sample the beverages at a microbrewery in Bethlehem, Penn.--turning down a light, fruity hefeweizen (complete with a lemon slice) for a darker, manlier ale:

 

Now, we're sure Obama loves a good brewski as much as the next dude. But there's something a little hard to swallow about his recent beer runs. The problem isn't that the senator claims to be above pandering in general; compared to the Clinton-McCain gas-tax debacle, posing for a photo with the King of Beers is a pretty standard--and excusable--infraction. It's that he's already dinged Clinton for doing the exact same thing. Speaking to steelworkers in Pittsburgh last month, Obama mocked his rival for seeking to boost her blue-collar cred with a boozy photo-op at the Bronko Restaurant and Lounge in Crown Point, Ind. where she reportedly chased a shot of Crown Royal with some Old Style beer. "After all, you've heard this kind of rhetoric before," he said at the time. "Around election time, the candidates can’t do enough for you. They'll promise you anything, give you a long list of proposals and even come around, with TV crews in tow, to throw back a shot and a beer." 

Hypocritical? Sure. Still, something tells us that between now and next Tuesday Obama will chug every cold one he sees--and keep the arugula behind closed doors.

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: schratboy (May 5, 2008 at 9:27 AM)

Fake as a $3.00 dollar bill, which actually none of our currency is really backed by anything since the privately owned Federal Reserve decided to scam our monetary system.


Posted By: Rebecka (May 3, 2008 at 3:20 PM)

frankie,

The "Racist"  remarks  first came up from none other than her hubby, in SC.  

Then just days before the Ohio/Texas primaries, the Clintons leaked that Obama's campaign had assured the Canadian Embassy that Obama wasn't serious about NAFTA.

Problem was, I had read the original story in the Canadian Press.  Clinton was the only one mentioned as having contacted the Canadian embassy, almost 2 weeks before.  

I don't know how old you are frankie, but since you seem to know so little about either candidate, could I suggest you do some research?  

The Peter Paul Lawsuit against the Clintons?

Her failed Healthcare plan, derailed mostly because she demanded utter secrecy.

Loss of jobs in NY after Clinton became Senator.

Times in the past when bill or hill have lied or taken the 5th amendment UNDER OATH.

Democrats who lost their seats in government due to the shenagins of the Clintons while they were in the White House.

I could go on but will leave the rest for another day.

BTW, for the benefit of people who keep bringing it up, Obama has not been tied to anything in the Rezko case.  NOT ONE THING.  


Posted By: pinkpanther87413 (May 3, 2008 at 2:47 PM)

frankie

No she didn't but her commercials do! on all counts!  I look up not down! I look foward not back! I look for hope and have found it. Clinton is not it, unless she get what she wants more than her hubby-power! I'm no scab and know McCain is not it either! The only reason we look down is that's how far Mrs Clinton perpetuates her theme of falsehoods, and where she get her commercials from, the dirt! They even say out loud Obama has to get dirty to deliver that final punch, which will most likely not happen, and God knows how much dirt one can find in the Clinton closet! if you see this as dirt vs dirt, wait till Clinton and McCain are in the same group as both have many years of coruption they need  to defend against! McCain and Obama in the same group has far less dirt on Obama side, compared to Clinton, which is why if Clinton gets in EVERY GOP WILL VOTE MCCAIN! If it's Obama, they will stay home and not vote, and that's 12 months of research in these blogs! just deal with the truth, which is our only reason we are voting-HOPE!


 
The Peek
 
 
SPORTS

Speedo's new and controversial high-tech LZR suit is helping swimmers smash dozens of records. How the company plans to capitalize on Olympic gold.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
AFRICA

These are among the ruling party's weapons against opposition voters. Still, the population clearly didn't cooperate in Friday's vote.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu