I've said it before
and I'll say it again, "Don't let us hyperventilating media types
distract you." We may prattle on about the latest spreads in
Pennsylvania and North Carolina,
but it doesn't matter all that much, at this point, who wins those
primaries--or the contests
that follow. This is a race for delegates, not states. And because
Democratic delegates are awarded proportionally, there's simply no way
for either candidate to reach the magic 2,025 majority--or for Clinton
to significantly slash Obama's current 150-plus earned delegate
lead--before the end of primary season on June 3.
In other words, only the party's 795 superdelegates can pick a winner--no matter what happens in Pennsylvania and beyond.
Of
course, this is old news to you. But it's worth taking a deep breath
from time to time and checking on these party poo-bahs. Hence the
Stumper's time-honored Superdelegate Watch.
So where does the
super-slugfest stand? More firmly in Barack Obama's corner than ever
before. Since Feb. 5, Obama has snagged 64 superdelegates, at a pace of
a little more than one a day; Clinton has corralled only nine. On March
6, we reported that Obama's total stood at 202. Now, according to the Wall Street Journal,
it's up to 217, while Clinton's has stagnated at 250. What's more, the
Journal reports that North Carolina's full congressional delegation
plans to back Obama after the state's primary on May 6. That means that
Obama (counting the Tarheel State supers) is leading Clinton in the
overall delegate tally 1,638 to 1,499.
The
math is pretty dire for Clinton. At this point, Obama needs 387
delegates to win the nomination. Let's assume that over the next two
months, he picks up 283, or half, of the remaining primary delegates--a
conservative estimate, considering that many of
the
states in play (North Carolina, Oregon,
Montana, South Dakota) favor him from the outset. That gets the Illinois
senator to 1,921--or
104 shy of 2,025. In other words, even if no more
superdelegates take sides before the end of regulation in June and the
candidates split the remaining primaries, Obama would need to convince
only a third (104 of 328) of the uncommitted supers come summer, while
Clinton would have to win over a full 75 percent (243 of 328). If past
is prelude--remember Obama's 64 to nine margin in February and
March--there's simply no way she'll swing it.
The more likely scenario is that the superdelegates--barring a scandal significantly larger than Obama's "pastor problem," which hasn't hurt him at the polls--will
keep trickling toward the Illinois senator at something like the
current pace. Consider the case of Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar, who
announced this morning on a conference call with reporters that she had
become the latest superdelegate to side with Obama. Klobuchar says she
isn't voting against Clinton, and doesn't think (like Obama supporter Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont)
that the former First Lady should call it quits. "I have so much
respect for her, and I think they'd both make great presidents," she
said. "Sen. Clinton has every right to continue. The tone of the
campaign didn't have anything to do with my decision." But Klobuchar
admits that she's secretly favored Obama for months. "For me,
after Obama won our caucuses [on Feb. 5], I started to know which way I
was headed," she says. "But out of respect for both candidates--I like
them both very much--I delayed." Asked "why now?" Klobuchar cited
unity. "I recognize that the supporters of both candidates have strong,
heartfelt emotions," she said. "But believe that I have an obligation
here to help bring our party together. Continuing to stay silent would
be, as my 12-year-old daughter likes to say: 'Awkward, mom. Awkward.'"
Like Klobuchar, many of the uncommitted superdelegates have already picked their horses. In fact, as one told the Politico
this morning, "There are no undecided superdelegates. Or at least there
are
very few of them. Most undeclared supers are just that — undeclared."
Seeing as Obama has won 32 of the 46 nominating contests to date, it's
reasonable to assume that at least a third already
lean his way. Meaning that the only remaining question isn't whether
there are enough
superdelegates left to put the frontrunner over the top. At this point, it's simply a matter of when
the continuing "awkwardness" of the Dem-on-Dem battle will convince them to
come out of the closet.