Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Tuesday, June 03, 2008 4:48 PM

Inside Clinton's Vice Presidential Campaign

Andrew Romano

 

With reporting by Suzanne Smalley 

Let the games begin.

Advertisement

As Hillary Clinton signals this evening in New York that she will start to wind down her presidential campaign, behind the scenes, her next political push--a bid for the vice presidency--is already up and running.

Earlier this afternoon, several news outlets reported that after months of sidestepping the issue Clinton has finally told her supporters--either in response to a question or, according Buffalo News, by "bringing it up herself"--that she is "open to" joining an Obama ticket as veep. Each of these reports focused on a conference call with New York's congressional delegation, suggesting that it was an isolated incident. But now a top Clinton strategist has exclusively confirmed to NEWSWEEK's Suzanne Smalley that the VP "discussion" also arose on other calls today with various Congressional supporters--and, in each instance, Clinton "left the door open."

"Many of her supporters believe if she's not nominated she must be on the ticket," the strategist says."They've been overt and aggressive about that." In response to the tenor of the conference calls, Suzanne's source adds, Clinton may retool tonight's speech to include a reference to the vice presidency. "If you're asking me to speculate, I would guess there was [an addition]," says the strategist.

What's important here is not that Clinton is interested in the Number Two slot; that shouldn't surprise anyone. It's that the Clinton camp clearly wants the world to know, right now, that she is. The point: to put public pressure on Obama to pick her as VP at the precise moment that she has the most possible leverage--i.e., when many of her 17 million voters don't want to see her go. Note that when the AP reported Clinton would concede tonight, the campaign smacked the story down; meanwhile, staffers are actually confirming the veep speculation. That speaks volumes.

Going forward, here's what I suspect Team Clinton will do:

1) Continue to claim that it was Clinton's supporters, not the candidate herself, who brought up the veep idea. This makes it look like a grassroots movement--and not a naked power grab. "The discussion on these conference calls today about the vice presidency was unexpected," says our source. "I think it came as a surprise to virtually everyone here [at campaign HQ]... Her supporters raised it first....This was the first time many have had a chance to press it on her and several pressed this idea on her." Whether or not that's true--recall the conflicting Buffalo News report--it's certainly the campaign's story, and they're sticking to it.

2) Stress that Clinton is merely "open" to whatever is best for the party--i.e., that she's not committing a faux pas by demanding the veepship but rather respectfully recognizing her supporters' demands. Says our strategist: "She didn't make an open bid for the vice presidency...People pressed it on her. She didn't say yes. She didn't say no. She said she'll do her best to elect a Democrat president...She left the door open." Graciousness is good; pushiness is bad.

3) Let the media do the dirty work, jumping to the conclusion that Clinton has, in effect, demanded the VP slot--and therefore transforming Obama's choice, as Chris Matthews just put it on MSNBC, from "passing her over" to actively "snubbing her." Meanwhile, watch as the punditocracy speculates that an Obama-Clinton "dream ticket" is the only way to mollify Clinton's millions of devastated fans and unify the party--thereby raising the hopes of Clinton's passionate supporters and creating something of a self-fulfilling prophecy.

4) Pray that Obama feels as if he has run out of options. Either he rebuffs Clinton, rejects his beloved "unity," opposes "what's best" for the Democrats, further alienates her half of the party and risks his electoral future--that's Team Clinton's implicit argument, not mine--or he asks Hillary to be his second fiddle.

Clinton is clearly crossing her fingers for the latter. We'll see soon enough how Obama reacts. 

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: orion12 (June 4, 2008 at 12:25 PM)

It is OVER!! But ithe real racet is just beginning. What a campaign.

Some of us who are really just looking on and having an open mind cannot help to muse at how the supporters of Obama and Clinton at time show anger because they believe their candidate should have won. Indeed there have been some bad judgements by both sides in this campaign but I must be honest to say that I have come to respect Obama and I think that he deserved to win.

Clinton was at first the popular person because Obama did not emerge. She perhaps even tolerated him thinking that he did not matter. But once his message, personality, style, statesmanship, etc all started to emerge, she became very uncomfortable. You all have read about what she tried to do to discredit and humiliate him. All those things started to make me feel very funny towards her sincerity. No wonder she lost if people who thought highly of her at first changed their minds as I did.

No doubt Clinton loves politics. So does Obama. But what differentiates them is that Obama is not so desperate. This has caused Clinton many supporters including the super delegates to move towards Obama. Obama has shown class, whereas she has not.

Clinton cares about herself too much. She has done a few things that leave objective people feeling she does not have what it takes to lead with integrity namely:

1. Really tell lies the way she did about her White House experience and having basically nothing to show.

2. Lying about Bosnia, on several occasions and trying to cover it up that she was tired.

3. Really applying some low punches to Obama. She treated him unfairly on so many occasions that even her own supporters when polled confirmed this in the majority.

4. Bringing in the race divide into the campaign, which has amply being dealt with by many.

5. Making many suggestive comments that her followers should not vote for Obama if he won the nomination.

6. Mis-managing her campaign, wasting money and poor planning, causing Obama to easily outmatch her.

7. Showing a very adamant personality. Not accepting ordinary logic of numbers, which showed that she just could not win. This raises questions about how well she would have been able to take advice from qualified people if she were president.

8. Creating a scenario, due to her desire to win, that would jeopardize the chances of Obama winning the presidential elections. She just does not appear to give a damn. All she wants is just to win.

9. Not conceding defeat, because she is playing a game; trying to blackmail Obama into making her his running mate. But she has said he was not qualified to be president. She has said repeatedly in interviews that there was no question of not winning. Now she wants to be VP. Does she have integrity?

10. Making those irresponsible remarks about assassination and not even apologizing for it. She has shown a significant amount of arrogance, which is incompatible with the position she wants to occupy.

These things she has done have been a letdown and now she wants to jump in, or literarily force herself into the VP position. She wants people to believe if she is not on the ticket Obama will not win over McCain. Again using those skills she has she is inciting her supporters to undermine the Democrats. Well in my view the establishment, which she had as her backer is now tired of her. Her whole behaviour is “Me first and too bad for you if I do not get what I want”.  I think that she may have had her way for too long and now feels she has the right to get the number one or two position in the country.

I feel, based on what has gone on these past months, that Obama can win without her. Strategically it would appear to his advantage to run with her. But this is due to the noise that she has been making. They do not have the same vision. They will clash. She cannot be number 2. She will try all her best to make him look little. (Well, Obama will not allow that, as he is too astute as a politician and very cool.) Let her have a voice. Let her talk and blow out steam. I wish as a woman she would have portrayed different characteristics that would have made me continue to support her. She did not.

Those who are calling Obama names be warned. America is changing. Whether we are women, white, blue collar, black, the bottom-line is the system has chosen. Do not be so hateful and mad that you lose sense of direction. Give yourselves time for the anger to go away and then push for the party to win. Sometime things do not turn out the way we think. Most of the time!!!


Posted By: brokenbottle (June 4, 2008 at 10:42 AM)

And the crazy thing is that in the Clintons' own Clinton centric universe, not picking her as veep would be, in their view, rejecting party unity and a snub to boot.

The Clintons have been acting like the US is planet Clinton and the rest of us are just living on it for the last 16 years.  It's not the idea that, at this point, she'd like to Veep that bothers me.  It's that air of entitlement that they carry all the time, like she has a significant number of supporters so the Veep position *should* be hers.  Even though the real thought is "but I really should have been the presidential nominee."  

The sad thing is that it's that sense of entitlement they carry that put her in this position to begin with and they don't see it.  If she hadn't assumed that the nomination would be hers simply because it was available and she wanted it maybe she would have run the first half of her campaign better and actually beaten Obama under the rule set she agreed to before she realized that she was losing to him.

I hope he can find a way to not offer her the Veep position and get her to publicly agree to support him.  If she can help deliver some voters and get him to the White House, THEN maybe he'd actually owe her something.  Simply showing up with a few rabid supports right now isn't good enough.


Posted By: crat3 (June 4, 2008 at 8:37 AM)

There is no journalistic integrity in anything written on Sen. Clinton by Newsweek.  Newsweek is pro-Obama biased media.  The pro-Obama biased Newsweek interfered in, undermined, and subverted the Democratic presidential nominating process.  The pro-Obama biased Newsweek sabotaged Sen. Clinton's campaign wtth impunity.  The media tyranny of the pro-Obama biased Newsweek is democracy's worse enemy.