-
Holly Bailey
|
Oct 17, 2007 05:54 PM
In Iowa today, Mitt Romney gave his seal of approval to the state’s
decision to move its GOP presidential primary to Jan. 3. “I think it’s
a good thing that Iowa is first,” Romney told reporters, according to the Politico’s Jonathan Martin.
“Iowans have shown over the years that they’re willing to get to know
the candidates on a personal basis and make a judgment on their heart
and character, not just their ads.” Not that there’s anything wrong
with ads in Romney’s book. His comments came on the heels of yet more
details on just how extensive the former governor’s advertising has
been during the first nine months of the campaign. According to the
Nielsen Company, Romney has placed 10,893 TV and radio ads so far-more
ads than any other two presidential hopefuls combined. Bill Richardson
placed second, with 5,975 ads, and Barack Obama was third, placing
4,293 ads. According to Nielsen, Romney ran 10,199 ads on local TV, the
bulk of them in Iowa, where Romney hit the airwaves 5,058 times. He ran
1,658 ads in New Hampshire, 977 ads in Vermont (where the TV market
reaches residents in northern New Hampshire), 893 ads in South Carolina
and 1,413 ads in Florida. None of his GOP opponents even came close to
his ad buys. Rudy Giuliani, who has yet to air a TV ad, ran 642 radio
spots. Ron Paul ran 232 TV ads, all in Iowa, and John McCain aired 166
TV ads in New Hampshire. At the same time, McCain leads the
presidential pack in cheaper online advertising. According to Nielsen,
McCain had 4.3 million sponsored links in August. Dennis Kucinich was
second with 1.8 million sponsored links and Romney was third, with 1.7
million. But we have a feeling that it’s only a matter of time before
the other candidates close the gap. Just Google “Fred Thompson.” Right
now, when you search for info on the former Tennessee senator, a banner
ad comes up touting Mike Huckabee’s Web site. “Huckabee Finn?” it says,
playing off former White House aide Dan Bartlett’s recent comments
about the former Arkansas governor’s last name. “Check out the real
story.”
More
-
Holly Bailey
|
Sep 6, 2007 10:36 AM
Is it any coincidence that Rudy Giuliani has announced not one, but
two Hollywood endorsements in the last 24 hours? As Fred Thompson
prepares to kick-off his campaign tour today in Iowa, Camp Rudy says
the former New York City mayor has picked up support from actors Robert
Duvall and Ron Silver. Now we aren’t going to rag on Duvall one bit.
He’s an Academy Award winner, starred in"The Godfather " I and II--two
of your Gaggler’s favorite films (and Rudy’s too, we hear)--and even
looks a little bit like Giuliani, we must say. Ron Silver, Rudy’s other
Hollywood get, is, well, eh--unless you think"Oh God! You Devil!" was an unappreciated gem of 1980s comedy gold, and in that case, our bad.
The news here is that Rudy, in a very
politics-isn’t-much-different-from-high-school way, is talking up
endorsements from two guys who have worked with Hollywood Fred--though
there’s no mention of this in the campaign’s press releases, of course.
Duvall starred with Thompson in “Days of Thunder,” while Silver lists
several episodes of “Law & Order” to his credit. It’s almost
certain that Duvall or Silver, should they hit the cable TV shows in
support of their man Rudy, will surely be asked about Thompson’s acting
(and political) abilities. What will they say? Who knows, but it’s
likely only a matter of time before Rudy’s campaign touts the checks
they’ve gotten from other Hollywood notables, like Kelsey Grammar and
Adam Sandler. Of course, that’s nothing compared to Sam Brownback’s
recent Hollywood get: an endorsement from Stephen Baldwin, Alec’s
brother and star of “Bio-Dome.” How will Thompson ever top that? Two
words: Pauly Shore.
More
-
Holly Bailey
|
Aug 11, 2007 09:17 PM
Out Front: Romney. Photo: Khue Bui for Newsweek
They didn't have to bring in Katherine Harris, but it almost felt
that way. Results from the Ames Straw Poll in Iowa were delayed more
than an hour, after one of the Diebold machines used to tally the votes
malfunctioned forcing a recount of 1,500 ballots. (Déjà vu, anyone?) No surprise, the big winner was Mitt Romney, who got 4,516 (or 32 percent of the vote).
But the big headline of the night was Mike Huckabee's second place
finish. The former Arkansas governor, who barely ranks on many national
polls, finished with 18 percent of the vote, or 2,587 votes. Romney
finished well ahead, but Huckabee's victory was notable because the
former Arkansas governor spent almost nothing on his get out the vote
efforts. While Romney and rival Sam Brownback (who finished a
disappointing 3rd place, with 15 percent of the vote) each had more
than 100 buses bring in supporters, Huckabee's campaign operated on the
cheap. "No buses... we couldn't afford it," a jubilant Huckabee told
reporters afterwards. "It's David and Goliath and a smooth stone.
That's the only way I can explain it."
How did the frontrunners do? Rudy Giuliani, up in most
national polls, declined to participate in the straw vote, and he got
only 183 votes (1 percent) out of the 14,302 ballots cast. John McCain
got 101 votes, while Fred Thompson got 1.4 percent with 203 votes. It's
hard to say if the poll results will do much in terms of winnowing the
field. Tommy Thompson, who finished in fourth place, has said he would
drop out if he didn't finish in the top three. And all eyes will surely
be on Brownback, who spent a lot of money to attract votes at Ames but
in the end had little to show for it.
Remember all that downplaying the Romney campaign did on the eve of the
vote? Well, on one hand, they were right. The number of overall ballots
cast were down more than half compared to 2000, when George W. Bush
easily won the poll. Yet, just as your Gaggler predicted, that didn't
dampen the Romney camp's excitement, which quickly touted the former
governor's "overwhelming victory." We'll have to wait until October to
find out how much Romney spent per vote cast-ditto for the other
campaigns. But one thing is clear: Romney and Huckabee are almost in
the same boat. Both camps are hoping the Ames result will spark some
momentum heading into fall, especially among voters outside of Iowa
where both have struggled to catch fire. The ballots may be counted,
but the judgment on whether the Ames Straw Poll waned in influence this
year is still out.
More
-
Holly Bailey
|
Aug 11, 2007 08:28 PM
Just in case you missed it, today is the infamous Ames Straw Poll, where as many as 40,000 Iowa Republicans are expected to cast a ballot for who they believe should be their party’s 2008 presidential nominee. Held every four years, it’s considered one of the most important political events heading into the presidential primary. Except, this year, it might not be, depending on who you talk to. For one, even though they are on the straw poll ballot, three of the leading frontrunners opted not to show up this year: Rudy Giuliani, John McCain and Fred Thompson, who isn’t even technically a candidate yet.
That has prompted all kinds of expectation playing on all sides. So far, it’s considered Mitt Romney’s race to lose, largely because he’s spent gobs of money wooing supporters in the state and busing them in for the vote. Anything less than victory--and by a big margin at that, rivals say-would suggest that that Romney might not be all that here in Iowa. On Friday, Romney’s campaign tried to lower expectations noting, among other things, that a lack of a “prevailing national frontrunner” would suppress the Ames turnout. Uh huh. Your Gaggler’s interpretation of the Romney memo: If Mitt wins big, Ames is huge! If he doesn’t, Ames is lames!
More
-
Holly Bailey
|
Aug 10, 2007 01:58 PM
It's not easy being on a diet when you're at the Iowa State Fair. Just ask Mike Huckabee. The former Arkansas governor dropped more than 200 pounds before he jumped in the race for the GOP presidential nomination. On Friday, he gave a speech at the fair in a last-minute attempt to woo voters on the eve of the Ames Straw Poll. Going to the Iowa fair is considered a right of passage for anyone with White House ambitions. Ditto for testing out the food, which includes everything from funnel cakes to deep fried pickles. How can Huckabee, now a healthy heart evangelist, resist all the transfat temptations? Huckabee admits it's tough going, but says he plans to follow a basic rule. "If it wasn't a food 100 years ago, it's not a food today," he told your Gaggler. In other words, corn dogs are out. "We'll let you have that," he said. (Thanks, but we've already had two.) All around us, the air was thick with the soul satisfying aroma of artery hardening treats. But Huckabee, like any wartime Commander in Chief In Waiting, stayed the course. "I saw the Fried Twinkie booth over there. he said with firm resolve. "You aren't going to see me in that line." He also vetoed some of the fair's more exotic offerings, including the potato lollypop--"Potato what?" he said, and waved it away.
Huckabee's fortitude is, on the one hand, admirable. But for voters in Iowa, it may also hint at a troubling, Bush-like stubborn streak--a refusal to admit when he's wrong and make course corrections when the facts on the ground demand them. Case in point: Huckabee, who proclaims himself a patriot, outright refused even a single forkful of the fair's proudest culinary achievement: the sublime Hot Beef Sundae. This siren song of mashed potatoes smothered with chipped beef, cheese and gravy is so deeply, Americanly delicious that just one bite is enough to make all who taste it place their hands on their hearts and spontaneously recite the National Anthem. Yet Huckabee was unmoved by its obvious appeal. "You've got to be kidding me," he said incredulously when your Gaggler tried to tempt him. "My gosh. Even in my fattest days, that doesn't appeal to me." So sad. But then, perhaps sensing that Republican straw poll voters might think twice about the bona fides of a candidate who goes to a fair and orders salad, Huckabee went off in search of manly fare that wouldn't betray his principals. "I'm looking for meat," he said. "A pork chop. That's something good and decent."
-
Holly Bailey
|
Aug 9, 2007 11:49 AM
What’s the secret behind Mitt Romney’s surge in the Iowa polls? Maybe it’s the food. The former Massachusetts governor has been pulling out all the stops to win this weekend’s Ames Straw Poll, blanketing Iowa with new TV ads and organizing buses to get supporters to the polls on Saturday. But his campaign is also throwing lots of money behind free food. On Wednesday, Romney held one of his "Ask Mitt Anything" town halls at a restaurant outside Iowa City, where prospective Romney supporters were treated to a free buffet. And we’re not talking sandwiches or finger food. Think Las Vegas style: shrimp cocktail, platters of steak, pasta salad, mashed potatoes and at least 10 different kinds of dessert, including strawberry cheesecake, brownies and multi-layer chocolate cake. Compare this to Duncan Hunter, who’s spent the past few days campaigning outside McDonald's restaurants around the state, where sad to say he wasn’t handing out Big Macs.
Wooing voters’ hearts through their stomachs is nothing new, especially in Iowa where presidential candidates are judged not only by their foreign policy skills but by their ability to flip a pancake. But you have to wonder: Are these people showing up for the candidate or for the free lunch? Romney held four food-related events on Wednesday and has five on his schedule today, including two coffees and an ice cream social. No word on what he’s planning to feed his supporters in Ames-though he’s already got competition from Sam Brownback, who’s talked up his barbecue, and Mike Huckabee, who is air-lifting a 150-pound watermelon in from Arkansas.
-
Holly Bailey
|
Aug 6, 2007 05:03 PM
John McCain’s presidential campaign may be struggling, but he’s getting some love on the trail in Iowa. Stumping near Mason City on Monday, Rudy Giuliani praised the Arizona senator, not once but twice, telling his audience that if he weren’t waging his own bid for the White House that he’d be campaigning for McCain. “He’d be my candidate,” Giuliani said, telling voters, among other things, that he agrees with McCain’s position on Iraq. “I admire the man tremendously.”
That’s some serious sweet talk, considering Rudy was out touting his own bid for the White House. In fact, his declaration prompted some surprised looks among audience members, including reporters on the scene. After all, it was less than two months ago that Giuliani and McCain got into a big time fight over immigration reform. Rudy was no fan of a McCain-sponsored bill in the Senate, trashing it during June’s CNN GOP debate as a “typical Washington mess.” That prompted an angry response from McCain, who snittily suggested that Giuliani should read the bill before criticizing it.
More
-
Holly Bailey
|
Aug 2, 2007 07:55 PM
Sam Brownback is really on a roll. First, as The Gaggle reported earlier, he picked a fight with Mitt Romney and Tom Tancredo, paying for phone calls to Iowa voters trashing their conservative credentials. Now, with the Ames Straw Poll a little more than a week away, Brownback is trying to put the smack down on Mike Huckabee--and The Huck is smacking back. Now, your Gaggler wasn't even going to go there, because come on, two guys with poll numbers in single digits dragging each other through the mud isn't exactly race-changing news. But it's suddenly gotten all WWE or something.
It all started earlier this week, when the Brownback campaign got wind of a letter that Iowa Rev. Tim Rude, a prominent evangelical pastor and Huckabee supporter, sent to a few other church leaders in the state. In it, Rude talked up Huckabee for being a Southern Baptist and trashed Brownback for being a Catholic. "Frankly, as a recovering Catholic myself, that is all I need to know about his discernment compared to (Huckabee's)," Rude wrote. Confronted with the email on Tuesday, Rude apologized, saying his remarks weren't meant for public consumption, and they weren't intended to be "anti-Catholic." Afterwards Huckabee, in a statement, said that he was glad Rude apologized. "They were not authorized by, disseminated by, approved by, or condoned by the campaign," Huckabee said, noting that many of his staffers are Catholic. But that wasn't enough for the Brownback campaign, which demanded a more explicit apology from the former Arkansas governor. "Does Governor Huckabee denounce Pastor Rude's anti-Catholic comments, or not?" a Brownback spokesman told reporters Wednesday.
More
-
Holly Bailey
|
Jul 26, 2007 12:20 PM
John McCain is standing by his man. Traveling in New Hampshire on Wednesday, the Arizona senator and 2008 presidential hopeful deflected questions about his campaign manager and longtime adviser, Rick Davis, who has been at the center of controversy over his ties to companies that profited big time off McCain's campaign. According to records filed with the Federal Election Commission, an Internet consulting firm partially owned by Davis charged McCain roughly $1 million during the campaign's second quarter--about 10 percent of what McCain raised during that three-month period. On Monday, the Wall Street Journal reported Davis also played a role in directing a pricey campaign contract for office space to a firm owned by an Indian casino developer with ties to a longtime Davis associate. Davis has denied wrongdoing, and both contacts have since been terminated--a not-so-surprising development, since McCain's campaign is now virtually broke. Questions over Davis's alleged profiteering have been at the center of internal feuding within the senator's campaign for months. The back-and-forth over money is said to have played a significant role in the departures of two key McCain staffers--manager Terry Nelson and longtime strategist John Weaver--earlier this month. Following a town hall in Keene, N.H., on Wednesday, NEWSWEEK asked McCain about the questions surrounding Davis--an inquiry he didn't seem happy to receive. "Rick is a friend and I trust him," an unsmiling McCain said, in his first comments on the subject. "All these allegations, I'm just not going to respond to." Asked if he was aware of Davis's ties to the companies his campaign paid, McCain cut off the question. "I'm not going to respond to these allegations," he repeated. "I will not. The record will speak for itself." His comments come on the heels of yet more resignations this week. On Monday, McCain's media team--Russ Schriefer and Stuart Stevens--tendered their resignations. The move comes amid a wave of departures, including McCain's top press officials and several state organizers.
More
-
Holly Bailey
|
Jul 25, 2007 12:22 PM
Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama aren't the only presidential wannabes caught up in a war of words. On the GOP side, there's a nasty catfight brewing between Mitt Romney and- Sam Brownback? The Kansas senator and longshot presidential hopeful has played it nice on the campaign trail to date. But as pressure to break out of the pack or pack it in intensifies, Brownback has gone on the attack in recent weeks, repeatedly questioning Romney's conservative credentials on everything from agriculture policies to abortion.
Two weeks ago, Brownback issued a snarky (at least for him) press release proposing a new word for the dictionary: "Mitt-amorphasis." (Get it?) Brownback's definition: "A self-directed and self-contradictory cyclical process, occurring in even-numbered years, by which a Massachusetts politician transforms at will." Among the word's proposed synonyms, according to the Brownback campaign, was "John Kerry." Zing! Romney's camp did what anyone regarded as a first-tier presidential contender would do: They largely ignored the attacks. But that didn't stop Brownback, who has since issued at least two releases a week attacking Romney's "ocean of contradiction." Earlier this week, Brownback upped the ante, paying for a series of automated phone calls to Iowa voters questioning Romney's stance on abortion. "Mitt Romney is telling Iowans he is firmly pro-life," the message says, according to AP. "Nothing could be further from the truth." Among other things, the message mentions that Romney's wife, Ann, "has contributed money to Planned Parenthood." Calling the calls "despicable," Romney's campaign called on Brownback to apologize. (Brownback's campaign also paid for calls questioning fellow longshot Tom Tancredo's abortion position.)
More
-
Holly Bailey
|
Jun 5, 2007 03:35 PM
It's no secret that folks in New Hampshire love presidential politics.
Well, maybe not everybody. In town to cover Tuesday's GOP debate, your
Gaggler was mingling with the locals at a downtown Manchester pub
("enterprise reporting," we call it) and met a man who manages a
commercial building in the area. The man, who declined to be named for
reasons that will become obvious, said the dirty little secret in New
Hampshire is that commercial property owners hate renting space to
political campaigns, mainly because they have a bad reputation for
being rowdy and obnoxious tenants.
How
so? Without naming names--and believe me, we tried--the man shared war
stories about political types who leased space in his building during
the 2004 primary season. Suffice to say, most of the stories had all
the elements of a really good Motley Crüe afterparty: cops, lots of
beer and drunk people. There was one about a campaign that was so noisy
that people in adjacent buildings complained. "We'd get calls at 10 or
11 at night, and you'd have to go down there to tell them to knock it
off," the man griped. "But you'd get there and find out that no one was
in charge. The person you needed to talk to- they were never there."
But
noise was nothing. One campaign, he says, threw a massive party before
vacating their space, which spilled out into the hallways during the
afternoon workday. During that fiesta, campaign workers, again no
names, started a food fight in which a platter of lasagna was
inexplicably thrown against the wall and left there. At least that's
what he thinks happened. He came across the bloody scene after the
campaign had moved out-the stain of tomatoes and grease still fresh.
Nearly four years later, he's still mad about it. "Lasagna!" the man
said, throwing up his hands in exasperation. "Lasagna on the wall!
These are some nasty people."
More
-
Weston Kosova
|
Jan 31, 2007 11:06 AM
From today's New York Times:
Essay Linking Liberal Jews and Anti-Semitism Sparks a Furor
-
Holly Bailey
|
Jan 3, 2007 11:20 AM
If you've been thinking that one of Gerald Ford's sons looks strangely familiar, you're not crazy. Steven Ford, the late president's youngest son, has been front and center during this week's memorial services in Washington and Michigan. But Ford is not...
More
-
Brian Braiker
|
Nov 7, 2006 04:52 PM
For a taste of how nasty these midterm elections got in the tighter
contests, look no further than New Jersey. In a race that has pitted an
incumbent appointee against a political neophyte with a Garden State
golden name, the GOP identified one Senate seat they felt hopeful they
could snag away from the Democrats. Steering clear of issues for the
bulk of his campaign, challenger Tom Kean, Jr., son of a beloved former
governor, has stumped hard by claiming that Democratic Sen. Bob
Menendez, who was appointed Jon Corzine after he vacated the seat to
become governor, is "under federal criminal investigation" for renting
a home to a nonprofit organization he had lobbied to obtain funds for.
(In fact, according to the Annenberg political fact check Web site FactCheck.org,
there is no available to evidence to support this conclusion. "Yes, a
federal grand jury has subpoenaed record of a lease agreement between
him and a nonprofit agency that is his tenant," says the FactCheck.
"But it's not publicly known who the target of the investigation is.")
That wasn't enough to stop the making of one memorable ad featuring a
central-casting-style Soprano goomba talking on his cell phone about
"our boy down in Washington, Bob Menendez." If tough-on-crime Kean wins
the election, concludes the goomba, "bada-bing, we're in it--but deep!"
More
-
Darren Briscoe
|
Nov 7, 2006 04:49 PM
Stop boring your friends and family with that lame story about how the
voting machine didn't work when you went to cast your ballot this
morning. There's a guy in Louisville, Kentucky who's got you beat by a
mile. The voter finished making his choices earlier today and tried to
feed the completed ballot into the machine to be recorded. But the
machine spit it back out. So he asked a poll worker for help. That's
when things got a little hairy. According to Lt. Col. Carl Yates of the
Jefferson Country Sheriff's Department, the poll worker told the voter
that his ballot was rejected because he hadn't filled out the back of
the ballot, which listed local judges up for election. The worker told
the voter he had to fill out the complete ballot. The voter tried to
correct him. "He said, 'I don't have to vote for any of those people, I
don't even know who they are,'" Yates told Newsweek. After a brief
debate, Yates says, the poll worker allegedly "grabbed the voter by the
neck and pushed him out of the door." When the voter tried to return,
Yates says, the man allegedly grabbed him again and forced him out of
the hall. When the police arrived, the voter returned a third time and
asked to press charges. The poll worker was charged with interfering
with an election and 4th degree assault, both misdemeanors. Yates says
he'll probably be released on his own recognizance. But have no fears,
Louisville residents. The poll worker won't be back on post today. And
if you do encounter an election official who's looking to rumble, stand
firm in your convictions: There is no requirement that Louisville
voters have to fill out the complete ballot. According to Yates, the
voter "probably just put it in the machine crooked."