Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com
Full Post
Posted Friday, August 29, 2008 12:26 AM

The Partisans Loved It. So Did The Pundits. But What Did the Only Undecided Voter* in Mile High Stadium Think of Obama's Speech?

Andrew Romano

DENVER--Barack Obama just wrapped up his nomination speech here at Mile High stadium, and it's already clear that the chattering classes are content. "Magnificent," said Pat Buchanan. "Awfully impressive," added Bill Kristol. "A masterpiece," concluded David Gergen. The reaction in the stands--shouting, stomping, phoning loved ones, snapping photos, weeping--wasn't much more equivocal. That said, it's worth remembering, despite all the understandable uplift, that neither pundits nor partisans will decide November's election--and worth wondering what the people who will (that is, undecideds) thought of Obama's performance.

Considering that Chicago distributed the evening's 60,000 civilian tickets solely to supporters who'd agreed to volunteer for the campaign, I wasn't expecting to find many Nobamans in the crowd. Fortunately, I stumbled upon Malissa Garcia. Her path to Mile High was somewhat circuitous--to say the least. Last weekend, CNN asked Garcia, a 23-year-old hairstylist at the nearby Oxford Club Salon, whether she'd be willing to spend the convention primping, preening and priming on-air Republican strategist Leslie Sanchez and her headful of extensions. She immediately accepted. After four days of follicular service, Sanchez rewarded her loyal tresswoman today with a ticket to the show--and Garcia, reluctant to miss "history," was soon sitting in Section 133 with a tray of chicken fingers on her lap and a camera (one video, one still) in either hand.

She arrived a skeptic. Unlike the hyperinformed true believers who make the most noise online and on the air--and, incidentally, like the vast majority of Americans--Garcia "hasn't been paying much attention to politics this year." Before tonight, in fact, she'd never seen Obama speak. Still, as a committed Clintonista during the Democratic primaries--"the country was in good shape when they were in the White House"--she told me she wasn't sure she'd be voting for the Illinois senator come fall. It wasn't her Republican family giving her grief--Garcia( defied them to support John Kerry in 2004--and it wasn't anything she knew about the nominee. Instead, it was what she didn't know. Saying she was "worried" by an email she'd received, Garcia, a "serious Christian," ran through an abridged list of familiar false Obama rumors: he "doesn't say the Pledge of Allegiance"; he may be "a Muslim"; he was "sworn in [to the Senate] on an Iraq Bible." (I take back that "familiar.") Do you believe them? I asked. "I don't know," she said. "Maybe I won't vote. I'll just let God figure it out."

Advertisement

Then came the feature presentation, with all its pundit-pleasing magnificence and impressiveness and masterpieciosity. As confetti mingled with smoke above the stadium and the Obaman hordes shuffled towards the exits, I asked Garcia whether Obama's performance had changed her mind. "Actually, yes," she said. "I really liked it." So if you had to vote today... "I think I'd vote for Obama," she interrupted. "I'm, like, 75 percent sure." Garcia said she was hooked when Monica Early of Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio--one of a series of "ordinary Americans" who spoke before the senator--confessed that she too had received a "scary email," but had discovered, after checking the facts, that "Barack Obama is a man of faith, a man of values and a man of action." She didn't love Obama's line about civil unions ("I don't agree with that"), but his armada of generals and riffs on education and health care more than made up for it. "My husband and I pay $400 a month, and that's only with partial dental and partial eye," she told me. Before the speech, Garcia associated Obama with "inexperience." But now, she said, "I think he can make change. And middle-class people like me really need change."

This is, of course, exactly what Chicago wants to hear. In fact, Garcia's reactions were so on message, I began to wonder whether David Axelrod had taken to creating cyborgs in his spare time. All kidding aside, Garcia is proof positive that Axelrod and Co. know their targets. They know that the most voters are only tuning in now. They know that a lot of early support is soft, and easily swayed by biographical details, strong surrogates and an isolated policy or two. They know that most former Clintonites aren't dead-enders. And they know that the best way to compete with a caricature of your candidate is to expose as many people as possible to the real thing. What happened to Garcia at Mile High tonight undoubtedly happened to voters all across the country (only without all the confetti). But the flipside of such an easy swing--which will likely show up soon in the polls--is that John McCain has a chance to swing the same people back his way next week in St. Paul, Minn. As Garcia told me, "now I'm going to have to watch the Republicans."

Curious, I asked whether she knew anything about McCain. "Just that he's just like Bush," she said.

Somewhere, David Axelrod is smiling.  

*We exaggerate.
 

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: ronekw (September 9, 2008 at 8:40 AM)

When should we start holding people to a standard of truth?  If you didn't sell the plane on eBay, stop saying you did.  If you supported the bridge to no where at first, took the money then changed your mind, stop saying you did not.  How incredibly difficult it is for us middle class to raise children with ethical standards of truth when they see people at the highest levels of office lie every day without consequnce.  This does not have to do with nuance, explanation, truth as we see it.  If it did not happen, tell the truth.  If you we dating Cindy when you were living with your wife,  McCain tell the truth, don't give some ridiculous answer and act like it was not a lie.  Those of us who believe in the same Christain God and read the bible..."thou shalt not lie"  "thou shalt not committ adultery"  Are those rules only for other people?


Posted By: VivianGorham (September 8, 2008 at 10:12 PM)

And by the way, Morgan2008, do you know the difference between a campaign, a social movement, and a cult?  Do you know the difference between electoral politics and community organizing?  Do you understand why Barack Obama went to Harvard to get a law degree and then returned to Chicago to continue to work there when he could have written his own ticket to Wall Street - since he was the number one law student at the number one law school in the United States?  It was to increase Democratic voter registration in Chicago in order to help Bill Clinton win.  Voter registration has always been the least sexiest job in electoral politics.  But that is what Barack Obama chose to do.  Check it out.  And while you're at it - do go find out what voting present in Illinois means.  You will find your line of reasoning is actually a baseless campaign smear.

I have been working as a community organizer for over 20 years, and I really don't let taunts like yours get to me.  So get reading, get some real information, and let's have a real discussion instead of just regurgitating a bag of campaign bs.  


Posted By: VivianGorham (September 8, 2008 at 10:01 PM)

Oh, Morgan2008, you sound like a Republican.  If you don't agree - attack the person.  I do understand what it feels like to lose a campaign, however, so I am sure you haven't had enough time to get over your loss and move on.   I certainly understand that and sympathize with you there.  However, what in the world do Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin have in common in terms of policy?  Really - nothing.  And there's the rub.  Hillary Clinton went negative in order to try and win.  Also understandably so.  Please don't cling to Hillary's rhetoric now.  Put country first.  (If indeed you are who you say you are.)  And move on.  Hillary did.


 
The Peek
 
 
STRATEGIES

Isn't it ironic: Xerox is hoping it can profit by teaching companies how to reduce their printing.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
NATIONAL SECURITY
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu