Newsweek - National News, World News, Health, Technology, Entertainment and more... | Newsweek.com

The Gold Digger

SPONSORED BY
Full Post
Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 9:17 PM

"Sweeney Todd" Cuts into the Oscar Race. Kinda

Ramin Setoodeh

 

I just got out of the first screening of "Sweeney Todd."

The movie is good, but not great. Tim Burton adapts the Sondheim musical into a bloodbath--at one point, the person seated next to me compared it to "Eastern Promises"--though it's all in good fun. Burton's direction is solid, especially in the middle hour. He nicely marries his gruesome touch with the Broadway showstoppers ("Pirelli's Miracle Elixir," "Johanna," "By the Sea," etc), and there are times when you feel like you're watching a classic Hollywood musical. The problem is, you want the movie to have more heart--and we all know how important heart is for Oscar voters. You don't leave the theater with the sense of mourning you should for the characters.

Advertisement

Johnny Depp is exactly as you would expect him to be in the lead role. It's a fine performance, although it feels like a singing version of Sleepy Hollow. It's such a competitive year for actors, I don't think his nomination is a guarantee.

Helena Bonham Carter is a knockout. She's shares the screen time with Depp, and she has rightfully been placed in the lead actress category. (Thanks to Sasha Stone for the tip.) She should be nominated.

Sacha Baron Cohen is amusing in a bit part.

Burton's direction might get him in the top five, maybe. But I think "Sweeney Todd" will miss out on best picture. There was applause as the movie started, some applause during the more imaginative numbers, but no applause at the end. That's not a good sign. Even "Charlie Wilson's War" got claps at the closing credits.

Update: Tom O'Neil loved the movie, of course, though he's been calling "Sweeney Todd" the movie of the year before he even saw it. He's free to gush like one of Sweeney's victims, but there's some bad journalism here. O'Neil writes that at the end, people were so mesmerized they couldn't leave their seats. That's not true. The final cut is so abrupt, you're almost unsure that the movie is really over. Once the credits started rolling, people picked up their stuff and left at a regular pace. If there's further debate, I'm calling the Carpetbagger as a witness.

You must be a registered user to comment.  Click here to register.  Already a user?  Click here to login.

Member Comments

Posted By: dmhct (December 20, 2007 at 10:42 AM)

The quintessential movie amateur who knows his own ego but not much else.

I enjoy reading reviews from movie critics - they are as entertaining as the movies themselves when written by those who don't get it.

Idea: attend a class and learn your trade.


Posted By: CalGal (December 8, 2007 at 12:41 AM)

Your take on the film is interesting but completely different than mine and many others that I've spoken to that have seen it as well. To say that it's a "bloodbath" is such a misnomer as the blood is a metaphor in the film. Due to it's somewhat "fake" nature, it doesn't have the "gore" of a Tarantino film for example. In addition, Depp's Sweeney displays all the emotion of a troubled soul---the brooding, the mood changes and the facial expressions are all classic Depp. He can convery more with a raised eyebrow than any actor working today. In addition, Sweeney Todd is the most unique film of 2007. I'm tired of "Old Men" and people trying to "Atone" for their mistakes. Sweeney Todd will haunt you and have you musing over it for days after. One can only hope the Academy will wake up this year and give Depp/Burton their long overdue Oscars.