Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Thursday, May 08, 2008 11:35 AM

With Friends Like These...

Andrew Romano

Jennifer McClellan had her head under a beauty-salon hairdryer when the call came. A Virginia state House member--and Democratic superdelegate--McClellan had endorsed Hillary Clinton for president the day after January's Iowa caucuses. But now it was April. Over the past three months, Barack Obama had amassed an insurmountable pledged-delegate lead in a series of primary wins--including one in her home state. So McClellan was wavering. "This is the most stressful thing I've been through in my whole life," she told the Washington Post. "It was never supposed to be like this." Fortunately, when McClellan picked up the phone, it was Clinton herself on the other end of the line. After congratulating McClellan on her recent engagement, reports the Politico, the former First Lady "thank[ed] me for my past support and [said] that she thinks when the primaries are over, she will have the popular vote." McClellan was "touched."

Apparently she wasn't touched enough. On Wednesday morning, McClellan announced that she had switched her allegiance to Obama. "I think the time has come to support Senator Obama as the likely nominee," she said in a conference call with reporters. "Given what happened last night, it's very unlikely we will have a different result, and it is time to come together as a party and prepare for victory against John McCain in November."

She's not alone. In the 36 hours since Clinton lost the popular vote in North Carolina--and the expectations game in Indiana--a growing number of her supporters haven't been particularly, um, supportive. As McClellan told the Politico, "there are many of us who believe--regardless of who we endorsed--that if Sen. Obama goes into the convention with the most pledged delegates and the popular vote, and doesn't get the nomination, that could cause problems." On Wednesday, George McGovern--the former South Dakota senator and 1972 Democratic presidential nominee--jumped ship for Obama. Meanwhile, California Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a Clinton superdelegate, told the Los Angeles Times that although "I have great fondness and great respect for Sen. Clinton and I'm very loyal to her... I'd like to talk with her and get her view on the rest of the race and what the strategy is." Feinstein's reason? "I think the race is reaching the point now where there are negative dividends from it, in terms of strife within the party." When asked yesterday whether Clinton should stay in the race, New York Sen. Chuck Schumer, another vocal Clinton backer, sounded equally glum. "It's her decision to make and I'll accept what decision she makes," he said.

Advertisement

And the hits keep coming today, with two additional pro-Clinton pols adding their voices to the chorus. In an interview with The Hill, Rep. Dale Kildee, a Clinton supporter from Michigan, said the New York senator should halt her campaign and carefully consider whether it makes sense to keep going. “I urge her to take the day off and think very seriously about doing what’s best for the country and best for the party,” said Kildee. “I got straight A’s in math." His Congressional colleague from Florida, Rep. Alcee Hastings, agreed--“It’s improbable to suggest she’d be at the top of the ticket"--and gave Obama "a big hug" this morning on the House floor. (Another Clinton superdelegate, Rep. Yvette Clarke of New York, asked him to sign the cover of today's New York Daily News, according to the Politico. Headline: "It's His Party.") Even some of Clinton's advisers are now "resigned to their candidate’s likely loss," according to the Wall Street Journal. "They have turned in favor of her bowing out for party unity, according to several who asked not to be named.”

Could this sudden flurry of high-profile supporters-turned-skeptics force Clinton from the race? Don't count on it. As we've already written, she's made something of a moral cause of letting the remaining states vote and finding a solution to the Florida and Michigan dispute--and she isn't exactly the type to let the naysayers get under her skin. One possible reason: her supporters may "find it easier to accept Obama as their nominee if they were satisfied that Clinton was not pressured to drop out and had exhausted every conceivable opportunity to make her case." So barring the biggest (and most inconceivable) superdelegate switcheroo of all--that is, Bubba, her hubby, the former president--we're still betting that Hillary will continue to campaign at least until the end of the month.

How "touched" she is by the current show of support is another story.

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: obamannoyed (May 8, 2008 at 9:58 PM)

The sheer arrogance and smugness of this virtual unknown, dragging with him a whole list of unsavory characters including his wife to the nomination finish line is truly fascinating.  But the unswerving blind mania-crazed allegiance from his lemmings that cling to and defend him with blood in their eyes is completely incomprehensible!  No amount of time will "heal"  or reconcile my vote to "stutterbama".  He can't talk in specifics.  In 20+ debates, what does anyone know about him?  He's right with his "urgency of now" before anyone really gets to know him.  I'd rather vote McCain if Hillary can't hang on.  It's insane for Hillary to get out of this race. She's not a quitter.  

I'm sure we haven't seen the worst of what this guy has yet to reveal to us, willingly or not.  He's the one who will do anything to get elected. Look at what he's gotten away with as he continues down the rosy garden path with Russert leading the way.  That interview on Meet the Press was laughable.  I've never seen Russert so careful with anyone else on an interview as to not let Obama slip up,  He even answered a question for Obama so all he had to do was say yes/no.

What about about the spousal influence of a Michelle Obama.


Posted By: griseldasan (May 8, 2008 at 9:37 PM)

The one that needs to wake up and smell the roses it's all the american people who believe that Obama will bring change.  The elite ( a handfull only) who have the power, have not decided who will win this nomination.  Forget about change, forget about speeches. At least with Hillary as president I can be sure my son will have a chance to pursue an education without having to pay outrageous interest.  And I repeat this, as a female democrat and Hillary supporter I will not vote for Obama.  He does not have the experience or the guts  to lead this country.


Posted By: lee226 (May 8, 2008 at 9:32 PM)

Rather than waste time on a blog why not research the candidate and what he has accomplished in the senate in Illinois. You can see all the voting anyone has done on line.What big thing has McCain done and Clinton done? Washington does not work well enough for anyone to get things done has it should be. Reason why the brilliant man who knows constitutional law unlike Bush, who has written 2 books and has been elected to the senate and run for president  and has a grand campaign , well organized fueled by real people with their cash, people who can read and learn the facts about a candidate, is running for president, unlike some people who can barely read but are quick to make judgement.

Learn how to think for yourselves.