Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
Full Post
Posted Friday, May 16, 2008 4:29 PM

Clinton's 'Classy' Exit Strategy

Andrew Romano

On CBS's "Early Show" Tuesday, co-host Harry Smith asked former Clinton Administration Press Secretary Dee Dee Myers a key question: "Why is Hillary Clinton still running?" Her response? "I don't think there's any question that she's going to get out. The only remaining question is when and how. And I think she'll do it in a way that's classy and helps the party." Although some Barack Obama supporters would disagree--in the heat of battle it's hard to give an opponent the benefit of the doubt--I think Myers is absolutely correct. Two signs from the past 24 hours:

1. When George W. Bush "attacked" Obama in the Knesset yesterday, Clinton rushed to his defense. "President Bush's comparison of any Democrat to Nazi appeasers is both offensive and outrageous on the face of it, especially in light of his failures in foreign policy," she told reporters in Rapid City, S.D. "There is a very clear difference between Democrats and Republicans on foreign policy and that difference will be evident once we take back the White House." Clinton's intervention was remarkable not because of what she said but because of what she didn't say. At the July 23, 2007 YouTube debate in South Carolina, a questioner asked Obama whether he would be "willing to meet--without precondition--in the first year of his presidency with the leaders of Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba and North Korea." "I would," he responded. Clinton immediately disagreed--""I thought that was irresponsible and frankly naive," she told Iowa's Quad-City Times--and went on to spend much of the remainder of the year pummeling Obama on this particular point. Yesterday, McCain used nearly the same language as Clinton--"naivete and inexperience and lack of judgment"--to characterize Obama's stance. But Clinton made no effort to reinforce her long-running contrast with Obama. That she passed up a priceless opportunity to make headlines at a point when the press is largely ignoring her--and chose instead to boost her rival's standing, even though she disagrees with him on the details--shows how little interest the New York senator has in battling Obama at this stage of the game. She's letting go, and allowing--even encouraging--the general election to begin. 

2. In a series of three news ads launched today on Kentucky and Oregon TV, Clinton vows to stand up for the middle class...

Advertisement

promises to close corporate tax loopholes...

and dismisses the punditocracy's calls for withdrawal to focus on her opposition to Bush's energy bill, which "removed local control over the siting of liquefied natural gas terminals on Oregon’s coast":

But she doesn't mention Obama's name once, let alone draw a single contrast. In the twilight of her campaign, then, Clinton's message is "here's what I can do" rather than "here's what my opponent can't." With that, she has every right to stay in the race through the final primaries on June 3--and may even help Obama by doing so. Barring a drastic change of course, I'd even say she's being pretty classy.

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: XMEE (May 18, 2008 at 11:12 PM)

TomCarney,

I couldn't agree with you more. My worry is that Senator Clinton's more ardent supporters seem to not care about the issues and problems with the country, only with getting revenge. And they also seem to, unfortunately, blame Senator Obama for her loss. It's very disconcerting to me. As a woman, I take the demand to be treated equal to men very seriously, and when these women behave is though the country derserves to be "punished" because not enough of them voted for the woman, I'm ashamed of their behavior. It discredits women who understand that to be treated equally, you must behave responsibly and deserving of equality. This is an election for our president and it very important, no matter who the candidates are on both sides. It's not a women's lib movement, and it's not something anyone has the right to sabotage because they feel they've been "scorned".


Posted By: mkgubbon (May 18, 2008 at 9:22 PM)

The question that should be asked is: "Does the American public want the media to elect their next President?" The world is shocked and amazed at how the media in the United States has treated a Presendential candidate for The United States of America. The democratic process of electing a President has been thrown to the wind and equal coverage has not been given to Hillary Clinton. The media has already elected THEIR canidate and vowing to the American public true and just coverage reporting, which should be unbiased has left a bad taste in the mouths of the American public. The media did not give accurate or just coverage of West Virginia. They did not ask why Obama did not even try in WV and why he is in Iowa and totally neglecting Oregon and Kentucky. Obviously those states do not matter. How may Americans do not matter to Obama? A revolution is in the forecast, if Americans cannot get fair and just coverage of a candidate without being "influenced" by the media, then as in history past, do Americans need to go "underground"? This is a perfect time to protest and as in history past, get the truth out with "underground" newspapers. Just like the civil war, the slaves, John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King the truth will set us free! Just when is it just and fair to watch a 20 minute speech given by an endorsee and cutting off Hillary Clintons' over 2-1 win WV? To have a discussion on the issues facing the candidates and only have Obama supporters represented has sunk the media to a new low. Ask any American, and they will tell you they are not tired of this race for the democratic party going on, they are tired of the media being biased and unjust in not only their portrayal of President candidate Hillary Clinton, but they are tired of not having a voice, a chance to vote, yes, all votes counted, and they are tired of hearing that this race is over when in reality it is definitely not over! Let America be heard, every vote counts, every state counts, and thank God Hillary has the guts and determination to go forth and make this nation once again the Democratic process, the Democratic freedom that so many have fought for. All the way to the convention floor-we will be heard, we will vote, we will have a say on who are next President is, we are Americans!

M.Gubbons speaks out for America!


Posted By: jeamaj (May 18, 2008 at 5:32 PM)

If you want to buy a car or home, but don't have the required money, you usually don't  get it.  Hillary Clinton does not have the required pledged delegates, superdelegates, or popular vote, so she can't get it.  Senator Clinton, lacking these basic requirements m continues her Presidential campaign.  She's $20 million in debt and will increase her debt.  There's talk that she wants some of Obama's campaign donations to cover the debt.   If this is a "classy exit strategy," then you're a bigger fool than she is.


 
The Peek
 
 
PROJECT GREEN
NWK Caption: At the Excel High School in Oakland, California a group of students, their teacher and members of community groups pose with air pollution monitors in front of a mural at the school.  July 26, 2008.       Left to Right:   Randy Colosky, a member of Global Community Monitor  wearing brown shirt ,Juan Hernandez, student (seated) ,   Ina Bendich, teacher Danyale Willingham,student in blue top).Elizabeth de Rham far right, member of the Rose Foundation.

Young pollution sleuths and community activists fight for healthier air.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu