Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
Full Post
Posted Friday, August 29, 2008 12:21 PM

Palin from 35,000 Feet

Andrew Romano

CHARLOTTE, N.C.--John McCain really, really wants to win. So badly, in fact, that he choose a veep who has the same handicap he's always criticizing Obama for--inexperience. Only worse.

I just landed here in North Carolina after taking a 6:45 a.m. flight out of Denver.  This meant, of course, that I didn't get to experience the revelation of McCain's new running mate, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, in real time. But the awkward timing did afford me an interesting vantage point on the announcement, as all of the Democratic delegates, strategists and various and sundry other politicos on board my Airbus A321 learned the news simultaneously, the moment the plane touched down, from the tiny flickering screens of their trusty CrackBerries.

The best way to describe the reaction aboard U.S. Airways Flight 1520: shock and awe.

I've done eight or nine "Veepwatch" profiles of McCain's possible picks: Romney, Pawlenty, Portman, Ridge et al. I never bothered to include Palin. The main reason: with only a small-town mayoralty and less than two years of governoring under her belt, the Alaskan, I suspected, would have a tough time passing McCain's "is she ready to be president?" test--the candidate's (oft-repeated) top criterion for picking a veep. "I'm aware of the enhanced importance of this issue given my age," McCain told Don Imus in early April, and it was hard to see how asking someone with an even shorter C.V. than Obama to stand a mere (septuagenarian's) heartbeat away from the Oval Office wouldn't hinder the Republicans' ability to attack the Illinois senator for his alleged "inexperience."

But now my gut tells me this won't be a huge problem for Crystal City--even though the Dems will rightly do their darndest make it one. "Today, John McCain put the former mayor of a town of 9,000 with zero foreign policy experience a heartbeat away from the presidency," said Obama spokesman Bill Burton in an immediate statement (watch for the coming swipes at Palin's ties to Big Oil). The problem, though, is that every time Chicago calls Palin green, it gives McCain yet another opportunity to question Obama's own resume. The pick presents Democrats with a knotty challenge: how do you argue that a fresh, groundbreaking Washington outsider is too inexperienced to be second fiddle while at the same time arguing that Obama--a fresh, groundbreaking Washington outsider himself--is ready to lead the free world?

The truth is, no one votes against a ticket topped by someone as seasoned as McCain solely because the No. 2 isn't an old Washington hand--especially when she's as compelling and complementary a character as Palin, a youngish former beauty-queen and mother of five who hunts, ice fishes, rides snowmobiles, eats moose hamburgers, owns a float plane and has branded herself as a candidate of "reform" and "change." But plenty of folks are willing to reject a No. 1. because of a skimpy resume. In other words, experience is an argument McCain WANTS to have--and Palin, oddly enough, helps him have it. And it's no coincidence that the people Palin was chosen in part to woo--disaffected Hillary Dems--tend to think that Obama is not qualified for the White House. She's a political pick meant for maximum electoral impact. Whether she'd make a good vice president is another story.

As thumbs twiddled over trackballs and Beltway types barked into their phones, I overheard a few telling reactions. "It's very savvy," said a black strategist heading to Washington, D.C. "Biden can't really hit her hard because she's a woman. He risks looking sexist." A stewardess said she was "pissed": "Does he think we're stupid enough to vote for a woman just because she's a woman?" Meanwhile, the man seated next to me, also en route to the capital, read a quote from Karlo Rove about the pick "reshaping both parties' coalitions" and pumped me for more info. A few rows back, a woman called a colleague to ask if Palin is "attractive." "Is she attractive?" she repeated when her interlocutor misheard. "IS SHE ATTRAC... nevermind." But the most revealing response came from a tall gentlemen with reading glasses perched on the end of his nose. "Whooooaaaa," he said into his phone. "Sarah Who?"

Advertisement
You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: willnotvoteobama (September 2, 2008 at 8:19 AM)

Well it seems the democrats are not happy with any thing and will go to the ends of the earth to discredit people. Sarah palin’s 17y/o daughter is pregnant but so is 2 million other unmarried teens in America!  But because its Mrs. Palin’s kid that makes her a bad parent or not in touch with her children….   I guess all the other parents of the other 2 million are bad as well! But wait her husband got a d.u.i. 22 yrs ago and had an accident that caused some property damage so he’s an awful person according to the liberal democrats! It makes no difference that Joe biden is a long time big government spender all the while he claims to be a regular guy! He says I ride Amtrak everyday to work and home he fails to mention that that Amtrak ride costs 97 dollars a day! That’s about the amount of money that 25% Americans make day (they are the low income earners but before taxes they are considered middle class according to the government which is a bunch of bull  in my opinion that’s at poverty level!) and he spends it on Amtrak yeah he a regular Joe! And barrack Obama well he’s no angel either he’s got some pretty bad bill’s hidden in his closet not to mention his admitted marijuana and cocaine use years ago but lets not talk about that says the liberal media lets talk about mr.palin’s d.u.i. Or the 17 y/o’s pregnancy this liberal bias in the media is getting a little aggravating but I think that the American people will see that this whole thing is leaning to far left and it will back fire in obama’s face costing him the chance at being the leader of the free world! It’s a shame that our election process has come to this!  as you can see all the dirt being dug up is from the move-on.org idiots  who wants those morons running the country they have obama in thier poket he's thier hand picked choice ! see mark's comment for proof !


Posted By: loriw (August 31, 2008 at 7:35 PM)

Since all the other blogs here at Newsweek are still down...I think they crashed just after the Palin announcement from all the excitement and blog activity, we are stuck here where you can't reply to bloggers post individually.  

To HarleyisHere...since you like sing and you like Obama I think you should go to GlennBeck.com

         Put in the search bar on the Glennbeck.com site    National Anthem    It's all about Obama

         Very, very funny and yet  very, very scary at the same time.

To VMAC  I guess you are so isolated in your own little world that you don't understand that  there  are women who actually believe in Pro-life besides Palin and WE TOO VOTE.  

Also to VMAC... Obama doesn't even do what he preached on the =pay for =work topic. In his own campaign their are no women in the top ranks and the women in his campaign are not paid as well as men in the same positions.  Since he is so into pay grades, if it were true that he paid= and promoted women to the top positions he would be showing us that he does it.  He doesn't practice what he preaches tho.

Evax...you get my award for the most tackless comment this week and the competition in that catagory was very stiff indead.  You state that Down's childern would be better off dead than alive. It takes a lot to be that ignorant.  That fact that you would state it in black and white shows the depth of your ignorance.  I can understand completely tho how you would be able to support a candidate that argued on more than one occassion for INFANTICIDE while in the IL legislature.

Evax and Obama are both in support of killing babies.

To Somerseten-More people turned Obama down than turned McCain down.  Do the math before you post.  While those on McCain's list that were passed over still spoke favorably about McCain, many of Obama's picks stated clearly they wouldn't even consider being his running mate.  Makes me wonder what more they know about Obama that is distasteful that we don't know yet.

To DanQuaylewithaPonytail...Palin is more of a man than Dan Quayle could ever HOPE to be. I was living in IN when Quayle was here.  Palin has more balls on her than Obama has on him. She will be a quick understudy for the Presidency and I have no doubt she could run this country and take the 3am phone call.  


Posted By: loriw (August 31, 2008 at 7:32 PM)

Since all the other blogs here at Newsweek are still down...I think they crashed just after the Palin announcement from all the excitement and blog activity, we are stuck here where you can't reply to bloggers post individually.  

To HarleyisHere...since you like sing and you like Obama I think you should go to GlennBeck.com

         Put in the search bar on the Glennbeck.com site    National Anthem    It's all about Obama

         Very, very funny and yet  very, very scary at the same time.

To VMAC  I guess you are so isolated in your own little world that you don't understand that  there  are women who actually believe in Pro-life besides Palin and WE TOO VOTE.  

Also to VMAC... Obama doesn't even do what he preached on the =pay for =work topic. In his own campaign their are no women in the top ranks and the women in his campaign are not paid as well as men in the same positions.  Since he is so into pay grades, if it were true that he paid= and promoted women to the top positions he would be showing us that he does it.  He doesn't practice what he preaches tho.

Evax...you get my award for the most tackless comment this week and the competition in that catagory was very stiff indead.  You state that Down's childern would be better off dead than alive. It takes a lot to be that ignorant.  That fact that you would state it in black and white shows the depth of your ignorance.  I can understand completely tho how you would be able to support a candidate that argued on more than one occassion for INFANTICIDE while in the IL legislature.

Evax and Obama are both in support of killing babies.

To Somerseten-More people turned Obama down than turned McCain down.  Do the math before you post.  While those on McCain's list that were passed over still spoke favorably about McCain, many of Obama's picks stated clearly they wouldn't even consider being his running mate.  Makes me wonder what more they know about Obama that is distasteful that we don't know yet.

To DanQuaylewithaPonytail...Palin is more of a man than Dan Quayle could ever HOPE to be. I was living in IN when Quayle was here.  Palin has more balls on her than Obama has on him. She will be a quick understudy for the Presidency and I have no doubt she could run this country and take the 3am phone call.